A new study from EPFL has found that the effectiveness of brain stimulation on motor skills is determined by an individual’s learning ability, rather than age. This research highlights the need for a more personalized approach to neurorehabilitation. Led by Friedhelm Hummel, the team used a technique called anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (atDCS), which uses a low electrical current delivered via electrodes on the scalp to modulate neuronal activity.
The study found that individuals with less efficient learning mechanisms benefit more from stimulation, while those with optimal learning strategies might experience negative effects. This suggests that brain stimulation has a restorative rather than an enhancing quality, with important implications for rehabilitation. According to Pablo Maceira, the study’s first author, this research will pave the way to maximize the effects of brain stimulation in individual subjects and patients.
The Effectiveness of Brain Stimulation Tied to Learning Ability, Not Age
Brain stimulation has been a promising technique in the field of neurorehabilitation, with the potential to improve motor skills and cognitive functions. However, inconsistent results have led researchers to explore why some individuals benefit from brain stimulation while others do not. A recent study by EPFL reveals that the effectiveness of brain stimulation is determined by an individual’s learning ability rather than age.
The Role of Learning Ability in Brain Stimulation
The study, led by Friedhelm Hummel at EPFL, investigated how native learning abilities determine the effect of brain stimulation applied while learning a motor task. The researchers recruited 40 participants, divided into middle-aged adults and older adults, who received either active anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (atDCS) or placebo stimulation. Over ten days, participants practiced a finger-tapping task designed to study motor sequence learning at home while receiving atDCS.
The team used a machine-learning model trained on a public dataset to classify participants as either “optimal” or “suboptimal” learners, based on their initial performance. The results showed that suboptimal learners, who were less efficient at internalizing the task at the early stages of learning, experienced an accelerated accuracy improvement while performing the task when receiving atDCS. This effect was not limited to people of a certain age, with suboptimal learners found among younger individuals as well.
The Implications for Neurorehabilitation
The study’s findings suggest that brain stimulation is more beneficial for individuals who initially struggle with motor tasks. As such, atDCS seems to possess a restorative rather than an enhancing quality, with important implications for rehabilitation. The results imply that personalized brain stimulation protocols will be developed to maximize benefits based on an individual’s specific needs, rather than a common trait such as age.
This approach could lead to more effective brain stimulation-based interventions, targeting specific mechanisms supporting learning, especially in the view of neurorehabilitation, for which the main basis is the re-learning of lost skills due to a brain lesion (e.g., after a stroke or a traumatic brain injury). In the future, clinicians could apply a more advanced version of the algorithm used in this study to determine whether a patient will benefit from a brain stimulation-based therapy, enhancing the effects of neurorehabilitation and personalizing treatment.
The Importance of Personalized Approaches
The study highlights the need for a more personalized approach to neurorehabilitation. By leveraging different methods in machine learning, researchers can untangle the influence of different factors on the individual effects of brain stimulation. This will pave the way to maximize the effects of brain stimulation in individual subjects and patients.
In conclusion, the effectiveness of brain stimulation is tied to an individual’s learning ability rather than age. The study’s findings have important implications for neurorehabilitation, suggesting that personalized brain stimulation protocols will be developed to maximize benefits based on an individual’s specific needs. This approach could lead to more effective brain stimulation-based interventions, targeting specific mechanisms supporting learning and enhancing the effects of neurorehabilitation.
External Link: Click Here For More
