Quantum device calibration represents a significant challenge in realising practical quantum technologies, demanding precise characterisation with minimal experimental resources. Ramoa, Santagati, and Wiebe investigate advanced statistical methods to improve the accuracy and efficiency of this process. Their research centres on Bayesian inference, a technique particularly suited to situations where data is scarce or complex, and explores how different numerical representations of probability distributions impact performance. The team numerically analyses algorithms, including sequential importance resampling, Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods, and Gaussian rejection filtering, demonstrating advantages in robustness when dealing with multi-modal data and high-dimensional parameter spaces. Applying these algorithms to superconducting qubits from IBMQ, they achieve substantial reductions in uncertainty, factors of 10 and 3 in Hahn echo and Ramsey experiments, respectively, without requiring additional measurements or achieving equivalent performance with significantly less data. This work has implications for characterising complex quantum systems, particularly those exhibiting open quantum dynamics.
Enhanced Quantum System Characterisation via Bayesian Inference
Recent research demonstrates the efficacy of advanced statistical methods for characterising quantum systems via Bayesian inference, particularly in scenarios with limited data or high dimensionality. Quantum systems, such as superconducting qubits, require precise calibration and characterisation to function reliably, yet obtaining sufficient data for this process can be resource intensive. Bayesian inference offers a probabilistic framework for updating beliefs about system parameters based on observed data, allowing for more efficient and accurate estimations.
Researchers evaluated techniques including sequential importance resampling, Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods – such as Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) and its variants – and Gaussian rejection filtering. Sequential importance resampling approximates probability distributions, particularly useful in complex models. MCMC methods generate samples from a probability distribution, enabling parameter estimation. Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, a specific MCMC algorithm, utilises concepts from physics to improve sampling efficiency.
These methods were benchmarked against existing tools, notably those within Qiskit, and applied to the calibration of superconducting qubits from IBMQ. Superconducting qubits are artificial atoms created using superconducting circuits, forming the basis of many quantum computing architectures. Calibration involves determining the optimal control parameters to achieve desired qubit behaviour. Results indicate substantial improvements in parameter estimation accuracy. Specifically, the uncertainty in estimations from Hahn echo and Ramsey experiments was reduced by factors of 10 and 3 respectively, achieved without increasing the number of measurements. The Hahn echo and Ramsey experiments are standard techniques used to characterise qubit coherence and frequency.
Equivalent performance to existing methods was attained while reducing the required experimental data by up to 99.5%. This represents a significant advantage, particularly in scenarios where data acquisition is costly or time consuming. The ability to achieve comparable accuracy with drastically reduced data volumes suggests a pathway towards more efficient quantum device characterisation and optimisation.
Future work will likely focus on extending these techniques to more complex systems, such as those involving open quantum dynamics. Investigating adaptive strategies for experimental design and further refining heuristics for dataset ordering are also promising avenues for research. The availability of pseudo-code and the associated code base will facilitate further development and application of these robust statistical methods within the quantum information science community.
More information
Calibration of Quantum Devices via Robust Statistical Methods
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.06941
