McMillan Model Explains Gaps in Thin NbSe₂, TaS₂ Samples

Tunneling measurements into thin layers of niobium diselenide and tantalum disulfide cannot be fully explained by current understandings of superconductivity, researchers from the Racah Institute of Physics at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem report. While these materials appear to exhibit only a single superconducting gap, the team found that detailed analysis reveals a more complex mechanism. Excellent agreement with the McMillan two-band model was achieved when considering large scattering parameters relative to the superconducting gaps, even with the apparent presence of just one gap in tunneling data. Lead author Hadar Steinberg said that they propose these highly cross-scattering gaps reside on the Γ and K Fermi surfaces derived from the transition metal atoms, suggesting a specific structural origin for these superconducting properties; the research also indicates that bulk 2H-NbSe₂ is likely a three-band superconductor.

Quantitative analysis of magnetic field-induced pair breaking also aligned with the two-band McMillan theory, bolstering the model’s validity. The researchers suggest that bulk 2H-NbSe₂ may be even more complex, likely a three-band superconductor, indicating a hierarchical structure to its superconducting behavior. This finding opens new avenues for investigating multi-band superconductivity in transition metal dichalcogenides and refining theoretical models to accurately capture their behavior.

This alignment is particularly notable given that the scattering parameters are large with respect to the superconducting gaps, challenging conventional understanding of how material imperfections influence superconductivity. These findings underscore the need for more sophisticated models to fully capture the behavior of these materials and potentially unlock new superconducting technologies.

Stay current

See today’s quantum computing news on Quantum Zeitgeist for the latest breakthroughs in qubits, hardware, algorithms, and industry deals.

Avatar of Ivy Delaney

Ivy Delaney

Ivy Delaney has been working with neural networks and machine learning since the mid-nineties, back when a couple of hidden layers and a long afternoon of training counted as ambitious. She has watched the field go from academic curiosity to the thing quietly running underneath everything, and she brings that long view to quantum computing. For Quantum Zeitgeist she covers the ground where the two fields meet. That means quantum machine learning and the variational algorithms it leans on, and it also means the less glamorous but more interesting story of classical machine learning already doing real work inside quantum machines, decoding error-correcting codes, calibrating noisy hardware and learning the error models that simulators depend on. She writes about the hardware those algorithms have to run on too, and about the post-quantum cryptography scramble that the same hardware has set off. Her stories typically start with the paper, whether that is peer-reviewed work, conference proceedings or an arXiv preprint, with the source linked so you can hold a claim up against the research it came from. She is unimpressed by benchmarks that will not say what they beat, and by demonstrations that only work in the press release.

Latest Posts by Ivy Delaney: