The Quantum Zeitgeist Guide to Quantum Computing

Quantum computing has the potential to revolutionize various fields, but its widespread adoption is hindered by several challenges. One major hurdle is the need for more robust and scalable hardware that can handle complex machine learning algorithms. Another challenge is developing sophisticated software frameworks that integrate with existing tools.

As the world grapples with the complexities of the digital age, a quiet revolution has been unfolding in the realm of quantum computing. This esoteric field, once confined to the rarefied atmosphere of academic journals and research institutions, is now poised to transform the very fabric of modern life. At its core, quantum computing represents a fundamental shift in how we process information, harnessing the strange and counterintuitive properties of subatomic particles to perform calculations that would be impossible for even the most advanced classical computers.

One of the key drivers behind this quantum zeitgeist is the quest for exponential scaling. Classical computers, reliant on bits that can exist in only one of two states (0 or 1), are rapidly approaching the physical limits of miniaturization. In contrast, quantum computers leverage qubits, which can exist in multiple states simultaneously, enabling an exponential increase in processing power as more qubits are added. This has profound implications for fields such as cryptography, optimization, and machine learning, where complex problems could be solved with unprecedented speed and accuracy.

However, the journey to realizing this vision is fraught with challenges. One of the most significant hurdles is the fragility of quantum states, which are prone to decoherence – a loss of coherence due to interactions with their environment. This necessitates the development of sophisticated error correction techniques, such as quantum error correction codes and noise-resilient algorithms. As researchers continue to push the boundaries of what is possible, the landscape of quantum computing is evolving rapidly, with breakthroughs in areas like topological quantum computing and adiabatic quantum computing offering promising new avenues for exploration.

What Is Quantum Computing

Quantum computing is a novel paradigm for processing information that exploits the principles of quantum mechanics to perform operations on data exponentially faster than classical computers. This property arises from the ability of quantum bits, or qubits, to exist in multiple states simultaneously, allowing them to process vast amounts of data in parallel.

The fundamental unit of quantum information is the qubit, which can exist as a superposition of 0 and 1, unlike classical bits that are restricted to either 0 or 1. Qubits are highly sensitive to their environment, requiring sophisticated control systems to maintain their fragile quantum states. Quantum gates, the quantum equivalent of logic gates in classical computing, are used to manipulate qubits and perform operations.

Quantum computers can solve specific problems much faster than classical computers by leveraging quantum parallelism. Shor’s algorithm, for instance, can factor large numbers exponentially faster than any known classical algorithm, with significant implications for cryptography. Similarly, Grover’s algorithm can search an unsorted database of N elements in O(√N) time, compared to the O(N) time required by classical algorithms.

Quantum computing is not without its challenges, however. The no-cloning theorem dictates that it is impossible to create a perfect copy of an arbitrary quantum state, making error correction a significant hurdle. Additionally, the fragility of qubits necessitates the development of robust control systems and fault-tolerant architectures.

Several approaches are being explored for building practical quantum computers, including superconducting circuits, trapped ions, and topological quantum computing. Superconducting circuits have demonstrated high fidelity gate operations and are a leading contender for scalable quantum computing. Trapped ion systems have shown remarkable coherence times and are well-suited for small-scale quantum simulations.

The development of quantum computing has far-reaching implications for fields such as cryptography, optimization, and machine learning. The potential to solve complex problems that are currently intractable could revolutionize industries and transform the way we approach complex problem-solving.

Brief History Of Quantum Computing

The concept of quantum computing dates back to the 1980s, when physicist David Deutsch proposed the idea of a universal quantum Turing machine. This theoretical framework laid the foundation for the development of quantum computers, which would be capable of solving complex problems exponentially faster than classical computers.

In the early 1990s, mathematician Peter Shor made a significant breakthrough by discovering an algorithm that could factor large numbers exponentially faster on a quantum computer than on a classical one. This sparked widespread interest in the field, as it implied that quantum computers could potentially break certain encryption algorithms used to secure online transactions.

The first experimental quantum computer was built in 1998 by Isaac Chuang and Michael A. Nielsen, using nuclear magnetic resonance technology. Although limited in scale, this achievement demonstrated the feasibility of building a functional quantum computer.

In the following years, significant advances were made in the development of quantum computing hardware and software. In 2007, David Poulin and Michelangelo Mangano proposed a new architecture for quantum computers based on adiabatic evolution, which would later be developed into the D-Wave quantum computer.

The first commercial quantum computer was released in 2011 by D-Wave Systems, although its capabilities were limited to specific optimization problems. Since then, significant progress has been made in the development of more powerful and versatile quantum computers, with companies like IBM, Google, and Rigetti Computing actively pursuing research and development in this area.

Today, quantum computing is a rapidly advancing field, with ongoing research focused on developing more robust and scalable hardware, improving software and algorithms, and exploring potential applications in fields such as chemistry, materials science, and machine learning.

Principles Of Quantum Mechanics

Quantum mechanics is based on the principles of wave-particle duality, uncertainty, and the probabilistic nature of physical phenomena. According to the Copenhagen interpretation, a quantum system exists in a superposition of states until it is measured, at which point it collapses into one definite state. This concept is supported by the double-slit experiment, where electrons passing through two slits create an interference pattern on a screen, demonstrating their wave-like behavior.

The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle is another fundamental principle of quantum mechanics, stating that certain properties of a particle, such as position and momentum, cannot be precisely known at the same time. This principle has been experimentally verified in various studies, including those using scanning tunneling microscopy to measure the position and momentum of atoms on a surface.

Quantum entanglement is a phenomenon where two or more particles become correlated in such a way that the state of one particle cannot be described independently of the others, even when they are separated by large distances. This concept has been experimentally confirmed through numerous studies, including those using photons and atomic systems.

The Schrödinger equation is a mathematical formulation of quantum mechanics that describes the time-evolution of a quantum system. It is based on the wave function, which encodes all the information about the system, and is used to calculate probabilities of different measurement outcomes.

Quantum decoherence is the loss of quantum coherence due to interactions with the environment, causing a quantum system to behave classically. This concept has been experimentally studied using various systems, including superconducting qubits and optical lattices.

The no-cloning theorem is a fundamental principle of quantum mechanics that states that an arbitrary quantum state cannot be copied or cloned. This theorem has been proven mathematically and has important implications for quantum computing and cryptography.

Qubits And Quantum Gates

Qubits are the fundamental units of quantum information, and they play a crucial role in quantum computing. A qubit is a two-state system that can exist in multiple states simultaneously, unlike classical bits which can only be in one of two states. This property allows qubits to process multiple possibilities simultaneously, making them incredibly powerful for certain types of computations.

One way to think about qubits is to consider a coin. A classical coin can either be heads or tails, but a quantum coin can exist as both heads and tails at the same time. This is known as a superposition, and it’s a key feature of qubits. Qubits can also become “entangled,” meaning that the state of one qubit is directly correlated with the state of another qubit, even if they’re separated by large distances.

Quantum gates are the quantum equivalent of logic gates in classical computing. They’re the basic operations that are performed on qubits to manipulate their states and perform computations. Quantum gates can be thought of as a set of instructions that tell the qubits what to do. There are many different types of quantum gates, including the Hadamard gate, the Pauli-X gate, and the CNOT gate.

The Hadamard gate is a fundamental quantum gate that creates a superposition state in a qubit. It’s often used as the first step in many quantum algorithms because it puts the qubit into a state where it can be manipulated by other gates. The Pauli-X gate is another important gate that flips the state of a qubit, similar to a classical NOT gate. The CNOT gate, or controlled-NOT gate, is a two-qubit gate that flips the state of one qubit if and only if the control qubit is in a certain state.

Quantum gates are typically represented as matrices, which allows them to be composed together to create more complex operations. This is similar to how classical logic gates can be combined to create more complex circuits. The ability to compose quantum gates is what makes quantum computing so powerful, because it allows for the creation of complex algorithms that can solve problems exponentially faster than classical computers.

The development of quantum gates and qubits has been an active area of research in recent years, with many different approaches being explored. Some researchers are focusing on developing more robust and reliable qubits, while others are working on creating new types of quantum gates that can be used to perform specific tasks.

Quantum Algorithms And Applications

Quantum algorithms are designed to solve specific problems that are inherently complex or time-consuming for classical computers. One such algorithm is Shor’s algorithm, which can factor large numbers exponentially faster than any known classical algorithm. This has significant implications for cryptography, as many encryption protocols rely on the difficulty of factoring large numbers.

Another important quantum algorithm is Grover’s algorithm, which can search an unsorted database of N elements in O(sqrt(N)) time, compared to O(N) time required by classical algorithms. This has potential applications in data analysis and machine learning.

Quantum computers can also be used for simulations of complex quantum systems, such as molecules and chemical reactions. The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a hybrid algorithm that combines classical and quantum computing to solve optimization problems. This has potential applications in fields such as chemistry and materials science.

In addition to these specific algorithms, quantum computers can also be used for machine learning and artificial intelligence. Quantum k-means clustering, for example, can be used for unsupervised learning tasks. Quantum support vector machines (QSVMs) are another example of a quantum algorithm that can be used for classification tasks.

Quantum computers have also been proposed as a potential solution to the “curse of dimensionality” in machine learning, where the number of features or dimensions grows exponentially with the size of the dataset. Quantum algorithms such as the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) and the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) can be used to reduce the dimensionality of high-dimensional datasets.

Quantum computers have also been proposed for use in optimization problems, such as the traveling salesman problem and the knapsack problem. These problems are NP-hard, meaning that the running time of classical algorithms increases exponentially with the size of the input.

Quantum Error Correction Methods

Quantum error correction methods are essential for large-scale quantum computing, as they enable the protection of fragile quantum states from decoherence caused by unwanted interactions with the environment. One popular method is the surface code, which encodes qubits on a 2D grid and uses stabilizer generators to detect errors. This approach has been shown to be highly effective in correcting errors, with a threshold error rate of around 1%.

Another important method is the Shor’s code, a type of quantum error correction that uses a combination of bit flip and phase flip corrections to protect qubits. This approach has been demonstrated to be highly effective in correcting errors, with a high fidelity of up to 99.99%.

Quantum error correction methods can also be classified into two main categories: active and passive correction. Active correction involves the continuous monitoring of the quantum system and the application of corrections as needed, whereas passive correction relies on the design of the quantum system itself to minimize errors.

Topological codes are another class of quantum error correction methods that use non-Abelian anyons to encode qubits. These codes have been shown to be highly effective in correcting errors, with a high threshold error rate of up to 10%.

Quantum error correction methods can also be used to correct errors in quantum communication protocols, such as quantum teleportation and superdense coding. For example, the use of entanglement purification protocols has been shown to improve the fidelity of quantum teleportation.

The development of robust quantum error correction methods is an active area of research, with new approaches being explored, such as the use of machine learning algorithms to optimize error correction protocols.

Types Of Quantum Computers

Quantum computers can be categorized into several types based on the underlying quantum systems used for computation. One type is the Gate-Based Quantum Computer, which uses a set of quantum gates to manipulate qubits and perform operations. This approach is similar to classical computing, where bits are manipulated using logic gates. The gate-based model is widely used in most quantum computing architectures, including those developed by IBM and Rigetti Computing.

Another type is the Analog Quantum Computer, also known as the Quantum Annealer. This type of computer uses a continuous set of quantum states to perform optimization tasks, rather than discrete qubits. D-Wave Systems is a prominent example of an analog quantum computer manufacturer.

Topological Quantum Computers are another type, which use exotic particles called anyons to store and manipulate quantum information. These computers are highly resistant to decoherence, making them potentially more robust than other types of quantum computers.

Adiabatic Quantum Computers are yet another type, which use a slow and controlled evolution of the quantum system to perform computations. This approach is similar to classical simulated annealing, where a system is slowly cooled to find its minimum energy state.

Quantum computers can also be classified based on their scalability, with some architectures designed to be highly scalable, such as the Quantum Circuit Model, while others are less so, like the Quantum Annealer.

Quantum Computing Hardware Platforms

Quantum computing hardware platforms are the physical systems that enable the manipulation of quantum bits, or qubits, to perform quantum computations. These platforms can be broadly classified into three categories: gate-based, analog, and hybrid.

Gate-based quantum computing platforms rely on the precise control of quantum gates, which are the quantum equivalent of logic gates in classical computers. These platforms typically use superconducting circuits, trapped ions, or photons as qubits. For instance, IBM’s Quantum Experience platform uses superconducting qubits, while Rigetti Computing’s Quantum Cloud platform employs a hybrid approach combining superconducting and photonic qubits.

Analog quantum computing platforms, on the other hand, rely on the manipulation of continuous variables, such as the amplitude and phase of electromagnetic waves. These platforms often employ optical or microwave cavities as the quantum system. D-Wave Systems’ Quantum Annealer is a prominent example of an analog quantum computing platform, which uses a process called quantum annealing to find the global minimum of a problem.

Hybrid quantum computing platforms combine elements of both gate-based and analog approaches. These platforms aim to leverage the strengths of each approach to achieve more robust and scalable quantum computations. For example, researchers have proposed hybrid platforms that use superconducting qubits for gate-based operations and optical cavities for analog quantum simulations.

The choice of quantum computing hardware platform depends on the specific application and the trade-offs between factors such as scalability, control fidelity, and noise resilience. Each platform has its unique advantages and challenges, and ongoing research aims to improve their performance and overcome the limitations.

Quantum computing hardware platforms are being actively developed by academia, startups, and established companies, with significant investments in research and development. The rapid progress in this field is expected to pave the way for the realization of practical quantum computers that can tackle complex problems in fields such as chemistry, materials science, and optimization.

Software Frameworks For Quantum Development

Quantum software frameworks are essential tools for the development of quantum computing applications, providing a structured environment for designing, testing, and executing quantum algorithms.

One popular framework is Qiskit, an open-source software development kit developed by IBM that enables users to create, compose, and execute quantum circuits on various backends, including simulators and real quantum hardware. Qiskit provides a comprehensive set of tools for quantum development, including a compiler, simulator, and runtime environment.

Another prominent framework is Cirq, an open-source software framework developed by Google that focuses on near-term quantum computing applications. Cirq provides a Python-based API for defining, manipulating, and optimizing quantum circuits, as well as a simulator for testing and validating these circuits.

Q# is a high-level programming language developed by Microsoft that allows developers to write quantum algorithms and execute them on simulators or real quantum hardware. Q# provides a set of libraries and tools for quantum development, including a compiler, simulator, and runtime environment.

The Xanadu Quantum Development Environment (QDE) is an open-source framework developed by Xanadu that provides a comprehensive set of tools for quantum computing, including a compiler, simulator, and runtime environment. QDE supports the development of quantum algorithms using the Xanadu’s proprietary quantum programming language, Pennylane.

Pennylane is an open-source software framework developed by Xanadu that provides a Python-based API for defining, manipulating, and optimizing quantum circuits. Pennylane includes a simulator for testing and validating these circuits, as well as a compiler for executing them on various backends.

These frameworks provide a foundation for the development of quantum computing applications, enabling researchers and developers to explore the potential of quantum computing and drive innovation in this field.

Quantum Machine Learning And AI

Quantum machine learning is an emerging field that combines the principles of quantum mechanics with machine learning algorithms to develop new computational models for data analysis and pattern recognition.

One of the key advantages of quantum machine learning is its ability to handle large datasets more efficiently than classical computers. This is because quantum computers can process multiple inputs simultaneously, thanks to the phenomenon of superposition, which allows qubits to exist in multiple states at once. For instance, a study demonstrated that a quantum k-means algorithm could cluster data points exponentially faster than its classical counterpart.

Another area where quantum machine learning is showing promise is in the development of more accurate and robust AI models. By leveraging the principles of quantum entanglement and superposition, researchers are creating AI systems that can learn from fewer training examples and generalize better to new situations. A paper demonstrated how a quantum-inspired neural network could achieve state-of-the-art performance on a range of image classification tasks while requiring significantly less training data.

Quantum machine learning is also being explored for its potential applications in areas such as natural language processing and recommender systems. For example, researchers have developed quantum algorithms for topic modeling that can extract more nuanced and accurate insights from large volumes of text data. A study demonstrated how a quantum-inspired topic model could outperform its classical counterpart on a range of benchmark datasets.

However, despite these advances, there are still significant technical challenges to overcome before quantum machine learning can be widely adopted. One of the main hurdles is the need for more robust and scalable quantum computing hardware that can handle the complex requirements of machine learning algorithms. Another challenge is the development of more sophisticated software frameworks that can integrate seamlessly with existing machine learning tools and workflows.

Researchers are actively working on addressing these challenges, and several promising approaches have emerged in recent years. For example, the development of noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices has provided a more feasible path to practical quantum computing applications, including machine learning.

Cybersecurity And Quantum Key Distribution

Cybersecurity threats are increasingly sophisticated, making it essential to develop robust encryption methods to safeguard sensitive information. Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) offers a promising solution by leveraging the principles of quantum mechanics to create unbreakable encryption keys.

In traditional public-key cryptography, keys are typically exchanged over an insecure channel, leaving them vulnerable to eavesdropping attacks. QKD, on the other hand, enables two parties to establish a shared secret key securely over an insecure channel, without physically exchanging the key. This is achieved by exploiting the no-cloning theorem and Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics.

The process of QKD involves encoding classical bits onto quantum states, such as photons, which are then transmitted over an optical fiber or through free space. Any attempt to measure or eavesdrop on these quantum states will introduce errors, making it detectable by the communicating parties. This allows them to verify the integrity of the key exchange and ensure its secrecy.

Several QKD protocols have been developed, including BB84, B92, and E91. These protocols differ in their encoding schemes, error correction mechanisms, and security proofs. For instance, the BB84 protocol uses a four-state encoding scheme, whereas the B92 protocol employs a two-state scheme.

QKD systems have been successfully demonstrated in various experiments and pilot projects, showcasing their feasibility for secure communication. In 2016, China launched the Quantum Experiments at Space Scale (QUESS) satellite, which enabled QKD-based secure communication between ground stations over thousands of kilometers.

The integration of QKD with classical cryptography can provide a robust security framework for high-stakes applications, such as financial transactions and military communications. However, widespread adoption of QKD technology is hindered by the need for reliable and efficient quantum key distribution networks, as well as the development of user-friendly interfaces for seamless integration with existing infrastructure.

Future Prospects And Challenges

Quantum computing has the potential to revolutionize various fields, including cryptography, optimization, and simulation. However, there are several challenges that need to be addressed before this technology can be widely adopted.

One of the major challenges is the issue of quantum noise and error correction. Quantum computers are prone to errors due to the noisy nature of quantum systems, which can lead to incorrect results. Researchers are actively working on developing robust methods for error correction, such as topological codes and adiabatic quantum computing.

Another challenge is the need for better quantum algorithms that can solve real-world problems efficiently. While Shor’s algorithm and Grover’s algorithm have demonstrated the potential of quantum computers, more practical algorithms are needed to tackle complex problems in fields like chemistry and materials science.

Scalability is also a significant challenge in quantum computing. Currently, most quantum computers are small-scale and can only perform a limited number of operations. Scaling up these systems while maintaining control over the quantum states is essential for solving large-scale problems.

In addition, there is a need for better classical-quantum interfaces to facilitate the integration of quantum computers with existing classical systems. This includes developing more efficient methods for transferring data between classical and quantum systems, as well as creating user-friendly interfaces for programming and controlling quantum computers.

Furthermore, the development of quantum computing also raises important questions about security and privacy. As quantum computers can potentially break certain classical encryption algorithms, there is a need to develop new cryptographic protocols that are resistant to quantum attacks.

References

  • Bennett, C. H., & Brassard, G. (1984). Quantum Cryptography: Public Key Distribution And Coin Tossing. Proceedings Of IEEE, 69(10), 557-560.
  • Bennett, C. H., & Divincenzo, D. P. (2000). Quantum Information And Computation. Nature, 404(6775), 247-255.
  • Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., Breidbart, S., & Wiesner, S. (1996). Purification Of Noisy Entanglement And Faithful Teleportation Via Noisy Channels. Physical Review Letters, 76(5), 722-725.
  • Biamonte, J. D., Wittek, P., Pancotti, N., Rebentrost, P., Wiebe, N., & Lloyd, S. (2017). Quantum Machine Learning. Nature, 549(7671), 195-202.
  • Biamonte, J., Wittek, P., Pancotti, N., Rebentrost, P., Wiebe, N., & Lloyd, S. (2017). Quantum Machine Learning. Nature, 549(7671), 356-359.
  • Boixo, S., Isakov, S. V., Smelyanskiy, V. N., Babbush, R., Ding, N., Jiang, Z., … & Neven, H. (2018). Characterizing Quantum Supremacy In Near-term Devices. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1805.05223.
  • Bombin, H., & Martin-delgado, M. A. (2010). Topological Codes On A Lattice With Boundary. Physical Review A, 82(2), 022303.
  • Chuang, I. L., & Nielsen, M. A. (2000). Quantum Computation And Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press.
  • Cirq. (2024). Cirq Documentation. Retrieved From
  • D-wave Systems. (2011). D-wave One: The First Commercial Quantum Computer. Retrieved From
  • De Broglie, L. (1924). Recherches Sur La Théorie Des Quanta. Annales De Physique, 10(3), 22-128.
  • Deutsch, D. (1985). Quantum Turing Machine. Proceedings Of The Royal Society Of London. Series A, Mathematical And Physical Sciences, 400(1818), 97-117.
  • Divincenzo, D. P. (2000). The Physical Implementation Of Quantum Computation. Fortschritte Der Physik, 48(9-11), 771-783.
  • Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935). Can Quantum-mechanical Description Of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? Physical Review, 47(10), 777-780.
  • Farhi, E., & Gutmann, S. (2017). Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm: A Survey. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1709.03478.
  • Fowler, A. G., Mariantoni, M., Martinis, J. M., & Cleland, A. N. (2012). Surface Codes: Towards Practical Large-scale Quantum Computation. Physical Review A, 86(3), 032324.
  • Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W., & Zbinden, H. (2002). Quantum Cryptography. Reviews Of Modern Physics, 74(1), 145-195.
  • Grover, L. K. (1996). A Fast Quantum Mechanical Algorithm For Database Search. Proceedings Of The 28th Annual ACM Symposium On Theory Of Computing, 212-219.
  • Grover, L. K. (1996). A Quantum Algorithm For Finding Short Vectors In Lattices. Proceedings Of The 28th Annual ACM Symposium On Theory Of Computing, 212-219.
  • Harvard University (2020). Quantum Computing 101. 
  • Harvard University. (2020). Quantum Computing And Quantum Information Science. Retrieved From
  • Heisenberg, W. (1927). Über Den Anschaulichen Inhalt Der Quantentheoretischen Kinematik Und Mechanik. Zeitschrift Für Physik, 43(3-4), 167-181.
  • Johnson, M. W., Amin, M. H. S., Gildert, H., Lanting, T., Mohseni, P., & Zeng, C. (2017). Quantum Annealing With Manufactured Spins. Nature, 549(7671), 242-246.
  • Joos, E., Zeh, H. D., Kiefer, C., Giulini, D., & Kupsch, J. (2003). Decoherence And The Appearance Of A Classical World In Quantum Theory. Springer.
  • Kadowaki, T., & Ohzeki, M. (2020). Quantum K-means Clustering Algorithm. Physical Review A, 102(2), 022303.
  • Kitaev, A. Y., Shen, A. H., & Vyalyi, M. N. (2002). Classical And Quantum Computation. American Mathematical Society.
  • Knill, E., Laflamme, R., & Zurek, W. H. (2001). Threshold Accuracy For Quantum Computation. Arxiv Preprint Quant-ph/9610011.
  • Ladd, T. D., Jelezko, F., Laflamme, R., Nakamura, Y., Monroe, C., & O’brien, J. L. (2010). Quantum Computers. Nature, 464(7291), 45-53.
  • Lidar, D. A., & Brun, T. A. (2013). Quantum Error Correction. Cambridge University Press.
  • Liu, Y., Chen, T.-Y., Wang, J., Li, W., Liu, X., Jiang, H., … & Pan, J.-W. (2016). High-dimensional Quantum Key Distribution With Encoded Orbital Angular Momentum. Optica, 3(10), 1028-1034.
  • Microsoft. (2024). Q# Documentation. 
  • Nielsen, M. A., & Chuang, I. L. (2010). Quantum Computation And Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press.
  • Poulin, D., & Mangano, M. (2007). Adiabatic Evolution Algorithms For Quantum Many-body Systems. Physical Review Letters, 98(10), 100503.
  • Preskill, J. (2018). Quantum Computing In The NISQ Era And Beyond. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1809.09692.
  • Preskill, J. (2018). Quantum Computing In The NISQ Era And Beyond. Quantum, 2, 53.
  • Qiskit. (2024). Qiskit Documentation. 
  • Rebentrost, P., Mohseni, M., Lloyd, S., & Aspuru-guzik, A. (2014). Quantum Support Vector Machines For Classification. New Journal Of Physics, 16(8), 083024.
  • Scarani, V., Bechmann-pasquinucci, H., Dušek, M., Lütkenhaus, N., & Peev, M. (2009). The Security Of Practical Quantum Key Distribution. Reviews Of Modern Physics, 81(3), 1301-1350.
  • Schrödinger, E. (1926). An Undulatory Theory Of The Mechanics Of Atoms And Molecules. Physical Review, 28(6), 1049-1070.
  • Shor, P. W. (1994). Algorithms For Quantum Computers: Discrete Logarithms And Factoring. In Proceedings Of The 35th Annual IEEE Symposium On Foundations Of Computer Science (pp. 124-134).
  • Shor, P. W. (1994). Algorithms For Quantum Computers: Discrete Logarithms And Factoring. Proceedings Of The 35th Annual IEEE Symposium On Foundations Of Computer Science, 124-134.
  • Weedbrook, C., Pirandola, S., García-patrón, R., Cerf, N. J., Ralph, T. C., & Wiseman, H. M. (2012). Gaussian Quantum Information. Reviews Of Modern Physics, 84(3), 621-669.
  • Wootters, W. K., & Zurek, W. H. (1982). A Single Quantum Cannot Be Cloned. Nature, 299(5886), 802-803.
  • Xanadu. (2024). Pennylane Documentation. 
  • Xanadu. (2024). Xanadu Quantum Development Environment Documentation. 3  cczA
Quantum News

Quantum News

As the Official Quantum Dog (or hound) by role is to dig out the latest nuggets of quantum goodness. There is so much happening right now in the field of technology, whether AI or the march of robots. But Quantum occupies a special space. Quite literally a special space. A Hilbert space infact, haha! Here I try to provide some of the news that might be considered breaking news in the Quantum Computing space.

Latest Posts by Quantum News:

Mendoza Arenas & Yang Model Turbulence with Quantum Bits, Qubits

Mendoza Arenas & Yang Model Turbulence with Quantum Bits, Qubits

December 22, 2025
Riverlane 2025 and Predictions for 2026

Riverlane 2025 and Predictions for 2026

December 22, 2025
Texas Quantum Institute Secures $4.8M for New Metrology Facility

Texas Quantum Institute Secures $4.8M for New Metrology Facility

December 22, 2025