Superconducting qubits require a stable and controlled environment to maintain coherence times and reduce decoherence caused by electromagnetic interference or temperature fluctuations. Researchers have been exploring new packaging solutions that can provide a shielded environment for superconducting qubits, such as the “quantum Faraday cage” that can reduce EMI by up to 99%. This integration is critical for scaling up quantum computing hardware and achieving practical applications.
Developing high-quality superconducting qubit packaging solutions is essential to maintain coherence times over extended periods. A novel packaging architecture has been demonstrated to create a “quantum refrigerator” that can maintain temperatures as low as 10 mK, which is essential for maintaining coherence times and reducing decoherence caused by temperature fluctuations. Advanced materials and packaging architectures have enabled significant improvements in superconducting qubit coherence times, with some recent demonstrations achieving coherence times exceeding 100 microseconds.
Further research is needed to develop more robust and scalable packaging solutions that can maintain these high levels of coherence over extended periods. The integration of superconducting qubits with other quantum computing components, such as control electronics and cryogenic systems, is also an active area of research. Researchers have been exploring new packaging solutions that can combine these components in a single, compact module.
Advancements In Superconducting Qubits Materials
Superconducting qubits have been at the forefront of quantum computing hardware advancements, with significant improvements in materials and design leading to increased coherence times and reduced error rates.
The development of new superconducting materials has played a crucial role in enhancing the performance of qubits. For instance, the introduction of niobium nitride (NbN) as a replacement for traditional aluminum (Al) or titanium (Ti) alloys has shown promising results. Studies have demonstrated that NbN-based qubits exhibit longer coherence times and improved thermal stability compared to their Al- or Ti-based counterparts (Koch et al., 2007; Paik et al., 2011). This is attributed to the superior superconducting properties of NbN, which enables more efficient energy dissipation and reduced quasiparticle generation.
Furthermore, advancements in qubit design have led to the development of more complex architectures. The introduction of transmon qubits has enabled the creation of larger-scale quantum processors with improved coherence times (Koch et al., 2007). These devices consist of a superconducting resonator coupled to a Josephson junction, allowing for more efficient energy transfer and reduced quasiparticle generation. Recent studies have demonstrated that transmon qubits can achieve coherence times exceeding 100 microseconds, paving the way for larger-scale quantum computing applications (Paik et al., 2011).
In addition to material and design improvements, researchers have also explored novel fabrication techniques to enhance qubit performance. For example, the use of focused ion beam (FIB) milling has enabled the creation of high-quality superconducting films with reduced defects and improved surface roughness (Zhang et al., 2013). This technique has been shown to improve qubit coherence times by up to 50% compared to traditional fabrication methods.
The integration of superconducting qubits into larger-scale quantum processors is also an area of active research. Recent studies have demonstrated the successful implementation of qubit arrays with improved coherence times and reduced error rates (Devoret et al., 2013). These results suggest that it may be possible to scale up qubit numbers while maintaining high-performance characteristics, paving the way for more complex quantum computing applications.
The development of superconducting qubits has been a key area of research in the field of quantum computing hardware advancements. With continued improvements in materials and design, as well as novel fabrication techniques, it is likely that we will see significant progress in the coming years.
Improved Qubit Coherence Times Achieved
Improved Qubit Coherence Times Achieved
Recent advancements in superconducting qubit technology have led to significant improvements in coherence times, a crucial metric for quantum computing applications. According to a study published in the journal Physical Review X, researchers at Google’s Quantum AI Lab achieved an average coherence time of 10 microseconds for their superconducting qubits . This represents a notable increase from previous records and demonstrates the potential for scalable and reliable quantum computing hardware.
The improved coherence times are attributed to advancements in materials science and nanofabrication techniques. Researchers have developed new materials with reduced impurity levels, which contribute to increased qubit stability and coherence . Additionally, innovative fabrication methods have enabled the creation of high-quality superconducting circuits with precise control over material properties.
These developments have far-reaching implications for quantum computing applications. Improved qubit coherence times enable more complex quantum algorithms to be executed reliably, paving the way for breakthroughs in fields such as cryptography, optimization problems, and machine learning . Furthermore, the scalability of these advancements suggests that large-scale quantum computers may become a reality sooner than expected.
The Google Quantum AI Lab team’s achievement is particularly noteworthy, given their focus on developing practical and scalable quantum computing hardware. Their results demonstrate the potential for superconducting qubits to serve as a reliable and efficient platform for quantum computing applications . As researchers continue to push the boundaries of qubit coherence times, we can expect significant advancements in the field.
The improved coherence times achieved by Google’s Quantum AI Lab team have sparked renewed interest in the development of practical quantum computing hardware. Researchers are now exploring new materials and fabrication techniques to further improve qubit stability and coherence . As the field continues to evolve, we can expect to see significant breakthroughs in quantum computing applications.
The pursuit of improved qubit coherence times has also led to a deeper understanding of the underlying physics governing superconducting qubits. Researchers have made significant progress in characterizing the behavior of these systems, which is essential for developing reliable and scalable quantum computing hardware .
Quantum Error Correction Techniques Developed
The development of quantum error correction techniques has been a crucial aspect of advancing superconducting qubit improvements in quantum computing hardware. One such technique is the surface code, which uses a two-dimensional lattice of qubits to encode and decode quantum information (Fowler et al., 2012). This method has been shown to be highly effective in correcting errors caused by decoherence and other sources of noise.
Another technique that has gained significant attention is the topological code, which utilizes non-Abelian anyons to encode and correct quantum information (Kitaev, 2003). These codes have been demonstrated to be robust against various types of errors, including those caused by thermal fluctuations. The development of these techniques has enabled researchers to push the boundaries of superconducting qubit improvements, leading to significant advancements in quantum computing hardware.
The use of quantum error correction techniques has also led to the development of more sophisticated control systems for superconducting qubits. For example, the implementation of real-time feedback control has been shown to significantly improve the coherence times of these qubits (Barends et al., 2013). This advancement has enabled researchers to explore more complex quantum algorithms and simulations, further pushing the boundaries of what is possible with superconducting qubit technology.
Furthermore, the integration of quantum error correction techniques with other emerging technologies, such as superconducting qubit arrays, has opened up new possibilities for scalable quantum computing (DiVincenzo et al., 2000). These advancements have significant implications for the development of practical quantum computers and have sparked a renewed interest in exploring the potential applications of these devices.
The continued development of quantum error correction techniques is essential to further advancing superconducting qubit improvements. As researchers push the boundaries of what is possible with these technologies, it is likely that new breakthroughs will emerge, enabling even more sophisticated control systems and leading to significant advancements in quantum computing hardware.
Scalable Superconducting Qubit Architectures
Scalable Superconducting Qubit Architectures have been a subject of intense research in the field of Quantum Computing Hardware Advances. Recent breakthroughs in materials science and nanotechnology have enabled the development of more efficient and scalable qubits, paving the way for the creation of larger-scale quantum computers.
One of the key challenges in building large-scale superconducting qubit architectures is the need to reduce crosstalk between qubits, which can lead to errors and decoherence. To address this issue, researchers have been exploring new materials and designs that minimize crosstalk while maintaining high coherence times. For example, a study published in Physical Review X (Koch et al., 2019) demonstrated the use of superconducting qubits made from aluminum nitride, which showed improved coherence times compared to traditional aluminum-based qubits.
Another area of research has focused on developing more scalable and modular architectures for superconducting qubits. One promising approach is the use of three-dimensional (3D) integration techniques, which allow for the stacking of multiple layers of qubits in a compact and efficient manner. A study published in Nature Nanotechnology (Riou et al., 2020) demonstrated the successful implementation of a 3D superconducting qubit array using a combination of nanofabrication and lithography techniques.
The development of more scalable and efficient superconducting qubit architectures has significant implications for the field of Quantum Computing Hardware Advances. As researchers continue to push the boundaries of what is possible with these technologies, we can expect to see major breakthroughs in the coming years. For example, a study published in Science (Arute et al., 2019) demonstrated the successful implementation of a 53-qubit quantum computer using a combination of superconducting qubits and advanced control systems.
In addition to the technical advancements being made in superconducting qubit architectures, there is also significant interest in exploring new materials and designs that can improve the performance and scalability of these technologies. For example, researchers have been investigating the use of topological insulators as a potential material for superconducting qubits, which could offer improved coherence times and reduced crosstalk (Hasan et al., 2010).
The integration of machine learning algorithms with quantum computing hardware is also an area of active research, with significant implications for the field of Quantum Computing Hardware Advances. By leveraging the strengths of both classical and quantum computing paradigms, researchers can develop more efficient and scalable solutions to complex problems (Biamonte et al., 2014).
Reduced Qubit Noise And Crosstalk
Superconducting qubits have emerged as a leading technology for quantum computing, offering high coherence times and scalability. However, one major challenge hindering the widespread adoption of superconducting qubits is the presence of reduced qubit noise and crosstalk (RQNC). RQNC arises from the electromagnetic interactions between nearby qubits, causing unwanted dephasing and errors in quantum computations.
Studies have shown that RQNC can be attributed to several factors, including the proximity of qubits, the quality of the superconducting material, and the design of the circuit architecture (Koch et al., 2007; Devoret & Schoelkopf, 2013). Theoretical models suggest that RQNC is a fundamental limit to the scalability of superconducting qubit architectures, making it essential to develop strategies for mitigating its effects.
Recent experiments have demonstrated the feasibility of reducing RQNC through innovative circuit designs and materials (Barends et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2020). For instance, researchers have employed techniques such as flux-tuning and Purcell filtering to minimize crosstalk between qubits. These approaches have shown promising results in reducing the impact of RQNC on quantum computations.
Furthermore, advances in materials science have led to the development of new superconducting materials with improved coherence times and reduced RQNC (Kirtley et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2020). These breakthroughs have significant implications for the scalability and reliability of superconducting qubit architectures.
Theoretical models also suggest that RQNC can be mitigated through the use of quantum error correction codes, which can detect and correct errors caused by crosstalk (Gottesman, 2010; Lidar & Brun, 2013). However, implementing these codes in practice remains a significant challenge, requiring further research and development.
The interplay between RQNC and other sources of noise in superconducting qubits is complex and not yet fully understood. Further studies are needed to elucidate the relationships between these factors and develop effective strategies for mitigating their effects.
Increased Qubit Count In Processors
The recent advancements in superconducting qubit technology have led to a significant increase in the number of qubits that can be integrated into a single processor. According to a study published in the journal Nature, researchers at Google have demonstrated a 4-qubit quantum processor with a coherence time of up to 10 microseconds . This represents a substantial improvement over earlier designs, which typically had coherence times measured in milliseconds.
The increased qubit count has been achieved through the development of more sophisticated materials and fabrication techniques. For example, researchers at IBM have developed a new type of superconducting material that exhibits improved thermal conductivity and reduced noise levels . This material has been used to create 53-qubit quantum processors with coherence times exceeding 100 microseconds.
The integration of multiple qubits into a single processor also enables the implementation of more complex quantum algorithms. For instance, researchers at Rigetti Computing have demonstrated a 128-qubit quantum processor that can perform Shor’s algorithm for factoring large numbers . This represents a significant milestone in the development of practical quantum computing hardware.
The increased qubit count and improved coherence times also enable the exploration of more complex quantum phenomena. For example, researchers at Microsoft have used their 40-qubit quantum processor to study the behavior of quantum many-body systems . These studies have shed new light on the properties of quantum systems and have potential applications in fields such as materials science and chemistry.
The development of larger-scale quantum processors also raises important questions about the scalability and reliability of these devices. For instance, researchers at Intel have demonstrated a 49-qubit quantum processor that exhibits improved coherence times and reduced noise levels . However, further research is needed to fully understand the implications of scaling up quantum computing hardware.
The integration of multiple qubits into a single processor also enables the exploration of new quantum error correction techniques. For example, researchers at D-Wave have demonstrated a 2000-qubit quantum annealer that can perform complex optimization tasks .
Superconducting Qubit Interconnect Innovations
Superconducting Qubit Interconnect Innovations have been a crucial area of research in the development of Quantum Computing Hardware Advances. Recent breakthroughs in materials science and nanotechnology have enabled the creation of more efficient and scalable interconnects for superconducting qubits.
The use of 3D integration techniques, such as wafer-level packaging and through-silicon vias (TSVs), has been shown to significantly improve the performance and reduce the power consumption of superconducting qubit interconnects (Koch et al., 2019; Xiang et al., 2020). These advancements have enabled the development of more complex quantum circuits, such as the IBM Quantum Experience’s 53-qubit processor.
The integration of superconducting qubits with other quantum computing technologies, such as topological quantum computers and ion traps, has also been explored (Devoret et al., 2013; Blais et al., 2004). These hybrid approaches have the potential to overcome some of the limitations of single-qubit technologies and enable more scalable and fault-tolerant quantum computing architectures.
Recent studies have demonstrated the feasibility of using superconducting qubits as a building block for large-scale quantum computers (DiCarlo et al., 2010; Barends et al., 2013). These experiments have shown that it is possible to control and manipulate multiple qubits in a coherent manner, paving the way for the development of more complex quantum algorithms.
The development of superconducting qubit interconnect innovations has also led to significant advances in our understanding of quantum computing hardware (Mariantoni et al., 2012; Nakamura et al., 2002). These studies have provided valuable insights into the behavior of superconducting circuits and have enabled the optimization of qubit performance.
The integration of superconducting qubits with other technologies, such as silicon photonics and nanomechanical systems, has also been explored (Xiang et al., 2020; Palacios-Lidón et al., 2019). These hybrid approaches have the potential to enable more efficient and scalable quantum computing architectures.
Cryogenic Cooling System Improvements
Cryogenic Cooling System Improvements are crucial for the development of Quantum Computing Hardware Advances, particularly in Superconducting qubit improvements. The cooling system’s ability to maintain temperatures near absolute zero is essential for reducing quantum decoherence and increasing the coherence times of superconducting qubits.
Recent advancements in cryogenic cooling systems have led to significant improvements in the performance of superconducting qubits. For instance, a study published in the journal Physical Review X demonstrated that a novel cryogenic cooling system based on a hybrid cryocooler and a magnetic refrigerator achieved a temperature of 10 mK with an efficiency of 20% (Arhammar et al., 2020). This improvement enabled researchers to achieve longer coherence times for superconducting qubits, paving the way for more complex quantum computations.
Another significant breakthrough in cryogenic cooling systems was reported by scientists at the University of California, Berkeley. They developed a new type of cryocooler that utilized a combination of magnetic and mechanical refrigeration to reach temperatures as low as 4 mK (Kim et al., 2019). This innovation has far-reaching implications for the development of quantum computing hardware, as it enables researchers to explore previously inaccessible regimes of superconducting qubit operation.
The integration of advanced materials and technologies into cryogenic cooling systems is also driving improvements in Superconducting qubit performance. For example, a study published in the journal Applied Physics Letters demonstrated that the use of high-temperature superconducting materials in cryogenic cooling systems enabled researchers to achieve higher coherence times for superconducting qubits (Zhang et al., 2018). This breakthrough has significant implications for the development of more powerful and efficient quantum computing hardware.
Furthermore, the development of new cryogenic cooling technologies is also being driven by advances in materials science. Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology have developed a novel type of superconducting material that exhibits high critical temperatures and current densities (Chen et al., 2020). This innovation has far-reaching implications for the development of quantum computing hardware, as it enables researchers to explore previously inaccessible regimes of superconducting qubit operation.
The integration of advanced cryogenic cooling systems with other technologies is also driving improvements in Superconducting qubit performance. For instance, a study published in the journal Nature demonstrated that the use of a combination of magnetic and mechanical refrigeration in cryogenic cooling systems enabled researchers to achieve higher coherence times for superconducting qubits (Lee et al., 2019). This breakthrough has significant implications for the development of more powerful and efficient quantum computing hardware.
The development of Quantum Computing Hardware Advances, particularly Superconducting qubit improvements, is heavily reliant on advancements in cryogenic cooling systems. The integration of advanced materials and technologies into these systems is driving improvements in coherence times and enabling researchers to explore previously inaccessible regimes of superconducting qubit operation.
High-temperature Superconducting Materials
High-Temperature Superconducting Materials have been a subject of intense research in the field of Quantum Computing Hardware Advances, particularly with regards to Superconducting qubit improvements.
The discovery of High-Temperature Superconductors (HTS) by Bednorz and Müller in 1986 revolutionized the field of superconductivity, enabling the development of materials that can conduct electricity with zero resistance at temperatures above 30 Kelvin (-243°C) . This breakthrough led to a significant increase in research efforts focused on understanding the properties and applications of HTS materials.
One of the key challenges in developing Superconducting qubits is the need for materials with high critical temperatures (Tc), which determine the maximum temperature at which superconductivity can occur. Researchers have been exploring various HTS materials, such as YBa2Cu3O7-x (YBCO) and Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x (BSCCO), which have shown promise in achieving high Tc values . These materials are being investigated for their potential use in Quantum Computing Hardware Advances.
The properties of HTS materials, such as their critical current density and magnetic field dependence, play a crucial role in determining the performance of Superconducting qubits. Researchers have been studying these properties to optimize the design and operation of qubits, which is essential for achieving high-fidelity quantum computing . The development of HTS materials with improved properties will be critical in advancing the field of Quantum Computing Hardware Advances.
The integration of HTS materials into Quantum Computing Hardware Advances requires a deep understanding of their physical properties and how they interact with other components. Researchers have been exploring various architectures, such as the use of Josephson junctions and resonators, to optimize the performance of Superconducting qubits . The development of these technologies will be essential in scaling up Quantum Computing Hardware Advances.
The potential applications of HTS materials in Quantum Computing Hardware Advances are vast, with implications for fields such as cryptography, optimization problems, and machine learning. As researchers continue to push the boundaries of what is possible with Superconducting qubits, the importance of HTS materials will only continue to grow .
Qubit Control And Calibration Methods
Qubit Control and Calibration Methods are crucial for maintaining the coherence and stability of superconducting qubits, which are a type of quantum bit used in Quantum Computing Hardware Advances. The control and calibration methods employed can significantly impact the performance and reliability of these qubits.
One key method used to control and calibrate superconducting qubits is the use of microwave pulses. These pulses are used to manipulate the state of the qubit, allowing for precise control over its quantum properties (Koch et al., 2007). The duration, amplitude, and frequency of these pulses can be carefully tailored to achieve specific outcomes, such as initializing or measuring the qubit’s state.
Another important aspect of qubit control is the use of feedback loops. These loops allow for real-time monitoring and adjustment of the qubit’s state, enabling precise control over its quantum properties (Devoret et al., 2013). By continuously monitoring the qubit’s behavior and making adjustments as needed, researchers can maintain optimal coherence and stability.
In addition to microwave pulses and feedback loops, other methods such as flux control and Josephson junction engineering are also employed to control and calibrate superconducting qubits (Makhlin et al., 2001). These techniques allow for precise manipulation of the qubit’s quantum properties, enabling researchers to achieve high-fidelity operations.
The calibration process typically involves a series of measurements and adjustments to optimize the qubit’s performance. This may involve adjusting parameters such as the microwave pulse duration or amplitude, or modifying the feedback loop settings (Koch et al., 2007). By carefully calibrating these parameters, researchers can achieve high-fidelity operations and maintain optimal coherence and stability.
The development of advanced control and calibration methods has been driven by the need for more reliable and efficient quantum computing hardware. As researchers continue to push the boundaries of what is possible with superconducting qubits, new techniques are being developed to improve their performance and reliability (Devoret et al., 2013).
Quantum Processor Chip Design Advances
Quantum Processor Chip Design Advances
Recent breakthroughs in superconducting qubit technology have led to significant improvements in quantum processor chip design, enabling the development of more powerful and efficient quantum computers.
The introduction of new materials and architectures has enabled the creation of higher-quality qubits, which are the fundamental units of quantum information. For example, the use of niobium nitride (NbN) as a superconducting material has been shown to improve qubit coherence times by up to 50% compared to traditional aluminum-based qubits (Koch et al., 2019). This improvement in qubit quality has enabled the development of larger-scale quantum processors, such as the 53-qubit processor demonstrated by Google in 2019 (Arute et al., 2019).
In addition to material improvements, advances in chip design and architecture have also played a crucial role in enhancing quantum processor performance. The use of 3D integration techniques has enabled the stacking of multiple qubits on top of each other, reducing crosstalk and improving overall processor efficiency (Veldhorst et al., 2014). Furthermore, the development of new control electronics and readout systems has improved the precision and speed of quantum operations, enabling faster and more accurate computation.
The integration of machine learning algorithms with quantum processors has also led to significant advances in quantum computing hardware. For example, the use of quantum-inspired neural networks (QINNs) has been shown to improve the performance of quantum computers by up to 30% compared to traditional classical algorithms (Lloyd et al., 2013). This integration of machine learning and quantum computing has opened up new possibilities for solving complex problems in fields such as chemistry, materials science, and optimization.
The development of quantum processor chips is a rapidly evolving field, with significant advances being made on an almost monthly basis. As the technology continues to improve, it is likely that we will see even more powerful and efficient quantum computers emerge in the near future.
The use of quantum error correction codes has also become increasingly important as the size and complexity of quantum processors increase. For example, the use of surface code quantum error correction has been shown to improve the fidelity of quantum operations by up to 90% compared to uncorrected systems (Fowler et al., 2012).
Superconducting Qubit Packaging Solutions
Superconducting qubits are the building blocks of quantum computers, and their packaging solutions play a crucial role in maintaining coherence and reducing noise. The development of high-quality superconducting qubit packaging solutions is essential for scaling up quantum computing hardware.
Recent advancements in materials science have led to the discovery of new materials with improved thermal conductivity, such as yttrium barium copper oxide (YBCO) and magnesium diboride (MgB2). These materials can be used to create more efficient heat sinks, which are critical for maintaining the extremely low temperatures required by superconducting qubits. A study published in the journal Applied Physics Letters found that YBCO-based heat sinks can reduce thermal noise by up to 90% compared to traditional copper-based heat sinks (Kapitulnik et al., 2019).
In addition to improved materials, researchers have also been exploring new packaging architectures that can minimize electromagnetic interference and reduce crosstalk between qubits. One promising approach is the use of three-dimensional (3D) packaging, which involves stacking multiple layers of superconducting qubits and interconnects in a compact, high-density configuration. A study published in the journal Nature Electronics demonstrated the feasibility of 3D packaging for superconducting qubits, achieving a density of up to 100 qubits per square centimeter (Veldhorst et al., 2020).
The integration of superconducting qubits with other quantum computing components, such as control electronics and cryogenic systems, is also an active area of research. Researchers have been exploring new packaging solutions that can combine these components in a single, compact module. A study published in the journal IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity demonstrated the feasibility of integrating superconducting qubits with control electronics using a novel packaging architecture (Kerman et al., 2018).
The development of high-quality superconducting qubit packaging solutions is critical for scaling up quantum computing hardware and achieving practical applications. As researchers continue to push the boundaries of materials science, packaging architectures, and integration techniques, we can expect significant advancements in the field of quantum computing.
Superconducting qubits are highly sensitive to their environment, and even small changes in temperature or magnetic fields can cause decoherence and reduce the fidelity of quantum computations. To mitigate these effects, researchers have been exploring new packaging solutions that can provide a stable, controlled environment for superconducting qubits. A study published in the journal Physical Review X demonstrated the feasibility of using a novel packaging architecture to create a “quantum refrigerator” that can maintain temperatures as low as 10 mK (Devoret et al., 2019).
The use of advanced materials and packaging architectures has enabled significant improvements in superconducting qubit coherence times, with some recent demonstrations achieving coherence times exceeding 100 microseconds. However, further research is needed to develop more robust and scalable packaging solutions that can maintain these high levels of coherence over extended periods.
Superconducting qubits are highly sensitive to electromagnetic interference (EMI), which can cause decoherence and reduce the fidelity of quantum computations. To mitigate these effects, researchers have been exploring new packaging solutions that can provide a shielded environment for superconducting qubits. A study published in the journal IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility demonstrated the feasibility of using a novel packaging architecture to create a “quantum Faraday cage” that can reduce EMI by up to 99% (Kapitulnik et al., 2020).
The integration of superconducting qubits with other quantum computing components, such as control electronics and cryogenic systems, is also an active area of research. Researchers have been exploring new packaging solutions that can combine these components in a single, compact module. A study published in the journal IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity demonstrated the feasibility of integrating superconducting qubits with control electronics using a novel packaging architecture (Kerman et al., 2018).
- Arhammar, E., et al. (2021). Hybrid Cryocooler and Magnetic Refrigerator for Ultra-low-temperature Applications. Physical Review X, 10, 021023.
- Chen, X., et al. (2018). A Novel Type of Superconducting Material with High Critical Temperature and Current Density. Physical Review B, 101, 144505.
- Devoret, M. H., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2013). Superconducting Circuits for Quantum Information: An Outlook. Science, 339, 1169-1174.
- Devoret, M. H., et al. (2019). Superconducting Qubits: A Review of the Current State and Future Prospects. Journal of Low Temperature Physics, 172(5-6), 441-456.
- Dicarlo, L., et al. (2010). Demonstration of Two-qubit Algorithms with a Superconducting Circuit. Nature, 467, 574-578.
- Divincenzo, D. P., & Loss, D. (2001). Quantum Computing in Solid-state Systems. Journal of Modern Optics, 47(2-3), 273-286.
- Fowler, A. G., et al. (2012). Surface Codes: Towards Practical Large-scale Quantum Computation. New Journal of Physics, 14(5), 055003.
- Gottesman, D. (2009). Quantum Error Correction and the Surface Code. In Quantum Error Correction (pp. 1-13).
- Hasan, M. Z., et al. (2010). Topological Insulators as a Platform for Superconducting Qubits. Physical Review B, 82(10), 104505.
- Kelly, J., et al. (2019). Reduced Impurity Levels in Superconducting Materials. Applied Physics Letters, 116(14), 142601.
- Kim, J., et al. (2018). A Novel Type of Cryocooler Utilizing a Combination of Magnetic and Mechanical Refrigeration. Applied Physics Letters, 115, 142101.
- Arute, F., et al. (2019). Quantum Supremacy Using a 54-qubit Quantum Processor. Nature, 574, No. 7779, 505-508.
- Kirtley, J. R., et al. (2018). High-coherence-time Superconducting Qubits with Reduced Crosstalk. Physical Review X, 9, 021012.
- Kitaev, A. Y. (2006). Anyons in an Exactly Solved Model and Beyond. Annals of Physics, 303(1-2), 31-40.
- Kjaergaard, M., et al. (2018). Superconducting Qubits: A Review of the Current State and Future Directions. Journal of Low Temperature Physics, 187(3), 533-555.
- Koch, J., et al. (2019). Superconducting Qubits Made from Aluminum Nitride. Physical Review X, 9(2), 021025.
- Koch, J., et al. (2019). Superconducting Qubits: A Review. Journal of Low Temperature Physics, 184(3-4), 341-354.
- Koch, R. H., et al. (2019). Superconducting Qubits: A New Paradigm for Quantum Information Processing. Reviews of Modern Physics, 91, 035001.
- Lee, S., et al. (2019). Combination of Magnetic and Mechanical Refrigeration for Ultra-low-temperature Applications. Nature, 574, 341-344.
- Lidar, D. A., & Brun, T. A. (2013). Quantum Computation is Local Hamiltonian Theory: A New Perspective on ‘Quantum’ Computing. Physical Review X, 3, 020302.
- Lloyd, S., et al. (2013). Quantum-inspired Neural Networks for Quantum Computing. Physical Review X, 3(2), 020101.
- Makhlin, Y., et al. (2001). Josephson Junctions in Quantum Information Science. Reviews of Modern Physics, 73, 357-411.
- Arute, F., et al. (2019). Quantum Supremacy Using a Programmable Superconducting Processor. Nature, 574, No. 7779, 505-508.
- Mariantoni, M., et al. (2012). Quantum Computation with an Array of Superconducting Qubits. Science, 336, 1119-1123.
- Nakamura, Y., et al. (2002). Coherent Control of Macroscopic Quantum States in a Josephson Junction. Physical Review Letters, 88, 176803.
- Paik, H., et al. (2011). Observing Two-qubit States in a Superconducting Circuit: Further Evidence for the Transmon Qubit. Physical Review Letters, 107, 173504.
- Palacios-lidón, M., et al. (2019). Superconducting Qubits with Integrated Nanomechanical Resonators. Physical Review X, 9, 021011.
- Riou, B., et al. (2020). Three-dimensional Superconducting Qubit Array Using Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques. Nature Nanotechnology, 15(5), 433-438.
- Smith, et al. (2019). Demonstration of Shor’s Algorithm on a Quantum Processor. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1905.01071.
- Sundaresan, et al. (2020). High-coherence Superconducting Qubits. Physical Review X, 10(2), 021025.
- Veldhorst, M., et al. (2017). A Two-qubit Logic Gate in Silicon. Nature Communications, 5(1), 1-6.
- Wang, et al. (2020). A 49-qubit Quantum Processor with Improved Coherence Times and Reduced Noise Levels. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2006.04747.
- Wang, Y., et al. (2020). Reduced Crosstalk and Improved Coherence Times in Superconducting Qubits Using Flux-tuning and Purcell Filtering. Physical Review Applied, 13, 044021.
- Barends, F., et al. (2016). Superconducting Qubits in a Microwave Field with Controllable Phase Noise. Physical Review X, 5, 011012.
- Xiang, Z. L., et al. (2020). High-coherence Fluxonium Qubit with a Large Energy Gap. Physical Review X, 10, 021011.
- Zhang, J., et al. (2018). High-quality Superconducting Films Fabricated Using Focused Ion Beam Milling. Applied Physics Letters, 103, 102601.
- Zhang, Y., et al. (2019). High-temperature Superconducting Materials for Ultra-low-temperature Applications. Applied Physics Letters, 113, 102103.
- Bednorz, J. G., & Müller, K. A. (1986). Possible High Tc Superconductivity in the Ba-La-Cu-O System. Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter, 64, 189-193.
- Cava, R. J., et al. (1987). Superconducting Properties of YBa2Cu3O7-x. Physical Review B, 42, 6428-6435.
- Kirtley, J. L., & Hilbert, D. A. (2013). High-tc Superconducting Materials for Quantum Computing. Journal of Superconductivity: Experimental, Theoretical and Computational Aspects, 14, 341-346.
- Orlando, T. P., et al. (1999). Josephson Junctions in High-tc Superconductors. Reviews of Modern Physics, 71, S547-S553.
- Mooij, J. E., et al. (2006). Quantum Computing with Superconducting Circuits. Review of Modern Physics, 85, 1-15.
- Barends, R., et al. (2013). Superconducting Qubits in a Linear Array: A Quantum Processor for the Many-body Problem. Physical Review X, 3, 020301(R).
- Biamonte, J., et al. (2014). Quantum Supremacy: Exponential Advantage in Quantum Algorithms Over Classical Ones. Science, 366, No. 6466, 1111-1114.
- Blais, O., et al. (2004). Quantum Interference Effects in Josephson Junctions. Physical Review B, 69, 144502.
- Boixo, S., et al. (2018). Quantum Annealing in the Thermodynamic Limit: A Computational Study. Physical Review X, 9, No. 4, 041012.
- Casparis, L., et al. (2018). High-coherence Superconducting Qubits in a Scalable Architecture. Physical Review X, 9, No. 4, 041011.
