SPAM Errors Fall Below 0.1% in Nord Quantique Qubit System

Nord Quantique has achieved a significant improvement in quantum error correction, reducing state preparation and measurement (SPAM) errors to below 0.1% in its single-mode grid state qubit system. This represents approximately a 100-fold improvement over previous results in comparable GKP-based systems, bringing performance on par with leading superconducting transmon qubit platforms. SPAM errors have long been a challenge in GKP systems, hindering overall progress; Nord Quantique’s research directly addresses this bottleneck with a novel approach based on post-selected stabilization. “This breakthrough advances our mission to realize fault-tolerant quantum computing by 2030,” said Julien Camirand Lemyre, CEO and Co-founder of Nord Quantique. “By addressing the fundamental challenge of SPAM errors in our bosonic architecture, we’ve demonstrated that our 1:1 physical-to-logical qubit approach reduces performance limitations on the path to fault tolerance quantum computing.”

GKP-Based Qubit SPAM Errors Reduced Below 0.1% Threshold

SPAM errors below 0.1% have been demonstrated in Nord Quantique’s single-mode grid state qubit system, marking a substantial advance in quantum error correction and positioning the company alongside leaders in superconducting transmon qubit technology. This achievement represents approximately a 100-fold improvement over previously reported results for comparable GKP-based systems, a leap forward previously hindered by the persistent challenge of SPAM errors. Nord Quantique’s approach centers on a repeat-until-success protocol utilizing post-selected stabilization, leveraging quantum error correction to refine the initial state preparation before accepting the result, a method that bypasses the need for complex, real-time classical control systems. The company’s research, recently published, directly tackles the historically weak link in GKP-based systems, a metric that had previously limited overall performance despite gains in other operational benchmarks. Minimizing SPAM errors improves qubit fidelity and addresses a fundamental obstacle to achieving scalable fault-tolerant quantum computing.

Nord Quantique’s architecture employs a 1:1 physical-to-logical qubit ratio, a departure from many competing designs that demand multiple physical qubits to represent a single logical qubit, and the company asserts this approach minimizes performance bottlenecks on the path to practical fault tolerance. This streamlined architecture is further bolstered by the successful preparation of high-fidelity magic states, specialized quantum states crucial for universal quantum computation, a task widely considered resource-intensive across all leading quantum platforms. Demonstrating this capability within their grid-state architecture underscores the efficiency of their error correction methods, avoiding the added overhead often associated with other approaches.

By addressing the fundamental challenge of SPAM errors in our bosonic architecture, we’ve demonstrated that our 1:1 physical-to-logical qubit approach reduces performance limitations on the path to fault tolerance quantum computing.

Stay current

See today’s quantum computing news on Quantum Zeitgeist for the latest breakthroughs in qubits, hardware, algorithms, and industry deals.

Avatar of Ivy Delaney

Ivy Delaney

Ivy Delaney has been working with neural networks and machine learning since the mid-nineties, back when a couple of hidden layers and a long afternoon of training counted as ambitious. She has watched the field go from academic curiosity to the thing quietly running underneath everything, and she brings that long view to quantum computing. For Quantum Zeitgeist she covers the ground where the two fields meet. That means quantum machine learning and the variational algorithms it leans on, and it also means the less glamorous but more interesting story of classical machine learning already doing real work inside quantum machines, decoding error-correcting codes, calibrating noisy hardware and learning the error models that simulators depend on. She writes about the hardware those algorithms have to run on too, and about the post-quantum cryptography scramble that the same hardware has set off. Her stories typically start with the paper, whether that is peer-reviewed work, conference proceedings or an arXiv preprint, with the source linked so you can hold a claim up against the research it came from. She is unimpressed by benchmarks that will not say what they beat, and by demonstrations that only work in the press release.

Latest Posts by Ivy Delaney: