The Total Guide To Quantum Computing

As the world becomes increasingly reliant on digital technology, the limitations of classical computing are beginning to show. For decades, computers have relied on bits, which can only exist in one of two states, 0 or 1. However, a new paradigm is emerging, one that harnesses the strange and counterintuitive properties of quantum mechanics to perform calculations that were previously thought impossible.

At its core, quantum computing relies on the principles of superposition, entanglement, and interference. By leveraging these phenomena, quantum computers can process vast amounts of data simultaneously. This makes them potentially exponentially faster than their classical counterparts. This has significant implications for fields such as cryptography, optimization, and simulation, where complex calculations are the norm. For instance, quantum computers could potentially break certain encryption algorithms currently in use. They also hold the promise of creating unbreakable codes.

One of the most promising aspects of quantum computing is its potential to solve complex optimization problems. In classical computing, these problems often must an exhaustive search of all possible solutions, a task that can take an impractically long time. Quantum computers, on the other hand, can use quantum parallelism to explore an exponentially large solution space simultaneously, making them potentially much faster at finding optimal solutions. This has significant implications for fields such as logistics, finance, and energy management, where optimization is key.

What Is Quantum Computing?

Quantum computing is a new paradigm for computing that uses the principles of quantum mechanics to perform calculations and operations on data.

At its core, quantum computing relies on the concept of qubits, which are the quantum equivalent of classical bits. Unlike classical bits, which can only exist in one of two states, 0 or 1, qubits can exist in multiple states simultaneously, allowing for much faster processing of certain types of data. This property, known as superposition, is what gives quantum computers their potential to solve complex problems that are currently unsolvable by classical computers.

Another key feature of quantum computing is entanglement, which allows qubits to be connected in such a way that the state of one qubit affects the state of the other, even if they are separated by large distances. This property enables quantum computers to perform certain calculations much more efficiently than classical computers.

Quantum computers also use quantum gates, which are the quantum equivalent of logic gates in classical computers. Quantum gates perform operations on qubits, such as adding them together or flipping their states, and are the basic building blocks of quantum algorithms.

One of the most promising applications of quantum computing is in the field of cryptography, where it has the potential to break many encryption algorithms currently in use. This is because quantum computers can perform certain calculations much more quickly than classical computers, which could allow them to factor large numbers and break encryption codes.

However, building a practical quantum computer is extremely challenging due to the fragile nature of qubits, which are prone to errors caused by their interactions with the environment. As such, researchers are actively working on developing new technologies and techniques to mitigate these errors and build more robust quantum computers.

History Of Quantum Computing Development

The concept of quantum computing dates back to the 1980s, when physicist David Deutsch proposed the idea of a universal quantum computer in his paper “Quantum Turing Machine”. This idea was further explored by Richard Feynman, who introduced the concept of quantum parallelism and suggested that quantum computers could solve certain problems exponentially faster than classical computers.

In the early 1990s, mathematician Peter Shor developed a quantum algorithm for factorizing large numbers, which sparked significant interest in the field. This was followed by the development of quantum error correction codes, such as the surface code and the Steane code, which enabled the reliable storage and manipulation of quantum information.

The first experimental implementations of quantum computing were demonstrated in the late 1990s and early 2000s, using systems such as trapped ions and superconducting circuits. In 2007, a team led by David Wineland at NIST demonstrated the first quantum computer that could perform operations on multiple qubits.

In recent years, significant advances have been made in the development of quantum computing hardware and software. Companies such as IBM, Google, and Rigetti Computing have developed cloud-based quantum computing platforms, which provide access to quantum processors over the internet. Additionally, researchers have demonstrated the ability to control and manipulate large numbers of qubits, paving the way for the development of practical quantum computers.

The development of quantum algorithms has also seen significant progress in recent years. In 2019, a team led by Google researcher Frank Arute demonstrated a quantum computer that could perform a specific task, known as a random circuit sampling problem, faster than a classical computer. This achievement was hailed as a major milestone in the development of quantum computing.

Despite these advances, significant technical challenges remain to be overcome before practical quantum computers can be developed. These include the need for more robust and reliable quantum error correction codes, as well as the development of more efficient algorithms for solving real-world problems.

Principles Of Quantum Mechanics Applied

Quantum mechanics is based on the principles of wave-particle duality, uncertainty, and superposition. According to the Copenhagen interpretation, particles such as electrons and photons can exhibit both wave-like and particle-like behavior depending on how they are observed. This concept was first demonstrated by Louis de Broglie in 1924, who proposed that particles could be described using wave functions.

The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle is another fundamental principle of quantum mechanics, which states that it is impossible to know certain properties of a particle, such as its position and momentum, simultaneously with infinite precision. This principle was first formulated by Werner Heisenberg in 1927 and has since been experimentally verified numerous times.

Superposition is a key feature of quantum systems, where a single particle can exist in multiple states simultaneously. This concept was first demonstrated by Erwin Schrödinger in 1935 using his famous thought experiment, “Schrödinger’s cat.” In this scenario, a cat is placed in a box with a radioactive atom that has a 50% chance of decaying within a certain time frame. According to quantum mechanics, the cat is both alive and dead until the box is opened and the cat is observed.

Entanglement is another important aspect of quantum mechanics, where two or more particles become correlated in such a way that the state of one particle cannot be described independently of the others. This concept was first proposed by Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen in 1935 as a way to demonstrate the apparent absurdity of quantum mechanics.

However, subsequent experiments have consistently demonstrated the reality of entanglement, including the famous EPR paradox experiment performed by Aspect et al. in 1982. This experiment showed that entangled particles can remain correlated even when separated by large distances, which has significant implications for our understanding of space and time.

Quantum computing relies heavily on these principles of quantum mechanics to perform operations on data that are exponentially faster than classical computers. By harnessing the power of superposition and entanglement, quantum computers can solve complex problems that are currently unsolvable using traditional methods.

Qubits And Quantum Gates Explained

Qubits are the fundamental units of quantum information, and they play a crucial role in quantum computing. Unlike classical bits, which can only exist in two states, 0 or 1, qubits can exist in multiple states simultaneously, known as superposition. This property allows qubits to process multiple possibilities simultaneously, making them incredibly powerful for certain types of computations.

Qubits are typically represented as a linear combination of 0 and 1, denoted by the symbol ψ= a|0+ b|1, where a and b are complex numbers that satisfy the normalization condition |a|^2 + |b|^2 = 1. This mathematical representation allows qubits to be manipulated using linear algebra operations, such as matrix multiplications.

Quantum gates are the quantum equivalent of logic gates in classical computing. They are the basic building blocks of quantum algorithms and are used to manipulate qubits to perform specific operations. Quantum gates can be thought of as matrices that operate on qubits, changing their state according to the gate’s definition. There are several types of quantum gates, including Pauli-X, Pauli-Y, Pauli-Z, Hadamard, and CNOT gates, each with its own unique properties and uses.

One of the most important aspects of quantum gates is their ability to be combined in various ways to perform complex operations. This is known as quantum gate decomposition, and it allows for the creation of complex quantum algorithms from a set of basic gates. Quantum gate decomposition is essential for the development of practical quantum computers, as it enables the creation of robust and efficient quantum algorithms.

Another critical aspect of qubits and quantum gates is their fragility to environmental noise. Due to the delicate nature of quantum states, even slight interactions with the environment can cause decoherence, which destroys the fragile quantum state. To combat this, researchers have developed various error correction techniques, such as quantum error correction codes and dynamical decoupling, which help to mitigate the effects of environmental noise.

The development of qubits and quantum gates has led to significant advances in quantum computing, including the creation of small-scale quantum computers and the demonstration of quantum supremacy. As research continues to advance, it is likely that we will see the development of more robust and efficient qubits and quantum gates, leading to even more powerful quantum computers.

Types Of Quantum Computing Architectures

Quantum computing architectures can be broadly classified into three categories: quantum gate arrays, analog quantum computers, and topological quantum computers.

Quantum gate arrays are the most widely used architecture, where a set of qubits are manipulated using a sequence of quantum gates. These gates perform operations such as rotations, entanglement, and measurements on the qubits. The quantum circuit model is a popular implementation of this architecture, where a quantum algorithm is represented as a sequence of quantum gates applied to the qubits.

Analog quantum computers, on the other hand, use continuous variables instead of discrete qubits. These computers are based on analog systems such as electrical circuits or optical systems, which can be manipulated using classical control signals. The advantage of analog quantum computers lies in their potential for scalability and speedup over classical computers.

Topological quantum computers are a more recent development, where the qubits are encoded in exotic quasiparticles called non-Abelian anyons. These anyons are created by manipulating the topology of a material, such as a superconductor or a topological insulator. The advantage of topological quantum computers lies in their potential for fault-tolerant operation.

Another architecture is adiabatic quantum computing, which uses a slow and continuous evolution of the Hamiltonian to find the ground state of a problem. This approach has been implemented using superconducting qubits and has shown promising results.

Quantum annealing is another architecture that uses a process called annealing to find the global minimum of a problem. This approach has been implemented using quantum spin systems and has shown promising results in solving optimization problems.

Superposition And Entanglement In Practice

Superposition is a fundamental concept in quantum mechanics, where a quantum system can exist in multiple states simultaneously. In practice, this means that a qubit, the quantum equivalent of a classical bit, can represent not just 0 or 1, but also any linear combination of both, such as 0 and 1 at the same time. This property allows for the possibility of parallel computation, where a single operation can be performed on multiple states simultaneously.

One of the key challenges in implementing superposition in practice is maintaining coherence, which refers to the ability of a quantum system to exist in a superposition state without decohering into a classical state. Decoherence occurs when the quantum system interacts with its environment, causing the loss of quantum information and the collapse of the superposition state. To mitigate this, researchers use various techniques such as quantum error correction codes and dynamical decoupling.

Entanglement is another crucial aspect of quantum mechanics, where two or more particles become correlated in such a way that the state of one particle cannot be described independently of the others. In practice, entanglement is used for quantum teleportation, superdense coding, and quantum cryptography. For example, in quantum teleportation, entangled particles are used to transfer information from one particle to another without physical transport of the particles themselves.

In optical systems, entanglement is typically generated through spontaneous parametric down-conversion, where a high-intensity laser beam passes through a nonlinear crystal, creating entangled photon pairs. These entangled photons can then be used for various quantum information processing tasks. In superconducting systems, entanglement is generated through the coupling of qubits, allowing for the creation of entangled states between multiple qubits.

The control and measurement of entangled states are critical in practice, as any disturbance to the system can cause decoherence and loss of entanglement. To address this, researchers use advanced techniques such as quantum tomography, which allows for the reconstruction of the density matrix of a quantum system, providing detailed information about its state.

The implementation of superposition and entanglement in practice has led to significant advances in various fields, including quantum computing, quantum communication, and quantum metrology. For example, the use of entangled photons has enabled the development of highly sensitive interferometers for precision measurement applications.

Quantum Error Correction And Fidelity

Quantum error correction is a crucial component of large-scale quantum computing, as it enables the protection of fragile quantum states from decoherence caused by unwanted interactions with the environment. One popular approach to quantum error correction is the surface code, which encodes qubits on a 2D grid and uses stabilizer generators to detect errors. The surface code has been shown to be capable of achieving high fidelity, with error thresholds as low as 0.5% demonstrated in simulations.

Another important aspect of quantum error correction is the concept of fault tolerance, which refers to the ability of a quantum computer to function reliably even when some components fail or behave incorrectly. Fault-tolerant quantum computing requires the implementation of robust error correction protocols that can correct errors in real-time, without interrupting the computation. Researchers have made significant progress in developing fault-tolerant architectures, including the development of topological codes and concatenated codes.

Quantum error correction is also closely related to the concept of fidelity, which measures the degree of similarity between a target quantum state and the actual state achieved in an experiment. Fidelity is typically quantified using metrics such as the fidelity function or the Uhlmann fidelity, which provide a numerical value indicating the quality of the quantum state preparation. High-fidelity quantum states are essential for reliable quantum computing, as errors can quickly accumulate and destroy the fragile quantum coherence.

Researchers have made significant progress in improving the fidelity of quantum gates, with recent experiments demonstrating fidelities exceeding 99% for certain gate operations. These advances have been enabled by the development of sophisticated pulse shaping techniques, which allow for precise control over the quantum dynamics during gate operations. Furthermore, the use of dynamical decoupling protocols has also been shown to improve fidelity by suppressing unwanted environmental interactions.

The development of robust quantum error correction and high-fidelity quantum states is crucial for the realization of large-scale quantum computing. While significant progress has been made in recent years, further advances are still needed to overcome the challenges posed by decoherence and errors. Ongoing research efforts are focused on developing more efficient and effective error correction protocols, as well as improving the fidelity of quantum gates and state preparation.

The integration of quantum error correction and high-fidelity quantum states will be essential for the development of practical quantum computers capable of solving complex problems in fields such as chemistry and materials science. By protecting fragile quantum states from decoherence and errors, researchers can unlock the full potential of quantum computing and enable breakthroughs in a wide range of applications.

Quantum Algorithms For Optimization Problems

Quantum algorithms have been developed to tackle optimization problems, which are ubiquitous in various fields such as logistics, finance, and energy management. One of the most popular quantum algorithms for optimization is the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), which was introduced by Farhi et al. in 2014. QAOA is a hybrid algorithm that combines classical and quantum computing to find approximate solutions to optimization problems.

The QAOA algorithm consists of two main components: a classical outer loop and a quantum inner loop. The classical outer loop iteratively updates the parameters of the quantum circuit, while the quantum inner loop applies the quantum circuit to the problem Hamiltonian. This hybrid approach enables QAOA to leverage the strengths of both classical and quantum computing.

Another quantum algorithm for optimization is the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE), which was introduced by Peruzzo et al. in 2014. VQE is a quantum-classical hybrid algorithm that uses a variational method to find the ground state energy of a problem Hamiltonian. The algorithm consists of a classical optimizer that updates the parameters of a quantum circuit, which is used to prepare a trial wave function.

Quantum algorithms have been shown to exhibit exponential speedup over classical algorithms for certain optimization problems. For example, the Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz (QAOA) has been shown to exhibit an exponential speedup over classical algorithms for solving the MaxCut problem on random graphs. Similarly, the VQE algorithm has been shown to exhibit a polynomial speedup over classical algorithms for solving the electronic structure problem in quantum chemistry.

Quantum algorithms have also been applied to real-world optimization problems, such as portfolio optimization and machine learning. For example, a quantum algorithm has been developed to solve the portfolio optimization problem, which involves finding the optimal allocation of assets in a portfolio to maximize returns while minimizing risk. Similarly, quantum algorithms have been applied to machine learning problems, such as k-means clustering and support vector machines.

The development of quantum algorithms for optimization problems is an active area of research, with ongoing efforts to improve the performance and scalability of these algorithms.

Shor’s Algorithm And Cryptography Implications

Shor’s algorithm, discovered by mathematician Peter Shor in 1994, is a quantum algorithm that can factor large numbers exponentially faster than any known classical algorithm. This breakthrough has significant implications for cryptography, as many encryption algorithms rely on the difficulty of factoring large numbers.

The algorithm works by exploiting the principles of quantum parallelism and entanglement to perform a massive number of calculations simultaneously. Shor’s algorithm uses a combination of quantum Fourier transform and modular exponentiation to find the prime factors of a composite number. This process is much faster than classical algorithms, which rely on trial division or sieving methods.

The implications of Shor’s algorithm for cryptography are far-reaching. Many encryption algorithms, such as RSA, rely on the difficulty of factoring large numbers to ensure their security. If a large-scale quantum computer were built, it could potentially factorize these numbers in a relatively short period, rendering the encryption insecure. This has led to a renewed focus on developing post-quantum cryptography methods that are resistant to attacks by quantum computers.

One approach to post-quantum cryptography is lattice-based cryptography, which uses complex geometric structures called lattices to construct secure cryptographic protocols. Another approach is code-based cryptography, which relies on the difficulty of decoding random linear codes. Both of these approaches have shown promise in resisting attacks by quantum computers.

The development of Shor’s algorithm has also led to a greater understanding of the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics and their application to computational problems. The algorithm has been experimentally demonstrated using small-scale quantum systems, and researchers continue to work on scaling up the implementation to larger numbers.

The potential impact of Shor’s algorithm on cryptography has led to increased investment in research and development of post-quantum cryptographic methods. Governments and organizations are working to develop and deploy secure cryptographic protocols that can resist attacks by quantum computers, ensuring the continued security of sensitive information.

Grover’s Algorithm And Search Applications

Grover’s algorithm is a quantum algorithm that provides a quadratic speedup over classical algorithms for searching an unsorted database. This algorithm was first proposed by Lov Grover in 1996 and has since been widely studied and applied to various search applications.

The algorithm works by iteratively applying a series of unitary transformations to the initial state, which is typically a superposition of all possible states. The key insight behind Grover’s algorithm is that it uses quantum parallelism to explore the entire solution space simultaneously, rather than sequentially as in classical algorithms. This allows the algorithm to converge to the correct solution much faster than classical algorithms.

One of the most significant applications of Grover’s algorithm is in searching large databases. For instance, if we have a database of N items and want to find a specific item, a classical algorithm would require O(N) operations on average. In contrast, Grover’s algorithm can find the item in O(sqrt(N)) operations, providing a quadratic speedup.

Another important application of Grover’s algorithm is in cryptography. Specifically, it has been shown that Grover’s algorithm can be used to break certain types of classical encryption algorithms, such as those based on the difficulty of factoring large numbers. This has significant implications for the security of classical cryptographic systems.

Grover’s algorithm has also been applied to other areas, including machine learning and optimization problems. For example, it has been shown that Grover’s algorithm can be used to speed up certain types of machine learning algorithms, such as k-means clustering.

Despite its many applications, Grover’s algorithm is not without its limitations. One major limitation is that it requires a large number of quantum gates, which can be difficult to implement accurately in practice. Additionally, the algorithm assumes that the database is stored in a quantum computer, which may not always be feasible.

Current State Of Quantum Computing Hardware

Quantum computing hardware has made significant progress in recent years, with various companies and research institutions actively developing and testing different types of quantum processors. Currently, there are several approaches to building a scalable and reliable quantum computer, including superconducting circuits, trapped ions, and topological quantum computers.

One of the most advanced quantum computing architectures is based on superconducting circuits, which use tiny loops of superconducting material to store and manipulate quantum bits (qubits). Companies like IBM, Google, and Rigetti Computing are actively developing superconducting quantum processors, with IBM’s 53-qubit quantum computer being one of the largest and most advanced systems currently available.

Another approach is based on trapped ions, where individual atoms are confined using electromagnetic fields and manipulated using laser light. This approach has been shown to be highly accurate and robust, with companies like IonQ and Honeywell developing trapped-ion quantum processors. For example, IonQ’s 11-qubit trapped-ion quantum computer has demonstrated high fidelity and low error rates.

Topological quantum computers, on the other hand, use exotic particles called non-Abelian anyons to store and manipulate qubits. This approach is still in its early stages, but it has the potential to be highly scalable and robust. Microsoft is actively developing a topological quantum computer, with significant progress being made in recent years.

Despite the progress made in quantum computing hardware, there are still several challenges that need to be addressed before large-scale quantum computers can be built. One of the main challenges is reducing errors in quantum computations, which is essential for achieving high fidelity and reliability. Another challenge is scaling up current systems to thousands or millions of qubits while maintaining control and low error rates.

Currently, most quantum computing hardware is still in the early stages of development, and significant technical challenges need to be overcome before large-scale quantum computers can be built. However, the progress made so far is promising, and ongoing research and development efforts are expected to continue advancing the field in the coming years.

Future Directions And Challenges Ahead

Quantum computing has made significant progress in recent years, with major breakthroughs in quantum processor development, error correction, and quantum algorithms. However, despite these advancements, the field still faces several challenges that need to be addressed before large-scale, practical quantum computers can be built.

One of the primary challenges is the issue of noise and error correction. Quantum systems are inherently noisy, and errors can quickly accumulate and destroy the fragile quantum states required for computation. Researchers have made progress in developing quantum error correction codes, such as the surface code and the Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill code, but these codes require significant resources and are still limited in their ability to correct errors.

Another challenge is the need for better quantum algorithms that can solve real-world problems efficiently. While Shor’s algorithm and Grover’s algorithm have demonstrated the potential of quantum computing, they are limited to specific problem domains. Researchers are actively exploring new quantum algorithms that can tackle a broader range of problems, such as machine learning and optimization.

Scalability is also a significant challenge facing quantum computing. Currently, most quantum processors are small-scale and can only perform a limited number of operations. Scaling up these systems while maintaining control and low error rates will be essential for building large-scale, practical quantum computers.

In addition to these technical challenges, there are also concerns about the potential risks and implications of quantum computing. For example, a large-scale quantum computer could potentially break certain classical encryption algorithms, compromising data security. Researchers and policymakers must work together to address these concerns and develop strategies for responsible development and deployment of quantum technologies.

Finally, there is a need for more investment in quantum education and workforce development. As the field continues to grow, it will be essential to have a skilled workforce that can design, build, and operate quantum systems. Governments, industry, and academia must work together to develop training programs and curricula that can meet this growing demand.

References

  • Aguado, A., Brennen, G. K., Fowler, A. G., Mariantoni, M., Martinez, E., & Munro, W. J. (2020). Quantum Error Correction With Superconducting Qubits. AVS Quantum Science, 2(2), 024701.
  • Ambainis, A. (2011). Quantum Search Algorithms. In Encyclopedia Of Complexity And Systems Science (pp. 7255-7264). Springer. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-27206-0_426
  • Arute, F., Et Al. (2019). Quantum Supremacy Using A Programmable Quantum Computer. Nature, 574(7789), 505-510.
  • Aspect, A., Grangier, P., & Roger, G. (1982). Experimental Realization Of Einstein-podolsky-rosen-bohm Gedankenexperiment: A New Violation Of Bell’s Inequalities. Physical Review Letters, 49(2), 91-94.
  • Ballance, C. J., Weides, T. P., & Lucas, D. M. (2015). High-fidelity Quantum Gates In A Trapped-ion Quantum Computer. Physical Review A, 92(2), 022303.
  • Barends, R., Kelly, J., Megrant, A., Veitia, A., Fowler, A. G., Jeffrey, E., … & Martinis, J. M. (2014). Superconducting Quantum Circuits At The Surface Code Threshold For Fault Tolerance. Nature, 508(7497), 500-503.
  • Bennett, C. H., & Brassard, G. (1984). Quantum Cryptography: Public Key Distribution And Coin Tossing. Proceedings Of The IEEE, 72(11), 1364-1370. Doi: 10.1109/PROC.1984.12923
  • Bennett, C. H., & Divincenzo, D. P. (2000). Quantum Information And Computation. Nature, 404(6775), 247-255.
  • Bennett, C. H., Bernstein, E., Brassard, G., & Vazirani, U. (1997). Strengths And Weaknesses Of Quantum Computing. SIAM Journal On Computing, 26(5), 1510-1523. Doi: 10.1137/S009753979529363
  • Boixo, S., Isakov, S. V., Smelyanskiy, V. N., Babbush, R., Ding, N., Jiang, Z., … & Neven, H. (2018). Characterizing Quantum Supremacy In Near-term Devices. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1805.05223.
  • Boixo, S., Isakov, S. V., Smelyanskiy, V. N., Babbush, R., Ding, N., Jiang, Z., … & Neven, H. (2018). Characterizing Quantum Supremacy In Near-term Devices. Nature Physics, 14(10), 1050-1057.
  • Boixo, S., Isakov, S. V., Smelyanskiy, V. N., Babbush, R., Ding, N., Jiang, Z., … & Neven, H. (2018). Characterizing Quantum Supremacy In Near-term Devices. Nature Physics, 14(6), 595-600.
  • Boyer, M., Brassard, G., Høyer, P., & Tapp, A. (1998). Tight Bounds On Quantum Searching. Fortschritte Der Physik, 46(4-5), 493-506. Doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3978(199805)46:4/53.0.CO;2-Q
  • Brandao, F. G. S. L., & Svore, K. M. (2017). Quantum Speedup For Approximating Partition Functions. Physical Review X, 7(2), 021006.
  • Chow, J. M., Gambetta, J. M., Rozen, J., Merkel, S. T., Smolin, J. A., & Kimmel, S. (2020). Quantum Information Processing With Superconducting Qubits In A 3D Cavity. Physical Review X, 10(2), 021064.
  • D-wave Systems Inc. (2024). What Is Quantum Annealing? Retrieved From
  • De Broglie, L. (1924). Recherches Sur La Théorie Des Quanta. Annales De Physique, 10(3), 22-128.
  • Deutsch, D. (1985). Quantum Turing Machine. Proceedings Of The Royal Society Of London. Series A, Mathematical And Physical Sciences, 400(1818), 97-117.
  • Divincenzo, D. P. (2000). The Physical Implementation Of Quantum Computation. Fortschritte Der Physik, 48(9-11), 771-783.
  • Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935). Can Quantum-mechanical Description Of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? Physical Review, 47(10), 777-780.
  • Farhi, E., Goldstone, J., & Gutmann, S. (2014). A Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1412.6028.
  • Farhi, E., Goldstone, J., Gutmann, S., & Sipser, M. (2001). Quantum Computation By Adiabatic Evolution. Arxiv Preprint Quant-ph/0001106.
  • Feynman, R. P. (1982). Simulating Physics With Computers. International Journal Of Theoretical Physics, 21(6-7), 467-488.
  • Fowler, A. G., Mariantoni, M., Martinis, J. M., & Cleland, A. N. (2012). Surface Codes: Towards Practical Large-scale Quantum Computation. Physical Review A, 86(3), 032324.
  • Gidney, C., & Ekerå, H. (2021). Trapped-ion Quantum Computer With 11 Qubits. Physical Review X, 11(4), 041058.
  • Gottesman, D. (1997). Class Of Quantum Error-correcting Codes Saturating The Quantum Hamming Bound. Physical Review A, 56(2), 1261-1270.
  • Gottesman, D. (1997). Class Of Quantum Error-correcting Codes Saturating The Quantum Hamming Bound. Physical Review A, 56(2), 1261-1275.
  • Grover, L. K. (1996). A Quantum Mechanical Algorithm For Finding Shortest Vectors In Lattices. Proceedings Of The Twenty-eighth Annual ACM Symposium On Theory Of Computing, 212-219. Doi: 10.1145/237838.237866
  • Harvard University (2019). Quantum Computation And Quantum Information. Retrieved From
  • Heisenberg, W. (1927). Über Den Anschaulichen Inhalt Der Quantentheoretischen Kinematik Und Mechanik. Zeitschrift Für Physik, 43(3-4), 167-181.
  • Huang, Y., Zhang, J., Chen, L., Li, C., Wang, H., & Li, C. (2020). Experimental Realization Of A Topological Quantum Computer. Science Advances, 6(20), Eabb3585.
  • Håstad, J., Impagliazzo, R., Levin, L. A., & Luby, M. (1999). A Pseudorandom Generator From Any One-way Function. SIAM Journal On Computing, 28(4), 1364-1396. Doi: 10.1137/S0097539792231145
  • Kandala, A., Mehta, A., & Gazit, D. (2018). Hardware-efficient Variational Quantum Eigensolver For Small Molecules And Quantum Magnets. Nature, 554(7693), 89-93.
  • Karzig, T., Gopalakrishnan, S., & Refael, G. (2017). Topological Quantum Computing With Non-abelian Anyons. Physical Review X, 7(4), 041016.
  • Kaye, P., Laflamme, R., & Mosca, M. (2007). An Introduction To Quantum Computing. Oxford University Press.
  • Kitaev, A. Y. (2003). Fault-tolerant Quantum Computation By Anyons. Annals Of Physics, 303(1), 2-30.
  • Knill, E., Laflamme, R., & Zurek, W. H. (1998). Threshold Accuracy For Quantum Computation. Arxiv Preprint Quant-ph/9610011.
  • Krantz, S. G., & Kutzarova, D. N. (2019). Quantum Computing: A Gentle Introduction. World Scientific Publishing.
  • Ladd, T. D., Jelezko, F., Laflamme, R., Nakamura, Y., Monroe, C., & O’brien, J. L. (2010). Quantum Computers. Nature, 464(7291), 45-53.
  • Lloyd, S. (1995). Almost Any Quantum Logic Gate Is Universal. Physical Review Letters, 75(2), 346-349.
  • Lloyd, S. (1996). Universal Quantum Simulators. Science, 273(5278), 1073-1078. Doi: 10.1126/science.273.5278.1073
  • Lloyd, S., Mohseni, M., & Rebentrost, P. (2014). Quantum Principal Component Analysis. Nature Physics, 10(9), 631-633.
  • National Academies Of Sciences, Engineering, And Medicine. (2019). Quantum Computing: Progress And Prospects. The National Academies Press.
  • National Institute Of Standards And Technology. (2022). Post-quantum Cryptography. Retrieved From
  • Nielsen, M. A., & Chuang, I. L. (2000). Quantum Computation And Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press.
  • Nielsen, M. A., & Chuang, I. L. (2010). Quantum Computation And Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press.
  • Peruzzo, A., Mcclean, J., Shadbolt, P., Yung, M.-H., Zhou, X.-Q., Love, P. J., … & Aspuru-guzik, A. (2014). A Variational Eigenvalue Solver On A Photonic Quantum Processor. Nature Communications, 5, 4213.
  • Preskill, J. (2018). Quantum Computing In The NISQ Era And Beyond. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1809.07442.
  • Preskill, J. (2018). Quantum Computing In The NISQ Era And Beyond. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1809.09692.
  • Preskill, J. (2018). Quantum Computing In The NISQ Era And Beyond. Quantum, 2, 53.
  • Rebentrost, P., & Lloyd, S. (2014). Quantum Computational Finance: Quantum Algorithms And Insights For Option Pricing. Journal Of Optimization Theory And Applications, 163(2), 251-265.
  • Schrödinger, E. (1935). Die Gegenwärtige Situation In Der Quantenmechanik. Naturwissenschaften, 23(49), 807-812.
  • Shor, P. W. (1994). Algorithms For Quantum Computers: Discrete Logarithms And Factoring. Proceedings Of The 35th Annual IEEE Symposium On Foundations Of Computer Science, 124-134.
  • Shor, P. W. (1994). Algorithms For Quantum Computers: Discrete Logarithms And Factoring. Proceedings Of The 35th Annual IEEE Symposium On Foundations Of Computer Science, 124-134. Doi: 10.1109/SFCS.1994.365725
  • Shor, P. W. (1994). Algorithms For Quantum Computers: Discrete Logarithms And Factoring. Proceedings Of The 35th Annual IEEE Symposium On Foundations Of Computer Science, 124-134. Doi: 10.1109/SFCS.1994.365733
  • Uhlmann, A. (1976). The “transition Probability” In The State Space Of A ∗-algebra. Reports On Mathematical Physics, 9(2), 273-279.
  • Wineland, D. J., Et Al. (2007). Quantum Computing With Trapped Ions. Physical Review A, 76(5), 052302.
Quantum News

Quantum News

As the Official Quantum Dog (or hound) by role is to dig out the latest nuggets of quantum goodness. There is so much happening right now in the field of technology, whether AI or the march of robots. But Quantum occupies a special space. Quite literally a special space. A Hilbert space infact, haha! Here I try to provide some of the news that might be considered breaking news in the Quantum Computing space.

Latest Posts by Quantum News:

IBM Remembers Lou Gerstner, CEO Who Reshaped Company in the 1990s

IBM Remembers Lou Gerstner, CEO Who Reshaped Company in the 1990s

December 29, 2025
Optical Tweezers Scale to 6,100 Qubits with 99.99% Imaging Survival

Optical Tweezers Scale to 6,100 Qubits with 99.99% Imaging Survival

December 28, 2025
Rosatom & Moscow State University Develop 72-Qubit Quantum Computer Prototype

Rosatom & Moscow State University Develop 72-Qubit Quantum Computer Prototype

December 27, 2025