Cheb-LCU Cuts Quantum Resources 10× in Rolls-Royce CFD Tests

Rolls-Royce and Classiq achieved a more than 10-fold reduction in quantum resources needed for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tests, a critical step toward practical quantum simulations for engineering. The collaboration focused on simulating steady flow through a one-dimensional nozzle, specifically including the complex physics of transonic flow with shocks, within a hybrid classical-quantum workflow. Researchers demonstrated the CFD process could still successfully converge and produce a reliable result while utilizing an approximate quantum solver, addressing a key challenge for near-term quantum applications. “Quantum computing matters to enterprises if it can fit into the workflows that engineers and researchers already use,” said Nir Minerbi, co-founder and CEO of Classiq. “This work is an important step in that direction.”

Hybrid Classical-Quantum Workflow for CFD Simulation

A tenfold reduction in required quantum resources represents a significant advancement in the pursuit of practical quantum simulations, as demonstrated by collaborative work between Classiq and Rolls-Royce. The companies’ recent investigation focused on integrating quantum computing methods into computational fluid dynamics (CFD), a computationally intensive field vital for designing complex systems across aerospace, energy, and automotive industries. Rather than seeking a perfect quantum solution, the study explored whether an approximate quantum solver could function within an established classical CFD workflow and still yield meaningful results. The classical CFD process maintained overall simulation control, while a quantum linear solver was implemented as a component within an iterative update step. Researchers found the workflow remained stable and converged, even when employing this approximate quantum solver, addressing a major concern regarding the feasibility of near-term quantum applications in engineering contexts.

This resilience suggests that fault-tolerant quantum computers may not be a prerequisite for initial benefits. The team tested a Chebyshev linear combination of unitaries (Cheb-LCU) approach, achieving the aforementioned 10x reduction in quantum resources compared to a Quantum Singular Value Transformation-based solver without sacrificing the overall convergence of the CFD process. This finding underscores the importance of evaluating quantum algorithms not in isolation, but within the broader context of a complete engineering workflow. While the initial study focused on a smaller test case, future work will concentrate on scaling the approach to tackle larger, more demanding CFD problems, potentially unlocking significant performance gains for industries reliant on complex simulations. The findings highlight a pragmatic path forward, suggesting that tolerable approximation in quantum subroutines can reduce resource demands and accelerate the adoption of quantum computing in real-world engineering applications.

Quantum computing matters to enterprises if it can fit into the workflows that engineers and researchers already use.

Stay current

See today’s quantum computing news on Quantum Zeitgeist for the latest breakthroughs in qubits, hardware, algorithms, and industry deals.

Avatar of Ivy Delaney

Ivy Delaney

Ivy Delaney has been working with neural networks and machine learning since the mid-nineties, back when a couple of hidden layers and a long afternoon of training counted as ambitious. She has watched the field go from academic curiosity to the thing quietly running underneath everything, and she brings that long view to quantum computing. For Quantum Zeitgeist she covers the ground where the two fields meet. That means quantum machine learning and the variational algorithms it leans on, and it also means the less glamorous but more interesting story of classical machine learning already doing real work inside quantum machines, decoding error-correcting codes, calibrating noisy hardware and learning the error models that simulators depend on. She writes about the hardware those algorithms have to run on too, and about the post-quantum cryptography scramble that the same hardware has set off. Her stories typically start with the paper, whether that is peer-reviewed work, conference proceedings or an arXiv preprint, with the source linked so you can hold a claim up against the research it came from. She is unimpressed by benchmarks that will not say what they beat, and by demonstrations that only work in the press release.

Latest Posts by Ivy Delaney: