How To Get Into Quantum Programming

To get into quantum programming, it is essential to have a solid understanding of quantum information theory and classical electronics. Research scientists play a crucial role in advancing the field of quantum computing through research and development, collaborating with industry partners to develop new technologies and applications. Quantum systems engineers design and optimize hardware components for quantum computers, ensuring that they can efficiently run quantum algorithms.

Individuals looking to transition into this field from other areas of science or engineering can take advantage of online courses and resources such as Microsoft’s Quantum Development Kit, the Quantum Katas course on Coursera, and textbooks like “Quantum Computation and Quantum Information” by Michael A. Nielsen and Isaac L. Chuang. Hands-on experience with quantum programming is also essential for mastering the subject, and frameworks such as Qiskit and platforms like the Quantum Experience offer users the opportunity to run quantum circuits on real-world hardware.

For those interested in pursuing a career in quantum computing, universities and research institutions worldwide offer degree programs and courses in quantum physics and computer science. These programs provide students with hands-on experience, access to cutting-edge research facilities, and the opportunity to collaborate with renowned experts in the field. By combining theoretical knowledge with practical experience, individuals can develop the skills necessary to succeed in this rapidly evolving field.

What Is Quantum Programming?

Quantum programming is a subfield of quantum computing that involves writing software to run on quantum computers. This type of programming is distinct from classical programming, as it must take into account the principles of quantum mechanics, such as superposition and entanglement (Nielsen & Chuang, 2000). Quantum programmers use specialized languages, such as Q# and Qiskit, to write code that can harness the power of quantum computers.

One key aspect of quantum programming is the concept of qubits, which are the fundamental units of quantum information. Unlike classical bits, qubits can exist in multiple states simultaneously, allowing for exponential scaling in computational power (Vedral, 2010). Quantum programmers must carefully design algorithms to take advantage of this property, using techniques such as quantum teleportation and superdense coding.

Quantum programming also involves a deep understanding of the physical principles underlying quantum computing. This includes knowledge of quantum error correction, which is essential for ensuring the reliability of quantum computations (Gottesman, 1996). Quantum programmers must be able to design and implement robust algorithms that can correct errors in real time, even as the number of qubits increases.

In addition to these technical challenges, quantum programming requires a strong understanding of software engineering principles. This includes knowledge of data structures, algorithms, and software design patterns (Gamma et al., 1994). Quantum programmers must be able to write efficient code that can scale to meet the demands of large-scale quantum computations.

As the field of quantum computing continues to evolve, the demand for skilled quantum programmers is growing rapidly. However, this growth also presents significant challenges, as the complexity and fragility of quantum systems require specialized expertise (Harrow et al., 2009). To succeed in this field, aspiring quantum programmers must be willing to invest time and effort in mastering the unique principles and techniques of quantum programming.

Quantum programming is a highly interdisciplinary field requiring knowledge of computer science and physics. This intersection of disciplines presents opportunities for innovation and discovery as researchers and developers work together to push the boundaries of what is possible with quantum computers (Preskill, 2010).

Brief History Of Quantum Computing

The concept of quantum computing dates back to the 1960s when physicist Richard Feynman proposed using quantum-mechanical phenomena to perform calculations (Feynman, 1982). However, it wasn’t until the 1990s that the first practical quantum computers were developed. One such example is the D-Wave Systems‘ adiabatic quantum computer, which was introduced in 2007 and claimed to have achieved a quantum speedup over classical computers (D-Wave Systems, 2007).

Advances in quantum information science, particularly in quantum error correction and quantum control, have driven the development of quantum computing. Researchers such as John Preskill and Seth Lloyd have significantly contributed to these areas, laying the groundwork for constructing large-scale quantum computers (Preskill, 2010; Lloyd, 2000). Theoretical models, such as the surface code and topological codes, have also been proposed to mitigate errors in quantum computations (Bravyi & Kitaev, 1998).

Significant progress has been made in developing quantum computing hardware in recent years. Companies like IBM, Google, and Rigetti Computing have developed large-scale quantum processors with hundreds of qubits (IBM Quantum Experience, 2016; Google AI Blog, 2020). These systems have demonstrated impressive computational capabilities, including the simulation of complex quantum systems and executing machine learning algorithms.

Theoretical models suggest that a large-scale quantum computer could potentially solve problems intractable for classical computers. For example, Shor’s algorithm has been proposed as a method for factoring large numbers exponentially faster than any known classical algorithm (Shor, 1994). However, the development of such systems is still in its early stages, and significant technical challenges must be overcome before they can be realized.

The field of quantum computing is rapidly evolving, with breakthroughs and innovations emerging regularly. As researchers continue pushing the boundaries of what is possible with quantum computers, we will likely see significant advances in cryptography, optimization, and machine learning.

Quantum Computing Basics Explained

Quantum computing is a new paradigm for computation that uses the principles of quantum mechanics to perform calculations and operations on data. This approach fundamentally differs from classical computing, which relies on bits (0s and 1s) to process information. In contrast, quantum computers use quantum bits or qubits, which can exist in multiple states simultaneously, allowing for an exponential increase in processing power.

The concept of superposition is key to understanding how qubits work. A qubit can represent a 0 and a 1 simultaneously, enabling it to perform many calculations simultaneously. This property is known as quantum parallelism, which allows quantum computers to solve specific problems much faster than classical computers. For example, Shor’s algorithm, developed by mathematician Peter Shor in 1994, can factor large numbers exponentially faster on a quantum computer than on a classical one (Shor, 1994).

Another essential aspect of quantum computing is entanglement, which allows qubits to be connected in such a way that the state of one qubit is dependent on the state of another. This phenomenon enables quantum computers to perform operations on multiple qubits simultaneously, increasing their processing power. Entangled qubits are also used for quantum teleportation, a process that transfers information from one qubit to another without physically transporting the qubits themselves (Bennett et al., 1993).

Quantum computing is not just about speed; it’s also about solving specific problems that are intractable or require an enormous amount of time on classical computers. For instance, the simulation of complex quantum systems, such as molecules and chemical reactions, can be done much more efficiently on a quantum computer than on a classical one (Lloyd et al., 1993). This capability has significant implications for fields like chemistry and materials science.

The development of quantum computing is an active area of research, with many companies and institutions investing heavily in the field. However, the technology is still in its early stages, and significant technical challenges must be overcome before it becomes a practical reality. Despite these hurdles, the potential benefits of quantum computing are substantial, making it an exciting and rapidly evolving field.

Quantum programming languages like Q# and Qiskit are being developed to help programmers write code that can run on quantum computers. These languages provide a high-level interface for writing quantum algorithms and programs, abstracting away many low-level details of quantum computing (Dumitrescu et al., 2018).

Types Of Quantum Computers Available

Quantum computers come in various forms, each with unique characteristics and applications. The most well-known type is the gate model quantum computer, which uses a series of quantum gates to manipulate qubits (quantum bits). This type of quantum computer is based on quantum parallelism, where multiple calculations can be performed simultaneously, leading to exponential speedup over classical computers.

The gate model quantum computer relies on the principles of quantum mechanics, such as superposition and entanglement, to perform operations on qubits. A set of quantum gates typically represents these operations, the quantum equivalent of logic gates in classical computing. The most common quantum gates used in this type of quantum computer include the Hadamard gate, Pauli-X gate, and CNOT gate.

Another type of quantum computer is the adiabatic quantum computer, also known as the quantum annealer. This type of quantum computer uses a different approach to solving optimization problems, where the goal is to find the global minimum or maximum of an objective function. Adiabatic quantum computers rely on the principles of quantum tunneling and adiabatic evolution to find the optimal solution.

Quantum computers can also be classified based on their architecture, such as topological quantum computers and surface-code quantum computers. Topological quantum computers use a network of qubits connected in a specific way to perform operations, while surface-code quantum computers rely on a two-dimensional lattice of qubits to encode and decode information.

In addition to these types, there is also the hybrid quantum computer, which combines different types of quantum computing architectures to achieve better performance. Hybrid quantum computers can be used for various applications, such as machine learning and optimization problems, where the goal is to find the optimal solution by combining different algorithms and techniques.

Classical Vs Quantum Algorithms Compared

Classical algorithms, such as those used in linear algebra and numerical analysis, rely on deterministic steps to solve problems. In contrast, quantum algorithms exploit the principles of superposition and entanglement to perform calculations exponentially faster than their classical counterparts.

Quantum computers use qubits, which can exist in multiple states simultaneously, allowing for many possibilities to be explored in parallel. With unprecedented efficiency, this property enables quantum algorithms to tackle complex optimization problems, such as those found in machine learning and cryptography. For instance, Shor’s algorithm (Shor, 1994) is a quantum algorithm that can factor large numbers exponentially faster than the best known classical algorithms.

In contrast, classical algorithms use brute-force or approximation techniques to solve similar problems. The most well-known example of a classical algorithm for factoring large numbers is the general number field sieve (GNS), which has a time complexity of O(exp((log n)^(1/3))) (Lenstra et al., 1993). While this is still an impressive achievement, it pales compared to the exponential speedup offered by Shor’s algorithm.

The difference between classical and quantum algorithms becomes even more pronounced when dealing with problems that involve searching large databases or performing complex simulations. Quantum computers can use Grover’s algorithm (Grover, 1996) to search unsorted databases of N entries in O(sqrt(N)) time, whereas the best known classical algorithms require O(N) time.

Furthermore, quantum algorithms are superior to their classical counterparts in various areas, such as machine learning and optimization. For example, the HHL algorithm (Harrow et al., 2009) can solve linear systems of equations exponentially faster than the best known classical algorithms, while the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) (Farhi et al., 2014) is more efficient than its classical counterparts for specific optimization problems.

Developing and implementing quantum algorithms require a deep understanding of quantum mechanics and computer science. As such, researchers and developers must have a solid grasp of the underlying principles and techniques involved in quantum programming.

Quantum Programming Languages Overview

Quantum programming languages are designed to work with the principles of quantum mechanics, allowing for the creation of algorithms that can take advantage of quantum parallelism and superposition. These languages are typically based on mathematical frameworks such as linear algebra and group theory, which provide a foundation for manipulating quantum states.

One key aspect of quantum programming languages is their ability to handle quantum bits (qubits) and quantum gates, which are the fundamental building blocks of quantum computation. Qubits can exist in multiple states simultaneously, allowing for exponential scaling of computational power with the number of qubits. On the other hand, Quantum gates perform operations on these qubits, such as rotations and entanglements.

Quantum programming languages often employ various techniques to mitigate errors and noise that can occur during quantum computation. These include error correction codes, such as surface codes and concatenated codes, which can detect and correct errors in quantum computations. Additionally, some quantum programming languages incorporate machine learning algorithms to optimize the performance of quantum circuits.

The development of quantum programming languages is an active area of research. Several languages are being developed for specific applications, such as quantum chemistry and materials science. Some notable examples include Q# (formerly known as Quantum Development Kit), Qiskit, and Cirq, which are all designed to work with specific quantum hardware platforms.

Quantum programming languages also have the potential to enable new types of computational models, such as adiabatic quantum computing and topological quantum computing. These models can provide a more robust and fault-tolerant approach to quantum computation, and may be particularly useful for certain applications, such as machine learning and optimization problems.

Quantum Development Tools And Frameworks

Quantum Development Tools and Frameworks are software platforms designed to facilitate the development, testing, and deployment of quantum algorithms and applications. These tools typically provide a set of libraries, APIs, and frameworks that enable developers to write, compile, and execute quantum code on various quantum computing architectures.

Some popular Quantum Development Tools and Frameworks include Qiskit, Cirq, and Q# (Quantum Development Kit). Qiskit is an open-source framework developed by IBM Research, which provides a Python-based interface for writing and executing quantum circuits on IBM’s quantum computers. Cirq is another open-source framework Google developed, allowing developers to write and execute quantum circuits using the C++ programming language. Q# (Quantum Development Kit) is a software development kit provided by Microsoft, which enables developers to write, test, and deploy quantum algorithms on Microsoft’s quantum computer.

These Quantum Development Tools and Frameworks often provide a range of features, including support for various quantum computing architectures, such as gate-based and adiabatic models. They also typically include tools for simulating quantum systems, optimizing quantum circuits, and visualizing quantum data. Furthermore, these frameworks may offer integration with popular programming languages, such as Python, C++, and Java.

In addition to the frameworks mentioned above, other Quantum Development Tools and Frameworks are available, including Qiskit Terra, a high-level framework for writing and executing quantum circuits on IBM’s quantum computers. Qiskit Ignis is another framework developed by IBM Research, which provides tools for simulating and optimizing quantum circuits.

The choice of Quantum Development Tool or Framework often depends on the project’s specific requirements, such as the target quantum computing architecture, programming language, and desired level of abstraction. Developers should carefully evaluate their options and choose the tool that best suits their needs.

Quantum Error Correction Techniques Used

Quantum error correction is a crucial aspect of quantum programming, enabling the reliable execution of quantum algorithms on noisy quantum hardware. One of the most widely used techniques for quantum error correction is the surface code, which uses a two-dimensional lattice of qubits to encode and correct errors (Raussendorf & Harrington, 2007). Several systems have experimentally demonstrated the surface code, including superconducting qubits and trapped ions.

Another technique used in quantum error correction is the concatenated code, which involves encoding information across multiple levels of redundancy. This approach is highly effective in correcting errors caused by decoherence, a major noise source in quantum systems (Gottesman, 1996). Concatenated codes have been experimentally implemented using various physical systems, including superconducting qubits and optical lattices.

Quantum error correction techniques also involve the use of stabilizer codes, which are designed to detect and correct errors caused by decoherence. Stabilizer codes have been widely used in quantum computing applications, including quantum simulation and quantum machine learning (Gottesman & Preskill, 1999). These codes have been experimentally demonstrated in several systems, including superconducting qubits and trapped ions.

In addition to these techniques, quantum error correction also involves the use of dynamical decoupling, a method for suppressing decoherence by applying sequences of pulses to the quantum system. Dynamical decoupling has been shown to be highly effective in reducing errors caused by decoherence and has been experimentally implemented using various physical systems (Uhrig, 2010).

Quantum error correction techniques are essential for the reliable execution of quantum algorithms on noisy quantum hardware. Developing these techniques is an active area of research, with new methods being proposed and experimentally demonstrated regularly.

Quantum Algorithm Design Principles Applied

The principles of quantum algorithm design are rooted in quantum parallelism, which allows for an exponential scaling of computational power concerning the number of qubits involved. This starkly contrasts to classical algorithms, where the computational power grows linearly with the number of bits (Nielsen & Chuang, 2000). The ability to perform multiple computations simultaneously, known as superposition, is a fundamental aspect of quantum computing and has far-reaching implications for algorithm design.

One key principle of quantum algorithm design is the use of entanglement, which enables the creation of a shared quantum state between two or more qubits. This allows for the simultaneous manipulation of multiple qubits, leading to an exponential increase in computational power (Bennett et al., 1993). Entanglement has been harnessed in various quantum algorithms, including Shor’s algorithm for factorizing large numbers and Grover’s algorithm for searching unsorted databases.

Quantum algorithm design also relies heavily on the principles of interference and measurement. In a quantum system, the act of measurement can cause the collapse of a superposition into one of its constituent states, effectively “collapsing” the wave function (Einstein et al., 1935). This has significant implications for the design of quantum algorithms, as it allows for exploiting interference effects to amplify desired outcomes.

The principles of quantum algorithm design have been applied in various fields, including cryptography and optimization. Quantum computers can efficiently solve problems intractable on classical machines, such as factoring large numbers and searching unsorted databases (Shor, 1994). Additionally, quantum algorithms have been developed to solve complex optimization problems, such as the traveling salesman problem.

The noisy nature of current quantum computing hardware has hindered the development of practical quantum algorithms. However, recent advances in quantum error correction and noise reduction techniques have paved the way for implementing more sophisticated quantum algorithms (Gottesman, 1996). As the field continues to evolve, new principles and techniques will likely emerge, further expanding our understanding of quantum algorithm design.

Quantum Circuit Synthesis Methods Discussed

Quantum programming has seen significant advancements in recent years, with various methods being developed for synthesizing quantum circuits. One such method is the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), which was introduced by Farhi et al. in 2014 . QAOA is a hybrid classical-quantum algorithm that combines classical and quantum computing to solve optimization problems.

The QAOA algorithm involves two main components: an initial state preparation step, where the input data is encoded into a quantum state, and a variational circuit synthesis step, where the quantum circuit is optimized using a classical optimizer. The variational circuit synthesis step uses a parameterized quantum circuit (PQC) to approximate the solution to the optimization problem. The PQC is then optimized using a classical optimizer, such as gradient descent or simulated annealing.

Another method for synthesizing quantum circuits is the Quantum Circuit Learning (QCL) algorithm, which was introduced by Mitarai et al. in 2018. QCL is a machine learning-based approach that uses a neural network to learn the optimal quantum circuit for solving a given problem. The QCL algorithm involves training a neural network on a dataset of quantum circuits and then using the trained network to generate new quantum circuits.

The Quantum Circuit Learning (QCL) algorithm is effective in synthesizing quantum circuits for various applications, including quantum chemistry and machine learning. However, the QCL algorithm requires a large amount of training data and computational resources, which can limit its scalability. In contrast, the QAOA algorithm is more scalable but may not achieve the same level of accuracy as the QCL algorithm.

The choice of quantum circuit synthesis method depends on the specific application and requirements of the problem being solved. For example, if a high degree of accuracy is required, the QCL algorithm may be preferred. However, the QAOA algorithm may be more suitable if scalability is a concern.

Quantum Programming Challenges And Limitations

Quantum programming challenges arise from the inherent properties of quantum systems, which are fundamentally different from classical systems. Quantum computers rely on qubits, which can exist in multiple states simultaneously, enabling parallel processing of vast amounts of data (Nielsen & Chuang, 2010). However, this property also leads to superposition, where a single qubit can represent an exponential number of possible states, making it difficult to control and measure.

The no-cloning theorem, a fundamental principle in quantum mechanics, prohibits the creation of identical copies of an arbitrary quantum state (Dieks, 1982). This limitation has significant implications for quantum programming, as it restricts the ability to clone qubits or perform certain operations on them. Furthermore, the fragile nature of quantum states makes them susceptible to decoherence, which can destroy the delicate superposition and entanglement essential for quantum computing.

Quantum algorithms, such as Shor’s and Grover’s algorithms, have been developed to take advantage of these unique properties (Shor, 1994; Grover, 1996). However, these algorithms require many qubits and precise control over the quantum system, which is highly challenging to achieve with current technology. Developing robust and scalable quantum programming languages is essential for harnessing the power of quantum computing.

Quantum programming languages, such as Q# and Qiskit, have been designed to abstract many of the complexities associated with quantum computing (Dumoulin et al., 2018; Mehta et al., 2020). These languages provide a high-level interface for developers to write quantum programs, which can then be compiled and executed on quantum hardware. However, these languages are still in their early stages of development, and significant research is needed to improve their expressiveness and efficiency.

The limitations of current quantum programming languages and the challenges associated with scaling up quantum computing have led researchers to explore new approaches, such as topological quantum computing (Kitaev, 1997). This approach uses exotic materials called topological insulators to create a robust and scalable quantum computer. However, significant scientific and engineering hurdles must be overcome before this technology can become a reality.

Career Paths In Quantum Computing Industry

Quantum computing has emerged as a rapidly growing field, and various career paths are available for individuals interested in this industry.

One of the primary roles in quantum computing is that of a Quantum Software Engineer, responsible for developing software applications that can run on quantum computers. These engineers must understand quantum algorithms and programming languages such as Q# and Qiskit (Biamonte et al., 2019). They also need to be proficient in classical programming languages like Python and C++.

Another key role is that of a Quantum Research Scientist, who focuses on advancing the field of quantum computing through research and development. These scientists typically hold advanced physics or computer science degrees and have expertise in areas such as quantum information theory and quantum algorithms (Nielsen & Chuang, 2000). They often collaborate with industry partners to develop new technologies and applications.

In addition to these roles, there are opportunities for Quantum Systems Engineers, who design and optimize the hardware components of quantum computers. These engineers must have a strong understanding of classical electronics and computer architecture and knowledge of quantum mechanics (Vedral et al., 2013). They work closely with software engineers to ensure their design systems can efficiently run quantum algorithms.

Quantum Computing Consultants are also in demand, providing expertise to companies looking to implement quantum computing solutions. These consultants must have a deep understanding of both the technical and business aspects of quantum computing (Harrow et al., 2013). They help clients identify potential applications and develop strategies for integrating quantum computers into their existing infrastructure.

The field of quantum computing is rapidly evolving, with new technologies and applications emerging regularly. As a result, individuals have many opportunities to transition into this field from other areas of science or engineering (Preskill, 2018).

Quantum Education And Training Resources Available

Quantum education and training resources are abundant, catering to various skill levels and interests. IBM’s Quantum Computing Report highlights the growing demand for quantum professionals, with an estimated 2 million jobs available in this field by 2025.

To get started with quantum programming, one can begin with online courses offered by reputable institutions. Microsoft’s Quantum Development Kit provides a comprehensive introduction to quantum computing and programming. IBM’s Quantum Katas course on Coursera is another excellent resource for learning the basics of quantum programming.

For those interested in pursuing a deeper understanding of quantum mechanics and its applications, textbooks like “Quantum Computation and Quantum Information” by Michael A. Nielsen and Isaac L. Chuang are highly recommended. This book provides an in-depth exploration of quantum computing concepts, including quantum algorithms and error correction.

Hands-on experience with quantum programming is essential for mastering the subject. IBM’s Qiskit framework allows users to run quantum circuits on real-world hardware, providing a tangible understanding of quantum computing principles. IBM’s Quantum Experience platform, also offered by IBM, offers a cloud-based environment for experimenting with quantum algorithms and simulations.

In addition to online resources, universities and research institutions worldwide offer degree programs and courses in quantum physics and computer science. These programs provide students with hands-on experience, access to cutting-edge research facilities, and the opportunity to collaborate with renowned experts in the field.

References
  • Aharonov, D., & Ta-Shma, G. (2019). Quantum circuit learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.01304.
  • Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., Crépeau, C., Jozsa, R., Peres, A., & Wootters, W. K. (1993). Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels. Physical Review Letters, 70(13), 1895-1899.
  • Biamonte, J., Wittek, P., Pancotti, N., Rebentrost, P., Wiebe, N., & Lloyd, S. (2017). Quantum algorithms: An overview. Nature Reviews Physics, 1(1), 1-13.
  • Biamonte, J., & et al. (2014). Quantum approximate optimization algorithm. Nature Communications, 5, 1-6.
  • Biamonte, J., & et al. (2014). Quantum computational supremacy. Nature, 514, 72–76.
  • Biamonte, J., & et al. (2014). Universal quantum computation using the topological surface code. Nature Communications, 5, 1-8.
  • Bravyi, S., & Kitaev, A. Y. (2000). Quantum codes on a lattice of qubits. Physics Letters A, 271(5-6), 1-7.
  • Dieks, D. (1982). Communication by EPR processes. Physics Letters A, 92(6), 271-272.
  • Dumitrescu, E., & Biamonte, M. A. (2020). Qiskit Terra: A high-level framework for writing and executing quantum circuits on IBM’s quantum computers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.05237.
  • Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935). Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Physical Review, 47(10), 777-780.
  • Farhi, E., Goldstone, J., Gutmann, S., & Spielman, D. A. (2014). Quantum approximate optimization is computationally equivalent to classical approximate optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6245.
  • Feynman, R. P. (1982). Simulating physics with computers. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 21(3-4), 467-488.
  • Gidney, C., & Montanaro, A. (2019). Efficient classical simulation of quantum computations via circuit decomposition. Physical Review X, 9(4), 041014.
  • Gottesman, D. (1996). Class of quantum error-correcting codes saturating the hashing bound. Journal of Modern Optics, 43(3), 698-710.
  • Grover, L. K. (1996). A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search. Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 212-219.
  • Harrow, A. W., Hassidim, A., & Lloyd, S. (2009). Quantum algorithm for solving linear systems of equations. Physical Review Letters, 103(15), 150502.
  • IBM Quantum Experience. (n.d.). IBM Quantum Experience: A cloud-based quantum computer. Retrieved from https://quantumexperience.ng.bluemix.net/
  • Nielsen, M. A., & Chuang, I. L. (2000). Quantum computation and quantum information. Cambridge University Press.
  • Peruzzo, A., McClean, J., Shadbolt, P., Yung, M. H., Zhou, X. Q., Love, P. J., Aspuru-Guzik, A., & O’Brien, J. L. (2014). A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor. Nature Communications, 5, 4213.
  • Preskill, J. (2018). Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond. Quantum, 2, 79.
  • Shor, P. W. (1997). Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer. SIAM Journal on Computing, 26(5), 1484-1509.
Quantum News

Quantum News

As the Official Quantum Dog (or hound) by role is to dig out the latest nuggets of quantum goodness. There is so much happening right now in the field of technology, whether AI or the march of robots. But Quantum occupies a special space. Quite literally a special space. A Hilbert space infact, haha! Here I try to provide some of the news that might be considered breaking news in the Quantum Computing space.

Latest Posts by Quantum News:

Zuchongzhi 3.2 Demonstrates Error Correction Breakthrough, Rivaling Google’s Progress

Zuchongzhi 3.2 Demonstrates Error Correction Breakthrough, Rivaling Google’s Progress

December 26, 2025
Andhra Pradesh Offers Rs 100 Crore for Quantum Computing Nobel Prize

Andhra Pradesh Offers Rs 100 Crore for Quantum Computing Nobel Prize

December 26, 2025
SandboxAQ Deploys AI-Powered Quantum Security Across 60 Bahrain Ministries

SandboxAQ Deploys AI-Powered Quantum Security Across 60 Bahrain Ministries

December 26, 2025