Dr Rowshan joins Sydney Quantum Academy to tackle error correction

The challenge of scaling quantum computing beyond simply adding qubits is intensifying, with even “very small error rates” becoming critical as computations grow, according to Dr Mohammad Rowshan. A Research Fellow at Sydney’s Centre for Quantum Software and Information, Dr Rowshan has joined the Sydney Quantum Academy Experts Network to focus on quantum low-density parity-check (qLDPC) codes as a potential solution.

He explains that quantum error correction works by encoding information across multiple physical qubits, a necessary step to detect and correct errors, stating, “The broader goal is to bridge the gap between mathematically powerful codes and architectures that can actually be built.” The Sydney Quantum Academy, a partnership of Macquarie, UNSW, Sydney and UTS universities backed by the NSW Government, trains quantum researchers and builds Sydney’s quantum workforce.

qLDPC Codes for Efficient Quantum Error Correction

qLDPC codes represent a focused effort to minimize the physical qubit overhead in quantum error correction, a critical challenge as systems scale beyond a few qubits. Dr Mohammad Rowshan’s appointment to the Sydney Quantum Academy Experts Network directly addresses this need, concentrating on the potential of these codes to reduce the resources required for reliable quantum computation. He intends to investigate how qLDPC codes can be practically implemented for universal quantum computing, building on his background in classical coding theory to improve efficiency and scalability.

The fragility of quantum information demands robust error correction, as even “very small error rates become a serious problem when computations involve many qubits and a very large number of operations,” according to Dr Rowshan. qLDPC codes offer a potential solution by reducing the number of physical qubits needed for this encoding, though efficient methods for performing universal quantum operations on the encoded data remain a key hurdle. The implications of efficient error correction extend to ambitious applications requiring large-scale quantum computers.

Rowshan emphasizes that “This is especially important for large fault-tolerant machines, which may require millions of physical qubits for demanding applications in areas such as cryptography, chemistry and materials science.” Without effective error correction, computations at that scale would quickly become unreliable, hindering progress in these fields.

Rowshan’s work isn’t solely focused on the codes themselves, but also on adapting them to the realities of existing quantum hardware. Constraints like limited qubit connectivity, biased noise, and finite decoding times must be considered to create a truly practical system. He is particularly interested in using the algebraic structure of qLDPC codes to simplify complex logical operations, such as non-Clifford gates, and reduce the overhead of necessary processes like magic-state preparation.

The goal is to minimize both the number of qubits and the time required for fault-tolerant quantum computation. If these pieces come together, we could move from small error-corrected demonstrations to sustained quantum computations that are genuinely beyond what classical computers can do.

we could move from small error-corrected demonstrations to sustained quantum computations that are genuinely beyond what classical computers can do.

Stay current

See today’s quantum computing news on Quantum Zeitgeist for the latest breakthroughs in qubits, hardware, algorithms, and industry deals.

Avatar of Ivy Delaney

Ivy Delaney

Ivy Delaney has been working with neural networks and machine learning since the mid-nineties, back when a couple of hidden layers and a long afternoon of training counted as ambitious. She has watched the field go from academic curiosity to the thing quietly running underneath everything, and she brings that long view to quantum computing. For Quantum Zeitgeist she covers the ground where the two fields meet. That means quantum machine learning and the variational algorithms it leans on, and it also means the less glamorous but more interesting story of classical machine learning already doing real work inside quantum machines, decoding error-correcting codes, calibrating noisy hardware and learning the error models that simulators depend on. She writes about the hardware those algorithms have to run on too, and about the post-quantum cryptography scramble that the same hardware has set off. Her stories typically start with the paper, whether that is peer-reviewed work, conference proceedings or an arXiv preprint, with the source linked so you can hold a claim up against the research it came from. She is unimpressed by benchmarks that will not say what they beat, and by demonstrations that only work in the press release.

Latest Posts by Ivy Delaney: