A new code cuts qubit needs for quantum logic, Photonic reports

Photonic has demonstrated a quantum low density parity check (QLDPC) code family capable of performing quantum computation while minimizing qubit use, a result detailed in a new Nature Communications paper, the company says. The company’s SHYPS codes efficiently manage both computation and error correction, requiring fewer physical qubits than existing surface codes; this advance is enabled by high-connectivity systems like Photonic’s Entanglement First architecture. “This paper introduced the first demonstrated QLDPC code family capable of performing logic efficiently—not just storing information, but computing with it, using a fraction of the qubits error correction has always demanded,” said Dr. Stephanie Simmons, Chief Quantum Officer at Photonic. “That distinction has changed the conversation across our industry: efficient QLDPC logic is no longer a theoretical promise, it’s a demonstrated result, with real implications for architectures and timelines.”

SHYPS Codes Enable Efficient Quantum Logic with Reduced Qubit Needs

The company’s Subsystem Hypergraph Product Simplex (SHYPS) codes achieve this efficiency by significantly reducing the number of physical qubits needed compared to surface codes at comparable code sizes. This reduction in qubit requirements accelerates the path toward building commercially viable quantum computers, addressing a longstanding challenge in the field. The efficiency of SHYPS codes is intrinsically linked to quantum systems with high connectivity, and Photonic’s Entanglement First architecture is designed to utilize these advances. These fast and lean SHYPS codes maintain competitive logical clock times and performance while requiring fewer qubits, marking a milestone for quantum error correction and opening avenues for further acceleration of quantum computing capabilities.
This paper introduced the first demonstrated QLDPC code family capable of performing logic efficiently – not just storing information, but computing with it, using a fraction of the qubits error correction has always demanded. Dr. Stephanie Simmons, Chief Quantum Officer at Photonic
Stay current

See today’s quantum computing news on Quantum Zeitgeist for the latest breakthroughs in qubits, hardware, algorithms, and industry deals.

Avatar of Ivy Delaney

Ivy Delaney

Ivy Delaney has been working with neural networks and machine learning since the mid-nineties, back when a couple of hidden layers and a long afternoon of training counted as ambitious. She has watched the field go from academic curiosity to the thing quietly running underneath everything, and she brings that long view to quantum computing. For Quantum Zeitgeist she covers the ground where the two fields meet. That means quantum machine learning and the variational algorithms it leans on, and it also means the less glamorous but more interesting story of classical machine learning already doing real work inside quantum machines, decoding error-correcting codes, calibrating noisy hardware and learning the error models that simulators depend on. She writes about the hardware those algorithms have to run on too, and about the post-quantum cryptography scramble that the same hardware has set off. Her stories typically start with the paper, whether that is peer-reviewed work, conference proceedings or an arXiv preprint, with the source linked so you can hold a claim up against the research it came from. She is unimpressed by benchmarks that will not say what they beat, and by demonstrations that only work in the press release.

Latest Posts by Ivy Delaney: