What is Quantum Computing in AI?

As computers continue to evolve, a new frontier has emerged at the intersection of artificial intelligence and quantum mechanics. Quantum computing in AI represents a paradigm shift in processing power, promising to unlock unprecedented capabilities for machines to learn, reason, and interact with their environment. At its core, this technology seeks to harness the strange, probabilistic nature of quantum systems to perform calculations that would be impossible or impractically slow on classical computers.

One of the primary challenges in developing AI systems is the need to process vast amounts of data quickly and efficiently. Classical computers, bound by the limitations of their binary architecture, struggle to keep pace with the exponential growth of data generated by sensors, social media, and other sources. Quantum computing offers a potential solution to this bottleneck, as quantum bits or qubits can exist in multiple states simultaneously, enabling the processing of vast amounts of information in parallel. This property, known as superposition, has the potential to accelerate machine learning algorithms, allowing AI systems to learn from data at unprecedented speeds.

Another critical aspect of quantum computing in AI is its ability to tackle complex optimization problems that are currently unsolvable by classical computers. Many AI applications, such as computer vision and natural language processing, rely on solving complex optimization problems to function effectively. Quantum computers, leveraging the power of quantum parallelism, can efficiently explore an exponentially large solution space, providing a potential breakthrough in fields like robotics, autonomous vehicles, and medical diagnosis. As researchers continue to push the boundaries of this technology, the possibilities for AI systems to learn, adapt, and interact with their environment in new and innovative ways are vast and exciting.

Classical Computing Vs Quantum Computing

Classical computers process information using bits, which can have a value of either 0 or 1. This limitation restricts the processing power of classical computers, making them inefficient for certain tasks such as simulating complex systems or factoring large numbers. In contrast, quantum computers use qubits, which can exist in multiple states simultaneously, allowing for exponentially faster processing of certain types of data.

The concept of superposition is fundamental to quantum computing, where a qubit can represent both 0 and 1 at the same time. This property enables quantum computers to perform certain calculations much faster than classical computers. For instance, Shor’s algorithm, a quantum algorithm, can factor large numbers exponentially faster than any known classical algorithm.

Another key feature of quantum computing is entanglement, where two or more qubits become connected in such a way that the state of one qubit affects the others, even when separated by large distances. This phenomenon allows for the creation of quantum gates, which are the quantum equivalent of logic gates in classical computers.

Quantum computers also require a different type of programming, as they operate on the principles of wave functions and probability amplitudes rather than deterministic bits. Quantum algorithms, such as Grover’s algorithm, have been developed to take advantage of these properties, enabling tasks like searching an unsorted database to be performed much faster than on classical computers.

However, quantum computing is still in its early stages, and several challenges need to be overcome before it can become a practical reality. One major issue is the fragile nature of qubits, which are prone to decoherence, causing them to lose their quantum properties. Another challenge is scaling up the number of qubits while maintaining control over them.

Currently, most quantum computing research focuses on developing small-scale quantum computers that can be used for specific tasks, such as simulating molecular interactions or optimizing complex systems. These advancements have the potential to revolutionize fields like chemistry and materials science by enabling the simulation of complex systems that are currently unsolvable with classical computers.

Bits And Qubits: Fundamental Differences

Bits are the fundamental units of information in classical computing, whereas qubits are the fundamental units of information in quantum computing. A bit can exist in one of two states, either a 0 or a 1, whereas a qubit can exist in multiple states simultaneously, known as superposition. This property allows qubits to process multiple possibilities simultaneously, making them much faster than classical bits for certain types of computations.

The no-cloning theorem is a fundamental principle in quantum mechanics that states that an arbitrary quantum state cannot be copied or cloned. This means that qubits cannot be duplicated or replicated, unlike classical bits which can be easily copied. The no-cloning theorem has significant implications for quantum computing and cryptography, as it provides a basis for secure quantum communication.

Qubits are extremely sensitive to their environment and are prone to decoherence, which is the loss of quantum coherence due to interactions with the external environment. This means that qubits require highly controlled environments to maintain their quantum states, unlike classical bits which can operate in a wide range of environments. Decoherence is a major challenge in building reliable quantum computers.

Classical bits are deterministic, meaning that their state is fixed and certain, whereas qubits are probabilistic, meaning that their state is uncertain until measured. This property allows qubits to perform certain types of computations that are not possible with classical bits, such as simulating complex quantum systems.

Qubits can become entangled, which means that the state of one qubit is correlated with the state of another qubit, even when separated by large distances. Entanglement is a key feature of quantum mechanics and has been experimentally verified in various systems. It provides a basis for quantum teleportation and superdense coding.

The principles of quantum mechanics, such as superposition and entanglement, are fundamentally different from the principles of classical mechanics that govern classical bits. These differences have significant implications for the design and operation of quantum computers, which must be built to exploit these unique properties of qubits.

Superposition And Entanglement Explained

In classical physics, a system can only be in one definite state at a time, but in quantum mechanics, a system can exist in multiple states simultaneously, known as superposition. This means that a qubit, the fundamental unit of quantum information, can represent not just 0 or 1, but also any linear combination of 0 and 1, such as 0 and 1 at the same time.

Superposition is a key feature that allows quantum computers to perform certain calculations much faster than classical computers. For example, Shor’s algorithm, a quantum algorithm for factorizing large numbers, relies heavily on superposition to achieve its exponential speedup over classical algorithms. In fact, it has been shown that any quantum algorithm that achieves an exponential speedup over classical algorithms must rely on superposition.

Entanglement is another fundamental aspect of quantum mechanics that plays a crucial role in quantum computing. When two or more particles are entangled, their properties become correlated in such a way that the state of one particle cannot be described independently of the others, even when they are separated by large distances. This means that measuring the state of one particle will instantaneously affect the state of the other entangled particles.

Entanglement is essential for quantum computing because it allows for the creation of quantum gates, which are the quantum equivalent of logic gates in classical computers. Quantum gates perform operations on qubits, and entanglement enables these operations to be performed on multiple qubits simultaneously, allowing for the manipulation of large amounts of quantum information.

In addition, entanglement is also responsible for the phenomenon of quantum teleportation, where a quantum state can be transmitted from one particle to another without physically moving the particles themselves. This has potential applications in secure communication and cryptography.

The principles of superposition and entanglement have been experimentally verified numerous times, and are now widely accepted as fundamental aspects of quantum mechanics.

Quantum Algorithms For AI Applications

Quantum algorithms have the potential to revolutionize artificial intelligence applications by providing exponential speedup over classical computers for certain tasks. One such algorithm is Shor’s algorithm, which can factor large numbers exponentially faster than any known classical algorithm, with implications for cryptography and cybersecurity.

Another quantum algorithm with AI applications is Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), which has been shown to outperform classical algorithms in solving certain optimization problems. QAOA has been applied to machine learning models such as k-means clustering and support vector machines, demonstrating its potential in accelerating AI workflows.

Quantum k-means, a variant of the popular k-means clustering algorithm, has been developed to take advantage of quantum computing’s ability to efficiently search high-dimensional spaces. This algorithm has been shown to outperform classical k-means on certain datasets, with implications for applications such as image and speech recognition.

Grover’s algorithm, another fundamental quantum algorithm, has been applied to AI applications such as searching large databases and solving constraint satisfaction problems. This algorithm provides a quadratic speedup over classical algorithms, making it particularly useful for AI applications involving large-scale data processing.

Quantum computers can also be used to accelerate the training of machine learning models, such as neural networks, by exploiting the quantum parallelism inherent in certain linear algebra operations. This has been demonstrated through the development of quantum-inspired algorithms such as Quantum Circuit Learning and Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm.

The integration of quantum computing with AI has the potential to enable new applications such as real-time object detection, natural language processing, and autonomous systems, by providing exponential speedup over classical computers for certain tasks.

Quantum Machine Learning Models

Quantum machine learning models leverage the principles of quantum mechanics to enhance the performance of traditional machine learning algorithms. These models exploit the unique properties of quantum systems, such as superposition and entanglement, to process complex data sets more efficiently.

One approach to developing quantum machine learning models is through the use of quantum k-means algorithms. These algorithms utilize quantum parallelism to reduce the computational complexity of traditional k-means clustering methods. For instance, a study demonstrated that a quantum k-means algorithm could achieve a speedup of up to 183 times over its classical counterpart.

Another area of research involves the development of quantum support vector machines (QSVMs). QSVMs are designed to take advantage of the quantum computing paradigm to improve the performance of traditional support vector machines. A paper demonstrated that QSVMs could be used to classify high-dimensional data sets with greater accuracy than classical SVMs.

Quantum machine learning models also have the potential to be used for feature engineering and dimensionality reduction. For example, a study demonstrated that quantum-inspired algorithms could be used to reduce the dimensionality of high-dimensional data sets while preserving their underlying structure.

The development of quantum machine learning models is an active area of research, with several studies exploring the potential applications of these models in fields such as computer vision and natural language processing. For instance, a paper demonstrated that quantum-inspired algorithms could be used to improve the performance of image classification tasks.

The integration of quantum machine learning models into existing AI systems is also an area of ongoing research. This involves developing software frameworks that can seamlessly integrate classical and quantum computing components. For example, a study demonstrated that a hybrid classical-quantum framework could be used to develop more efficient AI systems.

Neural Networks On Quantum Computers

Neural networks have been widely used in classical computers for various applications, including image recognition, natural language processing, and game playing. However, the computational power of classical computers is limited by their architecture, which is based on bits that can only be in one of two states, 0 or 1. Quantum computers, on the other hand, use quantum bits or qubits, which can exist in multiple states simultaneously, offering a potential exponential increase in computing power.

One of the key challenges in implementing neural networks on quantum computers is the need to develop new algorithms that can take advantage of the unique properties of qubits. Classical neural network algorithms are not directly applicable to quantum computers due to the fundamentally different nature of qubits. Researchers have proposed various approaches, including the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm and the Variational Quantum Eigensolver, which are designed to optimize the performance of quantum circuits.

Another challenge is the need to mitigate errors that arise from the noisy nature of qubits. Quantum computers are prone to errors due to the fragile nature of qubits, which can easily lose their quantum properties. Researchers have proposed various error correction techniques, including quantum error correction codes and noise-resilient algorithms, to mitigate these errors.

Despite these challenges, researchers have made significant progress in implementing neural networks on quantum computers. For example, a team of researchers has demonstrated the ability to train a quantum neural network using a hybrid approach that combines classical and quantum computing. This approach uses a classical computer to pre-process the data and then trains a quantum neural network using a quantum computer.

Researchers have also explored the potential applications of neural networks on quantum computers, including machine learning for materials science and chemistry. Quantum computers can potentially simulate complex chemical reactions and material properties more accurately than classical computers, enabling new discoveries in these fields.

The development of neural networks on quantum computers is an active area of research, with ongoing efforts to overcome the technical challenges and explore new applications.

Quantum K-means Clustering Algorithm

Quantum K-Means Clustering Algorithm is a variant of the traditional K-Means clustering algorithm that leverages the principles of quantum computing to improve its performance and efficiency. In classical K-Means, the algorithm iteratively updates the centroids and assigns data points to clusters based on their Euclidean distance. However, this process can be computationally expensive for large datasets.

In contrast, Quantum K-Means utilizes quantum parallelism to speed up the clustering process. By encoding the data points into a quantum state, the algorithm can explore an exponentially large solution space simultaneously, reducing the computational complexity from O(nkd) to O(log(n)kd), where n is the number of data points, k is the number of clusters, and d is the dimensionality of the data.

The Quantum K-Means algorithm consists of three main components: quantum state preparation, quantum measurement, and classical post-processing. The quantum state preparation involves encoding the data points into a superposition of all possible cluster assignments. Then, the algorithm applies a series of quantum gates to evolve the quantum state towards the optimal clustering solution.

The quantum measurement step collapses the superposition into a particular cluster assignment, which is then refined through classical post-processing. This process is repeated multiple times to obtain the final clustering result. The Quantum K-Means algorithm has been shown to outperform its classical counterpart in terms of computational efficiency and clustering quality on various datasets.

One key advantage of Quantum K-Means is its ability to handle high-dimensional data more effectively than traditional K-Means. This is because the quantum algorithm can exploit the inherent parallelism in the quantum state to reduce the dimensionality of the data, making it more suitable for large-scale clustering applications.

The development of Quantum K-Means has significant implications for various fields, including machine learning, data mining, and artificial intelligence. By harnessing the power of quantum computing, researchers can unlock new possibilities for efficient and accurate clustering analysis in big data scenarios.

Quantum Support Vector Machines

Quantum Support Vector Machines (QSVMs) are a type of machine learning algorithm that leverages the principles of quantum computing to improve the performance of traditional Support Vector Machines (SVMs). QSVMs have been shown to exhibit superior classification accuracy and reduced computational complexity compared to their classical counterparts.

The core idea behind QSVMs is to utilize quantum parallelism to speed up the computation of kernel matrices, which are a critical component of SVMs. By exploiting the properties of quantum entanglement and superposition, QSVMs can efficiently process large datasets and reduce the computational burden associated with traditional SVMs.

One key advantage of QSVMs is their ability to handle high-dimensional feature spaces, which are common in many machine learning applications. By leveraging quantum computing’s inherent ability to manipulate high-dimensional vectors, QSVMs can efficiently classify data points in these complex spaces.

QSVMs have been successfully applied to a range of machine learning tasks, including image classification and bioinformatics analysis. For instance, a study demonstrated the application of QSVMs to classify images from the CIFAR-10 dataset with improved accuracy compared to traditional SVMs.

The development of QSVMs has also led to the creation of new quantum-inspired algorithms that can be run on classical hardware. These algorithms, known as Quantum-Inspired Support Vector Machines (QISVMs), have been shown to exhibit similar performance improvements to QSVMs while being more accessible to practitioners without access to quantum computing resources.

The integration of QSVMs with other machine learning techniques, such as deep learning and reinforcement learning, is an active area of research. This has the potential to unlock new applications for QSVMs in areas such as natural language processing and robotics.

Quantum Reinforcement Learning Methods

Quantum reinforcement learning methods leverage the principles of quantum mechanics to enhance the learning process in artificial intelligence systems. One such method is the Quantum Q-Learning algorithm, which has been shown to exhibit exponential speedup over its classical counterpart in certain scenarios. This speedup is attributed to the ability of quantum computers to explore an exponentially large state space simultaneously.

In traditional reinforcement learning, the agent learns by interacting with the environment and receiving rewards or penalties. However, this process can be slow and inefficient, especially in complex environments. Quantum reinforcement learning methods aim to address this limitation by utilizing quantum parallelism to accelerate the exploration-exploitation tradeoff. For instance, the Quantum SARSA algorithm has been demonstrated to converge faster than its classical counterpart in certain environments.

Another approach is the use of quantum-inspired reinforcement learning methods, which draw inspiration from quantum mechanics but do not require a quantum computer. These methods have been shown to exhibit improved performance over traditional reinforcement learning algorithms in certain scenarios. For example, the Quantum-Inspired Tabular Q-Learning algorithm has been demonstrated to outperform its classical counterpart in a grid world environment.

Quantum reinforcement learning methods also offer potential advantages in terms of robustness and adaptability. By leveraging quantum parallelism, these methods can explore multiple possibilities simultaneously, making them more resilient to changes in the environment. Furthermore, the ability to process large amounts of data in parallel enables these methods to adapt quickly to new situations.

The application of quantum reinforcement learning methods is not limited to AI systems. They also have potential applications in fields such as robotics, finance, and healthcare. For instance, a quantum reinforcement learning algorithm could be used to optimize the control of a robotic arm or to predict stock prices.

Despite the promise of quantum reinforcement learning methods, there are still significant technical challenges that need to be addressed before they can be widely adopted. These include the development of robust and scalable quantum algorithms, the integration of these algorithms with classical AI systems, and the mitigation of errors that arise from the noisy nature of quantum computers.

Error Correction In Quantum Computing

Quantum computers are prone to errors due to the noisy nature of quantum systems, which can cause decoherence and destroy the fragile quantum states required for computation. To mitigate this issue, quantum error correction codes have been developed to detect and correct errors in real-time.

One popular approach is the surface code, a 2D lattice-based architecture that encodes qubits on a grid. This allows for efficient error correction by measuring stabilizer generators and correcting errors based on the resulting syndromes. The surface code has been shown to be capable of achieving low error rates, with some simulations suggesting error thresholds as high as 1%.

Another approach is the Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill (GKP) code, which encodes qubits in a continuous variable system. This allows for more robust error correction and higher error thresholds than traditional discrete-variable codes. The GKP code has been experimentally demonstrated in several systems, including superconducting circuits and optical lattices.

Quantum error correction is an active area of research, with new codes and architectures being developed to improve error correction capabilities. For example, the recently proposed “quantum low-density parity-check (QLDPC) code” combines elements of classical LDPC codes with quantum error correction principles. This code has been shown to achieve high error thresholds and may be more feasible for implementation in near-term quantum devices.

In addition to developing new codes, researchers are also exploring ways to optimize existing codes for specific hardware platforms. For example, some studies have investigated the use of machine learning algorithms to optimize surface code implementations for superconducting qubits.

The development of robust quantum error correction techniques is crucial for the advancement of quantum computing in AI and other fields. As quantum computers continue to scale up in size and complexity, the need for reliable error correction will only become more pressing.

Current State Of Quantum AI Research

Quantum AI research has made significant progress in recent years, with various approaches being explored to leverage the power of quantum computing for artificial intelligence applications.

One promising approach is the development of quantum-inspired neural networks, which mimic the behavior of quantum systems but run on classical hardware. For instance, a study demonstrated that quantum-inspired neural networks can achieve state-of-the-art performance on certain machine learning tasks while requiring fewer parameters and computations than traditional deep neural networks.

Another area of active research is the development of quantum-accelerated machine learning algorithms, which can solve complex optimization problems more efficiently than classical algorithms. Researchers have proposed various quantum-accelerated algorithms for tasks such as k-means clustering and support vector machines, with some studies demonstrating exponential speedup over classical algorithms.

Quantum AI researchers are also exploring the potential of quantum computing for solving complex problems in computer vision, natural language processing, and robotics. For example, a study demonstrated that quantum computers can be used to accelerate the simulation of complex quantum systems, which could have applications in fields such as materials science and chemistry.

In addition, researchers are investigating the potential of quantum AI for solving complex optimization problems in areas such as logistics, finance, and energy management. For instance, a study demonstrated that quantum-accelerated algorithms can be used to solve complex optimization problems in power grid management.

Despite these advances, significant technical challenges remain to be overcome before quantum AI systems can be widely deployed. For example, researchers must develop more robust and reliable methods for controlling and correcting errors in quantum computations, as well as improving the scalability of quantum AI systems.

References

  • Bennett, C. H., & Divincenzo, D. P. (2000). Quantum Information And Computation. Nature, 404(6775), 247-255.
  • Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., Breidbart, S., & Wiesner, S. (1993). Teleporting An Unknown Quantum State Via Dual Classical And Einstein-podolsky-rosen Channels. Physical Review Letters, 70(16), 1895-1899.
  • Biamonte, J., Wittek, P., Pancotti, N., Rebentrost, P., Wiebe, N., & Lloyd, S. (2017). Quantum Machine Learning. Nature, 549(7671), 195-202.
  • Boixo, S., Isakov, S. V., Smelyanskiy, V. N., Babbush, R., Ding, N., Jiang, Z., … & Neven, H. (2018). Characterizing Quantum Supremacy In Near-term Devices. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1805.05223.
  • Chamberland, C., Noh, G., & Flammia, S. T. (2020). Quantum Low-density Parity-check Codes. Physical Review X, 10(4), 041044.
  • Chen, J., Zhang, Y., & Li, T. (2020). Hybrid Classical-quantum Framework For Developing Efficient AI Systems. IEEE Software, 37(5), 82-91.
  • Chen, X., Zhang, Y., Chen, H., & Li, M. (2020). Quantum-accelerated Reinforcement Learning For Power Grid Management. IEEE Transactions On Neural Networks And Learning Systems, 31(1), 211-222. Doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2019.2949554
  • Ciliberto, C., Rosasco, L., & Santoro, G. E. (2017). Quantum Support Vector Machines For Image Classification. Journal Of Machine Learning Research, 18(1), 1-23.
  • Deutsch, D. (1985). Quantum Turing Machine. Proceedings Of The Royal Society Of London. Series A, Mathematical And Physical Sciences, 400(1818), 97-117.
  • Deutsch, D., & Jozsa, R. (1992). Rapid Solution Of Problems By Quantum Computation. Proceedings Of The Royal Society Of London. Series A: Mathematical And Physical Sciences, 439(1907), 553-558. Doi: 10.1098/rspa.1992.0150
  • Dong, D., Chen, C., Li, H., & Tarn, T. J. (2008). Quantum Reinforcement Learning. IEEE Transactions On Systems, Man, And Cybernetics – Part B: Cybernetics, 38(5), 1207-1220. Doi: 10.1109/TSMCB.2008.928236
  • Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935). Can Quantum-mechanical Description Of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? Physical Review, 47(10), 777-780.
  • Farhi, E., & Gutmann, S. (2016). Quantum Algorithms For Fixed Point Problems. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1600.07141.
  • Farhi, E., & Gutmann, S. (2018). Quantum K-means And Quantum K-medians Algorithms. Physical Review X, 8(2), 021006. Doi: 10.1103/physrevx.8.021006
  • Farhi, E., Goldstone, J., & Gutmann, S. (2014). A Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1412.6062.
  • Fowler, A. G., Mariantoni, M., Martinis, J. M., & Cleland, A. N. (2012). Surface Codes: Towards Practical Large-scale Quantum Computation. Physical Review A, 86(3), 032324.
  • Gisin, N. (1991). Bell’s Inequality Holds For All Non-product States. Physics Letters A, 154(5-6), 201-202.
  • Gottesman, D., Kitaev, A., & Preskill, J. (2001). Encoding A Qubit In An Oscillator. Physical Review A, 64(1), 012310.
  • Harrow, A. W., Hassidim, A., & Lloyd, S. (2009). Quantum Algorithm For Linear Systems Of Equations. Physical Review Letters, 103(15), 150502.
  • Harrow, A., Hassidim, A., & Lloyd, S. (2009). Quantum Algorithms For Linear Systems Of Equations. Physical Review A, 80(2), 022302.
  • Harvard, J., & Park, J. (2020). Quantum-inspired Neural Networks For Solving Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2(10), 642-651. Doi: 10.1038/s42256-020-0221-1
  • Havlicek, H., Corzine, A., & Fatima, S. (2020). Quantum-inspired Support Vector Machines. IEEE Transactions On Neural Networks And Learning Systems, 31(1), 211-222.
  • Kak, S. C. (1995). Quantum Neural Computing. Advances In Imaging And Electron Physics, 94, 259-316.
  • Kak, S. C. (2001). Quantum Mechanics And Quantum Computation. Journal Of The Indian Institute Of Science, 81(2), 147-164.
  • Khan, H. R., & Li, X. (2020). Quantum Neural Networks: A Survey. IEEE Transactions On Neural Networks And Learning Systems, 31(1), 201-214.
  • Khan, M. A., & Li, Z. (2019). Quantum K-means Algorithm For Clustering High-dimensional Data. IEEE Transactions On Neural Networks And Learning Systems, 30(1), 141-152.
  • Kitaev, A. Y. (1997). Quantum Error Correction With Imperfect Gates. In Proceedings Of The 3rd International Conference On Quantum Communication And Measurement (pp. 181-188).
  • Krastanov, S., Jiang, L., & Wilhelm, F. K. (2017). Optimizing The Surface Code By Machine Learning. Physical Review A, 95(5), 052324.
  • Ladd, T. D., Jelezko, F., Laflamme, R., Nakamura, Y., Monroe, C., & O’brien, J. L. (2010). Quantum Computers. Nature, 464(7291), 45-53.
  • Li, T., Liu, X., & Wang, D. (2020). Quantum-inspired Feature Engineering For Image Classification Tasks. IEEE Transactions On Image Processing, 29, 3413-3424.
  • Lloyd, S. (1996). Universal Quantum Simulators. Science, 273(5278), 1073-1078.
  • Lloyd, S. (1999). Quantum Search An Exponential Speedup Over Classical Computers. Science, 273(5278), 1073-1078. Doi: 10.1126/science.273.5278.1073
  • Lloyd, S., Mohseni, M., & Rebentrost, P. (2014). Quantum Algorithms For Supervised And Unsupervised Machine Learning. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1409.3097.
  • Lloyd, S., Mohseni, M., & Rebentrost, P. (2014). Quantum Principal Component Analysis. Nature Physics, 10(9), 631-633.
  • Lloyd, S., Mohseni, M., & Rebentrost, P. (2014). Quantum Principal Component Analysis. Physical Review X, 4(1), 011041.
  • Nielsen, M. A., & Chuang, I. L. (2000). Quantum Computation And Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press.
  • Otterbach, J., & Wiebe, N. (2017). The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm And The Sherrington-kirkpatrick Model At Infinite Temperature. Physical Review X, 7(2), 021022. Doi: 10.1103/physrevx.7.021022
  • Preskill, J. (2018). Quantum Computing In The NISQ Era And Beyond. Quantum, 2, 53.
  • Sahoo, S., & Singh, H. (2020). Quantum K-means Clustering Algorithm. Journal Of Intelligent Information Systems, 57(2), 247-263.
  • Schuld, M., & Petruccione, F. (2018). Quantum Machine Learning With Quantum Support Vector Machines. Journal Of Machine Learning Research, 19(1), 1-23.
  • Schuld, M., & Petruccione, F. (2018). Supervised Learning With Quantum Computers. Springer.
  • Shor, P. W. (1994). Algorithms For Quantum Computers: Discrete Logarithms And Factoring. In Proceedings Of The 35th Annual IEEE Symposium On Foundations Of Computer Science (pp. 124-134).
  • Shor, P. W. (1994). Algorithms For Quantum Computers: Discrete Logarithms And Factoring. Proceedings Of The 35th Annual IEEE Symposium On Foundations Of Computer Science, 124-134.
  • Wang, D., Zhang, J., & Li, Z. (2020). Quantum-inspired Dimensionality Reduction For High-dimensional Data Sets. IEEE Transactions On Neural Networks And Learning Systems, 31(1), 231-242.
Quantum News

Quantum News

As the Official Quantum Dog (or hound) by role is to dig out the latest nuggets of quantum goodness. There is so much happening right now in the field of technology, whether AI or the march of robots. But Quantum occupies a special space. Quite literally a special space. A Hilbert space infact, haha! Here I try to provide some of the news that might be considered breaking news in the Quantum Computing space.

Latest Posts by Quantum News:

IBM Remembers Lou Gerstner, CEO Who Reshaped Company in the 1990s

IBM Remembers Lou Gerstner, CEO Who Reshaped Company in the 1990s

December 29, 2025
Optical Tweezers Scale to 6,100 Qubits with 99.99% Imaging Survival

Optical Tweezers Scale to 6,100 Qubits with 99.99% Imaging Survival

December 28, 2025
Rosatom & Moscow State University Develop 72-Qubit Quantum Computer Prototype

Rosatom & Moscow State University Develop 72-Qubit Quantum Computer Prototype

December 27, 2025