As humanity continues to explore the vast expanse of space, it’s only natural to wonder about the possibilities of extraterrestrial life and its potential for technological advancements. One fascinating concept that has garnered significant attention in recent years is the idea of Dyson Spheres – hypothetical megastructures that could be built around stars to harness their energy.
Dyson Spheres
The discovery of a Dyson Sphere, a massive structure around a star to capture its energy output, could suggest that advanced civilizations are avoiding contact with Earth or are too far away to detect. However, building such a structure poses significant challenges and limitations, including enormous material requirements, immense energy needs, thermal management issues, and astronomical concerns. Furthermore, megastructure construction raises ethical considerations regarding environmental impact, resource exploitation, concentration of power, and interstellar relations. The potential risks and consequences of constructing a Dyson Sphere highlight the importance of responsible innovation and sustained scientific inquiry into emerging technologies.
The concept of Dyson Spheres was first proposed by physicist Freeman Dyson in the 1960s, as a way for advanced civilizations to capture and utilize the energy emitted by their host star. The idea is based on the assumption that an advanced civilization would eventually require more energy than its planet could provide, prompting it to construct a massive structure encompassing its entire star system. This megastructure would be composed of solar panels or other energy-gathering devices, allowing the civilization to tap into the vast amounts of energy radiated by its star.
One of the most intriguing aspects of Dyson Spheres is their potential for detection. Since these structures would necessarily absorb and re-emit light in specific ways, astronomers have proposed various methods for identifying them. For instance, a Dyson Sphere might produce a distinctive infrared signature, or even cause subtle variations in the star’s brightness as it rotates. The search for such signatures has sparked a new wave of interest in the field of astrobiology, as scientists seek to determine whether advanced civilizations exist elsewhere in the universe – and if they’ve already begun constructing their own Dyson Spheres.
Origins Of Dyson Sphere Concept
The concept of Dyson Spheres originated from the idea that advanced civilizations could harness the energy of their stars by constructing megastructures around them. This notion was first proposed by physicist Freeman Dyson in his 1960 paper where he suggested that advanced extraterrestrial civilizations might build massive structures to capture and utilize the energy emitted by their stars.
Dyson’s idea was sparked by the search for extraterrestrial intelligence and the possibility of detecting signs of intelligent life elsewhere in the universe. He proposed that advanced civilizations could construct megastructures, such as shells or spheres, around their stars to absorb and convert stellar energy into a usable form. This concept has since been explored in various fields, including astrobiology, astrophysics, and the search for extraterrestrial intelligence.
The Dyson Sphere concept is often categorized into three types: Dyson Shells, Dyson Swarms, and Dyson Nets. A Dyson Shell would be a spherical structure encompassing the entire star, while a Dyson Swarm would consist of multiple smaller structures orbiting the star. A Dyson Net, on the other hand, would be a network of cables or filaments that capture and transmit energy from the star.
The construction of a Dyson Sphere would require an enormous amount of material, potentially exceeding the mass of Jupiter. The structure would also need to be incredibly durable to withstand the intense radiation and high-energy particles emitted by the star. Furthermore, the sphere’s surface temperature would need to be maintained at a level that allows for energy conversion, which could be achieved through advanced heat management systems.
The detection of Dyson Spheres is an active area of research, with scientists employing various methods to identify potential candidates. These include searching for infrared radiation signatures, anomalous star dimming patterns, and other indirect indicators of megastructure presence. While no conclusive evidence has been found yet, the search continues, driven by the intriguing possibility of discovering signs of advanced extraterrestrial life.
The concept of Dyson Spheres has also inspired science fiction authors and sparked philosophical debates about the potential implications of advanced civilizations harnessing their stars’ energy. The idea has become a cultural phenomenon, symbolizing humanity’s fascination with the possibilities of advanced technology and our place in the universe.
Definition And Types Of Dyson Spheres
The concept of Dyson Spheres was first proposed by physicist Freeman Dyson in the 1960s as a way for an advanced civilization to harness the energy of its star. A Dyson Sphere is a hypothetical megastructure that would encompass a star and capture a significant portion of its electromagnetic radiation.
There are three main types of Dyson Spheres, each with its own unique characteristics. The first type, known as a Dyson Shell, is a thin, spherical structure that completely encloses a star. This type of sphere would be the most efficient at capturing energy, but it would also require the most material to construct.
The second type, known as a Dyson Swarm, consists of a large number of smaller, solar-powered satellites that are distributed throughout a sphere around a star. This type of sphere would be less massive than a Dyson Shell, but it would still be able to capture a significant amount of energy.
The third type, known as a Dyson Net, is a network of cables and struts that are suspended within a sphere around a star. This type of sphere would be the least massive of the three, but it would also be the most difficult to construct.
Dyson Spheres have been proposed as a way for advanced civilizations to survive in a universe where energy resources are limited. They could potentially provide a civilization with enough energy to power its activities for billions of years.
The search for Dyson Spheres is an active area of research, with scientists using a variety of methods to search for evidence of their existence. These methods include searching for signs of infrared radiation that may be emitted by a Dyson Sphere, as well as looking for stars that are surrounded by unusual amounts of dust or debris.
Energy Requirements For Construction
The concept of Dyson Spheres, proposed by physicist Freeman Dyson in the 1960s, revolves around the idea of constructing megastructures that encompass a star to capture its energy output. One crucial aspect of building such enormous structures is the immense amount of energy required for their construction.
Estimates suggest that the energy requirements for building a Dyson Sphere would be staggering, potentially exceeding the entire energy output of a star over its lifetime. For instance, constructing a Dyson Shell around the Sun would require approximately 2 x 10^22 Joules of energy.
The sheer scale of this energy requirement is underscored by comparisons to human civilization’s current energy consumption patterns. To put this into perspective, humanity’s total energy consumption in 2020 was roughly 5.6 x 10^20 Joules, which is several orders of magnitude lower than the estimated energy required for building a Dyson Sphere.
The construction of such megastructures would necessitate the development of novel, highly efficient energy generation and storage technologies. This could involve the harnessing of exotic energy sources, such as antimatter or zero-point energy, which are still purely theoretical at present.
Furthermore, the mass requirements for constructing a Dyson Sphere would be equally daunting, potentially necessitating the dismantling of entire planets to harvest their material resources. Building a Dyson Shell around the Sun would require approximately 2 x 10^22 kilograms of material.
The immense energy and material requirements for constructing a Dyson Sphere underscore the significant technological and engineering challenges that must be overcome before such megastructures can become a reality.
Materials Needed For Dyson Sphere Build
The concept of a Dyson Sphere, proposed by physicist Freeman Dyson in the 1960s, is a hypothetical megastructure that encompasses a star to capture its energy output. The materials required to build such a massive structure would need to be incredibly strong, lightweight, and durable.
One of the primary concerns when considering the construction of a Dyson Sphere is the material’s tensile strength. According to calculations, the sphere would need to withstand stresses of up to 10^5 atmospheres, which is far beyond the capabilities of any known materials. Even the strongest materials currently available, such as carbon nanotubes or graphene, would not be able to withstand such forces.
Another critical factor is the material’s density. To minimize the mass of the sphere while maintaining its structural integrity, the material would need to have an extremely low density. This could potentially be achieved through the use of advanced materials with high strength-to-weight ratios, such as certain types of aerogels or metamaterials.
The thermal management of a Dyson Sphere is also a significant challenge. The sphere would need to be able to efficiently dissipate heat generated by the star’s energy output, which could reach temperatures of up to 5,000 Kelvin at the surface. This might require the development of advanced heat shields or radiators made from materials with high thermal conductivity and emissivity.
In addition to these considerations, the material would also need to be resistant to radiation damage, as it would be exposed to intense stellar radiation over extended periods. This could potentially be addressed through the use of radiation-hardened materials or advanced shielding technologies.
The construction of a Dyson Sphere would likely require the development of entirely new materials with properties that are not yet achievable with current technology. The creation of such materials would necessitate significant advances in fields such as materials science, nanotechnology, and engineering.
Scalability And Size Limitations
The concept of Dyson Spheres, proposed by physicist Freeman Dyson in the 1960s, revolves around the idea of building megastructures that encompass a star to capture its energy output. One of the primary concerns surrounding Dyson Spheres is their scalability and size limitations.
From an engineering perspective, constructing a Dyson Sphere would require an enormous amount of material, potentially exceeding the mass of Jupiter. According to calculations, a Dyson Sphere with a radius similar to Earth’s orbit would necessitate approximately 2.98 x 10^22 kilograms of material, which is roughly 100 times the mass of Jupiter.
Another significant challenge lies in the sphere’s thermal management. As the structure absorbs energy from its host star, it would inevitably heat up, leading to a buildup of internal pressure and potential structural instability. Research suggests that a Dyson Sphere would need to be constructed with materials possessing extremely high thermal conductivity to mitigate this issue.
Furthermore, the laws of physics impose additional constraints on the size of a Dyson Sphere. According to general relativity, a massive object like a Dyson Sphere would warp spacetime around it, creating significant gravitational redshift and time dilation effects. As calculated, a Dyson Sphere with a radius similar to Earth’s orbit would produce a gravitational redshift of approximately 10^-5.
In addition to these physical limitations, there are also concerns regarding the feasibility of constructing such a massive structure. The energy requirements for building and maintaining a Dyson Sphere would be enormous, likely exceeding the energy output of its host star. Research suggests that the construction of a Dyson Sphere might require an unfeasibly long period, potentially spanning millions or billions of years.
Theoretical models have also been proposed to address these scalability and size limitations. For instance, the concept of a “Dyson Swarm” has been suggested, comprising a large number of smaller, solar-powered satellites that collectively encompass a star, thereby reducing the material requirements and thermal management challenges associated with a single, massive Dyson Sphere.
Heat Management And Temperature Control
Heat management and temperature control are crucial aspects of any megastructure, including Dyson Spheres. The immense amount of energy generated by the star at the center of a Dyson Sphere would necessitate advanced heat management systems to prevent overheating and maintain a habitable environment.
One potential solution is the use of radiators or heat sinks to dissipate excess heat into space. This approach has been proposed in various studies, which suggests that a Dyson Sphere could be designed with a network of radiators to maintain a stable temperature.
Another strategy for heat management is the use of advanced materials with high thermal conductivity. For example, graphene and other nanomaterials have been shown to possess exceptional thermal conductivity properties, making them ideal candidates for heat management applications. The integration of such materials into a Dyson Sphere’s structure could enable efficient heat dissipation and temperature control.
In addition to these passive heat management strategies, active temperature control systems could also be employed. For instance, advanced refrigeration systems or thermoelectric devices could be used to regulate the temperature within a Dyson Sphere. These systems would require significant amounts of energy, however, which could potentially be generated through the capture of stellar energy.
The importance of heat management and temperature control in megastructures like Dyson Spheres cannot be overstated. As noted by physicist Freeman Dyson himself, “the problem of heat disposal is a serious one” in the context of megastructures.
Effective heat management and temperature control would be essential for maintaining a habitable environment within a Dyson Sphere, enabling the support of life and potentially even advanced civilizations.
Gravity And Rotation Effects Inside
The concept of Dyson Spheres, proposed by physicist Freeman Dyson in the 1960s, revolves around the idea of megastructures built around stars to harness their energy output. One crucial aspect to consider when designing such a massive structure is the effect of gravity and rotation on its internal dynamics.
Gravity plays a vital role in shaping the internal environment of a Dyson Sphere. The gravitational force would be strongest at the surface of the sphere, gradually decreasing towards the center. This gradient would lead to a density variation within the sphere’s material, with denser regions forming near the surface and less dense areas towards the center.
Rotation also has a significant impact on the internal dynamics of a Dyson Sphere. As the sphere rotates, centrifugal force would push matter away from the axis of rotation, creating a bulge at the equator. This effect would be more pronounced if the sphere were to rotate rapidly, leading to a flattened shape at the poles and an elongated shape at the equator.
The interplay between gravity and rotation would result in complex internal dynamics within a Dyson Sphere. For instance, the Coriolis force, arising from the Earth’s rotation, plays a crucial role in shaping global weather patterns. Similarly, within a Dyson Sphere, the Coriolis force would influence the movement of matter and energy, leading to intricate circulation patterns.
Another critical aspect to consider is the effect of frame-dragging, a consequence of general relativity. As the sphere rotates, it would drag spacetime around with it, causing any nearby objects to move along curved trajectories. This effect would be particularly significant near the surface of the sphere, where the rotation rate and gravitational force are highest.
The intricate interplay between gravity, rotation, and frame-dragging within a Dyson Sphere highlights the complexity of designing such a massive structure. A thorough understanding of these effects is essential to create a stable and functional megastructure capable of harnessing a star’s energy output.
Potential Uses For Dyson Spheres
Dyson spheres, hypothetical megastructures encompassing stars, could potentially be used for various purposes, including energy generation, astrobiology research, and even interstellar travel.
One potential use of Dyson spheres is as a means to harness the energy output of a star. By constructing a shell around a star, a civilization could capture and convert a significant portion of the star’s electromagnetic radiation into usable energy. This concept was first proposed by physicist Freeman Dyson in 1960, who suggested that advanced extraterrestrial civilizations might use such structures to power their activities.
Dyson spheres could also be used as vast astrobiological laboratories, providing a unique environment for studying the origins and evolution of life. The interior surface of a Dyson sphere could be tailored to mimic various planetary environments, allowing for the simulation of diverse ecosystems and the testing of hypotheses regarding the emergence of complex life forms.
Furthermore, Dyson spheres might serve as colossal propulsion systems for interstellar travel. By constructing a massive, light-reflecting shell around a star, a civilization could potentially accelerate their spacecraft to significant fractions of the speed of light, enabling faster-than-light travel times between stars.
Additionally, Dyson spheres could be used as mega-telescopes, providing unparalleled opportunities for astronomical observation and research. The vast, curved surface of a Dyson sphere could be equipped with sensors and detectors, allowing for the collection of unprecedented amounts of data on celestial objects and events.
Finally, Dyson spheres might also serve as colossal storage facilities for data or even entire ecosystems. The immense volume enclosed by a Dyson sphere could be used to store vast amounts of information or even preserve endangered species in a stable, long-term environment.
Detection Methods For Identifying Dyson Spheres
Dyson spheres are hypothetical megastructures that encompass a star, capturing a significant portion of its electromagnetic radiation to generate energy. The detection methods for identifying Dyson spheres rely on the anomalies they would introduce in the observed properties of their host stars.
One method involves searching for infrared excess emission from stars, which could indicate the presence of a Dyson sphere. This approach is based on the assumption that a Dyson sphere would absorb and re-emit stellar radiation at longer wavelengths, resulting in an unusual infrared signature.
Another method focuses on the transit technique, where the dimming of a star’s light as a Dyson sphere passes in front of it is measured. This approach requires high-precision photometry and could be used to identify Dyson spheres with sizes comparable to those of Jupiter.
The astrometric method involves measuring the position and motion of a star over time, which could reveal the gravitational influence of a massive Dyson sphere. This approach is particularly useful for identifying Dyson spheres around low-mass stars or in multiple star systems.
The spectroscopic method involves analyzing the spectral energy distribution of a star, which could be affected by the presence of a Dyson sphere. This approach is based on the assumption that a Dyson sphere would introduce characteristic absorption or emission features in the stellar spectrum.
The timing method involves measuring the periodic variations in the brightness of a star, which could be caused by the rotation or orbital motion of a Dyson sphere. This approach requires long-term monitoring of stellar variability and could be used to identify Dyson spheres with sizes comparable to those of Earth.
Implications Of Discovering Alien Dyson Spheres
The concept of Dyson Spheres, proposed by physicist Freeman Dyson in the 1960s, suggests that advanced extraterrestrial civilizations could harness their star’s energy by constructing a megastructure around it. This idea has sparked interest in the search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI) and the potential implications of discovering such structures.
One of the most significant implications of discovering an alien Dyson Sphere would be the confirmation of the existence of intelligent life beyond Earth. This finding would revolutionize our understanding of the universe, challenging our current assumptions about the uniqueness of human civilization. The discovery would also raise questions about the nature of advanced civilizations and their potential motivations for constructing such massive structures.
The detection of a Dyson Sphere could also provide insights into the energy requirements and technological capabilities of an advanced civilization. By analyzing the structure’s size, shape, and material composition, scientists might infer the civilization’s level of technological advancement and its ability to harness energy on a cosmic scale. This information could have significant implications for our own understanding of energy production and consumption.
Furthermore, the discovery of an alien Dyson Sphere would likely spark a new era of interstellar communication and cooperation. The detection of such a structure would imply that the civilization responsible for its construction is capable of communicating with other intelligent beings across vast distances. This could lead to a reevaluation of our current approaches to SETI and the potential for establishing contact with extraterrestrial life.
The discovery of an alien Dyson Sphere would also raise important questions about the long-term survival of advanced civilizations. If we were to detect a structure that has been in operation for millions or billions of years, it could provide insights into the sustainability of advanced civilizations and their ability to adapt to changing environmental conditions.
Finally, the detection of an alien Dyson Sphere would have significant implications for our understanding of the Fermi Paradox, which asks “Where is everybody?” The discovery of such a structure would suggest that advanced civilizations may be avoiding contact with Earth or are simply too far away to detect. This finding could lead to a reevaluation of our current strategies for searching for extraterrestrial life.
Challenges And Limitations Of Building Dyson Spheres
The concept of Dyson Spheres, proposed by physicist Freeman Dyson in the 1960s, involves constructing a megastructure around a star to capture its energy output. However, building such a massive structure poses significant challenges and limitations.
One major challenge is the enormous amount of materials required for construction. A Dyson Sphere would need to be composed of a material with incredibly high strength-to-weight ratio, as it would have to support its own weight while withstanding the gravitational force of the star. According to calculations, the required material would need to have a tensile strength of at least 10^22 N/m^2, which is far beyond current technological capabilities.
Another significant limitation is the immense energy requirement for construction and maintenance. The energy output of the star itself might not be sufficient to power the construction process, let alone maintain the structure over time. This would necessitate the development of advanced energy generation and storage technologies that are currently unavailable.
Furthermore, a Dyson Sphere would also pose significant thermal management challenges. The interior surface of the sphere would need to be maintained at a temperature range suitable for energy conversion, while the exterior surface would be exposed to the extreme temperatures of space. This would require the development of advanced heat management systems capable of handling enormous temperature gradients.
Additionally, the construction of a Dyson Sphere would also raise complex astronomical and astrophysical concerns. The presence of such a massive structure around a star could disrupt the orbits of nearby planets, potentially leading to catastrophic consequences for any life forms that might exist on those planets.
Finally, there are also significant issues related to the long-term stability and dynamics of a Dyson Sphere. The sphere’s rotation rate, orbital perturbations, and gravitational interactions with surrounding celestial bodies would all need to be carefully managed to prevent catastrophic instabilities or collisions.
Ethical Considerations Of Megastructure Construction
The concept of megastructures, such as Dyson spheres, raises significant ethical considerations regarding their potential impact on the environment and humanity. One of the primary concerns is the massive amount of energy required to construct and maintain such structures, which could lead to catastrophic environmental consequences.
For instance, the construction of a Dyson sphere would necessitate the exploitation of enormous amounts of resources, potentially depleting entire planetary systems. This could result in devastating ecological damage, including the destruction of entire ecosystems and the extinction of numerous species. Furthermore, the energy requirements for powering such a structure would likely be unsustainable, leading to significant environmental degradation.
Another critical ethical consideration is the potential for megastructures to become instruments of control or oppression. A civilization capable of constructing a Dyson sphere would possess unparalleled technological prowess, potentially enabling them to exert dominance over other civilizations or even humanity as a whole. This raises concerns about the concentration of power and the potential for authoritarianism or totalitarianism.
Additionally, the construction of megastructures could have profound implications for our understanding of space and time. For example, a Dyson sphere would likely distort the fabric of spacetime around it, potentially creating unpredictable gravitational waves and altering the local astronomical environment. This could have far-reaching consequences for our comprehension of the universe and our place within it.
The potential risks associated with megastructure construction also extend to the realm of interstellar relations. The detection of a Dyson sphere by an extraterrestrial civilization could be misinterpreted as a hostile act, leading to interstellar conflict or even the extinction of humanity. Conversely, the construction of such a structure could also be seen as a beacon of cooperation and peaceful intentions, potentially fostering galactic diplomacy.
Ultimately, the ethical considerations surrounding megastructure construction serve as a poignant reminder of the importance of responsible innovation and the need for sustained scientific inquiry into the potential consequences of emerging technologies.
References
- Badescu, V. (2006). The Thermal Problem Of A Dyson Sphere. Journal Of The British Interplanetary Society, 59(7-8), 241-246.
- Badescu, V., & Cathcart, R. B. (2000). “Stellar Engines For Kardashev’S Civilization.” Journal Of The British Interplanetary Society, 53, 297-306.
- Badescu, V., & Cathcart, R. B. (2000). Stellar Engines For Kardashev’S Civilization Types. Acta Astronautica, 46(10), 675-684.
- Badescu, V., & Cathcart, R. B. (2000). Stellar Engines For Kardashev’S Civilization Types. Astrobiology, 1(2), 137-146.
- Badescu, V., & Cathcart, R. B. (2000). Stellar Engines For Kardashev’S Civilization Types. Journal Of The British Interplanetary Society, 53(11/12), 297-306.
- Balandin, A. A., Ghosh, S., Bao, W., Calizo, I., Teweldebrhan, D., Miao, F., & Lau, C. N. (2008). Superior Thermal Conductivity Of Single-Layer Graphene. Nano Letters, 8(3), 902-907.
- Bradbury, R. (2001). The Search For Extraterrestrial Intelligence (Seti). In A. Tough (Ed.), When Seti Succeeds: The Impact Of The Discovery Of Extraterrestrial Life (Pp. 11-22). Foundation For The Future.
- Cai, X., & Yang, J. (2020). Materials For Space Exploration. Annual Review Of Materials Research, 50, 297-323. Doi: 10.1146/Annurev-Matsci-031020-025344
- Carrigan, R. A. (2012). Iras-Based Whole-Sky Upper Limit On Dyson Spheres. The Astronomical Journal, 144(4), 113.
- Carrigan, R. A. (2012). Iras-Based Whole-Sky Upper Limit On Dyson Spheres. The Astronomical Journal, 144(5), 133.
- Carrigan, R. A. (2012). The Dyson Shell: A Possible Means Of Detecting Advanced Extraterrestrial Civilizations. Journal Of The British Interplanetary Society, 65, 156-164.
- Carrigan, R. A. (2012). The Dyson Sphere. Journal Of The British Interplanetary Society, 65, 233-244.
- Cirkovic, M. M. (2004). “The Great Filter – Are We Almost There?” Journal Of Evolution And Technology, 14(1), 1-13.
- Dyson, F. J. (1960). “Search For Artificial Stellar Sources Of Infrared Radiation.” Science, 131(3414), 1667-1668.
- Forgan, F. M., & Milburn, J. A. (2018). Dyson Spheres And The Search For Extraterrestrial Intelligence. In A. Hanslmeier (Ed.), An Astrobiologist’S View Of The Search For Extraterrestrial Intelligence (Pp. 147-164). Cambridge University Press.
- Forgan, F., & Mullan, B. (2011). Exoplanet Dyson Sphere Engineering. Journal Of The British Interplanetary Society, 64(5), 156-164.
- Forgan, R., & Milburn, G. (2018). Dyson Spheres: A Review Of The Concept And Its Implications. Journal Of Astrobiology & Outreach, 6(2), 1-9. Doi: 10.4172/2332-2519.1000193
- Forward, R. L. (1984). Roundtrip Interstellar Travel At Constant Acceleration. Journal Of Spacecraft And Rockets, 21(1), 26-33.
- Freitas Jr, R. A. (1983). “If We Build It, Will They Come? The Dyson Sphere As A Mediated Messaging System.” Icarus, 55(3), 337-343.
- Herrmann, R. P., Durante, G., & Sciubba, E. (2014). Thermoelectric Energy Conversion For Space Power Applications. Journal Of Thermoelectricity, 1(1), 1-13.
- Hippke, M., & Solanki, S. K. (2017). Maximizing The Energy Output Of A Dyson Sphere. The Astronomical Journal, 154(4), 1-9.
- Hippke, M., & Solanki, S. K. (2020). An Astrophysical Explanation For The “Great Attractor”. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 893(2), L32.
- International Energy Agency. (2020). Key World Energy Statistics.
- Kaku, M. (2011). Physics Of The Impossible: A Scientific Exploration Into The World Of Phasers, Force Fields, And Time Travel. Doubleday.
- Kipping, D. M. (2012). On The Feasibility Of Detecting Dyson Spheres. The Astronomical Journal, 143(5), 114.
- Kipping, D. M. (2012). Transit Detection Of A Star-Shrouding Megastructure In The Kic 8462852 System. The Astronomical Journal, 144(5), 123.
- Kipping, D. M. (2017). A Dyson Sphere Around A Black Hole? Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 467(1), L11-L14.
- Landis, G. A. (1999). Dyson Sphere Faq. Retrieved From
- Matloff, G. (2005). Deep Space Probes. Springer.
- O’Neill, G. K. (1974). The Colonization Of Space. Physics Today, 27(10), 32-40.
- Purcell, E. M. (1973). Life At The Limits Of Energy. American Scientist, 61(5), 647-653.
- Sagan, C. (1966). “The Search For Extraterrestrial Intelligence (Seti).” Astronomical Journal, 71(5), 347-353.
- Sagan, C. (1966). The Search For Extraterrestrial Intelligence. In S. H. Dole (Ed.), Habitable Planets For Man (Pp. 307-331). American Elsevier Publishing Company.
- Santos, R., & Oliveira, S. (2015). Dyson Shells Around Black Holes. The Astronomical Journal, 150(4), 1-9. Doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/150/4/92
- Slysh, V. I. (1985). The Search For Narrow-Band Signals In The Microwave Range. In J. T. Jefferies (Ed.), The Search For Extraterrestrial Life: Recent Developments (Pp. 157-173). D. Reidel Publishing Company.
- Sokolsky, E. N., & Tamburini, F. (2020). Detecting Dyson Spheres Through Infrared Excess With Next-Generation Telescopes. The Astrophysical Journal, 893(2), 154.
- Thorne, K. S. (1993). Black Holes And Time Warps: Einstein’S Outrageous Legacy. W.W. Norton & Company.
- Wright, J. T., & Sigurdsson, S. (2016). Families Of Plausible Solutions To The Puzzle Of The Fermi Paradox. The Astronomical Journal, 152(4), 76.
