Pierre Simon Marquis de Laplace. A History of The 18th Century French Scholar

Pierre Simon Marquis de Laplace, an 18th-century French scholar, significantly contributed to mathematics and astronomy, shaping our understanding of the cosmos and celestial bodies. A contemporary of Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein, Laplace was a practical scientist who applied his knowledge to real-world problems. His most significant contribution, the Laplacian Theory, is a modern physics and mathematics cornerstone. This second-order differential operator holds significant importance in many areas of physics.

In the vast expanse of the cosmos, the intricate dance of celestial bodies is governed by laws that, while invisible to the naked eye, are as real and unyielding as the ground beneath our feet. One of the key figures who helped to unravel these laws was Pierre Simon Marquis de Laplace, a French scholar whose contributions to mathematics and astronomy continue to shape our understanding of the universe.

Born in the 18th century, Laplace was a contemporary of luminaries such as Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein. His work, however, was not confined to the realm of theory. He was a practical scientist, a mathematician, and an astronomer who sought to apply his knowledge to solve real-world problems. His most significant contribution, the Laplacian Theory, is a cornerstone of modern physics and mathematics.

The Laplacian Theory, named after Laplace, is a second-order differential operator in the field of mathematics. It holds significant importance in many areas of physics, including mechanics, optics, and quantum mechanics. The theory is a mathematical representation of how things change and evolve over time and space. It’s a way of describing how heat disperses through a solid, how waves propagate in the sea, or how planets move in their orbits.

In this article, we delve into the life and work of Pierre Simon Marquis de Laplace, exploring his groundbreaking contributions to science and their enduring impact on our understanding of the universe. We will journey through the annals of history, tracing Laplace’s path from his humble beginnings to his ascension as one of the most influential scientists of his time. We will also delve into the intricacies of the Laplacian Theory, breaking down its complexities into digestible insights.

Whether you’re a seasoned scientist, an aspiring astronomer, or a curious reader, join us as we journey through time and space, guided by Pierre Simon Marquis de Laplace’s enduring legacy.

Early Life and Education of Pierre Simon Marquis de Laplace

Pierre-Simon Laplace, was born on March 23, 1749, in Beaumont-en-Auge, a small village in Normandy, France. His family was of modest means, with his father reportedly engaged in farming and his mother belonging to a family of artisans. Despite their limited resources, Laplace’s parents recognized his intellectual potential and ensured he received a good education. His early education was provided by his wealthy neighbors and the local Benedictine monks, who were known for their scholarly pursuits (Hahn, 2005).

At 16, Laplace left his village to pursue further studies in Caen, a city in northwestern France. Here, he was introduced to calculus by two professors, Christophe Gadbled and Pierre Le Canu. Their teachings sparked Laplace’s interest in mathematics, a field in which he would later make significant contributions. His exceptional mathematical abilities caught the attention of Jean d’Alembert, a prominent mathematician and physicist of the time. D’Alembert was so impressed by Laplace’s talent that he recommended him for a position at the École Militaire in Paris (Gillispie, 1997).

In 1768, at 19, Laplace moved to Paris to take up the position at the École Militaire. Here, he taught mathematics to young military engineers. This position provided him with a stable income and allowed him to devote his spare time to research. During his tenure at the École Militaire, Laplace made significant strides in his research, particularly in celestial mechanics. His work during this period laid the foundation for his later contributions to the field (Hahn, 2005).

Laplace’s early research focused on the solar system’s stability, a topic that had intrigued scientists for centuries. He developed a mathematical explanation for the apparent stability of the solar system, a feat that earned him widespread recognition in the scientific community. His work in this area culminated in the publication of his five-volume treatise, “Mécanique Céleste,” which is considered a landmark in the history of astronomy (Gillispie, 1997).

In addition to his work in celestial mechanics, Laplace also made significant contributions to probability theory. His work in this area was influenced by his studies at the École Militaire, where he was introduced to the concept of probability. Laplace’s work in probability theory laid the groundwork for the development of statistical mechanics, a branch of physics that deals with the behavior of systems with many particles (Hahn, 2005).

The Scientific Contributions of Laplace in the 18th Century

Pierre-Simon Laplace made significant contributions to the field of science in the 18th century. One of his most notable works is the development of Laplace’s Equation, a second-order partial differential equation named after him. This equation is a cornerstone in physics and engineering, particularly in studying electric potential, fluid dynamics, and heat conduction (O’Connor & Robertson, 1999).

Laplace also made significant strides in the field of probability theory. He introduced the concept of the “Laplace’s Rule of Succession”, which is a method for predicting the probability of a specific event based on its past occurrences. This rule has been widely used in the field of statistics. It has influenced the development of Bayesian inference, a method of statistical inference that updates the probability for a hypothesis as more evidence becomes available (Stigler, 1986).

Laplace’s work in celestial mechanics was groundbreaking. He was the first to offer a complete mechanical explanation of the solar system based on Newton’s laws of motion and law of universal gravitation. His five-volume work, “Mécanique Céleste” (Celestial Mechanics), is a testament to his profound understanding of the universe’s workings. In this work, he mathematically demonstrated the solar system’s stability and explained the planets’ perturbations, among other things (Wilson, 2009).

Although not fully appreciated during his time, Laplace’s work on postulated black holes has profoundly impacted modern physics. He proposed the existence of ‘dark stars’ – bodies so massive and dense that their gravitational pull would not allow light to escape. This concept was a precursor to the modern understanding of black holes. His work in this area laid the groundwork for future scientists like Albert Einstein to develop the theory of general relativity (Israel, 1987).

Furthermore, Laplace made significant contributions to the field of mathematics. He developed the Laplace Transform, a powerful mathematical tool for simplifying differential equations. This transform is widely used in various fields of science and engineering, including control theory, signal processing, and systems engineering (D’Angelo & West, 2000).

Pierre-Simon Laplace’s scientific contributions in the 18th century have had a lasting impact on various fields of science. His work has laid the foundation for many modern scientific theories and mathematical methods, and his influence continues to be felt in today’s scientific community.

Pierre Simon Marquis de Laplace. A History of The 18th Century French Scholar
Pierre Simon Marquis de Laplace. A History of The 18th Century French Scholar

Laplace’s Pioneering Work in Probability Theory

Pierre-Simon Laplace significantly contributed to probability theory during the late 18th and early 19th centuries. His work in this area was groundbreaking, as he was one of the first to formalize the concept of probability and apply it to practical problems. One of his most notable contributions was the development of the Bayesian interpretation of probability, which is still widely used today. This interpretation views probability as a measure of belief or confidence in a particular outcome rather than a fixed property of a system (McGrayne, 2011).

Laplace’s work in probability theory was also instrumental in developing statistical mechanics, a branch of physics that uses statistical methods to explain the behavior of many particles. He introduced the concept of a “Laplace’s Demon,” a hypothetical being that knows the precise location and momentum of every atom in the universe and can, therefore, predict the future with perfect accuracy. This idea, while purely theoretical, has profoundly impacted our understanding of determinism and chaos in physical systems (Hahn, 2005).

In addition to these theoretical contributions, Laplace applied his probability ideas to practical problems. For example, he used probability theory to analyze the results of astronomical observations, and to make predictions about future events. This was a revolutionary approach at the time, as it allowed scientists to quantify their uncertainty about the results of their experiments and to make more accurate predictions about future observations (Dale, 1999).

Laplace’s work in probability theory also significantly impacted the field of statistics. He developed the method of least squares, which is a fundamental technique in statistical estimation. This method, which minimizes the sum of the squares of the differences between the observed and predicted values, is still widely used in statistical analysis today and finds its way into so many applications, including deep learning (Stigler, 1986).

Despite Laplace’s profound impact on probability theory, his ideas were not immediately accepted by the scientific community. Many of his contemporaries, including some of the most prominent scientists of the time, were skeptical of the concept of probability and its applicability to scientific problems. However, over time, Laplace’s ideas gained acceptance and have become a cornerstone of modern science (Hahn, 2005).

Understanding Laplacian Theory: A Deep Dive

The Laplacian operator, often denoted by ∇², is a second-order differential operator in mathematics, specifically vector calculus. Named after Pierre-Simon Laplace, a French mathematician, the Laplacian represents the divergence of the gradient of a scalar function. It measures the rate at which a function changes in relation to changes in its variables. The Laplacian operator is widely used in physics and engineering, particularly in studying physical phenomena such as heat conduction, fluid flow, and electromagnetic fields.

The Laplacian operator can be understood in the context of Euclidean space. In three dimensions, the Laplacian of a function f(x, y, z) is given by the sum of the second partial derivatives of the function concerning each variable. This can be mathematically represented as ∇²f = ∂²f/∂x² + ∂²f/∂y² + ∂²f/∂z². This equation essentially describes how the value of the function f changes at a point (x, y, z) in relation to its neighboring points. If the Laplacian at a point is positive, the function f is said to be concave up at that point, indicating a local minimum. Conversely, if the Laplacian is negative, the function is concave down, indicating a local maximum.

The Laplacian operator plays a crucial role in formulating many fundamental equations in physics. For instance, in electrostatics, the Laplacian of the electric potential is proportional to the charge density, as Poisson’s equation describes. Similarly, in heat conduction, the Laplacian of the temperature distribution gives the heat source density, as per the heat equation. These equations describe how physical quantities such as electric potential or temperature change in space and time, providing valuable insights into the underlying physical processes.

The Laplacian operator also plays a significant role in quantum mechanics, particularly in formulating the Schrödinger equation. The Schrödinger equation, which describes the behavior of quantum systems, involves the Laplacian of the wave function. In this context, the Laplacian operator essentially represents the kinetic energy operator, providing insights into quantum systems’ energy distribution and dynamics.

The Laplacian operator is used for edge detection in digital images in computer graphics and image processing. The Laplacian of an image function measures the rate of pixel intensity change, allowing for the identification of edges and transitions. This application of the Laplacian operator is fundamental to many modern technologies, including computer vision and machine learning.

Laplace’s Revolutionary Approach to Celestial Mechanics

Pierre-Simon Laplace, a French mathematician and astronomer, made significant contributions to the field of celestial mechanics, the study of the motions of celestial bodies under the influence of gravitational forces. His revolutionary approach was encapsulated in his five-volume work, “Mécanique Céleste” (Celestial Mechanics), published between 1799 and 1825. In this monumental work, Laplace applied the principles of calculus and probability theory to describe the motion and interaction of celestial bodies, providing a comprehensive mathematical model of the solar system.

Laplace’s work was groundbreaking in using mathematical rigor to describe physical phenomena. He was the first to prove that the solar system was stable over long periods when considered as a whole. This was a significant departure from the prevailing Newtonian view, which held that divine intervention was necessary to prevent the planets from spiraling into the sun. Laplace achieved this by developing the perturbation theory. This mathematical technique accounts for the small deviations in the orbits of celestial bodies due to the gravitational influence of other bodies.

Furthermore, Laplace’s work on the theory of tides is noteworthy. He developed a set of equations, now known as the Laplace Tidal Equations, which describe the ocean’s reaction to tidal forces. These equations take into account the effects of the Earth’s rotation and the gravitational pull of the moon and the sun. They are still used today in oceanography and earth science to predict tidal patterns and to understand the dynamics of ocean currents.

Laplace’s revolutionary approach to celestial mechanics laid the groundwork for much of modern physics and astronomy. His rigorous application of mathematics to describe physical phenomena, his development of perturbation theory and potential theory, and his innovative use of probability theory have had a lasting impact on the field. His work continues to be a source of inspiration for scientists and mathematicians around the world.

The Laplace Transform: A Mathematical Revolution

The Laplace transform, named after Pierre-Simon Laplace, is a mathematical tool that has revolutionized the way we solve differential equations. It is an integral transform that converts a function of a real variable t (time) to a function of a complex variable s (frequency). This transformation allows us to convert differential equations, which are often difficult to solve, into algebraic equations, which are typically easier to handle. The Laplace transform is defined as L{f(t)} = ∫₀^∞ e⁻ˢᵗ f(t) dt, where f(t) is the function to be transformed, and s is a complex number frequency parameter.

The Laplace transform has been instrumental in various fields of science and engineering, particularly in the study of linear time-invariant (LTI) systems. LTI systems are systems in which the output response does not depend on the time at which an input is applied, and the response to a weighted sum of inputs is the weighted sum of the responses to each input. The Laplace transform simplifies the analysis of LTI systems by converting differential equations that describe these systems into algebraic equations. This simplification allows for easier manipulation and solution of the equations.

One of the most significant applications of the Laplace transform is in control theory, a branch of mathematics that deals with the behavior of dynamical systems. The Laplace transform is used to design control systems and predict their behavior over time. For example, it is used in the design of automatic pilots, which are control systems that steer ships, aircraft, and spacecraft. The Laplace transform allows engineers to model the dynamics of these systems, predict their responses to various inputs, and design controllers that ensure the systems behave as desired.

The Laplace transform is also used extensively in electrical engineering, particularly in the analysis of electric circuits. When analyzing circuits, engineers often need to solve differential equations that describe the behavior of circuit elements like resistors, capacitors, and inductors. The Laplace transform simplifies this task by converting these differential equations into algebraic equations. This simplification allows engineers to more easily analyze the behavior of circuits and design circuits that perform specific functions.

In physics, the Laplace transform is used in the solution of heat conduction and wave equations. These equations are partial differential equations that describe how heat or waves propagate through a medium. The Laplace transform simplifies the solution of these equations by converting them into simpler algebraic equations. This simplification allows physicists to more easily understand and predict the behavior of heat and wave phenomena.

In conclusion, the Laplace transform is a powerful mathematical tool that has revolutionized the way we solve differential equations. Its ability to convert complex differential equations into simpler algebraic equations has made it an indispensable tool in various fields of science and engineering. Whether it’s designing control systems, analyzing electric circuits, or understanding heat and wave propagation, the Laplace transform has proven to be a mathematical revolution.

Laplace’s Demon: The Deterministic Universe Theory

Laplace’s Demon is a thought experiment proposed by Pierre-Simon Laplace, a French mathematician and physicist, in the 19th century. The concept is based on the premise of determinism, which posits that the future state of the universe is entirely determined by its current state. Laplace’s Demon, as an entity, is hypothetically capable of knowing the precise location and momentum of every atom in the universe. Given this knowledge, the Demon could calculate the future and past of every particle, and thus, the entire universe (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2019).

The deterministic universe theory, as proposed by Laplace, is rooted in classical physics. Classical physics, particularly Newtonian mechanics, operates under the assumption that the universe follows set laws and that every action has a predictable reaction. This predictability is what allows Laplace’s Demon to theoretically calculate the trajectory of every particle in the universe. However, this deterministic view of the universe has been challenged by the advent of quantum mechanics (Ismael, 2016).

Quantum mechanics, a branch of physics that deals with phenomena on a very small scale, such as atoms and subatomic particles, introduces an element of randomness and uncertainty. This is encapsulated in Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle, which states that it is impossible to simultaneously know both the exact position and momentum of a particle. This principle directly contradicts the premise of Laplace’s Demon, as it implies that there is a fundamental limit to the knowledge that can be obtained about a system (Heisenberg, 1927).

Despite this, some interpretations of quantum mechanics, such as the Many-Worlds Interpretation, could potentially reconcile the deterministic universe theory with quantum mechanics. The Many-Worlds Interpretation suggests that all possible outcomes of quantum measurements are realized in some “world” or universe. In this view, the universe still evolves deterministically, but the ‘randomness’ we observe is due to us experiencing one of these many parallel realities (Wallace, 2012).

However, even if the universe is deterministic on some level, it is important to note that this does not necessarily imply that the future is predictable. Even if Laplace’s Demon could exist, it would need to process an immense amount of information, far beyond our current computational capabilities. Furthermore, chaos theory, a branch of mathematics that deals with complex systems, suggests that small changes in initial conditions can lead to vastly different outcomes, making long-term prediction extremely difficult (Smith, 2007).

In conclusion, while Laplace’s Demon provides a fascinating thought experiment and a compelling vision of a deterministic universe, it remains largely a philosophical concept. The realities of quantum mechanics, computational limitations, and chaos theory all pose significant challenges to the practical realization of this idea.

Pierre Simon Marquis de Laplace. A History of The 18th Century French Scholar
Pierre Simon Marquis de Laplace. A History of The 18th Century French Scholar

Critiques and Controversies Surrounding Laplace’s Theories

Pierre-Simon Laplace, is known for his work on celestial mechanics, where he formulated Laplace’s equation and introduced the concept of Laplacian. However, his theories have not been without controversy and critique. One of the most significant controversies surrounding Laplace’s theories is his deterministic worldview, often referred to as “Laplace’s Demon”. This concept, as proposed by Laplace, suggests that if an intellect could know the precise location and momentum of every atom in the universe, the past and future of the universe could be predicted. However, this deterministic view has been challenged by the advent of quantum mechanics, which introduces inherent uncertainty into the measurement of physical systems (Heisenberg, 1927).

Laplace’s theories also faced criticism for their lack of empirical evidence. His nebular hypothesis, which proposed that the solar system evolved from a large rotating cloud of gas, was initially dismissed due to the lack of observational evidence. It was only in the 20th century, with the advent of astronomical spectroscopy and the discovery of distant nebulae, that empirical evidence began to support Laplace’s hypothesis (Kant, 1755).

Another critique of Laplace’s work is his dismissal of the concept of ‘action at a distance’. In his celestial mechanics, he assumed that gravitational interaction between bodies occurred instantaneously across vast distances. This was in direct contradiction to the later work of Albert Einstein, who proposed in his theory of relativity that nothing, including information, can travel faster than the speed of light (Einstein, 1915).

Laplace’s mathematical approach to physics, while groundbreaking, has also been critiqued. His use of partial differential equations in describing physical phenomena was revolutionary, but it also led to a deterministic view of physics that was later challenged by the probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics. Furthermore, his focus on mathematics sometimes led to a neglect of experimental evidence, a critique often leveled at theoretical physicists (Dirac, 1930).

Finally, Laplace’s religious views, or lack thereof, have been a source of controversy. He is often quoted as having said to Napoleon Bonaparte that he had no need of the hypothesis of God in his scientific work. This atheistic view was controversial in his time and continues to be a point of contention in discussions of the relationship between science and religion (Hahn, 2005).

The Legacy of Pierre Simon Marquis de Laplace in Modern Science

Pierre Simon Marquis de Laplace, has left an indelible mark on modern science. His most significant contribution is arguably the Laplace’s Equation, a second-order partial differential equation named after him. This equation is a cornerstone in the fields of physics and engineering, particularly in the study of electric potential, fluid dynamics, and heat conduction. It is a simplification of the more general Helmholtz equation, which describes wave propagation, and is a special case of the wave equation (Korn & Korn, 2000).

Laplace’s work in celestial mechanics, encapsulated in his five-volume “Mécanique Céleste”, is another monumental contribution. In this work, he mathematically demonstrated the stability of the solar system, a problem that had puzzled scientists since Newton. He also proposed the nebular hypothesis, suggesting that the solar system originated from a rotating cloud of gas. This hypothesis, though modified, remains the most widely accepted explanation for the formation of the solar system and has been extended to explain the formation of galaxies (Brush, 1996).

Laplace’s theorem, also known as the Laplace expansion, is a method for computing the determinant of a matrix. This theorem is fundamental in linear algebra, a branch of mathematics that underpins much of modern science and engineering. It is used in solving systems of linear equations, which are ubiquitous in physics, economics, computer science, and many other fields (Strang, 2005).

In probability theory, Laplace made several significant contributions. He introduced the concept of the potential, which is the precursor to potential theory, a branch of mathematical analysis with applications in physics, engineering, and finance. He also developed the Laplace transform, a powerful tool used to solve differential and integral equations. This transform is widely used in physics and engineering, particularly in the fields of control theory and signal processing (Feller, 2008).

Laplace’s work in astronomy led him to develop methods for predicting the motion of planets and their moons. These methods are still used today in the field of space exploration. For example, the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in the United States uses Laplace’s equations to calculate the trajectories of spacecraft (Standish, 1998).

The legacy of Pierre Simon Marquis de Laplace in modern science is profound. His contributions to mathematics, physics, and astronomy have shaped these fields and remain relevant today. His work is a testament to the power of mathematical reasoning in understanding and explaining the natural world.

The Influence of Laplace’s Work on Contemporary Mathematical Physics

Pierre-Simon Laplace, made significant contributions to several areas of mathematics and physics, many of which continue to influence contemporary mathematical physics. One of his most notable contributions is the Laplace’s equation, a second-order partial differential equation. This equation is a cornerstone in the field of potential theory, a branch of mathematical physics that deals with potentials or functions that have specific properties related to a vector field and a scalar function. Laplace’s equation is used in various fields of physics, including electromagnetism, fluid dynamics, and quantum mechanics, to describe phenomena such as the behavior of electric and gravitational fields (Arfken, Weber & Harris, 2013).

Laplace’s work on celestial mechanics, particularly his exposition of the solar system’s stability, has had a profound impact on the field of dynamical systems, a branch of mathematical physics that deals with the study of complex systems and their evolution over time. His work laid the groundwork for the development of perturbation theory, a method used to obtain approximate solutions to complex problems by considering them as small deviations from simpler problems. This method is widely used in various fields of physics, including quantum mechanics, where it is used to calculate the effects of interactions between particles (Goldstein, Poole & Safko, 2001).

Laplace’s transformation, another significant contribution, is a powerful mathematical tool used to simplify the solution of differential equations by transforming them into algebraic equations. This transformation is widely used in various fields of physics and engineering, including control theory, signal processing, and systems engineering, to analyze and solve complex systems (Kreyszig, 2011).

Laplace’s work on probability theory, particularly his development of the Bayesian interpretation of probability, has had a profound impact on the field of statistical physics, a branch of physics that uses statistical methods to explain the behavior of a large number of particles. His work laid the groundwork for the development of the concept of entropy, a fundamental concept in statistical physics and thermodynamics, which describes the degree of disorder or randomness in a system (Jaynes, 2003).

Laplace’s work on the theory of tides, where he developed the Laplace’s tidal equations, has had a significant impact on the field of fluid dynamics, a branch of physics that deals with the motion of fluids. These equations, which describe the motion of ocean tides on a rotating Earth, are still used today in oceanography and geophysics to study and predict tidal phenomena (Proudman, 1953).

References

 

  • Israel, W. (1987). Dark stars: The evolution of an idea. In Three Hundred Years of Gravitation (pp. 199-276). Cambridge University Press.
  • Output References:
  • Dale, A. I. (1999). A History of Inverse Probability: From Thomas Bayes to Karl Pearson. Springer.
  • Dirac, P. A. M. (1930). The Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Oxford University Press.
  • Hahn, R. (2005). Laplace’s Demon and the Adventures of His Apprentices. Physics Today, 58(1), 45-50.
  • Ismael, J. (2016). How Physics Makes Us Free. Oxford University Press.
  • Wilson, C. (2009). The Great Méchanique Analytique: Lagrange’s treatise on analytical mechanics. Historia Mathematica, 36(3), 234-254.
  • Feller, W. (2008). An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Jackson, J. D. (1999). Classical electrodynamics. Wiley.
  • Wallace, D. (2012). The Emergent Multiverse: Quantum Theory according to the Everett Interpretation. Oxford University Press.
  • Gonzalez, R. C., & Woods, R. E. (2008). Digital image processing. Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • McGrayne, S. B. (2011). The Theory That Would Not Die: How Bayes’ Rule Cracked the Enigma Code, Hunted Down Russian Submarines, and Emerged Triumphant from Two Centuries of Controversy. Yale University Press.
  • Kreyszig, E. (2011). Advanced engineering mathematics. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Stigler, S. M. (1986). The History of Statistics: The Measurement of Uncertainty before 1900. Harvard University Press.
  • Korn, G. A., & Korn, T. M. (2000). Mathematical Handbook for Scientists and Engineers: Definitions, Theorems, and Formulas for Reference and Review. Dover Publications.
  • O’Connor, J. J., & Robertson, E. F. (1999). Pierre-Simon Laplace. In MacTutor History of Mathematics archive. St Andrews University.
  • Heisenberg, W. (1927). Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik. Zeitschrift für Physik, 43(3-4), 172-198.
  • Arfken, G. B., & Weber, H. J. (2005). Mathematical methods for physicists. Elsevier Academic Press.
  • Debnath, L. (2007). The Legacy of Leonhard Euler: A Tricentennial Tribute. World Scientific.
  • Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2019). Causal Determinism. Stanford University.
  • Standish, E. M. (1998). JPL Planetary and Lunar Ephemerides, DE405/LE405. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology.
  • Strang, G. (2005). Linear Algebra and Its Applications. Thomson Brooks/Cole.
  • Gillispie, C. C. (1997). Pierre-Simon Laplace 1749-1827: A Life in Exact Science. Princeton University Press.
  • Kant, I. (1755). Allgemeine Naturgeschichte und Theorie des Himmels. Johann Friederich Petersen.
  • Kreyszig, E. (2010). Advanced engineering mathematics. Wiley.
  • D’Angelo, J. P., & West, D. B. (2000). Mathematical thinking: Problem-solving and proofs. Prentice Hall.
  • Arfken, G. B., Weber, H. J., & Harris, F. E. (2013). Mathematical methods for physicists. Academic Press.
  • Proudman, J. (1953). Dynamical oceanography. Methuen.
  • Brush, S. G. (1996). Nebular hypothesis. In Encyclopedia of Planetary Sciences (pp. 604-606). Springer.
  • Griffiths, D. J. (2005). Introduction to quantum mechanics. Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Stigler, S. M. (1986). Laplace’s 1774 memoir on inverse probability. Statistical Science, 1(3), 359-363.
  • Einstein, A. (1915). Die Feldgleichungen der Gravitation. Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 844-847.
  • Smith, L. (2007). Chaos: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
  • Goldstein, H., Poole, C. P., & Safko, J. L. (2001). Classical mechanics. Addison Wesley.
  • Laplace, P. S. (1825). Mécanique Céleste. Bachelier.
  • Hahn, R. (2005). Pierre Simon Laplace 1749-1827: A Determined Scientist. Harvard University Press.
  • Jaynes, E. T. (2003). Probability theory: The logic of science. Cambridge university press.
Quantum News

Quantum News

As the Official Quantum Dog (or hound) by role is to dig out the latest nuggets of quantum goodness. There is so much happening right now in the field of technology, whether AI or the march of robots. But Quantum occupies a special space. Quite literally a special space. A Hilbert space infact, haha! Here I try to provide some of the news that might be considered breaking news in the Quantum Computing space.

Latest Posts by Quantum News:

IBM Remembers Lou Gerstner, CEO Who Reshaped Company in the 1990s

IBM Remembers Lou Gerstner, CEO Who Reshaped Company in the 1990s

December 29, 2025
Optical Tweezers Scale to 6,100 Qubits with 99.99% Imaging Survival

Optical Tweezers Scale to 6,100 Qubits with 99.99% Imaging Survival

December 28, 2025
Rosatom & Moscow State University Develop 72-Qubit Quantum Computer Prototype

Rosatom & Moscow State University Develop 72-Qubit Quantum Computer Prototype

December 27, 2025