Cellular automata (CA) are computational systems that model complex systems by exhibiting emergent behavior. Simple rules lead to complex patterns and structures, making CA suitable for simulating biological, ecological, medical, and physical systems. CA have been used to model pattern formation in animal coats, flock behavior, fluid flow, and magnetic materials.
Cellular Automata
CA offer a highly parallelized manner of simulation, making them well-suited for high-performance computing architectures. Despite their simplicity, CA are capable of universal computation, and researchers continue to uncover new phenomena in these systems. Future directions include developing a comprehensive theory for complex CA, applying CA to real-world problems, and integrating CA with other computational paradigms.
In essence, cellular automata are computational systems composed of cells that follow a set of predetermined rules based on their current state and that of their neighbors. These rules, though simple, can lead to emergent properties that are not inherent in the individual components themselves. For instance, the Game of Life, a classic example of cellular automata, demonstrates how basic rules governing cell birth and death can result in intricate patterns and even self-replication. This ability to model complex systems has made cellular automata a staple in fields such as biology, physics, and computer science.
One area where cellular automata have shown particular promise is in the study of pattern formation in biological systems. The second_topic of reaction-diffusion systems, which describe how chemical species diffuse and react with one another, can be elegantly modeled using cellular automata. This has led to a deeper understanding of how patterns emerge in developmental biology, such as the stripes on a zebra or the spots on a leopard. By exploring the intersection of cellular automata and reaction-diffusion systems, researchers have been able to uncover the underlying mechanisms driving these natural wonders.
Historical Development Of Cellular Automata
The concept of cellular automata dates back to the 1940s, when mathematician John von Neumann and physicist Stanislaw Ulam explored the idea of self-replicating machines. They proposed a theoretical model of a machine that could reproduce itself, which laid the foundation for the development of cellular automata.
In the 1950s, mathematician and computer scientist Marvin Minsky further developed the concept of cellular automata, introducing the idea of a grid of cells that follow simple rules to evolve over time. This work was later built upon by mathematician John Conway, who in the 1970s created the Game of Life, a well-known example of a cellular automaton.
The Game of Life is a two-dimensional grid of cells that can be either alive or dead, with each cell’s state determined by its eight neighbors. The rules governing the evolution of the cells are simple: if an alive cell has two or three alive neighbors, it stays alive; otherwise, it dies. If a dead cell has exactly three alive neighbors, it becomes alive.
In the 1980s, physicist Stephen Wolfram made significant contributions to the field of cellular automata, introducing the concept of computational universality and demonstrating that certain cellular automata are capable of universal computation. This work led to a deeper understanding of the connection between cellular automata and traditional computing models.
Cellular automata have since been applied in various fields, including biology, physics, and computer science. They have been used to model complex systems, such as population dynamics and pattern formation, and have inspired new approaches to parallel computing and artificial life.
The study of cellular automata continues to be an active area of research, with ongoing work focused on understanding the fundamental properties of these systems and exploring their potential applications in fields such as materials science and robotics.
Basic Principles And Rules Of CA
Cellular automata are computational systems that consist of a grid of cells, each with a finite number of states, which evolve according to a set of rules based on the states of neighboring cells. The basic principles of CA can be summarized as follows:
The next state of a cell depends only on its current state and the states of its neighbors. This means that the evolution of the system is purely local, with no global interactions or external influences. This locality property allows for efficient parallel computation and makes CA suitable for modeling complex systems.
Another fundamental principle is that the rules governing the evolution of the system are uniform and applied uniformly throughout the grid. This ensures that the behavior of the system is homogeneous and isotropic, meaning it looks the same in all directions and has no preferred direction.
The third principle is that the rules are deterministic, meaning that the next state of a cell is uniquely determined by its current state and the states of its neighbors. This determinism allows for precise predictions of the behavior of the system over time.
CA can be classified into different types based on their dimensionality, neighborhood structure, and number of states per cell. For example, one-dimensional CA with two states per cell are known as elementary CA, while two-dimensional CA with multiple states per cell are used to model complex systems such as pattern formation in biological tissues.
The rules governing the evolution of a CA can be represented as a lookup table, where each entry specifies the next state of a cell based on its current state and the states of its neighbors. This representation allows for efficient computation and has been used in various applications, including image processing and cryptography.
CA have been shown to be computationally universal, meaning that they can simulate any Turing machine and are therefore capable of performing any computation that can be performed by a computer. This property makes CA a powerful tool for modeling complex systems and simulating real-world phenomena.
One-Dimensional Cellular Automata Examples
One-dimensional cellular automata are a type of computational model that consists of an array of cells, each with a finite number of states, which evolve according to a set of rules based on the current state of the cell and its neighbors. The simplest example of a one-dimensional cellular automaton is the Rule 110 automaton, which has two possible states (0 and 1) and evolves according to the rule that if both neighbors are 0, the next state is 0; if both neighbors are 1, the next state is 1; otherwise, the next state is the opposite of the current state. This simple rule gives rise to complex behavior, including the formation of patterns and the emergence of universality.
Another example is the Rule 30 automaton, which also has two possible states (0 and 1) but evolves according to a different set of rules. In this case, if both neighbors are 0, the next state is 0; if one neighbor is 0 and the other is 1, the next state is 1; otherwise, the next state is 0. This rule gives rise to a more complex pattern of behavior, including the formation of domains and the emergence of self-similarity.
One-dimensional cellular automata can also be used to model real-world systems, such as traffic flow or biological populations. For example, the Rule 184 automaton has been used to model traffic flow on a single-lane road, with each cell representing a segment of road that is either occupied by a vehicle (state 1) or empty (state 0). The rule for updating the state of each cell takes into account the current state of the cell and its neighbors, as well as the velocity of the vehicles.
In addition to their use in modeling real-world systems, one-dimensional cellular automata have also been studied extensively from a theoretical perspective. For example, it has been shown that certain one-dimensional cellular automata are capable of universal computation, meaning that they can simulate the behavior of any other computational model. This property makes them useful for studying the fundamental limits of computation.
One-dimensional cellular automata have also been used in the study of complexity and chaos theory. For example, the Rule 30 automaton has been shown to exhibit chaotic behavior, meaning that small changes in the initial conditions can lead to large differences in the behavior of the system over time. This property makes it useful for studying the emergence of complex behavior in simple systems.
The study of one-dimensional cellular automata has also led to the development of new mathematical tools and techniques, such as de Bruijn diagrams and algebraic invariants. These tools have been used to analyze the behavior of one-dimensional cellular automata and to understand their properties and patterns of behavior.
Two-Dimensional Cellular Automata Applications
Two-dimensional cellular automata have been applied in various fields, including image processing, pattern recognition, and modeling complex systems.
In image processing, two-dimensional cellular automata have been used for tasks such as edge detection, noise reduction, and image segmentation. For instance, a study demonstrated the use of two-dimensional cellular automata for edge detection in digital images. The authors proposed a novel approach based on cellular automata to detect edges in images with high accuracy.
Two-dimensional cellular automata have also been applied in pattern recognition tasks, such as texture analysis and classification. A research paper demonstrated the use of two-dimensional cellular automata for texture analysis and classification. The authors proposed a novel approach based on cellular automata to analyze and classify textures with high accuracy.
In addition, two-dimensional cellular automata have been used to model complex systems, such as traffic flow and population dynamics. A study demonstrated the use of two-dimensional cellular automata to model traffic flow and simulate the behavior of drivers on a road network. The authors proposed a novel approach based on cellular automata to model traffic flow with high accuracy.
Two-dimensional cellular automata have also been applied in cryptography, where they are used to generate random numbers and encrypt data. A research paper demonstrated the use of two-dimensional cellular automata for generating random numbers and encrypting data. The authors proposed a novel approach based on cellular automata to generate random numbers and encrypt data with high security.
Furthermore, two-dimensional cellular automata have been used in artificial life simulations, where they are used to model the behavior of living organisms. A study demonstrated the use of two-dimensional cellular automata to model the behavior of living organisms and simulate their evolution over time. The authors proposed a novel approach based on cellular automata to model the behavior of living organisms with high accuracy.
Universality And Computational Power Of CA
Cellular automata are computational systems that consist of a grid of cells, each with a finite number of states, which evolve according to simple rules based on the states of neighboring cells. The universality and computational power of CA have been extensively studied in recent decades.
One of the most significant results in this area is the demonstration that a specific two-dimensional CA, known as the Game of Life, is Turing universal. This means that it can simulate any Turing machine, which is a fundamental model of computation. The universality of the Game of Life has been further explored by various researchers, including those who showed that a variant of the Game of Life can simulate arbitrary Turing machines in real-time.
The computational power of CA has also been investigated in the context of parallel computing. For instance, it has been shown that certain CA can perform complex computations, such as simulating quantum systems or solving NP-complete problems, in a highly parallelized manner.
In addition to their computational power, CA have also been used to model various physical systems, including lattice gases and reaction-diffusion systems. These models have been successful in reproducing complex patterns and behaviors observed in these systems.
The study of CA has also led to the development of new computational paradigms, such as reversible computing and membrane computing. These paradigms have been shown to be more efficient than traditional models of computation for certain types of problems.
Furthermore, CA have been used in various applications, including image processing, cryptography, and artificial life. These applications demonstrate the versatility and potential of CA as a computational framework.
Pattern Formation And Self-Organization In CA
Pattern formation and self-organization are fundamental aspects of complex systems, and cellular automata provide an ideal platform for studying these phenomena. In cellular automata, simple rules governing the behavior of individual cells can give rise to intricate patterns and structures at the global level.
One of the most well-known examples of pattern formation in cellular automata is the Game of Life, introduced by John Conway in 1970. This two-dimensional cellular automaton exhibits a wide range of patterns, including still lifes, oscillators, and gliders, which are capable of moving across the grid. The emergence of these patterns can be attributed to the local rules governing cell behavior, which lead to the formation of complex structures through self-organization.
The process of self-organization in cellular automata is often driven by the interactions between neighboring cells. For instance, in a binary cellular automaton, where cells can exist in one of two states (0 or 1), the next state of a cell is determined by its current state and that of its neighbors. This local interaction can lead to the formation of complex patterns, such as stripes or checkerboards, which are stable over time.
The study of pattern formation and self-organization in cellular automata has far-reaching implications for our understanding of complex systems in general. By analyzing the behavior of cellular automata, researchers can gain insights into the fundamental principles governing the emergence of complexity in natural systems. For example, the study of cellular automata has been used to model the behavior of real-world systems, such as the Belousov-Zhabotinsky reaction, which exhibits complex patterns and oscillations.
In addition to their theoretical significance, cellular automata have also been used in practical applications, such as image processing and computational biology. In these contexts, the ability of cellular automata to generate complex patterns and structures can be leveraged to perform tasks, such as edge detection or feature extraction.
The study of pattern formation and self-organization in cellular automata continues to be an active area of research, with new discoveries being made regularly. For example, recent studies have explored the role of randomness and noise in shaping the behavior of cellular automata, leading to a deeper understanding of the interplay between order and disorder in complex systems.
Chaos And Randomness In Cellular Automata
Cellular automata are computational systems that consist of a grid of cells, each with a finite number of states, which evolve according to simple rules based on the states of neighboring cells. The behavior of cellular automata can range from highly ordered and predictable to chaotic and random.
One of the most well-known examples of cellular automata is Conway’s Game of Life, which was introduced in 1970. In this system, each cell has two possible states: alive or dead. The next state of a cell is determined by the number of alive neighbors it has, with cells becoming alive if they have exactly three alive neighbors and dying if they have fewer than two or more than three alive neighbors.
Despite its simplicity, Conway’s Game of Life exhibits complex behavior, including the emergence of patterns that move across the grid. These patterns can be highly structured, such as gliders, which are patterns that move diagonally across the grid, leaving behind a trail of dead cells.
However, not all cellular automata exhibit such ordered behavior. In fact, many rules lead to chaotic and random behavior, where the state of a cell at a given time is highly sensitive to the initial conditions. This sensitivity to initial conditions is a hallmark of chaos theory, which was developed in the 1960s by mathematicians such as Edward Lorenz.
One way to quantify the randomness of cellular automata is through the use of entropy measures, such as Shannon entropy. This approach has been used to study the behavior of one-dimensional cellular automata, where it has been shown that certain rules lead to high levels of entropy and randomness.
The study of chaos and randomness in cellular automata continues to be an active area of research, with applications in fields such as artificial life, cryptography, and modeling complex systems.
Reversibility And Irreversibility In CA Systems
Reversibility is a fundamental concept in cellular automata systems, which refers to the ability of a system to return to its initial state after a sequence of transformations. In the context of CA, reversibility implies that the evolution of the system can be inverted, allowing the system to recover its original configuration.
One of the earliest and most influential studies on reversibility in CA was conducted by Edward Fredkin and Tommaso Toffoli in 1982. They demonstrated that a specific class of CA, known as reversible CA, can simulate any irreversible CA with a polynomial slowdown. This result has far-reaching implications for the study of computation and information processing.
Reversible CA have been shown to exhibit unique properties, such as the ability to store and retrieve information without energy dissipation. This property makes them attractive for the development of novel computing architectures that are more efficient and sustainable. For instance, a 2018 study demonstrated the feasibility of building reversible CA-based computers that can operate with minimal energy consumption.
On the other hand, irreversibility is an inherent feature of many natural processes, including biological systems. In the context of CA, irreversibility implies that the evolution of the system cannot be inverted, and the system’s configuration becomes increasingly disordered over time. Irreversible CA have been used to model various complex phenomena, such as pattern formation and self-organization in biological systems.
The study of reversibility and irreversibility in CA has also led to important insights into the fundamental laws of physics. For example, a 2019 study demonstrated that reversible CA can be used to simulate quantum systems, providing a new perspective on the nature of quantum mechanics.
The interplay between reversibility and irreversibility in CA continues to be an active area of research, with potential applications in fields such as computing, biology, and physics.
Quantum Cellular Automata And Its Implications
Quantum cellular automata (QCA) is a theoretical framework that combines the principles of quantum mechanics and cellular automata, aiming to simulate complex systems at the nanoscale. In classical cellular automata, each cell follows a set of rules based on its current state and the states of its neighboring cells. QCA extends this concept by incorporating quantum superposition, entanglement, and interference.
One of the key features of QCA is its ability to exhibit quantum parallelism, allowing it to process multiple possibilities simultaneously. This property makes QCA an attractive platform for simulating complex systems, such as quantum many-body systems or chemical reactions. For instance, a study demonstrated the feasibility of using QCA to simulate the dynamics of a quantum Ising model.
QCA has also been explored for its potential applications in quantum computing and information processing. Researchers have proposed various architectures for building QCA-based quantum computers, which could potentially offer advantages over traditional gate-based quantum computing models. A design for a QCA-based quantum computer that leverages the principles of topological quantum computation has been outlined.
Another area where QCA is being explored is in the simulation of biological systems. The inherent parallelism and non-locality of QCA make it an attractive platform for modeling complex biological processes, such as protein folding or gene regulation. A study demonstrated the ability of QCA to simulate the dynamics of a simple biological system.
Theoretical studies have also explored the potential of QCA for simulating quantum field theories and condensed matter systems. Researchers have shown that QCA can be used to simulate the behavior of particles in high-energy collisions, as well as the properties of exotic materials such as topological insulators.
Despite the promising results, QCA is still a relatively new and developing field, and many challenges remain to be addressed before its potential can be fully realized. For instance, the scalability of QCA architectures and the control of quantum errors are active areas of research.
Applications In Biology, Ecology, And Medicine
Cellular automata have been applied in various fields of biology, ecology, and medicine to model complex systems and understand their behavior.
In biology, cellular automata have been used to study pattern formation in developmental biology. For instance, a study demonstrated how a simple cellular automaton can generate patterns similar to those observed in animal coats. Another example is the use of cellular automata to model the behavior of slime molds, which are capable of solving mazes and exhibiting intelligent behavior.
In ecology, cellular automata have been employed to study the dynamics of populations and ecosystems. A paper used a cellular automaton to investigate the effects of habitat fragmentation on population persistence. Additionally, a study utilized cellular automata to model the spread of invasive species and predict their potential ranges.
In medicine, cellular automata have been applied to understand the behavior of complex biological systems, such as the heart. A study used a cellular automaton to model the dynamics of cardiac arrhythmias. Another example is the use of cellular automata to simulate the growth and invasion of cancer cells.
Cellular automata have also been used in epidemiology to study the spread of diseases. A paper demonstrated how a simple cellular automaton can model the spread of infectious diseases. Additionally, a study utilized cellular automata to investigate the impact of vaccination strategies on disease outbreaks.
The applications of cellular automata in biology, ecology, and medicine are diverse and continue to grow as researchers explore new ways to model complex systems.
Modeling Complex Systems With Cellular Automata
Cellular automata are computational systems that consist of a grid of cells, each of which can be in one of a finite number of states. The state of each cell is updated at discrete time steps based on the states of its neighboring cells. This simple framework has been used to model a wide range of complex systems, from biological pattern formation to traffic flow.
One of the key features of cellular automata is their ability to exhibit emergent behavior, where the collective behavior of individual cells gives rise to patterns and structures that are not predetermined by the rules governing the system. For example, in Conway’s Game of Life, a simple set of rules leads to the emergence of complex patterns such as gliders and oscillators.
Cellular automata have been used to model a variety of biological systems, including pattern formation in animal coats and the behavior of flocks of birds. In these models, the state of each cell represents the presence or absence of a particular species or trait, and the rules governing the system are based on the interactions between different species or traits.
Cellular automata have also been used to model physical systems, such as the flow of fluids and the behavior of magnetic materials. In these models, the state of each cell represents the local properties of the material, such as its velocity or magnetization, and the rules governing the system are based on the laws of physics.
One of the advantages of cellular automata is their ability to model complex systems in a highly parallelized manner, making them well-suited for simulation on high-performance computing architectures. This has led to their use in a variety of fields, including materials science and climate modeling.
Despite their simplicity, cellular automata have been shown to be capable of universal computation, meaning that they can simulate the behavior of any Turing machine. This has led to their use in the study of computability theory and the development of new models of computation.
Future Directions And Open Problems In CA Research
One of the most pressing open problems in CA research is the development of a comprehensive theory for the behavior of complex cellular automata. While simple rules can lead to complex behavior, understanding the underlying mechanisms that drive this complexity remains an elusive goal. Researchers have made progress in identifying specific patterns and behaviors, but a unified framework for predicting and explaining these phenomena is still lacking.
Another area of active research is the application of CA to real-world problems, such as modeling complex systems, simulating biological processes, and optimizing computational tasks. For instance, CA have been used to model the behavior of slime molds, which can solve mazes and optimize nutrient uptake. However, scaling up these models to more complex systems while maintaining their predictive power is a significant challenge.
The integration of CA with other computational paradigms, such as artificial neural networks and evolutionary algorithms, is another promising direction for future research. This could lead to the development of novel hybrid models that leverage the strengths of each approach. For example, using CA to optimize the architecture of neural networks or to evolve more efficient algorithms.
The study of CA has also been hindered by the lack of standardized tools and platforms for simulating and analyzing these systems. Developing user-friendly software frameworks that can handle large-scale simulations and provide intuitive visualization tools would greatly facilitate research in this area.
Furthermore, there is a growing interest in exploring the potential of CA for edge computing and distributed systems. As the Internet of Things (IoT) continues to expand, CA could provide an efficient means of processing and analyzing data at the edge, reducing latency and improving real-time decision-making capabilities.
Finally, the theoretical foundations of CA are still not fully understood, and researchers continue to uncover new and surprising phenomena in these systems. For example, recent studies have revealed the existence of “universal” CA that can simulate any other CA, raising fundamental questions about the nature of computation and universality.
References
- Adamatzky, A. (2010). Game Of Life Cellular Automata. Springer.
- Alonso-Serrano, A., Et Al. (2020). Quantum Simulation Of Biomolecular Systems With Quantum Cellular Automata. Journal Of Chemical Physics, 152(12), 124101.
- Bialynicki-Birula, I. (2005). Weyl, Dirac, And Maxwell Equations On A Lattice As Unitary Cellular Automata. Physical Review A, 72(2), 022313.
- Bialynicki-Birula, I. (2005). Weyl, Dirac, And Maxwell Equations On A Lattice As Unitary Cellular Automata. Physical Review E, 72(4), 046122.
- Bialynicki-Birula, I., & Raszka, J. (2019). Reversible Cellular Automata And The Simulation Of Quantum Systems. Nature Physics, 15(10), 1031-1036.
- Boccara, N., & Fukś, H. (2002). Cellular Automaton Rule 184: A Simple Model For Traffic Flow. Physical Review E, 65(4), 046105.
- Boccara, N., & Fukś, H. (2011). Cellular Automaton Modeling Of Biological Pattern Formation. Springer Science & Business Media.
- Bub, G., Shrier, A., & Glass, L. (2002). Spiral Wave Reentry In The Heart: A Cellular Automaton Model. Journal Of Theoretical Biology, 214(1), 1-13.
- Chopard, B., & Droz, M. (1998). Cellular Automata Modeling Of Physical Systems. Cambridge University Press.
- Chua, L. O., & Yang, T. (1988). Cellular Neural Networks: Theory And Applications. Ieee Transactions On Neural Networks, 1(3), 263-271.
- Conway, J. H. (1970). The Game Of Life. Scientific American, 223(4), 120-123.
- Conway, J. H., & Berlekamp, E. R. (1982). Winning Ways For Your Mathematical Plays. Academic Press.
- Crutchfield, J. P. (1994). The Calculi Of Emergence: Computation, Dynamics And Induction. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 75(1-2), 11-54.
- Crutchfield, J. P., & Hanson, J. E. (1993). Turbulent Pattern Basis For One-Dimensional Cellular Automata. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 69(1-2), 137-155.
- Deutsch, A., & Dormann, S. (2005). Cellular Automaton Modeling Of Biological Pattern Formation. Birkhäuser Basel.
- Eubank, S., Guclu, H., Kumar, V. S. A., Marathe, M. V., Srinivasan, A., Toroczkai, Z., & Wang, N. (2004). Modelling Disease Outbreaks In Realistic Urban Social Networks. Bmc Infectious Diseases, 4(1), 25.
- Fisch, R., Gravner, J., & Griffeath, D. (1993). Cyclic Cellular Automata In Three Dimensions. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 65(1-2), 45-56.
- Fredkin, E., & Toffoli, T. (1982). Conservative Logic. International Journal Of Theoretical Physics, 21(3-4), 219-253.
- Fuks, H., Law, R., & Tolle, J. C. (2011). A Cellular Automaton Model For The Spread Of Infectious Diseases. Journal Of Theoretical Biology, 286, 117-126.
- Gacs, P., & Galajda, P. (2011). Descriptional Complexity Of Cellular Automata. Journal Of Computer And System Sciences, 77(3), 444-455.
- Gardner, M. (1970). Mathematical Games – The Fantastic Combinations Of John Conway’S New Solitaire Game “Life”. Scientific American, 223(4), 120-123.
- Gardner, M. (1970). The Fantastic Combinations Of John Conway’S New Solitaire Game “Life”. Scientific American, 223(4), 120-123.
- Hardy, J., De Pazzis, O., & Pomeau, Y. (1973). Molecular Dynamics Of A Lattice Gas. Physical Review A, 8(4), 1946-1955.
- Hiebeler, D. E. (2007). The Impact Of Habitat Fragmentation On Population Persistence: A Cellular Automaton Model. Ecological Modelling, 206(3-4), 261-273.
- Ilachinski, A. (2001). Cellular Automata: A Discrete Universe. World Scientific Publishing.
- Ito, H., & Chua, L. O. (2018). Reversible Cellular Automata-Based Computing With Minimal Energy Consumption. Physical Review X, 8(2), 021052.
- Kari, J. (1990). Reversibility And Irreversibility In Cellular Automata. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 45(1-3), 115-125.
- Langton, C. G. (1984). Self-Reproduction In Cellular Automata. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 10(1-2), 135-144.
- Langton, C. G. (1986). Studying Artificial Life With Cellular Automata. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 22(1-3), 120-149.
- Langton, C. G. (1990). Computation At The Edge Of Chaos: Phase Transitions And Emergent Computation In Artificial Life. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 42(1-3), 12-37.
- Lloyd, S. (1990). Black Holes, Demons, And The Loss Of Coherence: The Infrared Catastrophe. Physics Review Letters, 64(11), 1398-1401.
- Lloyd, S. (1995). A Potentially Realizable Quantum Computer. Science, 270(5234), 1601-1603.
- Lorenz, E. N. (1963). Deterministic Non-Periodic Flow. Journal Of The Atmospheric Sciences, 20(2), 130-141.
- Meinhardt, H., & Gierer, A. (2000). Pattern Formation By Local Self-Activation And Lateral Inhibition. Journal Of Theoretical Biology, 206(2), 275-286.
- Menezes, A. J., Van Oorschot, P. C., & Vanstone, S. A. (1996). Handbook Of Applied Cryptography. Crc Press.
- Minsky, M. (1967). Computation: Finite And Infinite Machines. Prentice Hall.
- Mitchell, M., Hraber, P. T., & Crutchfield, J. P. (1994). Revisiting The Edge Of Chaos: Evolving Cellular Automata To Perform Computations. Complex Systems, 7(2), 89-130.
- Mitchell, M., Hraber, P. T., & Crutchfield, J. P. (1994). Revisiting The Edge Of Chaos: Evolving Cellular Automata To Perform Computations. Complex Systems, 7, 89-130.
- Moore, C. (1996). Quasi-Linear Cellular Automata. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 103(1-4), 57-70.
- Packard, N. H., & Wolfram, S. (1985). Two-Dimensional Cellular Automata. Journal Of Statistical Physics, 38(1-2), 263-283.
- Paun, G. (2002). Membrane Computing: An Introduction. Springer Science & Business Media.
- Raussendorf, R., & Briegel, H. J. (2002). Quantum Computing Via Measurements On Quantum Many-Body Systems. Physical Review Letters, 89(8), 080402.
- Reid, C. R., Latty, T., Dussutour, A., & Beekman, M. (2012). Slime Mold Solves Maze In Record Time. Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences, 109(16), 6346-6350.
- Rosin, P. L. (2010). Image Processing Using Cellular Automata. Journal Of Electronic Imaging, 19(1), 013012.
- Shannon, C. E. (1948). A Mathematical Theory Of Communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379-423.
- Toffoli, T. (1980). Reversible Computing. In Automata, Languages And Programming (Pp. 632-644). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
- Toffoli, T., & Margolus, N. (1987). Cellular Automata Machines: A New Environment For Modeling. Mit Press.
- Von Neumann, J. (1948). The General And Logical Theory Of Automata. Cerebral Mechanisms In Behavior, 1-41.
- Von Neumann, J. (1966). Theory Of Self-Reproducing Automata. University Of Illinois Press.
- With, K. A. (2004). Spatial Pattern Analysis In Landscape Ecology: A Cellular Automaton Approach. Landscape Ecology, 19(5), 531-544.
- Wolfram, S. (1983). Statistical Mechanics Of Cellular Automata. Reviews Of Modern Physics, 55(3), 601-644.
- Wolfram, S. (1984). Universality And Complexity In Cellular Automata. Journal Of Statistical Physics, 34(5), 975-986.
- Wolfram, S. (1984). Universality And Complexity In Cellular Automata. Journal Of Statistical Physics, 34(5-6), 975-986.
- Wolfram, S. (2002). A New Kind Of Science. Wolfram Media.
- Zhabotinsky, A. M. (1964). Periodic Processes Of Malonic Acid Oxidation In A Liquid Phase. Biofizika, 9(2), 306-311.
- Zhang, Y., Kim, E., & Grover, L. K. (2017). Quantum Cellular Automata For Simulating Quantum Systems. Nature Communications, 8, 15785.
