The challenge of understanding how systems maintain continuous innovation, rather than reaching a stable state, lies at the heart of complex systems research, and Amahury J López-Díaz, Pedro Juan Rivera Torres, and Gerardo L Febres, alongside Carlos Gershenson, have now developed a new way to measure this ‘open-ended evolution’. Their work introduces a metric, termed Ω, that quantifies the sustained production of novel behaviours in dynamic systems by tracking the persistence of different patterns over time, distinguishing genuine innovation from temporary fluctuations. Using Random Boolean Networks as a versatile testing ground, the team investigates how different mechanisms, including contextual switching and conditional logic, influence a system’s capacity for ongoing evolution, revealing that mechanisms embracing a degree of ‘undecidability’ are key to maintaining novelty. This research establishes a portable benchmark for assessing open-ended evolution in biological models and offers guidance for designing synthetic biological circuits capable of sustained innovation.
Measuring Open-Ended Evolution and Novelty
Scientists are investigating open-ended evolution (OEE), the ability of a system to generate novelty and complexity without a predetermined goal, arguing it is a fundamental property of life and complex systems. Understanding OEE necessitates quantitative metrics, moving beyond descriptive assessments, and requires measuring the information content of a system using concepts like Kolmogorov complexity and entropy. Systems exhibiting OEE demonstrate properties like antifragility, benefiting from disorder, and criticality, where systems at the edge of chaos may be more adaptable. Researchers are also investigating semantic closure, the ability of a system to create its own meanings, and paradoxical signaling, where contradictory signals contribute to homeostasis.
Epigenetics, the study of dynamic gene regulatory networks, plays a role in creating the conditions for OEE. Scientists employ information-theoretic measures, estimate Kolmogorov complexity, analyze network structures, examine temporal changes, and utilize logical modeling to assess OEE. This work has implications for understanding the origin of life, designing artificial life systems capable of adapting to unpredictable environments, and improving our understanding of complex biological systems. OEE is a fundamental concept in complexity science, providing a framework for understanding how complex systems emerge and evolve, and may also explain the vast diversity of microbial life on Earth. This research calls for a new approach to studying evolution and complexity, embracing the importance of intrinsic novelty generation.
Quantifying Sustained Novelty in Dynamical Systems
Scientists have developed a new metric, Ω, to quantify open-ended evolution (OEE) in discrete dynamical systems, focusing on the sustained production of novel phenotypes rather than eventual stabilization. The team defines OEE operationally as the capability of a system to continually generate novel structures or behaviors without settling into fixed or cyclic states, and Ω measures this by calculating the residence-time-weighted contribution of each attractor’s cycle length over time. A value of zero indicates single-attractor dynamics, while increasing Ω values correlate with the number and persistence of distinct cyclic phenotypes, distinguishing enduring innovation from transient noise. This conservation-innovation trade-off drives the evolution of critical dynamics, and the resulting networks exhibit characteristics indicative of sustained novelty. The research builds on formal proofs demonstrating that undecidability is a requirement for OEE. Scientists explored state-dependent mechanisms, such as contextual switching, conditional necessity/possibility, controlled contradictions, and correlated branching, as enabling conditions for sustained novelty, recognizing that these mechanisms allow systems to construct uncomputable futures. By focusing on these underlying mechanisms, the study moves beyond simply quantifying open-endedness to understanding how it arises evolutionarily, emphasizing that the capacity for open-endedness emerges from evolution itself.
Open-ended Evolution Quantified by Attractor Dynamics
This work introduces a new metric, Ω, to quantify open-ended evolution (OEE), defined as the continual production of novel phenotypes without settling into fixed states. Researchers demonstrate that Ω effectively measures OEE by quantifying the residence-time-weighted contribution of each attractor’s cycle length over time; a value of zero indicates single-attractor dynamics, while increasing values correlate with the number and persistence of distinct cyclic phenotypes. Experiments revealed that state-dependent mechanisms, specifically contextual switching, conditional necessity/possibility, controlled contradictions, and correlated branching, are enabling conditions for sustained novelty.
The team measured the performance of these mechanisms in both homogeneous and heterogeneous updating schemes, establishing a clear link between these state-dependent processes and the capacity for ongoing innovation. Results demonstrate that systems incorporating these mechanisms exhibit significantly higher Ω values, indicating a greater capacity for generating and maintaining diverse phenotypes over time. Further analysis showed that the metric Ω is not limited to specific systems; it can be extended to continuous and hybrid state spaces, positioning it as a portable benchmark for OEE in discrete biological modeling. This breakthrough delivers a versatile tool for assessing the potential for open-endedness in a wide range of systems and provides a guide for engineering evolvable synthetic circuits. Measurements confirm that the capacity for open-endedness arises from evolution itself, suggesting that organisms can create their own mechanisms to promote ongoing novelty.
Sustained Recurrence Defines Open-Ended Evolution
This research introduces a new metric, Ω, to quantify open-ended evolution (OEE) in complex systems modeled as discrete dynamical networks. The team demonstrates that OEE is not simply the continual generation of new states, but requires sustained recurrence in those states; a system must dwell on distinct patterns of activity for a significant period to be considered truly open-ended. The metric, Ω, quantifies this by weighting the residence time of each recurring pattern, effectively distinguishing between genuine innovation and transient noise. Specifically, systems incorporating contextual switching, conditional logic, controlled contradictions, or correlated branching exhibited higher values of Ω, indicating a greater capacity for generating and maintaining diverse phenotypes over time.
👉 More information
🗞 Characterizing Open-Ended Evolution Through Undecidability Mechanisms in Random Boolean Networks
🧠 ArXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.15534
