Quantum sensing has made tremendous progress in recent years, driven by advancements in superconducting qubits and quantum magnetometers. Researchers have been exploring new materials and technologies to improve the accuracy and precision of these devices, leading to breakthroughs in the field. The integration of quantum computing hardware with other technologies has enabled the creation of high-quality superconducting qubits with reduced noise levels and increased coherence times.
Quantum magnetometers rely on the precise measurement of magnetic fields to detect subtle changes in their surroundings. Researchers have demonstrated the potential of using quantum computing hardware for sensing applications, including the detection of magnetic fields and electric currents. The use of niobium nitride (NbN) and aluminum (Al) in the development of superconducting qubits has been particularly promising, enabling the creation of high-quality devices with improved performance.
The future of quantum sensing looks promising, with significant advancements expected in the coming years. Researchers are actively exploring new materials and technologies that can improve the accuracy and precision of quantum magnetometers. The integration of quantum computing hardware with other technologies is also expected to lead to significant breakthroughs in the field, enabling the creation of more accurate and reliable quantum magnetometers.
Fundamentals Of Quantum Magnetometry
Quantum magnetometry is a subfield of quantum sensing that utilizes the principles of quantum mechanics to measure magnetic fields with high precision and sensitivity. This technology has been gaining significant attention in recent years due to its potential applications in various fields, including navigation, geophysics, and materials science.
The fundamental principle behind quantum magnetometry is the use of atomic spins as sensitive probes for measuring magnetic fields. In a typical setup, a sample of atoms or ions with well-defined spin properties is placed in a magnetic field, and the resulting Zeeman splitting of the energy levels is measured. The precision of this measurement is directly related to the number of atoms involved and the coherence time of their spins.
One of the key advantages of quantum magnetometry over classical magnetometers is its ability to achieve higher sensitivity and resolution. This is due to the fact that quantum systems can exhibit quantum entanglement, which allows for the creation of highly correlated states between particles. By exploiting this property, researchers have been able to develop quantum magnetometers with unprecedented precision.
For example, a study published in Physical Review Letters demonstrated the use of nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers in diamond as sensitive probes for magnetic field measurements . The NV centers were shown to exhibit long coherence times and high sensitivity to magnetic fields, making them ideal candidates for quantum magnetometry applications. Another study published in Nature Photonics reported on the development of a quantum magnetometer based on atomic ensembles, which achieved a record-breaking sensitivity of 10^-14 Tesla .
The potential applications of quantum magnetometry are vast and varied. In navigation, for instance, quantum magnetometers could enable more accurate and precise positioning systems, particularly in environments where classical magnetometers may be unreliable. Geophysicists also stand to benefit from the increased precision offered by quantum magnetometry, as it could lead to improved understanding of Earth’s magnetic field and its variations over time.
Furthermore, the development of quantum magnetometry has sparked interest in the study of quantum noise and its impact on measurement precision. Researchers have been exploring various strategies for mitigating this effect, including the use of quantum error correction codes and advanced signal processing techniques . As the field continues to evolve, it is likely that we will see significant advancements in both the technology itself and our understanding of the underlying physics.
Principles Of Superconducting Qubits
Superconducting qubits are a type of quantum bit that operates at very low temperatures, typically near absolute zero (0 Kelvin). These qubits rely on the phenomenon of superconductivity to achieve their unique properties. Superconductivity is a state in which certain materials exhibit zero electrical resistance when cooled below a specific temperature, known as the critical temperature (Tc) . In the case of superconducting qubits, the material used is typically a type-II superconductor, such as niobium or aluminum.
The operation of superconducting qubits involves the manipulation of quantum states using electromagnetic pulses. These pulses are applied to the qubit through a resonator, which is essentially a tiny cavity that enhances the interaction between the qubit and the external magnetic field . The qubit’s state can be controlled by adjusting the frequency and amplitude of these pulses. This control allows for precise manipulation of the qubit’s quantum states, enabling applications in quantum computing and sensing.
One key aspect of superconducting qubits is their sensitivity to magnetic fields. When a superconducting qubit is placed in an external magnetic field, its energy levels shift due to the Zeeman effect . This phenomenon allows for precise measurement of the magnetic field’s strength and direction. In fact, superconducting qubits have been used as magnetometers with unprecedented sensitivity, rivaling even the most advanced classical instruments.
The principles of superconducting qubits can be understood through their energy-level diagram. The qubit’s ground state is typically separated from its excited states by a large energy gap . However, when an external magnetic field is applied, this energy gap can be reduced or even eliminated, allowing for quantum tunneling between the two states. This phenomenon enables the precise measurement of magnetic fields and has significant implications for quantum sensing applications.
Superconducting qubits have been extensively studied in various research settings, including universities and national laboratories . These studies have led to a deep understanding of their properties and behavior under different conditions. The results of these investigations have been published in numerous scientific journals and conference proceedings, providing valuable insights into the principles of superconducting qubits.
The development of superconducting qubits has also led to significant advances in quantum computing and sensing . These applications rely on the precise control and manipulation of quantum states, which is made possible by the unique properties of superconducting qubits. As research continues to push the boundaries of what is possible with these devices, it is likely that even more innovative applications will emerge.
Quantum Noise Reduction Techniques
Quantum noise reduction techniques are essential for improving the sensitivity of quantum magnetometers, which rely on the interaction between a magnetic field and a quantum system to detect tiny changes in magnetic fields.
One key technique is the use of squeezed light, which has been shown to reduce quantum noise by up to 50% (Wiseman <a href=”https://quantumzeitgeist.com/quandb-a-quantum-chemical-property-database-enhancing-3d-molecular-learning/”>& Doherty, 1997; Olivares et al., 2006). Squeezed light is generated when a non-classical state of light is amplified, resulting in a reduction of the uncertainty principle’s effect on the measurement. This technique has been successfully implemented in various quantum magnetometers, including those based on nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers in diamond (Schirhagel et al., 2012).
Another approach to reducing quantum noise is through the use of feedback control systems. These systems can actively monitor and adjust the quantum state of the system to minimize the effects of noise (Doherty & Wiseman, 1993; Geremia et al., 2004). This technique has been demonstrated in various quantum magnetometers, including those based on superconducting qubits (Slichter et al., 2010).
Quantum error correction codes are also being explored as a means of reducing quantum noise. These codes can detect and correct errors that occur during the measurement process, effectively reducing the impact of noise on the final result (Gottesman, 1996; Knill & Laflamme, 2000). While still in its early stages, this technique holds promise for improving the sensitivity of quantum magnetometers.
In addition to these techniques, researchers are also exploring new materials and systems that can be used to improve the sensitivity of quantum magnetometers. For example, graphene-based sensors have been shown to have high sensitivity and low noise levels (Novoselov et al., 2004; Wang et al., 2013). Other materials, such as topological insulators, are also being explored for their potential use in quantum magnetometry.
The development of new techniques and materials is crucial for improving the sensitivity of quantum magnetometers. As researchers continue to push the boundaries of what is possible with these devices, they may unlock new applications in fields such as medicine, materials science, and geophysics.
Magnetic Field Sensitivity Limits
The sensitivity of quantum magnetometers, a type of quantum sensor, to magnetic fields is a critical parameter that determines their ability to detect and measure magnetic signals. The sensitivity of these devices is typically expressed as the minimum detectable magnetic field (B_min) or the noise equivalent magnetic field (NEBM). According to a study published in Physical Review X, the NEBM for a high-temperature superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) magnetometer can be as low as 10^-14 Tesla per root hertz (1/√Hz) .
However, the sensitivity of these devices is limited by various factors, including thermal noise, magnetic field fluctuations, and instrumental noise. A study in the Journal of Applied Physics found that the NEBM for a SQUID magnetometer can be increased by up to two orders of magnitude due to thermal noise alone . Additionally, the sensitivity of quantum magnetometers can also be limited by the quality of the superconducting material used in their construction.
The development of new materials and technologies has led to significant improvements in the sensitivity of quantum magnetometers. For example, a study published in Nature Materials demonstrated that the use of nanoscale superconducting materials can lead to a 10-fold improvement in NEBM . Furthermore, the integration of quantum magnetometers with other sensing technologies, such as atomic magnetometry, has also shown promise for improving sensitivity.
Despite these advances, there are still significant challenges to overcome before quantum magnetometers can achieve their full potential. One major limitation is the difficulty in scaling up these devices while maintaining their sensitivity. A study in the Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism found that as the size of a SQUID magnetometer increases, its NEBM also increases . This makes it challenging to develop large-scale quantum magnetometers with high sensitivity.
Researchers are exploring various strategies to overcome this limitation, including the use of new materials and architectures. For example, a study published in Physical Review B demonstrated that the use of topological insulators can lead to significant improvements in NEBM .
The development of more sensitive quantum magnetometers has far-reaching implications for fields such as medicine, geophysics, and materials science. However, further research is needed to overcome the challenges associated with scaling up these devices while maintaining their sensitivity.
Applications In Geophysical Exploration
Quantum magnetometers have revolutionized the field of geophysical exploration by providing a highly sensitive and accurate means of detecting magnetic fields in various environments.
These devices utilize the principles of quantum mechanics to detect even the slightest changes in magnetic fields, making them invaluable tools for applications such as oil and gas exploration, mineral prospecting, and environmental monitoring. The sensitivity of quantum magnetometers is due to their ability to exploit the quantum properties of certain materials, allowing them to detect tiny variations in magnetic fields that would be undetectable with traditional methods.
One of the key advantages of quantum magnetometers is their ability to operate in a wide range of environments, from the surface to depths of several kilometers. This makes them particularly useful for exploring complex geological structures and identifying potential targets for drilling or mining. Furthermore, the high accuracy and precision of quantum magnetometers enable researchers to gather detailed information about the subsurface geology, which can be used to inform decisions on resource extraction and management.
In addition to their practical applications, quantum magnetometers have also been used in scientific research to study the Earth’s magnetic field and its variations over time. By analyzing data from these devices, scientists can gain insights into the Earth’s internal dynamics and the processes that shape our planet’s magnetic field. This knowledge can be used to improve our understanding of geological phenomena such as plate tectonics and seismology.
The development of quantum magnetometers has also led to significant advances in materials science and technology. The creation of these devices requires the use of advanced materials with unique properties, which have been found to have other applications in fields such as electronics and optics. This cross-pollination of ideas between different scientific disciplines has driven innovation and progress in various areas.
The integration of quantum magnetometers into geophysical exploration workflows has also led to improved efficiency and reduced costs. By providing a more accurate and detailed understanding of the subsurface geology, these devices enable researchers to identify potential targets with greater precision, reducing the need for exploratory drilling and minimizing environmental impact.
Quantum Magnetometers For Medical Imaging
Quantum magnetometers have emerged as a promising technology for medical imaging, offering enhanced sensitivity and resolution compared to traditional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques.
The development of quantum magnetometers is rooted in the principles of quantum sensing, which involves harnessing the unique properties of superconducting qubits or other quantum systems to detect tiny changes in magnetic fields. This capability enables researchers to create highly sensitive magnetometers that can detect even the slightest variations in magnetic field strength (Degen et al., 2017; Rugar et al., 2004).
One of the key advantages of quantum magnetometers is their ability to achieve higher sensitivity than traditional MRI techniques, particularly at low magnetic fields. This makes them ideal for applications such as imaging small animals or detecting subtle changes in brain activity (Schirner et al., 2018; Kitching et al., 2016). Furthermore, the use of quantum magnetometers can potentially reduce the need for ionizing radiation in medical imaging procedures.
Quantum magnetometers have also shown promise in the field of neuroimaging, where they can be used to detect subtle changes in brain activity associated with neurological disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease (Kitching et al., 2016; Schirner et al., 2018). The high sensitivity and resolution offered by quantum magnetometers make them an attractive option for researchers seeking to better understand the neural mechanisms underlying these conditions.
The integration of quantum magnetometers into medical imaging protocols is still in its early stages, but ongoing research suggests that they may offer significant advantages over traditional techniques. As the technology continues to evolve, it is likely that we will see increased adoption of quantum magnetometers in a range of medical applications (Degen et al., 2017; Rugar et al., 2004).
The development of quantum magnetometers has also sparked interest in their potential use for detecting biomarkers associated with various diseases. By leveraging the high sensitivity and resolution offered by these devices, researchers may be able to identify subtle changes in magnetic field strength that are indicative of specific disease states (Kitching et al., 2016; Schirner et al., 2018).
High-temperature Superconducting Materials
High-Temperature Superconducting Materials have been a subject of intense research in the field of Quantum Sensing, particularly in the development of Quantum magnetometers.
The discovery of High-Temperature Superconductivity (HTS) by Bednorz and Müller in 1986 revolutionized the understanding of superconducting materials, with the observation of superconductivity at temperatures above 30 Kelvin in lanthanum barium copper oxide (La2-xBaxCuO4) . This breakthrough led to a flurry of research on HTS materials, which have since been explored for their potential applications in Quantum Sensing.
One of the key features of HTS materials is their ability to exhibit perfect diamagnetism, meaning they expel magnetic fields and can be used as sensitive magnetometers. The high critical temperature (Tc) of these materials allows them to operate at temperatures close to room temperature, making them more practical for use in Quantum Sensing applications . For example, the yttrium barium copper oxide (YBCO) material has been shown to exhibit a Tc of up to 93 Kelvin, making it an attractive candidate for Quantum magnetometer development.
The high sensitivity and resolution of HTS materials have made them ideal for use in Quantum Sensing applications, such as magnetic field mapping and quantum computing. The ability of these materials to detect tiny changes in magnetic fields has been demonstrated through various experiments, including the detection of single spins in diamond-based sensors . Furthermore, the development of HTS materials has also led to advancements in the understanding of superconductivity itself, with new insights into the mechanisms governing this phenomenon.
The integration of HTS materials into Quantum magnetometers has also enabled the development of more sensitive and accurate sensing devices. For instance, the use of HTS-based sensors has been shown to improve the resolution of magnetic field measurements by several orders of magnitude . This has significant implications for various fields, including geophysics, materials science, and quantum computing.
The continued research into HTS materials is expected to lead to further breakthroughs in Quantum Sensing, with potential applications in areas such as quantum metrology and high-energy physics. As the field continues to evolve, it is likely that new HTS materials will be discovered or developed, pushing the boundaries of what is currently possible with these remarkable materials.
Fluxonium-based Quantum Magnetometers
Fluxonium-Based Quantum Magnetometers have emerged as a promising technology for precise magnetic field measurements, with potential applications in fields such as materials science and geophysics.
The Fluxonium qubit is a type of superconducting circuit that can be used to create highly sensitive magnetometers. These devices exploit the phenomenon of quantum entanglement to amplify tiny changes in magnetic fields, allowing for unprecedented precision in measurements. Research by Kerman et al. demonstrated the use of Fluxonium-based magnetometers for detecting magnetic fields with a sensitivity of 10^-12 Tesla per square root hertz.
One of the key advantages of Fluxonium-Based Quantum Magnetometers is their ability to operate at very low temperatures, typically around 20 millikelvin. This allows them to achieve high sensitivity while minimizing noise and interference from environmental sources. A study by Lupascu et al. showed that Fluxonium-based magnetometers can maintain a coherence time of up to 100 microseconds, even in the presence of moderate magnetic fields.
The development of Fluxonium-Based Quantum Magnetometers has also led to significant advances in our understanding of quantum measurement theory. These devices have been used to demonstrate the principles of quantum error correction and to explore the limits of precision in quantum measurements. A paper by DiCarlo et al. presented a detailed analysis of the quantum measurement process using Fluxonium-based magnetometers.
In addition to their scientific significance, Fluxonium-Based Quantum Magnetometers also have potential practical applications. For example, they could be used for precise magnetic field mapping in materials science and geophysics, or for detecting subtle changes in magnetic fields associated with geological phenomena such as earthquakes.
The scalability of Fluxonium-Based Quantum Magnetometers is another area of ongoing research, with scientists exploring ways to integrate multiple qubits into a single device. This would enable the creation of more sensitive magnetometers that can be used for a wide range of applications.
Quantum Error Correction Methods
Quantum Error Correction Methods play a crucial role in the development of Quantum Sensing technologies, particularly in Quantum magnetometers. One such method is the Surface Code, which uses a two-dimensional lattice of qubits to encode quantum information (Raussendorf & Harrington, 2007). This approach has been shown to be highly effective in correcting errors caused by decoherence and other sources of noise.
The Surface Code relies on the principle of redundancy, where multiple copies of the same quantum state are encoded in different parts of the lattice. By measuring the correlations between these qubits, it is possible to detect and correct errors that may have occurred during the encoding process (Fowler et al., 2012). This method has been experimentally demonstrated using superconducting qubits and has shown promise for use in Quantum magnetometers.
Another important aspect of Quantum Error Correction Methods is the concept of Quantum Error Correction Codes. These codes are designed to detect and correct errors that occur during quantum computations, such as those used in Quantum magnetometers (Gottesman, 2010). One popular example is the Steane Code, which uses a combination of redundancy and error correction techniques to protect quantum information from decoherence.
Quantum Error Correction Codes have been extensively studied in the context of Quantum Computing, where they are essential for maintaining the integrity of quantum computations. However, their application in Quantum Sensing technologies, such as Quantum magnetometers, is still an active area of research (Barends et al., 2015). Further investigation into these codes and their implementation in Quantum magnetometers may lead to significant improvements in sensitivity and accuracy.
The development of Quantum Error Correction Methods has also led to the creation of new Quantum Sensing technologies. For example, the use of Topological Codes, such as the Toric Code, has been proposed for use in Quantum magnetometers (Bravyi & Kitaev, 1998). These codes have the potential to provide high-fidelity quantum information processing and may be used to improve the accuracy of Quantum magnetometers.
The integration of Quantum Error Correction Methods with other technologies, such as Superconducting Qubits and Quantum Hall Effect devices, has also been explored for use in Quantum magnetometers (Devoret et al., 2013). This multidisciplinary approach has the potential to lead to significant breakthroughs in the field of Quantum Sensing.
Cryogenic Cooling Requirements
To achieve high sensitivity in quantum magnetometry, cryogenic cooling is essential to reduce thermal noise and increase the signal-to-noise ratio. The most common method used is liquid helium (LHe) cooling, which can reach temperatures as low as 4.2 K (Dowling et al., 2015). However, this approach has limitations due to the finite supply of LHe and the complexity of the cryogenic system.
A more efficient alternative is to use a dilution refrigerator, which can cool samples to temperatures below 10 mK (Pielmeier et al., 2009). This method involves a two-stage cooling process, where a mixture of helium-3 and helium-4 is used to cool a sample to the desired temperature. The advantages of this approach include higher cooling efficiency and reduced thermal noise.
The choice of cryogenic material also plays a crucial role in determining the sensitivity of quantum magnetometers. Superconducting materials such as niobium (Nb) and titanium (Ti) are commonly used due to their high critical temperatures and low thermal conductivity (Kirtley, 1985). However, these materials have limitations when it comes to achieving high sensitivity at very low temperatures.
To overcome these limitations, researchers have turned to new materials with improved properties. For example, the use of superconducting nanowires has shown promise in achieving higher sensitivity and lower noise levels (Koch et al., 2016). These nanowires can be fabricated using techniques such as electron beam lithography and can be integrated into existing cryogenic systems.
The development of new cryogenic materials and cooling technologies is crucial for the advancement of quantum magnetometry. As researchers continue to push the boundaries of sensitivity and resolution, the need for innovative cooling solutions will only increase. By exploring new materials and techniques, scientists can unlock the full potential of quantum sensing and enable a wide range of applications.
The integration of cryogenic cooling with advanced magnetic field sensors is also an area of active research. For example, the use of superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) has shown promise in achieving high sensitivity and resolution (Clarke et al., 2013). These SQUIDs can be used to detect tiny changes in magnetic fields and have applications in fields such as geophysics and materials science.
The development of compact and portable cryogenic systems is also essential for the widespread adoption of quantum magnetometry. Researchers are exploring new technologies such as closed-cycle refrigerators and pulse tube coolers, which can achieve high cooling efficiency while minimizing size and weight (Radebaugh et al., 2017).
Quantum Interference Effects In Magnetometry
The phenomenon of quantum interference effects has been extensively studied in the context of magnetometry, a field that utilizes the principles of quantum mechanics to measure magnetic fields with high precision. Research has shown that these effects can significantly impact the accuracy and reliability of magnetometric measurements (Degen et al., 2017). In particular, the presence of quantum interference effects can lead to systematic errors in the measurement of magnetic fields, which can have far-reaching consequences for applications such as navigation and geophysical exploration.
Studies have demonstrated that the quantum interference effects in magnetometry are closely related to the properties of the sensing material used. For instance, experiments conducted on superconducting quantum interferometers (SQIs) have revealed that these devices exhibit a high degree of sensitivity to magnetic fields due to the presence of quantum interference effects (Anastasovska et al., 2016). Similarly, research on nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers in diamond has shown that these defects can be used as highly sensitive magnetometers, with the performance of which being influenced by quantum interference effects (Maze et al., 2008).
Theoretical models have been developed to describe and predict the behavior of quantum interference effects in magnetometry. These models take into account various factors such as the properties of the sensing material, the geometry of the measurement device, and the presence of external magnetic fields (Schirmer et al., 2019). By using these models, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of the underlying physics governing quantum interference effects in magnetometry and develop strategies to mitigate their impact on measurements.
Experimental investigations have been conducted to explore the properties of quantum interference effects in various magnetometric systems. For example, experiments on SQIs have demonstrated that these devices exhibit a high degree of sensitivity to magnetic fields due to the presence of quantum interference effects (Anastasovska et al., 2016). Similarly, research on NV centers in diamond has shown that these defects can be used as highly sensitive magnetometers, with the performance of which being influenced by quantum interference effects (Maze et al., 2008).
The study of quantum interference effects in magnetometry is an active area of research, with ongoing investigations aimed at understanding and mitigating their impact on measurements. By advancing our knowledge of these effects, researchers can develop more accurate and reliable magnetometric systems for a wide range of applications.
Quantum Interference Effects in Magnetometry are closely related to the properties of the sensing material used. Theoretical models have been developed to describe and predict the behavior of quantum interference effects in magnetometry. Experimental investigations have been conducted to explore the properties of quantum interference effects in various magnetometric systems.
Advancements In Quantum Computing Hardware
Quantum computing hardware has witnessed significant advancements in recent years, with the development of more sophisticated quantum processors and improved materials for superconducting qubits.
The introduction of new materials such as niobium nitride (NbN) and aluminum (Al) has enabled the creation of high-quality superconducting qubits with reduced noise levels and increased coherence times. These advancements have been crucial in the development of more accurate quantum magnetometers, which rely on the precise measurement of magnetic fields to detect subtle changes in their surroundings.
Recent studies have demonstrated the potential of using quantum computing hardware for sensing applications, including the detection of magnetic fields and electric currents. Researchers at Google have developed a 53-qubit quantum processor that has achieved high-fidelity operations and has been used to demonstrate the principles of quantum magnetometry (Arute et al., 2019). Similarly, scientists at IBM have created a 127-qubit quantum processor that has enabled the demonstration of quantum error correction techniques (Gidney & Ekerå, 2020).
The development of more advanced quantum computing hardware has also led to significant improvements in the accuracy and precision of quantum magnetometers. Researchers have demonstrated the ability to detect magnetic fields with unprecedented sensitivity using a 53-qubit quantum processor (Arute et al., 2019). Furthermore, scientists have used quantum computing hardware to demonstrate the principles of quantum error correction techniques, which are essential for the development of more accurate and reliable quantum magnetometers (Gidney & Ekerå, 2020).
The integration of quantum computing hardware with other technologies has also led to significant advancements in the field of quantum sensing. Researchers have demonstrated the potential of using quantum computing hardware to detect subtle changes in magnetic fields and electric currents (Arute et al., 2019). Furthermore, scientists have used quantum computing hardware to develop more accurate models of complex systems, which is essential for the development of more reliable and accurate quantum magnetometers (Gidney & Ekerå, 2020).
The future of quantum sensing looks promising, with significant advancements expected in the coming years. Researchers are actively exploring new materials and technologies that can improve the accuracy and precision of quantum magnetometers. The integration of quantum computing hardware with other technologies is also expected to lead to significant breakthroughs in the field.
- Anastasovska, J., et al. (2020) ‘Superconducting Quantum Interferometers For Magnetometry.’ *Physical Review X*, 6, 021013.
- Arute, F., et al. (2019) ‘Quantum Supremacy Using A 53-qubit Quantum Processor.’ *Nature*, 574, 505-510.
- Arute, F., et al. (2019) ‘Quantum Supremacy Using A Programmable Quantum Computer.’ *Nature*, 574, 505-508.
- Balasubramanian, G., et al. (2011) ‘Nanoscale Magnetometry With Diamond-based Quantum Sensors.’ *Science*, 334, 610-613.
- Balasubramanian, G., et al. (2011) ‘Nanoscale Temperature Imaging And Sensing With Nitrogen Vacancy Centers.’ *Physical Review Letters*, 102, 255301.
- Barends, R., et al. (2014) ‘Superconducting Qubits In A Microwave Field With Tunable Coupling.’ *Physical Review X*, 5, 021013.
- Bednorz, J. G., & Müller, K. A. (1986) ‘Possible High Tc Superconductivity In The Ba-la-cu-o System.’ *Zeitschrift Für Physik B Condensed Matter*, 64, 189-193.
- Bravyi, S., & Kitaev, A. Y. (2002) ‘Quantum Codes On A Lattice Of Qubits.’ *Physics Letters A*, 271(1-2), 17-23.
- Budker, D., & Romalis, J. V. (2007) ‘Optical Magnetometry.’ *Reviews Of Modern Physics*, 74, 1153-1201.
- Clarke, J., & Wilhelm, F. K. (2011) ‘Superconducting Qubits: A Review.’ *Journal Of Low Temperature Physics*, 151(3-4), 153-166.
- Clarke, J., et al. (2011) ‘Squids: Fundamentals And Applications To Qubits.’ *Reviews Of Modern Physics*, 85, 161-208.
- Degen, C. L., & Tabuchi, N. (2016) ‘Quantum Magnetometry.’ *Annual Review Of Condensed Matter Physics*, 8, 347-365.
- Degen, C. L., Reinhard, F., & Cappellaro, P. (2017) ‘Quantum Sensing With Nitrogen-vacancy Centers.’ *Journal Of Physics: Conference Series*, 890, 012001.
- Degen, C. L., Reinhard, F., & Cappellaro, P. (2019) ‘Quantum Sensing With Superconducting Qubits.’ *Reviews Of Modern Physics*, 89, 035002.
- Degen, C. L., et al. (2017) ‘Quantum Sensing In The Presence Of Noise And Decoherence.’ *Reviews Of Modern Physics*, 89, 025001.
- Devoret, M. H., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2013) ‘Superconducting Circuits For Quantum Information: An Overview.’ *Annual Review Of Condensed Matter Physics*, 4, 303-324.
- Devoret, M. H., et al. (2012) ‘Superconducting Qubits In A Microwave Field With Tunable Coupling.’ *Physical Review X*, 3, 041011.
- Dicarlo, L., et al. (2010) ‘Quantum Measurement Theory With Fluxonium-based Magnetometers.’ *Journal Of The Optical Society Of America B*, 32, 641-652.
- Doherty, A. C., & Wiseman, H. M. (1993) ‘Optimal Estimation Of Quantum States: A Review.’ *Physical Review A*, 48, 2532-2544.
- Dowling, J. P., & Milburn, G. J. (2000) ‘Quantum Computation With Continuous-variable Systems: Wigner Function Approach.’ *Journal Of Modern Optics*, 62, 1-15.
- Fowler, S. E., Marianti, C., & Devoret, M. H. (2012) ‘Surface Code Quantum Computing With Superconducting Qubits.’ *Physical Review A*, 86, 042311.
- Geremia, J. M., et al. (2006) ‘Feedback Control Of A Superconducting Qubit.’ *Physical Review Letters*, 93, 150503.
- Gidney, C., & Ekerå, J. (2019) ‘Efficient Quantum Circuits For Silicon Quantum Dots.’ *Physical Review X*, 10, 021015.
- Gottesman, D. (1996) ‘Class Of Quantum Error-correcting Codes Saturating The Holevo Bound For Mixed States.’ *Physical Review A*, 54, 1862-1871.
- Gottesman, D. (1997) ‘Stabilizer Codes And Quantum Error Correction.’ *Journal Of Mathematical Physics*, 41, 5031-5045.
- Graham, R. G., & Harte, J. A. (2018) ‘Quantum Magnetometers For Geophysical Exploration.’ *Journal Of Applied Geophysics*, 137, 145-154.
- Kerman, J. A., et al. (2016) ‘Fluxonium-based Quantum Magnetometer.’ *Physical Review X*, 8, 021013.
- Kim, J. S., et al. (2004) ‘Scaling Of High-temperature Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices.’ *Journal Of Superconductivity And Novel Magnetism*, 27(5), 1231-1236.
- Kirtley, J. L. (2019) *Superconducting Materials: Properties And Applications*. Academic Press.
- Kirtley, J. L., et al. (2003) ‘High-temperature Superconducting Squids For Magnetic Field Mapping.’ *IEEE Transactions On Applied Superconductivity*, 13, 844-847.
- Kitching, J., et al. (2016) ‘Chip-scale Quantum Magnetometer.’ *Physical Review X*, 6, 021013.
- Knill, E., & Laflamme, R. (2000) ‘Theory Of Quantum Error Correction.’ *Physical Review A*, 61, 052307.
- Koch, N., et al. (2016) ‘Superconducting Nanowires For Quantum Magnetometry.’ *Physical Review X*, 6, 021012.
- Lang, K. M., et al. (2013) ‘High-temperature Superconducting Quantum Interference Device Magnetometer.’ *Physical Review X*, 4, 021001.
- Lupascu, I., et al. (2017) ‘Coherence And Sensitivity Of Fluxonium-based Magnetometers.’ *Physical Review B*, 99, 104503.
- Maze, J. R., et al. (2008) ‘Nanoscale Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging Of A Single Cell.’ *Science*, 322, 1021-1025.
- National Institute Of Standards And Technology. (2020) *Superconducting Qubits For Quantum Computing And Sensing.*
- Novoselov, K. S., et al. (2005) ‘Two-dimensional Gas Of Massless Dirac Fermions In Graphene.’ *Nature*, 438, 197-200.
- Olivares, S., et al. (2007) ‘Quantum Noise Reduction In A Superconducting Qubit.’ *Physical Review Letters*, 96, 150503.
- Pielmeier, A., et al. (2013) ‘Dilution Refrigerator For Quantum Computing And Sensing Applications.’ *Journal Of Low Temperature Physics*, 156, 333-343.
- Pratt, J. R., et al. (2012) ‘Thermal Noise In High-temperature Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices.’ *Journal Of Applied Physics*, 115(17), 174501.
- Radebaugh, R., et al. (2015) ‘Closed-cycle Refrigerators For Quantum Computing And Sensing Applications.’ *Journal Of Low Temperature Physics*, 187, 533-543.
- Raussendorf, R. A., & Harrington, J. (2007) ‘Fault-tolerant Quantum Computation With High Threshold Thresholds For Small Surface Codes.’ *Physical Review A*, 76, 022301.
- Rugar, D., Budakian, M., Chervenak, G., & Yannoni, C. R. (2004) ‘Single Spin Resolution With A Magnetic Resonance Force Microscope.’ *Nature*, 430, 329-332.
- Schirhagel, K., et al. (2014) ‘High-sensitivity Magnetometry With A Diamond-based Quantum Sensor.’ *New Journal Of Physics*, 14, 103026.
- Schirmer, M., et al. (2018) ‘Quantum Magnetometry With Nitrogen-vacancy Centers In Diamond.’ *Physical Review A*, 99, 022101.
- Scholtes, T., et al. (2020) ‘High-precision Quantum Magnetometry With A Nitrogen-vacancy Center Sensor.’ *Nature Communications*, 11, 1-9.
- Sherrill, M. D., et al. (2013) ‘Nanoscale Superconducting Materials For Improved Sensitivity In Magnetometers.’ *Nature Materials*, 13(10), 974-979.
- Slichter, C. P., et al. (2013) ‘Quantum Error Correction In A Superconducting Qubit.’ *Physical Review A*, 82, 052311.
- Taylor, et al. (2011) ‘High-sensitivity Magnetometry With A Diamond-based Quantum Sensor.’ *Nature Photonics*, 7, 791-795.
- Tinkham, M. (1996) *Introduction To Superconductivity*. Oxford University Press.
- Turner, A. M., et al. (2016) ‘Topological Insulators For Improved Sensitivity In Magnetometers.’ *Physical Review B*, 90(10), 104503.
- Umezawa, K., & Ishiguro, T. (1986) ‘High-temperature Superconductivity In Yba2cu3o7-x.’ *Physical Review B*, 44, 7366-7374.
- Wang, Z., et al. (2016) ‘High-sensitivity Magnetometry With A Graphene-based Sensor.’ *Physical Review B*, 87, 115401.
- Wiseman, H. M., & Doherty, A. C. (1995) ‘Optimal Estimation Of Quantum States.’ *Physical Review A*, 56, 3483-3494.
- Zeeman, P. (1902) ‘On The Influence Of Magnetism On The Nature Of Light Emitted By A Substance In An Electric Discharge.’ *Philosophical Magazine*, 44, 269-274.
