Entanglement in Quantum Computing. How Does this Quantum Mechanical Principle Work?

Quantum computing is powered by the quantum mechanical phenomenon of entanglement, where particles become inseparably linked regardless of distance. This revolutionary field has brought us to a new era in information processing, using the principles of quantum mechanics to create a new type of computer.

Unlike classical computers that use bits, quantum computers operate on quantum bits or qubits, harnessing the principles of superposition and entanglement. This scientific discovery and technological innovation could redefine our understanding of computing.

The history of quantum computing is a fascinating journey that has brought us to the brink of a new era in information processing. It is a tale of scientific discovery and technological innovation, where the strange and counterintuitive principles of quantum mechanics have been harnessed to create a new kind of computer.

These quantum computers operate on entirely different principles than their classical counterparts. Instead of bits, they use quantum bits or qubits, which, thanks to the principles of superposition and entanglement, can represent multiple states simultaneously.

The applications of quantum computing are vast and varied, from cryptography and optimization to drug discovery and climate modeling. However, programming these quantum computers to exploit their full potential is a challenge that scientists and engineers are still grappling with. Entanglement, in particular, is a resource that needs to be carefully managed and manipulated to achieve the quantum advantage.

This article delves into the fascinating world of quantum computing, exploring the principle of entanglement and how it works. We trace the history of this field, from the early theoretical foundations to the latest breakthroughs. We examine the unique properties of qubits and the role of superposition and entanglement in quantum computation. We also look at the potential applications of quantum computing and the challenges involved in programming entanglement. Whether you are a seasoned scientist, a tech enthusiast, or a curious reader, join us as we unravel the mysteries of the quantum world.

Understanding the Basics of Quantum Computing

Unlike classical computers that use bits as their smallest information units, quantum computers use quantum bits or qubits. A classical bit can be in one of two states – 0 or 1. However, a qubit can be in a state of 0, 1, or both simultaneously, a phenomenon known as superposition (Nielsen & Chuang, 2010). This ability to exist in multiple states simultaneously allows quantum computers to process vast amounts of data simultaneously.

The principle of superposition is closely tied to another quantum mechanical property called entanglement. Entanglement is a unique quantum phenomenon where two or more particles become linked, and the state of one particle is directly related to the state of the other, no matter the distance between them (Einstein et al., 1935). In quantum computing, entanglement allows for more parallelism and interconnectedness in information processing. This means quantum computers can solve complex problems much faster than classical computers.

Quantum gates, the basic building blocks of quantum circuits, are another fundamental aspect of quantum computing. These gates manipulate the state of qubits and allow for the execution of quantum algorithms; unlike classical gates that perform operations like AND, OR, and NOT, quantum gates perform operations that can change the state of a qubit from a definite state to a superposition of states (Nielsen & Chuang, 2010). This is another factor contributing to quantum computers’ superior computational power.

However, quantum computing also presents several challenges. One of the most significant issues is quantum decoherence. This is the loss of quantum state due to interaction with the environment, which can lead to computational errors (Schlosshauer, 2007). Researchers are actively developing error correction techniques and more stable qubits to mitigate this issue.

Another challenge is scalability. Building a large-scale quantum computer is a daunting task due to the delicate nature of qubits and the difficulty in maintaining their quantum state. However, significant progress has been made in recent years, with companies like IBM and Google announcing quantum processors with increasing qubits.

The History and Evolution of Quantum Computing

The concept of quantum computing was first introduced by physicist Richard Feynman in 1982. Feynman proposed that a quantum computer could simulate the behavior of quantum systems. This task is infeasible for classical computers due to the exponential growth of the state space with the number of particles. Feynman’s idea was revolutionary, suggesting that quantum mechanics could be harnessed to perform computations (Feynman, 1982).

In 1985, David Deutsch of the University of Oxford took Feynman’s idea further by describing the theoretical basis for a universal quantum computer. Deutsch’s quantum Turing machine, as it came to be known, could simulate any physical process, given enough time and resources. This was a significant advancement in the field, providing a concrete model for quantum computation (Deutsch, 1985).

The 1990s saw the development of quantum algorithms that outperform their classical counterparts. In 1994, a mathematician at Bell Labs, Peter Shor, devised a quantum algorithm that could factor large numbers exponentially faster than the best-known classical algorithm. This discovery was significant because factoring large numbers is the basis for many modern encryption schemes. If a large-scale quantum computer could be built, it would be able to crack these codes in a fraction of the time it would take a classical computer (Shor, 1994).

The first experimental demonstrations of quantum computing principles came in the late 1990s and early 2000s. In 1998, Isaac Chuang of IBM and Mark Kubinec of the University of California, Berkeley, led a team. They demonstrated the first quantum logic gate using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). In 2000, a group at the University of Innsbruck in Austria, led by Rainer Blatt, demonstrated a two-qubit quantum computer that could perform simple algorithms (Chuang et al., 1998; Blatt et al., 2000).

The field of quantum computing has continued to evolve rapidly in the 21st century. Quantum computers with dozens of qubits have been built and used to perform increasingly complex calculations. In 2019, a team at Google claimed to have achieved “quantum supremacy” by performing a calculation on a quantum computer that would be practically impossible on a classical computer. However, this claim has been disputed, and the debate over what constitutes “quantum supremacy” continues (Arute et al., 2019).

Despite the rapid progress in the field, many challenges remain in developing practical, large-scale quantum computers. These include issues related to qubit coherence, error correction, and the scaling up of quantum systems. However, the potential of quantum computing to revolutionize fields such as cryptography, material science, and artificial intelligence continues to drive research and investment in this exciting field.

The Concept of Superposition in Quantum Computing

The concept of superposition is a fundamental principle in quantum computing, which sets it apart from classical computing. However, a quantum bit, or qubit, can exist in a superposition of states in quantum computing. This means that a qubit can be in a state that is a combination of both 0 and 1 at the same time (Nielsen & Chuang, 2010). This is not a probabilistic statement but rather a reflection of the qubit’s ability to exist in multiple states simultaneously.

The principle of superposition is derived from the mathematical framework of quantum mechanics. In quantum mechanics, the state of a quantum system is described by a wave function, which is a mathematical function that provides probabilities for the outcomes of measurements of the system. The superposition principle states that any two (or more) quantum states can be added together, or “superposed,” and the result will be another valid quantum state; and conversely, that every quantum state can be represented as a sum of two or more other distinct states (Griffiths, 2005).

The ability of qubits to exist in a superposition of states allows quantum computers to process a vast number of computations simultaneously. This is because each qubit utilized can take on a superposition of values. For example, two qubits can take on four values, three qubits can take on eight values, and so forth. This exponential increase in processing power is one of the key advantages of quantum computing (Mermin, 2007).

However, the superposition of states in a quantum system is not an easy property to maintain. Quantum systems are extremely sensitive to their environments, and any interaction with the outside world can cause the system to lose its superposition and collapse into a single state, a process known as decoherence (Schlosshauer, 2007). This is one of the major challenges in the development of quantum computers.

The Role of Qubits in Quantum Computing

The ability of qubits to exist in multiple states simultaneously allows quantum computers to process a vast number of computations. This is a significant departure from classical computing, where bits must process computations sequentially. The power of quantum computing lies in the ability to perform many calculations simultaneously, which can dramatically increase computational speed for certain types of problems (Preskill, 2018).

Another key property of qubits is entanglement, a quantum phenomenon where two or more particles become linked, and the state of one particle can instantaneously affect the state of the other, no matter the distance between them. This property is leveraged in quantum computing to create a sort of “quantum shortcut,” allowing faster processing times. Entanglement is a fundamental aspect of quantum computing and allows quantum computers to outperform classical computers in certain tasks (Haroche & Raimond, 2006).

Qubits are also subject to quantum interference. This is a phenomenon where the probability amplitudes of a quantum state can interfere constructively or destructively, similar to how waves in the ocean can either build upon or cancel each other out. Quantum interference can be used in quantum computing to manipulate the probabilities of the different states of a qubit, thereby influencing the outcome of computations (Mermin, 2007).

However, qubits are also subject to quantum decoherence, which can cause a quantum system to lose its properties and behave more like a classical system. This is a major challenge in quantum computing, as it can lead to errors in computations. Much research is currently being conducted to find ways to mitigate decoherence and improve the stability of qubits (Schlosshauer, 2007).

Deciphering the Principle of Entanglement in Quantum Computing

Quantum entanglement is a phenomenon where two or more particles become interconnected and instantaneously affect each other’s state, regardless of the distance separating them. Quantum entanglement is a fundamental resource in quantum computing, enabling the creation of quantum bits, or qubits, that can exist in multiple states simultaneously, a stark contrast to classical bits that can only exist in one state at a time.

The principle of entanglement in quantum computing is leveraged to create superposition and interference, two key elements that differentiate quantum computing from classical computing. Superposition allows a qubit to exist in multiple states simultaneously, thereby enabling the simultaneous processing of many computations. This is achieved by entangling the qubits, which instantaneously affect each other’s state. Conversely, interference manipulates the probabilities of the qubits’ states, steering the computation toward the correct answer (Nielsen & Chuang, 2010).

Entanglement is also the driving force behind quantum teleportation. This process allows the state of a qubit to be transferred from one location to another without the physical transportation of the qubit itself. This is achieved by entangling two qubits at a source location, then measuring the state of the original qubit and transmitting this information to the destination. The state of the original qubit is then recreated at the destination, effectively teleporting the qubit’s state (Bennett et al., 1993).

However, maintaining entanglement over long distances and periods is a significant challenge in quantum computing. This is due to a phenomenon known as decoherence, where interaction with the environment causes the qubits to lose their quantum properties. Decoherence is a major obstacle in developing large-scale quantum computers and quantum communication networks (Schlosshauer, 2007).

The principle of entanglement holds immense potential for quantum computing. It is the key to quantum algorithms that can solve certain problems exponentially faster than classical algorithms, such as factoring large numbers and searching unsorted databases (Shor, 1994; Grover, 1996). Moreover, entanglement enables quantum error correction, which protects quantum information from errors due to decoherence and other quantum noise (Shor, 1995).

How Entanglement Works in Quantum Mechanics

This concept was proposed by Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen in 1935 in what is now known as the EPR paradox (Einstein et al., 1935). They argued that quantum mechanics was incomplete because it allowed for “spooky action at a distance,” a term coined by Einstein to describe the seemingly impossible instantaneous interaction between entangled particles.

The process of entanglement begins when two particles interact in a way that the quantum state of each particle cannot be described independently of the state of the other, even when a large distance separates the particles. This interaction could be through collision, decay of a particle into two or more particles, or through a measurement that entangles the states of the particles (Horodecki et al., 2009). Once entangled, a change in the state of one particle will instantaneously affect the state of the other, no matter how far apart they are.

The phenomenon of entanglement is best explained using the principles of superposition and wave function collapse in quantum mechanics. When an observation is made on an entangled particle, its wave function collapses to a definite state, and the wave function of the other entangled particle also collapses instantaneously to a correlated state, regardless of the distance between them (Schlosshauer et al., 2013).

Quantum entanglement has been experimentally confirmed through Bell’s theorem experiments. Proposed by physicist John Bell in 1964, Bell’s theorem states that certain predictions of quantum mechanics are incompatible with the concept of local realism, which is the belief that particles have definite states even when not observed and that their behaviors do not depend on distant events (Bell, 1964). Experiments testing Bell’s theorem have shown violations of local realism, providing strong evidence of quantum entanglement.

Despite its counterintuitive nature, quantum entanglement has practical applications. It is the basis for quantum computing, cryptography, and teleportation. In quantum computing, entangled quantum bits (qubits) can represent and process a vast amount of information simultaneously, potentially surpassing the capabilities of classical computers (Nielsen & Chuang, 2010). In quantum cryptography, entanglement is used to create secure communication channels, as any attempt to eavesdrop on the communication would disturb the entangled particles and be detected (Gisin et al., 2002).

Quantum entanglement once considered a philosophical conundrum, has become a central concept in quantum mechanics and a tool for technological innovation. Its existence challenges our intuitive understanding of the world and continues to inspire new questions about the fundamental nature of reality.

Programming Entanglement in Quantum Computing

Programming entanglement in quantum computing involves creating and manipulating qubits so that they become entangled. This is achieved through quantum gates, the basic operations in quantum computing. Quantum gates, unlike classical logic gates, can create entanglement and superposition, another quantum phenomenon where a particle can be in multiple states at once. Quantum gates operate on qubits to change their state, and sequences of these gates can be used to perform complex computations.

Programming entanglement begins with initializing qubits in a specific state, usually the |0⟩ state. Then, quantum gates are applied to these qubits to create entanglement. For instance, the Hadamard gate can be used to put a qubit into a superposition of the |0⟩ and |1⟩ states, and the CNOT gate can be used to entangle two qubits. After applying these gates, the state of the qubits is a superposition of the states of the individual qubits, and measuring one qubit will instantaneously affect the state of the other.

Programming entanglement is not without its challenges. One of the main issues is the fragility of quantum states. Quantum information can be easily lost or corrupted due to environmental interaction, a problem known as decoherence. This makes maintaining and manipulating entangled states over long periods difficult. Error correction and fault tolerance techniques are being developed to mitigate these issues, but they are still a significant obstacle to large-scale quantum computing.

Another challenge is the complexity of quantum algorithms. Quantum algorithms, which leverage entanglement and superposition to perform computations, are often more complex than their classical counterparts. This complexity makes designing and implementing quantum algorithms a difficult task. However, quantum programming and software advances are making this task more manageable.

Despite these challenges, the potential benefits of quantum computing, particularly entanglement, are immense. Entanglement allows for exponential increases in computational power, making it possible to solve problems currently intractable for classical computers. Moreover, entanglement can be used for quantum cryptography, enabling secure communication that is theoretically impossible to eavesdrop on. As our understanding of quantum physics and our ability to manipulate quantum states improve, the possibilities for quantum computing will continue to expand.

Practical Applications of Quantum Entanglement

Quantum entanglement is characterized by the deep correlation between two or more particles such that the state of one particle is immediately connected to the state of the other, regardless of the distance separating them (Einstein et al., 1935).

One of the most promising applications of quantum entanglement is in the field of quantum computing. Quantum computers use quantum bits, or qubits, which can exist in multiple states at once thanks to the principle of superposition. When qubits become entangled, the information they hold becomes interlinked. This allows quantum computers to process many computations simultaneously, potentially solving certain problems faster than classical computers (Nielsen & Chuang, 2000).

Quantum entanglement also has significant potential in the realm of secure communication. Quantum key distribution (QKD) uses entangled particles to transmit information securely. Any attempt to intercept or measure the entangled particles would alter their state, alerting the intended recipients to the breach. This makes QKD potentially unbreakable, assuming perfect implementation (Bennett & Brassard, 1984).

In addition to computing and communication, quantum entanglement could revolutionize imaging techniques. Quantum imaging uses entangled photons to create higher-resolution images and less noise than classical imaging techniques. This could have applications in medical imaging, microscopy, and even satellite imaging (Lemos et al., 2014).

Quantum entanglement could also be used for precise measurements and sensing. Entangled particles can measure physical quantities, such as magnetic fields or gravitational waves, with unprecedented precision. The correlation between entangled particles can reduce noise and improve measurement accuracy (Giovannetti et al., 2004).

Despite these promising applications, the practical implementation of quantum entanglement remains challenging. Issues such as maintaining entanglement over long distances, dealing with quantum decoherence, and scaling up quantum systems are all active areas of research. However, the potential benefits of quantum entanglement are so significant that researchers worldwide are vigorously pursuing these challenges.

The Future of Quantum Computing: Opportunities and Challenges

Quantum computing, a field that marries quantum physics and computer science, is poised to revolutionize the future of information processing. Quantum computers leverage the principles of quantum mechanics to process information in ways that classical computers cannot. This allows quantum computers to perform many calculations simultaneously, potentially solving certain problems faster than classical computers (Nielsen & Chuang, 2010).

However, building a practical quantum computer is a formidable challenge. One of the main obstacles is maintaining quantum coherence, the delicate state in which qubits interact with each other to perform quantum computations. Quantum coherence is easily disrupted by environmental factors such as heat and electromagnetic radiation, a problem known as decoherence. To mitigate decoherence, quantum computers must be isolated from their environment and cooled to temperatures near absolute zero (Devoret & Schoelkopf, 2013).

Another significant challenge is quantum error correction. Due to the fragile nature of quantum states, quantum computers are prone to errors. Classical error correction methods, which rely on redundancy, are not directly applicable to quantum computing because of a principle known as the no-cloning theorem, which states that an unknown quantum state cannot be copied exactly (Preskill, 1998). Researchers are developing quantum error correction codes, but implementing them in a physical system requires many physical qubits for each logical qubit (Terhal, 2015).

Despite these challenges, there are promising developments in the field. For instance, topological quantum computing, which uses anyons (particles that exist only in two dimensions) to store and manipulate information, is theoretically more robust against errors (Nayak et al., 2008). Moreover, quantum algorithms such as Shor’s algorithm for factoring large numbers and Grover’s algorithm for searching unsorted databases have been shown to offer exponential speedup over their classical counterparts (Shor, 1997; Grover, 1996).

The potential applications of quantum computing are vast. In cryptography, quantum computers could break many of the current encryption schemes, necessitating the development of new quantum-resistant algorithms (Bernstein & Lange, 2017). In material science and chemistry, quantum computers could simulate quantum systems with high precision, aiding in designing new materials and drugs (Cao et al., 2019). In machine learning, quantum algorithms could speed up certain tasks, although this is still a topic of active research (Biamonte et al., 2017).

Exploring the Academic Research on Quantum Superposition and Entanglement

Quantum superposition and entanglement are two fundamental principles of quantum mechanics that have been extensively studied in academic research. Quantum superposition refers to the ability of a quantum system to exist in multiple states simultaneously until it is measured. This concept was first proposed by Erwin Schrödinger, one of the pioneers of quantum mechanics, and is best exemplified by his famous thought experiment known as Schrödinger’s cat (Schrödinger, 1935). In this experiment, a cat in a box is alive and dead until observed, illustrating the concept of superposition.

Quantum entanglement, on the other hand, is a phenomenon where two or more particles become interconnected so that the state of one particle is immediately connected to the other, no matter the distance between them.

The phenomenon of quantum entanglement has been experimentally confirmed in numerous studies. For instance, a landmark experiment conducted by Alain Aspect and his colleagues in 1982 demonstrated that entangled photons separated by large distances could influence each other’s states instantaneously, thus confirming the predictions of quantum mechanics and refuting the EPR paradox (Aspect et al., 1982). This experiment has been replicated and refined in subsequent studies, further solidifying the evidence for quantum entanglement.

Quantum superposition, while more difficult to observe directly due to the measurement problem, has also been confirmed in various experiments. For example, a study conducted by Andrew Cleland and his team in 2010 demonstrated quantum superposition in a macroscopic object for the first time (Cleland & Martinis, 2010). They could put a tiny metal paddle into a superposition of vibrating and not vibrating, providing clear evidence for the reality of quantum superposition.

The principles of quantum superposition and entanglement have profound implications for various fields, including quantum computing and cryptography. Quantum computers, for instance, rely on the principle of superposition to perform multiple calculations simultaneously, potentially offering exponential speedup over classical computers (Nielsen & Chuang, 2000). On the other hand, Quantum cryptography uses the principle of entanglement to create unbreakable encryption keys, promising a new era of secure communication (Bennett & Brassard, 1984).

Despite the significant progress made in understanding these phenomena, many questions remain. For instance, physicists still debate the interpretation of quantum superposition and entanglement and their implications for our understanding of reality.

Moreover, the practical applications of these principles, such as quantum computing and cryptography, are still in the early stages and face numerous technical challenges. Nevertheless, the academic research on quantum superposition and entanglement continues to push the boundaries of our understanding of the quantum world, offering exciting possibilities for the future.

References

  • Shor, P. W. (1997). Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer. SIAM Review, 41(2), 303-332.
  • Preskill, J. (1998). Reliable quantum computers. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 454(1969), 385-410.
  • Nielsen, M.A. and Chuang, I.L., 2010. Quantum computation and quantum information: 10th anniversary edition. Cambridge University Press.
  • Biamonte, J., Wittek, P., Pancotti, N., Rebentrost, P., Wiebe, N., & Lloyd, S. (2017). Quantum machine learning. Nature, 549(7671), 195-202.
  • Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W., & Zbinden, H. (2002). Quantum cryptography. Reviews of Modern Physics, 74(1), 145-195.
  • Arute, F., Arya, K., Babbush, R., Bacon, D., Bardin, J. C., Barends, R., … & Chen, Z. (2019). Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature, 574(7779), 505-510.
  • Terhal, B. M. (2015). Quantum error correction for quantum memories. Reviews of Modern Physics, 87(2), 307.
  • Shor, P. W. (1995). Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory. Physical Review A, 52(4), R2493–R2496.
  • Haroche, S., & Raimond, J. M. (2006). Exploring the quantum: Atoms, cavities, and photons. Oxford University Press.
  • Deutsch, D. (1985). Quantum theory, the Church–Turing principle, and the universal quantum computer. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 400(1818), 97-117.
  • Grover, L. K. (1996). A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search. Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, 212–219.
  • Schlosshauer, M., 2007. Decoherence and the quantum-to-classical transition. Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Aspect, A., Dalibard, J., & Roger, G. (1982). Experimental Test of Bell’s Inequalities Using Time-Varying Analyzers. Physical Review Letters, 49, 1804-1807.
  • Preskill, J. (2018). Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond. Quantum, 2, 79.
  • Bennett, C. H., & Brassard, G. (2014). Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing. Theoretical computer science, 560, 7-11.
  • Shor, P. W. (1994). Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring. In Proceedings 35th annual symposium on foundations of computer science (pp. 124-134). IEEE.
  • Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M., & Horodecki, K. (2009). Quantum entanglement. Reviews of Modern Physics, 81(2), 865-942.
  • Schrödinger, E. (1935). Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik. Naturwissenschaften, 23, 807-812.
  • Cao, Y., Romero, J., Olson, J. P., Degroote, M., Johnson, P. D., Kieferová, M., … & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2019). Quantum chemistry in the age of quantum computing. Chemical Reviews, 119(19), 10856-10915.
  • Bell, J. S. (1964). On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox. Physics Physique Физика, 1(3), 195-200.
  • Yan, F., Gustavsson, S., Kamal, A., Birenbaum, J., Sears, A. P., Hover, D., … & Oliver, W. D. (2016). The flux qubit was revisited to enhance coherence and reproducibility. Nature Communications, 7(1), 1-8.
  • Lemos, G. B., Borish, V., Cole, G. D., Ramelow, S., Lapkiewicz, R., & Zeilinger, A. (2014). Quantum imaging with undetected photons. Nature, 512(7515), 409–412.
  • Griffiths, D.J., 2005. Introduction to quantum mechanics. Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., Crépeau, C., Jozsa, R., Peres, A., & Wootters, W. K. (1993). Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels. Physical Review Letters, 70(13), 1895–1899.
  • Chuang, I. L., Gershenfeld, N., & Kubinec, M. G. (1998). Experimental implementation of fast quantum searching. Physical Review Letters, 80(15), 3408.
  • Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., & Maccone, L. (2004). Quantum-Enhanced Measurements: Beating the Standard Quantum Limit. Science, 306(5700), 1330–1336.
  • Devoret, M. H., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2013). Superconducting circuits for quantum information: an outlook. Science, 339(6124), 1169-1174.
  • Cleland, A. N., & Martinis, J. M. (2010). A nanometre-scale mechanical electrometer. Nature, 464, 697-703.
  • Nayak, C., Simon, S. H., Stern, A., Freedman, M., & Das Sarma, S. (2008). Non-Abelian anyons and topological quantum computation. Reviews of Modern Physics, 80(3), 1083.
  • Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935). Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? Physical Review, 47(10), 777–780.
  • Feynman, R. P. (1982). Simulating physics with computers. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 21(6-7), 467-488.
  • Blatt, R., & Zoller, P. (2000). Quantum jumps in atomic systems. European Journal of Physics, 21(6), 425.
  • Schlosshauer, M., Kofler, J., & Zeilinger, A. (2013). A Snapshot of Foundational Attitudes Toward Quantum Mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 44(3), 222-230.
  • Mermin, N.D., 2007. Quantum computer science: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.
  • Bennett, C. H., & Brassard, G. (1984). Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing, 175–179.
Kyrlynn D

Kyrlynn D

KyrlynnD has been at the forefront of chronicling the quantum revolution. With a keen eye for detail and a passion for the intricacies of the quantum realm, I have been writing a myriad of articles, press releases, and features that have illuminated the achievements of quantum companies, the brilliance of quantum pioneers, and the groundbreaking technologies that are shaping our future. From the latest quantum launches to in-depth profiles of industry leaders, my writings have consistently provided readers with insightful, accurate, and compelling narratives that capture the essence of the quantum age. With years of experience in the field, I remain dedicated to ensuring that the complexities of quantum technology are both accessible and engaging to a global audience.

Latest Posts by Kyrlynn D:

Google Willow Chip, A Closer Look At The Tech Giant's Push into Quantum Computing

Google Willow Chip, A Closer Look At The Tech Giant’s Push into Quantum Computing

February 22, 2025
15 Of The World's Strangest Robots

15 Of The World’s Strangest Robots

February 10, 2025
ZuriQ, 2D-Ion Trapped Technology Quantum Computing Company From Switzerland

ZuriQ, 2D-Ion Trapped Technology Quantum Computing Company From Switzerland

January 29, 2025