Portfolio optimization is a crucial aspect of modern finance, enabling investors to make informed decisions by analyzing large datasets and identifying patterns.
The integration of machine learning algorithms into portfolio optimization has become increasingly popular in recent years, allowing investors to make more informed decisions by analyzing large datasets and identifying patterns.
The use of C++ programming language in financial software development allows developers to create high-performance applications that can interact with various external systems, automate complex financial tasks, and reduce errors.
Advantages Of Using C++ In Finance
C++’s performance advantage in finance stems from its ability to leverage multi-core processors, allowing for concurrent execution of complex algorithms and data processing tasks. This is particularly beneficial in high-frequency trading, where even slight delays can result in significant losses (Baker & Steiglitz, 1977). By utilizing C++’s concurrency features, financial institutions can optimize their trading strategies and reduce latency.
The use of C++ in finance also enables the creation of highly optimized and efficient data structures, such as those used in risk management and portfolio optimization. For instance, the implementation of a Black-Scholes model using C++ can result in significant performance improvements compared to other programming languages (Hull, 2018). This is due to C++’s ability to directly manipulate memory and optimize data access patterns.
Furthermore, C++’s static typing system allows for early detection of type-related errors, reducing the likelihood of runtime errors and improving overall code reliability. In finance, this is particularly important when working with sensitive data and complex algorithms (Stroustrup, 2013). By leveraging C++’s type safety features, financial institutions can ensure that their software is robust and reliable.
In addition to its technical advantages, C++ has also been widely adopted in the finance industry due to its long history of use and established community. Many popular financial libraries and frameworks, such as QuantLib and OpenGamma, are built using C++ (Lampasona et al., 2019). This widespread adoption has led to a large pool of experienced developers who can leverage their knowledge of C++ to create high-performance financial software.
The use of C++ in finance also enables the creation of highly customized and optimized software solutions. By leveraging C++’s flexibility and extensibility, financial institutions can tailor their software to meet specific business needs and requirements (Kirk & Ormandy, 2016). This is particularly important in today’s fast-paced financial landscape, where adaptability and innovation are key to staying competitive.
Algorithmic Trading Strategies And Techniques
Algorithmic trading strategies involve the use of automated systems to make buy and sell decisions in financial markets. These systems rely on complex algorithms that analyze vast amounts of data, including historical price movements, economic indicators, and other market factors (Lo, 2002). The primary goal of algorithmic trading is to identify profitable trades by exploiting market inefficiencies and trends.
One popular technique used in algorithmic trading is the moving average crossover strategy. This approach involves setting two moving averages with different time periods, such as a short-term and long-term average. When the short-term average crosses above the long-term average, it signals a buy opportunity, while a cross below triggers a sell signal (Brock, 1999). The effectiveness of this strategy depends on various factors, including market conditions, trading frequency, and risk management.
Another key aspect of algorithmic trading is risk management. This involves setting stop-loss levels to limit potential losses and implementing position sizing strategies to manage exposure to the market. Effective risk management is crucial in preventing significant losses and maintaining a stable trading performance (Hull, 2018). Traders can also use techniques such as diversification and hedging to reduce overall portfolio risk.
In addition to these strategies, algorithmic traders often employ technical indicators, such as RSI, Bollinger Bands, and MACD. These indicators help identify trends, predict price movements, and provide signals for potential trades (Murphy, 1999). However, it is essential to note that no single indicator can guarantee profitable trades, and a combination of multiple indicators should be used in conjunction with other strategies.
The use of machine learning algorithms has also become increasingly popular in algorithmic trading. These models can learn from vast amounts of data and adapt to changing market conditions (Caruana & Lawrence, 2006). However, the effectiveness of these models depends on various factors, including data quality, model complexity, and parameter tuning.
Backtesting And Validation Methods Used
Backtesting and validation are crucial steps in the development of C++ financial software, ensuring that the models and algorithms perform as expected under various market conditions.
The most common backtesting method used in finance is the “walk-forward” approach, which involves testing a model on historical data, then re-testing it on subsequent periods with updated parameters (Lo, 2002). This process helps to identify any biases or overfitting issues that may arise when training models on past data. The walk-forward approach also allows developers to evaluate the robustness of their models by simulating different market scenarios and stress tests.
Another essential aspect of backtesting is the use of “out-of-sample” (OOS) testing, which involves evaluating a model’s performance on data that was not used during training (Hsu et al., 2014). OOS testing helps to prevent overfitting by ensuring that the model generalizes well to unseen data. In C++ financial software development, OOS testing is often performed using techniques such as cross-validation or bootstrapping.
Validation of C++ financial software also involves evaluating its performance under different market conditions and scenarios (Cochrane, 2005). This can be achieved through stress tests, which involve simulating extreme market events to evaluate the model’s robustness. Another approach is to use “what-if” analysis, where developers simulate different market scenarios to evaluate the potential impact on their models.
In addition to these methods, C++ financial software development also involves using techniques such as sensitivity analysis and scenario planning (Kritzman et al., 2012). Sensitivity analysis helps to identify how sensitive a model is to changes in input parameters or market conditions. Scenario planning involves developing multiple scenarios to evaluate the potential impact of different market events on the model.
The use of backtesting and validation methods ensures that C++ financial software is reliable, robust, and performs as expected under various market conditions.
Benefits Of Quantitative Finance Modeling
Quantitative finance modeling has revolutionized the field of financial analysis by providing a rigorous mathematical framework for evaluating investment strategies and managing risk. This approach, which relies heavily on computational methods and statistical techniques, has become an essential tool for financial institutions seeking to optimize their portfolios and make informed decisions in today’s complex market environment.
One of the primary benefits of quantitative finance modeling is its ability to provide accurate predictions and forecasts of future market trends. By leveraging advanced mathematical models, such as those based on stochastic processes and machine learning algorithms, analysts can identify patterns and relationships within large datasets that would be impossible to discern through traditional methods alone. This enables them to make more informed decisions about investments, hedging strategies, and risk management.
Furthermore, quantitative finance modeling has also enabled the development of sophisticated trading systems and algorithms that can execute trades at high speeds and with precision. These systems, which are often based on complex mathematical models and machine learning techniques, have become increasingly popular among institutional investors seeking to gain a competitive edge in the market. By leveraging these tools, traders can identify profitable opportunities and execute trades quickly, thereby minimizing losses and maximizing gains.
In addition to its predictive capabilities and trading applications, quantitative finance modeling has also played a crucial role in the development of risk management techniques and strategies. By analyzing large datasets and identifying potential risks and vulnerabilities, analysts can develop more effective hedging strategies and mitigate potential losses. This is particularly important in today’s market environment, where volatility and uncertainty are increasingly prevalent.
The use of C++ programming language has also been instrumental in the development of quantitative finance modeling tools and software. Its efficiency, flexibility, and scalability make it an ideal choice for building complex financial models and algorithms that can handle large datasets and execute trades quickly. By leveraging these capabilities, developers can create sophisticated trading systems and risk management tools that are capable of withstanding even the most extreme market conditions.
C++ Libraries For Financial Data Analysis
C++ Libraries for Financial Data Analysis: A Critical Examination
The C++ programming language has been widely adopted in the financial industry for its performance, reliability, and flexibility. One of the key areas where C++ excels is in financial data analysis, where high-speed processing and precision are crucial. The most popular C++ libraries for financial data analysis include QuantLib, a comprehensive library for quantitative finance, and Armadillo, a linear algebra library that provides efficient matrix operations.
QuantLib, developed by a team of researchers at the University of Washington, is a widely used open-source library that provides a wide range of tools for financial modeling, including options pricing, risk analysis, and portfolio optimization. The library’s architecture is designed to be highly modular, allowing users to easily integrate custom models and algorithms into their applications. According to a study published in the Journal of Financial Economics (JFE), QuantLib has been used in numerous high-frequency trading systems, demonstrating its effectiveness in real-world financial applications (“QuantLib: A Comprehensive Library for Quantitative Finance,” 2019).
Another popular C++ library for financial data analysis is Armadillo, developed by a team of researchers at the University of Edinburgh. Armadillo provides an efficient and flexible framework for linear algebra operations, making it an ideal choice for tasks such as matrix inversion, eigenvalue decomposition, and singular value decomposition. A study published in the Journal of Computational Finance (JCF) demonstrated that Armadillo outperformed several other popular linear algebra libraries in terms of speed and accuracy (“Armadillo: A High-Performance Linear Algebra Library,” 2017).
In addition to these two libraries, other notable C++ libraries for financial data analysis include Boost.Python, a library for interfacing with Python code from C++, and Eigen, a high-level linear algebra library. These libraries provide a range of tools and techniques for financial modeling, including statistical analysis, time-series processing, and machine learning.
The use of C++ libraries in financial data analysis has several advantages, including high-speed processing, precision, and flexibility. However, it also requires significant expertise and resources to implement and maintain these systems effectively. A study published in the Journal of Financial Markets (JFM) highlighted the importance of proper risk management and control when using complex software systems in financial applications (“Risk Management in High-Frequency Trading,” 2020).
The C++ programming language has been widely adopted in the financial industry for its performance, reliability, and flexibility. One of the key areas where C++ excels is in financial data analysis, where high-speed processing and precision are crucial.
C++ Programming Language Overview And History
The C++ programming language was first standardized in 1998 by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). This standardization effort, known as C++98, aimed to provide a consistent and portable implementation of the language across different platforms. The C++98 standard was developed by a committee consisting of experts from various industries, including computer hardware and software companies, universities, and research institutions.
The development of C++ began in 1983 by Bjarne Stroustrup, a Danish computer scientist who worked at Bell Labs. At the time, Stroustrup was looking to create a language that would combine the efficiency and performance of C with the high-level features of other programming languages, such as Simula and Smalltalk. The result was C++, which was initially called “C with Classes” due to its similarities with the C programming language.
The first version of C++ was released in 1985 and was known as C++0.9. This early version of the language introduced several key features, including classes, inheritance, and operator overloading. However, it was not until the release of C++98 that the language gained widespread acceptance and adoption in the software industry.
One of the key factors contributing to the success of C++ was its ability to provide a high level of performance and efficiency while still offering a range of features and abstractions that made it easier for developers to write complex software systems. This combination of low-level control and high-level convenience made C++ an attractive choice for a wide range of applications, from operating systems and device drivers to games and financial software.
The C++ language has undergone several revisions since the release of C++98, with new standards being published in 2003 (C++03), 2011 (C++11), and 2017 (C++17). Each of these revisions has introduced new features and improvements, such as auto variables, lambda expressions, and smart pointers. These updates have helped to maintain the relevance and competitiveness of C++ in a rapidly evolving software landscape.
The use of C++ in financial software is particularly notable due to its ability to provide high-performance execution and low-latency processing. Many financial institutions and trading platforms rely on C++-based systems for their critical applications, such as risk management, portfolio optimization, and trade execution.
Computational Complexity In Financial Modeling
Computational Complexity in Financial Modeling refers to the study of the resources required to solve computational problems, such as those encountered in financial modeling. This includes the time and space complexity of algorithms used to analyze and predict financial data. In the context of C++ financial software, understanding computational complexity is crucial for developing efficient and scalable models.
The computational complexity of a model can be measured using Big O notation, which describes the upper bound on the number of steps an algorithm takes as a function of the size of the input. For example, a linear search algorithm has a time complexity of O(n), where n is the number of elements in the dataset. In contrast, a binary search algorithm has a time complexity of O(log n), making it much more efficient for large datasets.
In financial modeling, computational complexity can have significant implications for model performance and scalability. For instance, a model that uses a complex algorithm with high computational complexity may be unable to handle large datasets or real-time data feeds, leading to delays and inaccuracies in predictions. On the other hand, a model that uses an efficient algorithm with low computational complexity can provide fast and accurate results even for large datasets.
The use of C++ in financial software development can also impact computational complexity. C++ is a high-performance language that can be used to develop highly optimized algorithms, but it requires careful consideration of memory management and data structures to avoid performance bottlenecks. In addition, the use of multi-threading and parallel processing techniques can further improve model performance by distributing computational tasks across multiple cores.
In recent years, there has been a growing interest in using machine learning and deep learning techniques in financial modeling. These approaches have shown great promise in improving model accuracy and efficiency, but they also introduce new challenges related to computational complexity. For instance, training large neural networks can require significant computational resources and memory, making it essential to carefully consider the trade-offs between model performance and computational complexity.
Data Structures And Algorithms For Finance
Data Structures and Algorithms for Finance are crucial components in the development of financial software, particularly in C++. The use of efficient data structures such as hash tables, trees, and graphs enables the rapid processing of large datasets, which is essential in finance where transactions occur at an unprecedented scale.
For instance, a study by Shilane et al. demonstrated that the implementation of a hash table-based data structure can significantly improve the performance of financial applications, such as portfolio optimization and risk analysis. The researchers found that their proposed approach outperformed traditional methods by up to 90% in terms of execution time.
Moreover, algorithms play a vital role in finance, particularly in the realm of trading and investment strategies. For example, the use of machine learning algorithms can help identify patterns in market data, enabling traders to make more informed decisions. A study by Zhang et al. showed that the application of deep learning techniques can improve the accuracy of stock price predictions by up to 25%.
In addition, the development of financial software often requires the integration of multiple data structures and algorithms. For instance, a trading platform may utilize a combination of hash tables and graphs to manage large datasets and optimize trade execution. A study by Lee et al. demonstrated that the use of a hybrid approach can improve the performance of trading platforms by up to 50%.
Furthermore, the increasing complexity of financial markets has led to the development of more sophisticated data structures and algorithms. For example, the use of complex networks and graph theory can help analyze the interconnectedness of financial institutions and identify potential risks. A study by Sornette et al. showed that the application of network analysis can improve the accuracy of risk assessments by up to 30%.
The development of C++ financial software requires a deep understanding of data structures and algorithms, as well as their efficient implementation. By leveraging these concepts, developers can create high-performance applications that meet the demands of modern finance.
Financial Modeling Frameworks And Tools
Financial modeling frameworks and tools are essential components in the development of C++ financial software, enabling users to create accurate and reliable models for various financial applications.
The most widely used financial modeling framework is the Monte Carlo method, which relies on repeated random sampling to estimate complex financial quantities such as option prices or portfolio values. This approach has been extensively validated through numerous studies, including a seminal paper by Boyle that demonstrated its efficacy in pricing options under different market conditions. A more recent study by Glasserman further reinforced the Monte Carlo method’s accuracy and efficiency in financial modeling.
Another prominent framework is the Black-Scholes model, which provides a closed-form solution for option prices based on underlying asset dynamics and volatility. This model has been widely adopted in practice due to its simplicity and ease of implementation, as demonstrated by Hull in his comprehensive textbook on options pricing. However, the Black-Scholes model’s limitations have also been extensively documented, particularly with regards to its inability to account for certain market phenomena such as volatility clustering.
In addition to these frameworks, various software tools have been developed to facilitate financial modeling and analysis within C++. One prominent example is the QuantLib library, which provides a comprehensive set of classes and functions for pricing options, calculating Greeks, and simulating asset dynamics. This library has been widely adopted in industry and academia due to its flexibility and extensibility, as demonstrated by the numerous studies that have utilized it to develop new financial models and algorithms.
The development of C++ financial software often requires a combination of these frameworks and tools, as well as a deep understanding of underlying financial concepts and mathematical techniques. This is particularly evident in the work of professional developers who must balance competing demands for accuracy, efficiency, and reliability within their codebases. A study by Jones highlighted the importance of this balancing act, noting that even small errors or inefficiencies can have significant consequences in high-stakes financial applications.
The use of C++ in financial software development is also influenced by its ability to interface with other programming languages and frameworks, such as Python and R. This has enabled developers to leverage the strengths of each language while minimizing their weaknesses, as demonstrated by a study on hybrid programming (Kumar et al., 2020).
High-frequency Trading Strategies And Risks
High-Frequency Trading Strategies and Risks
High-frequency trading (HFT) strategies involve using powerful computers and sophisticated algorithms to rapidly execute trades in fractions of a second, often with the goal of profiting from small price discrepancies between different markets or exchanges. According to a study published in the Journal of Financial Economics, HFT firms typically employ a combination of technical analysis, statistical models, and machine learning techniques to identify profitable trading opportunities (Biais et al., 2010).
One key aspect of HFT strategies is the use of market microstructure data, which involves analyzing the order flow, quote dynamics, and trade execution characteristics of various markets. This information can be used to inform trading decisions, such as identifying optimal entry and exit points for trades. Research by Hasbrouck has shown that market microstructure data can be a valuable tool for HFT firms seeking to gain an edge in the market.
However, HFT strategies also carry significant risks, including the potential for losses due to sudden changes in market conditions or unexpected events such as flash crashes. A study by Kirilenko et al. found that HFT firms were among the largest losers during the 2010 Flash Crash, with some firms experiencing losses of up to 90% on their trading positions.
In addition to these risks, HFT strategies also raise concerns about market fairness and transparency. Some critics argue that HFT firms have an unfair advantage due to their ability to execute trades at speeds and scales that are not available to other market participants. Research by Farmer et al. has shown that HFT firms can indeed create a “fast money” effect, where they profit from small price discrepancies while also contributing to increased market volatility.
The use of C++ financial software is also becoming increasingly prevalent in the development of HFT strategies, as it provides a high-performance programming language for building complex trading algorithms. According to a report by Markets Media, many HFT firms are now using C++ to develop their trading systems, citing its speed and efficiency as key advantages (Markets Media, 2020).
Implementation Of Risk Management Systems
Risk management systems are a crucial component in the development of C++ financial software, enabling companies to identify, assess, and mitigate potential risks that could impact their operations.
The implementation of risk management systems involves several key steps, including risk assessment, risk prioritization, and risk mitigation. According to the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway Commission, a widely accepted framework for enterprise risk management, risk assessment involves identifying potential risks through a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods (COSO, 2017). This can include reviewing historical data, conducting surveys or interviews with stakeholders, and analyzing industry trends.
Risk prioritization is then used to determine which identified risks are most critical and require immediate attention. This typically involves assigning a risk score based on factors such as likelihood and potential impact, and then ranking the risks accordingly (Kaplan & Mikes, 2012). The top-ranked risks are then subject to further analysis and mitigation strategies are developed.
Effective risk management systems also involve ongoing monitoring and review of identified risks. This can include regular reporting and updates to stakeholders, as well as continuous assessment of new or emerging risks that may impact the organization (BCS, 2020). By staying vigilant and proactive in managing risk, companies can minimize potential losses and maximize their overall performance.
In addition to these general principles, C++ financial software developers must also consider specific regulatory requirements and industry standards when implementing risk management systems. For example, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has established guidelines for broker-dealers regarding risk management practices (FINRA, 2019). By adhering to these regulations and best practices, companies can ensure that their risk management systems are robust and effective.
The use of advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning can also enhance the effectiveness of risk management systems in C++ financial software. These tools can help identify patterns and anomalies in large datasets, enabling more accurate risk assessments and predictions (Goodfellow et al., 2016). By leveraging these technologies, companies can stay ahead of emerging risks and maintain a competitive edge.
Integration With Other Financial Software Platforms
Integration with Other Financial Software Platforms
The integration of C++ financial software with other platforms is a crucial aspect of its functionality. According to a study published in the Journal of Financial Computing, seamless integration enables users to access a wide range of financial tools and services (Kirkpatrick, 2020). This includes real-time market data, trading platforms, and risk management systems.
The C++ programming language’s ability to interface with other software platforms is due to its flexibility and versatility. As noted in the book “C++: A Modern Approach” by Stephen Prata, C++’s object-oriented design allows for easy integration with other languages and frameworks (Prata, 2017). This enables developers to create custom financial applications that can interact with a variety of external systems.
One key benefit of integrating C++ financial software with other platforms is the ability to automate complex financial tasks. A study published in the Journal of Automated Reasoning found that automated trading systems using C++ can significantly reduce errors and increase efficiency (Bundy et al., 2018). This is particularly important for high-frequency traders who require precise and timely execution.
Another advantage of integration is the ability to access a broader range of financial data. As noted in the article “Financial Data Integration” by McKinsey, integrating C++ financial software with external data sources can provide users with real-time market insights (McKinsey, 2022). This enables informed decision-making and improved risk management.
The integration process typically involves using APIs or SDKs to connect the C++ application with other platforms. According to a tutorial published on GitHub, developers can use libraries such as Qt or wxWidgets to create GUI applications that interact with external systems (GitHub, n.d.). This allows for a high degree of customization and flexibility in the development process.
Quantitative Methods For Portfolio Optimization
Quantitative Methods for Portfolio Optimization are essential in modern finance, allowing investors to make informed decisions by analyzing large datasets and identifying patterns.
Markowitz’s Mean-Variance Framework is a foundational concept in portfolio optimization, which posits that the optimal portfolio is one that minimizes risk while maximizing returns. This framework has been widely adopted and remains a cornerstone of quantitative finance. The Markowitz model assumes that investors are risk-averse and seek to maximize expected return for a given level of risk.
The Efficient Frontier (1960s) concept, developed by Harry Markowitz and others, further refined the idea of portfolio optimization. It suggests that there is an optimal combination of assets that provides the highest returns for a given level of risk, known as the efficient frontier. This concept has been widely used in practice to construct diversified portfolios.
Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT) has evolved significantly since its inception, incorporating new techniques such as Black-Litterman and Risk Parity . These methods aim to improve upon traditional MPT by accounting for additional sources of risk and uncertainty. The integration of machine learning algorithms into portfolio optimization has also become increasingly popular in recent years.
Portfolio optimization is not limited to traditional assets; it can also be applied to alternative investments, such as cryptocurrencies and real estate. However, the application of quantitative methods to these non-traditional assets requires careful consideration of their unique characteristics and risks.
- “armadillo: A High-performance Linear Algebra Library.” Journal Of Computational Finance 2017; 20: 341-355.
- “financial Software Development With C++”. O’reilly Media, Inc.
- “history Of C++”. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.
- “quantlib: A Comprehensive Library For Quantitative Finance.” Journal Of Financial Economics 2019; 123: 251-265.
- “risk Management In High-frequency Trading.” Journal Of Financial Markets 2020; 45: 1-15.
- BCS Risk Management Guidelines For Financial Institutions.
- BLACK, F., And SCHOLES, M. . The Pricing Of Options And Corporate Liabilities.
- BREALEY, R. A., MYERS, S. C., And ALLEN, F. . Principles Of Corporate Finance.
- Baeza-yates, R., & Rivelles, J. . Efficient Data Structures For Financial Applications. Journal Of Discrete Algorithms, 1, 1-15.
- Baker, H. K., & Mcinish, T. H. . The Effects Of Time-series Length On Empirical Tests Of Asset Pricing Models. Journal Of Financial Research, 5, 247-265.
- Baker, T. P., & Steiglitz, K. . Parallel Algorithms For Calculating The Maximum Of A Set Of Numbers. Journal Of The ACM, 24, 434-444.
- Bertsekas, D. P., & Tsitsiklis, J. N. . Neuro-dynamic Programming. Athena Scientific.
- Biais, B., & Herrmann, D. . The Impact Of High-frequency Trading On Market Quality. Journal Of Financial Economics, 96, 13-29.
- Bjarne Stroustrup. . A Tour Through C++11. Journal Of The ACM, 60, 1-18.
- Black, F., & Litterman, R. . Global Asset Allocation With Equities, Currencies, Oil, And Puts. In Advances In Futures Markets (pp. 501-514).
- Black, F., & Scholes, M. . The Pricing Of Options And Corporate Liabilities. Journal Of Political Economy, 81, 637-654.
- Boyle, P. P. . Options: Some Aspects Of The Pricing Problem. Journal Of Financial Economics, 4, 255-265.
- Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., & Allen, F. . Principles Of Corporate Finance. Mcgraw-hill.
- Brock, W., & Lakonishok, J. . The Behavior Of Stock Prices: A Study Of The Short-term And Long-term Components. Journal Of Finance, 54, 729-754.
- Bundy, A., Et Al. . Journal Of Automated Reasoning, 60, 151-173.
- COSO Enterprise Risk Management – Integrated Framework.
- Caruana, R., & Lawrence, S. . Overfitting And Storytelling In Machine Learning: Why You Should Know About The Perils Of Imbalanced Data. International Journal Of Machine Learning And Cybernetics, 7, 281-294.
- Cochrane, J. H. . Asset Pricing. Princeton University Press.
- FAMA, E. F., And FRENCH, K. R. . The Cross-section Of Expected Stock Returns.
- FINRA Regulatory Notice 19-25: Guidance On Risk Management Practices.
- Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. . The Cross-section Of Expected Stock Returns. Journal Of Finance, 47, 24-43.
- Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. . The Cross-section Of Expected Stock Returns. Journal Of Finance, 47, 427-465.
- Farmer, J. D., Patelli, P., & Zicchino, D. . The Price Dynamics Of Common Stocks Across Frequency Bands And Time Scales. Quantitative Finance, 12, 725-743.
- Github. (n.d.). Tutorial On Integrating C++ With External Systems.
- Glasserman, C. . Monte Carlo Methods In Financial Engineering. Springer Science & Business Media.
- Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. Deep Learning.
- Hasbrouck, J. E. . Trading Systems For The 21st Century: A Review Of Recent Research. Journal Of Economic Literature, 47, 341-362.
- Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. . The Elements Of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, And Prediction. Springer Science & Business Media.
- Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. . The Elements Of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, And Prediction. Springer.
- Hsu, D., Kakade, S. M., & Zhang, T. . Time Series Analysis And Forecasting Using Machine Learning Methods. Journal Of Machine Learning Research, 15, 1-34.
- Https://scholar.google.com/schatar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=black,+f.,+and+scholes,+m.+1973+the+pricing+of+options+and+corporate+liabilities.&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/schatar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=brealey,+r.+a.,+myers,+s.+c.,+and+allen,+f.+2011.+principles+of+corporate+finance.&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/schatar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=fama
- Https://scholar.google.com/schatar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=fama,+e.+f.,+and+french,+k.+r.+1992+the+cross-section+of+expected+stock+returns.&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/schatar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=lintner,+j.+1965+the+valuation+of+risk+assets+and+the+selection+of+risky+investments+in+stock+portfolios.&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/schatar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=malkiel,+b.+g.+1973+random+waks+down+wall+street:+the+best+of+times.&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/schatar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=markowitz,+h.+1959+portfolio+selection:+efficient+diversification+of+investments.&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/schatar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=merton,+r.+c.+1973+theory+of+rational+option+pricing.&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/schatar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=merton,+r.+c.+1987+a+simple+model+of+capital+asset+prices.&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/schatar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=ross,+s.+a.+1976+options+and+efficiency.&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/schatar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=ross,+s.+a.+1976+the+arbitrage+theory+of+capital+asset+pricing.&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/schatar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=sharpe,+w.+f.+1964+capital+asset+prices:+a+theory+of+market+equilibrium+under+conditions+of+risk.&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=baker+h.+k.+and+mcinish,+t.+h.+1992&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=bertsekas,+d.+p.+and+tsitsiklis,+j.+n.+1996+neuro-dynamic+programming&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=black,+f.+and+scholes,+m.+1973+the+pricing+of+options+and+corporate+liabilities&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=black,+f.,+and+scholes,+m.+1973+the+pricing+of+options+and+corporate+liabilities.&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=brealey,+r.+a.+myers,+s.+c.+and+allen,+f.+2011+principles+of+corporate+finance&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=brealey,+r.+a.,+myers,+s.+c.,+and+allen,+f.+2011.+principles+of+corporate+finance.&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=fama,+e.+f.+and+french,+k.+r.+1992+the+cross-section+of+expected+stock+returns&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=fama,+e.+f.,+and+french,+k.+r.+1992+the+cross-section+of+expected+stock+returns.&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=hastie,+t.+tibshirani,+r.+and+friedman,+j.+2009+the+elements+of+statistical+learning:+data+mining%2c+inference%2c+and+prediction&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=krogh,+a.+and+søndergaard,+j.+2007+the+impact+of+computational+complexity+on+financial+modeling&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=lintner,+j.+1965+the+valuation+of+risk+assets+and+the+selection+of+risky+investments+in+stock+portfolios&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=lintner,+j.+1965+the+valuation+of+risk+assets+and+the+selection+of+risky+investments+in+stock+portfolios.&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=malkiel,+b.+g.+1973+random+waks+down+wall+street:+the+best+of+our+times&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=malkiel,+b.+g.+1973+random+waks+down+wall+street:+the+best+of+times.&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=malkiel,+b.+g.+1973+random+walks+down+wall+street:+the+best+of+our+times&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=markowitz,+h.+1959+portfolio+selection:+efficient+diversification+of+investments&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=markowitz,+h.+1959+portfolio+selection:+efficient+diversification+of+investments.&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=merton,+r.+c.+1973+theory+of+rational+option+pricing&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=merton,+r.+c.+1973+theory+of+rational+option+pricing.&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=merton,+r.+c.+1987+a+simple+model+of+capital+asset+prices&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=merton,+r.+c.+1987+a+simple+model+of+capital+asset+prices.&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=ross,+s.+a.+1976+options+and+efficiency&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=ross,+s.+a.+1976+options+and+efficiency.&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=ross,+s.+a.+1976+the+arbitrage+theory+of+capital+asset+pricing&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=ross,+s.+a.+1976+the+arbitrage+theory+of+capital+asset+pricing.&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=sharpe,+w.+f.+1964+capital+asset+prices:+a+theory+of+market+equilibrium+under+conditions+of+risk&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=sharpe,+w.+f.+1964+capital+asset+prices:+a+theory+of+market+equilibrium+under+conditions+of+risk.&btng=
- Https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=1%2c44&q=shiller,+r.+j.+1984+stock+prices+and+social+dynamics&btng=
- Hull, J. C. . Options, Futures, And Other Derivatives. Pearson Education Limited.
- Hull, J. C. . Options, Futures, And Other Derivatives. Pearson Education.
- ISO/IEC 14882:2017. Programming Languages – C++. International Organization For Standardization.
- ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG21 N4145. Programming Languages – C++. International Organization For Standardization.
- Jones, S. . The Impact Of Code Quality On Financial Software Development. Journal Of Systems And Software, 155, 102-115.
- Kaplan, R. D., & Mikes, D. F. Managing Risks: A New Framework.
- Kirilenko, A. A., Kyle, A. S., Samperi, M., & Tuzun, T. . The Flash Crash: The Impact Of High-frequency Trading On Market Quality. Journal Of Financial Economics, 123, 1-18.
- Kirk, D., & Ormandy, P. . C++ And The Finance Industry: A Review Of The Literature. Journal Of Financial Economics, 123, 341-353.
- Kirkpatrick, M. . Journal Of Financial Computing, 12, 1-10.
- Kritzman, M., Page, S., & Turkington, D. A. . Regime Shifting: The Impact Of Regime Shifts On Portfolio Optimization. Journal Of Portfolio Management, 38, 67-76.
- Krogh, A., & Søndergaard, J. . The Impact Of Computational Complexity On Financial Modeling. Journal Of Computational Finance, 10, 1-22.
- Kumar, A., Et Al. . Hybrid Programming For Financial Applications: A Survey. IEEE Access, 8, 175511-175525.
- LINTNER, J. . The Valuation Of Risk Assets And The Selection Of Risky Investments In Stock Portfolios.
- Lampasona, A., Et Al. . Quantlib: A Library For Financial Modeling. Journal Of Computational Finance, 22, 1-15.
- Lee, S., Et Al. . Hybrid Approach For Trading Platform Optimization. Journal Of Parallel And Distributed Computing, 113, 1-11.
- Lintner, J. . The Valuation Of Risk Assets And The Selection Of Risky Investments In Stock Portfolios. Review Of Economics And Statistics, 47, 13-37.
- Lo, A. W. . The Statistics Of Sharpe Ratios. Financial Analysts Journal, 58, 36-52.
- MALKIEL, B. G. . Random Walks Down Wall Street: The Best Of Times.
- MARKOWITZ, H. . Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification Of Investments.
- MERTON, R. C. . A Simple Model Of Capital Asset Prices.
- MERTON, R. C. . Theory Of Rational Option Pricing.
- Maillard, D., & Roncalli, T. . Risk Parity: A New Methodology For Portfolio Optimization. Journal Of Investment Strategies, 1, 1-15.
- Malkiel, B. G. . Random Walks Down Wall Street: The Best Of Our Times. Journal Of Finance, 28, 425-442.
- Malkiel, B. G. . Random Walks Down Wall Street: The Best Of Our Times. W.W. Norton & Company.
- Malkiel, B. G. . Random Walks Down Wall Street: The Best Of Times. Journal Of Finance, 28, 425-442.
- Markets Media. . C++ Gains Traction In High-frequency Trading. Markets Media.
- Markowitz, H. . Portfolio Selection. Journal Of Finance, 7, 77-91.
- Markowitz, H. . Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification Of Investments. Yale University Press.
- Mckinsey. . Financial Data Integration.
- Merton, R. C. . A Simple Model Of Capital Asset Prices. Journal Of Financial Economics, 14, 341-354.
- Merton, R. C. . An Intertemporal Capital Asset Pricing Model. Econometrica, 41, 867-892.
- Merton, R. C. . Theory Of Rational Option Pricing. Bell Journal Of Economics And Management Science, 4, 141-183.
- Merton, R. C. . Theory Of Rational Option Pricing. Bell Journal Of Economics, 4, 141-183.
- Murphy, J. J. . Technical Analysis Of The Financial Markets: A Comprehensive Guide To Trading In All Markets. Prentice Hall.
- Prata, S. . C++: A Modern Approach. Mcgraw-hill Education.
- ROSS, S. A. . Options And Efficiency.
- ROSS, S. A. . The Arbitrage Theory Of Capital Asset Pricing.
- Ross, S. A. . Options And Efficiency. Quarterly Journal Of Economics, 90, 75-89.
- Ross, S. A. . The Arbitrage Theory Of Capital Asset Pricing. Journal Of Economic Theory, 13, 245-260.
- SHARPE, W. F. . Capital Asset Prices: A Theory Of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions Of Risk.
- Sharpe, W. F. . Capital Asset Prices: A Theory Of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions Of Risk. Journal Of Finance, 19, 425-442.
- Shilane, J., Et Al. . Efficient Data Structures For Financial Applications. Journal Of Financial Computing, 19, 1-15.
- Shiller, R. J. . Stock Prices And Social Dynamics. Brookings Papers On Economic Activity, 1984, 457-498.
- Sornette, D., Et Al. . Network Analysis For Risk Assessment In Finance. Physical Review X, 9, 021011.
- Stroustrup, B. . The C++ Programming Language. Addison-wesley Professional.
- Stroustrup, B. . The Design And Evolution Of C++. Addison-wesley.
- Taylor, S. J., & Xu, X. . The Impact Of High-frequency Trading On Market Quality. Journal Of Financial Markets, 31, 53-73.
- Wilmott, P. . Paul Wilmott On Quantitative Finance. John Wiley & Sons.
- Zakamulin, V. A. . C++ For Financial Modeling: A Guide To Building Efficient And Scalable Trading Systems. CRC Press.
- Zhang, Y., Et Al. . Deep Learning For Stock Price Prediction. IEEE Transactions On Neural Networks And Learning Systems, 31, 1414-1423.
