Quantum Motion shrinks qubit sensor footprint by 10,000 times

Quantum Motion has achieved a 10,000-times reduction in qubit sensor footprint by demonstrating an IC-native superinductor built directly into a standard silicon chip, the company says. The team integrated titanium nitride (TiN), a material already present in Global Foundries’ 22nm FDSOI process, to create a superconducting inductor that eliminates the need for bulky, visible spiral inductors. This innovation also delivers a minimum integration time of 1 ± 0.3 ps, a substantial improvement over the previous 625 ps standard.

IC-Native Superinductor Achieves 10,000x Qubit Sensor Footprint Reduction

This approach bypasses the need for discrete, large inductive components traditionally required for qubit readout. This speed increase is not solely due to integration. The team also exploited a new operational regime where the non-linear inductance of the TiN film amplifies the readout signal at higher power levels. The reduction in parasitic elements, a common challenge in miniaturized circuits, further contributes to the enhanced performance.

Staff Quantum Engineer at Quantum Motion, Tom Swift, emphasized the broader implications of this work for scaling quantum computers, according to the company. “In reality, we need to think about the scalability of the entire system and in particular how we might scale to a million-qubit system,” Swift said.

“With that goal in mind, we need to consider how we can make all of the different aspects of a quantum computer, the readout, the control, smaller and if possible, as close in size to the qubits themselves.” This focus on scaling the entire system is critical for realizing practical, large-scale quantum computation. The new rfSET’s compact footprint and low power consumption address key limitations in current silicon spin qubit readout technology.

VP of Quantum Engineering at Quantum Motion and Professor of Quantum Computing Hardware at CIC nanoGUNE, Fernando González-Zalba, believes this demonstration resolves a significant hurdle in the field, the firm reports. “Using the superinductors native to the CMOS process, we have shown a way to meet all the requirements for spin qubit readout,” González-Zalba stated.

“We’ve created a method with a compact on-chip footprint that is low-power and extremely sensitive. I believe with this demonstration we have shown how to solve the readout problem for semiconductor spin qubits.” The research team, comprised of Tom Swift, Alberto Gomez-Saiz, Fabio Olivieri, Gorka Aizpurua-Iraola, Manuel Suárez-Rodríguez, James Kirkman, Grayson Noah, Mathieu de Kruijf, Felix-Ekkehard von Horstig, John Morton and M. Fernando Gonzalez-Zalba, is now focused on integrating the rfSET with arrays of silicon spin qubits. The goal is to demonstrate high-speed, high-fidelity spin readout operating well below the microsecond timescale.

This work, published in Nature Electronics, reinforces Quantum Motion’s position that spin qubits offer a viable pathway toward building a large-scale, fault-tolerant quantum computer through the combination of high-performance integrated readout and established industrial CMOS manufacturing processes.

In quantum computing we talk a lot about scalability, but we focus mainly on the qubits themselves. In reality, we need to think about the scalability of the entire system and in particular how we might scale to a million-qubit system.

Tom Swift, Staff Quantum Engineer at Quantum Motion
Stay current

See today’s quantum computing news on Quantum Zeitgeist for the latest breakthroughs in qubits, hardware, algorithms, and industry deals.

Avatar of Ivy Delaney

Ivy Delaney

Ivy Delaney has been working with neural networks and machine learning since the mid-nineties, back when a couple of hidden layers and a long afternoon of training counted as ambitious. She has watched the field go from academic curiosity to the thing quietly running underneath everything, and she brings that long view to quantum computing. For Quantum Zeitgeist she covers the ground where the two fields meet. That means quantum machine learning and the variational algorithms it leans on, and it also means the less glamorous but more interesting story of classical machine learning already doing real work inside quantum machines, decoding error-correcting codes, calibrating noisy hardware and learning the error models that simulators depend on. She writes about the hardware those algorithms have to run on too, and about the post-quantum cryptography scramble that the same hardware has set off. Her stories typically start with the paper, whether that is peer-reviewed work, conference proceedings or an arXiv preprint, with the source linked so you can hold a claim up against the research it came from. She is unimpressed by benchmarks that will not say what they beat, and by demonstrations that only work in the press release.

Latest Posts by Ivy Delaney: