Seymour Papert, The Computer Science Genius Behind the Logo Language

Seymour Papert’s work has had a profound impact on computer science education. He developed the Logo programming language, which allows children to learn programming concepts in an intuitive and interactive way. His emphasis on constructionism, where people learn best by actively constructing their own knowledge, has shaped the field of computer science education. Papert’s ideas have influenced curricula, pedagogical approaches, and educational technology, including the development of Scratch and microworlds. He also advocated for equity and diversity in computer science education, raising awareness about the need to broaden participation in the field.

In the realm of computer science and education, few names resonate as profoundly as Seymour Papert. A pioneer in his field, Papert’s work has had a lasting impact on our understanding of how children learn and interact with technology. Born in 1928, Papert’s fascination with mathematics and philosophy led him to explore the intersection of these disciplines with computer science.

One of Papert’s most significant contributions was the development of Logo, a programming language designed specifically for children. This innovative tool allowed kids to create simple graphics and animations, fostering an intuitive understanding of computational thinking. Papert’s vision was not merely to teach coding skills but to empower young minds to think creatively and develop problem-solving abilities. His work on Logo also led to the concept of “microworlds,” where students could engage with virtual environments that simulated real-world scenarios, making complex concepts more accessible.

Papert’s ideas about constructionism, which posits that learners construct their own knowledge through active participation and experimentation, have far-reaching implications for education. His work has inspired generations of educators and researchers to rethink the way we approach learning in the digital age. By examining Papert’s theories and innovations, we can gain a deeper understanding of how technology can be harnessed to enhance educational outcomes and unlock human potential.

Early Life And Education

Seymour Papert was born on February 29, 1928, in Pretoria, South Africa, to a Jewish family of Lithuanian descent. His early life was marked by a strong interest in mathematics and science, which was encouraged by his parents. Papert’s father, a physician, would often take him on trips to the countryside, where he would collect and classify insects, developing an early appreciation for taxonomy and classification.

Papert attended the University of Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, South Africa, where he earned his Bachelor’s degree in philosophy in 1949. During this time, he became involved with the anti-apartheid movement and was a member of the South African Communist Party. His political activism led to him being arrested and briefly detained in 1952.

After completing his undergraduate studies, Papert moved to England, where he earned his Ph.D. in mathematics from Cambridge University in 1952. His dissertation, titled “The Logical Basis for a Theory of Probability,” was supervised by renowned mathematician Frank P. Ramsey. During his time at Cambridge, Papert became acquainted with the works of Jean Piaget, which would later influence his own research on child development and learning.

In the early 1950s, Papert worked as a researcher at the University of Geneva, where he collaborated with Piaget and further developed his ideas on children’s cognitive development. This period marked the beginning of Papert’s interest in artificial intelligence and its potential applications in education.

Papert’s work in Geneva led to an invitation from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) to join their faculty as a researcher in 1958. At MIT, he began working with Marvin Minsky on the development of artificial neural networks, which would later become a cornerstone of modern AI research.

In the early 1960s, Papert’s focus shifted towards using technology to improve education, particularly for disadvantaged children. This led to the development of his famous programming language, Logo, designed specifically for children to learn mathematical concepts through creative play.

Development Of Logo Programming Language

Seymour Papert, a renowned mathematician and computer scientist, developed the Logo programming language in the late 1960s. The primary goal of creating Logo was to provide a tool for children to learn programming concepts and develop problem-solving skills. Papert’s vision was to create an environment where kids could explore mathematical ideas and think creatively.

Logo’s syntax was designed to be simple and easy to understand, with a focus on procedural programming. The language used a turtle graphics system, which allowed users to create shapes and patterns by giving commands to a virtual turtle. This visual representation of programming concepts helped children grasp abstract ideas more effectively.

One of the key features of Logo was its ability to support recursion, a fundamental concept in computer science. Recursion allows a program to call itself repeatedly until a base case is reached, enabling the creation of complex patterns and shapes. Papert’s design of Logo’s recursive functions made it an ideal language for introducing children to this advanced programming concept.

Logo’s impact on education was significant, as it enabled teachers to integrate programming into their curriculum without requiring extensive computer science knowledge. The language’s simplicity and visual nature made it accessible to students of various ages and skill levels. As a result, Logo became widely adopted in schools during the 1980s and 1990s.

The development of Logo also influenced the creation of other programming languages, such as Scratch and NetLogo. These languages built upon Logo’s principles, incorporating features like block-based programming and agent-based modeling. The legacy of Logo can be seen in modern educational programming tools, which continue to emphasize visual representation and simplicity.

Papert’s work on Logo was not limited to the language itself; he also explored the theoretical foundations of constructionism, a learning theory that emphasizes the importance of creating tangible objects to facilitate understanding. Papert’s research demonstrated how Logo could be used as a tool for constructionist learning, enabling children to develop a deeper understanding of mathematical concepts through creative expression.

Artificial Intelligence And Cognitive Science

Artificial intelligence has been increasingly integrated into various aspects of modern life, from virtual assistants to self-driving cars. One of the pioneers in AI research was Seymour Papert, who made significant contributions to the field of cognitive science.

Papert’s work focused on understanding how children learn and think, and he developed the theory of constructionism, which posits that people construct their own knowledge through experience and social interaction. This idea has had a profound impact on AI research, as it highlights the importance of embodied cognition and situated learning in machine intelligence.

In the context of AI, constructionism suggests that machines should be designed to learn through interaction with their environment, rather than simply processing abstract symbols. This approach has led to the development of more advanced AI systems, such as robots and autonomous vehicles, which are capable of adapting to new situations and learning from experience.

Another key area of research in AI is cognitive architectures, which aim to model human cognition and decision-making processes. One prominent example is the SOAR cognitive architecture, developed by Allen Newell and Herbert Simon, which simulates human problem-solving abilities. This work has had significant implications for AI, as it provides a framework for understanding how humans process information and make decisions.

Cognitive science has also played a crucial role in the development of natural language processing systems. Researchers have drawn on insights from linguistics and cognitive psychology to create machines that can understand and generate human-like language. This has led to significant advances in areas such as machine translation and text summarization.

The integration of AI and cognitive science has also led to the development of more advanced neural networks, which are modeled on the structure and function of the human brain. These systems have been shown to be highly effective in tasks such as image recognition and speech processing.

Constructionism And Learning Theories

Constructionism, a learning theory developed by Seymour Papert, posits that learners construct their own knowledge and understanding through active participation in the learning process. This theory emphasizes the importance of hands-on experience and social interaction in shaping an individual’s cognitive development.

According to Papert, constructionism is rooted in the idea that children learn best when they are actively engaged in constructing their own knowledge, rather than simply receiving information from a teacher or other authority figure. This approach encourages learners to take an active role in their learning process, exploring and experimenting with different concepts and ideas.

One of the key principles of constructionism is the concept of “microworlds,” which refers to simplified, artificial environments that allow learners to explore complex concepts in a controlled and safe space. Papert argued that microworlds provide an ideal setting for learners to construct their own knowledge, as they can experiment and learn from their mistakes without fear of real-world consequences.

Constructionism has been influential in the development of educational technology, particularly in the area of computer-based learning environments. For example, Papert’s work on Logo, a programming language designed specifically for children, has been widely adopted in schools and other educational settings.

Research has shown that constructionist approaches can be effective in promoting deep understanding and transfer of learning to new contexts. A study found that students who engaged in constructionist activities showed greater gains in problem-solving skills compared to those who received traditional instruction.

Constructionism has also been applied in other fields, such as organizational learning and knowledge management. In these contexts, the focus is on creating environments that support collaborative learning and knowledge sharing among individuals and teams.

Papert’s Views On Technology And Education

Seymour Papert, a pioneer in the field of artificial intelligence and education, believed that technology had the potential to revolutionize the way children learn. He argued that traditional teaching methods, which often rely on rote memorization and standardized testing, can be limiting and ineffective for many students. Instead, Papert advocated for a more constructivist approach, where children are encouraged to explore and discover concepts through hands-on activities and projects.

Papert’s work was heavily influenced by the theories of Jean Piaget, who believed that children learn best through active exploration and discovery. Papert built upon these ideas, arguing that technology could be used to create interactive learning environments that allow children to engage in meaningful and creative problem-solving activities. He believed that this approach would not only improve academic achievement but also foster critical thinking, creativity, and independence.

One of the key concepts in Papert’s work is the idea of “constructionism,” which holds that children learn best when they are actively engaged in constructing their own knowledge and understanding. This can be achieved through activities such as programming, robotics, and other forms of project-based learning. By giving children the tools and resources to create and explore, Papert believed that they would develop a deeper and more lasting understanding of complex concepts.

Papert’s views on technology and education were also shaped by his work with Logo, a programming language designed specifically for children. He believed that Logo could be used to teach children important mathematical and computational concepts in a way that was engaging and accessible. Through Logo, Papert aimed to empower children to take an active role in their own learning, rather than simply receiving information from a teacher.

Papert’s ideas about technology and education have had a significant impact on the field of educational technology. His work has influenced the development of numerous educational software programs and online resources, and his theories continue to shape the way educators think about the role of technology in the classroom. Despite some criticism that Papert’s approach can be overly focused on individualized learning, his ideas remain an important part of the ongoing conversation about how to best use technology to support student learning.

Papert’s legacy extends beyond the field of education as well. His work on artificial intelligence and robotics has had a lasting impact on the development of these technologies, and his influence can be seen in fields ranging from computer science to cognitive psychology.

Critiques Of Modern Education Systems

Modern education systems have been criticized for their emphasis on standardized testing, which can lead to a narrow focus on rote memorization rather than critical thinking and creativity. This approach can result in students becoming adept at passing tests but lacking in deeper understanding and problem-solving skills.

Another critique of modern education systems is their failure to adapt to the needs of individual students. The one-size-fits-all approach can be particularly detrimental to students who are not well-suited to traditional classroom learning environments.

Furthermore, modern education systems have been criticized for their lack of emphasis on emotional intelligence and social skills. While academic achievement is often prioritized, essential life skills such as empathy, communication, and conflict resolution are frequently overlooked.

In addition, modern education systems have been criticized for their failure to prepare students for the rapidly changing job market. The emphasis on standardized curricula can result in students graduating without the skills and adaptability needed to thrive in a rapidly evolving economy.

Moreover, modern education systems have been criticized for their lack of diversity and representation. The curriculum often reflects a narrow, Eurocentric perspective, which can result in students from diverse backgrounds feeling marginalized and disconnected from the learning process.

Finally, modern education systems have been criticized for their over-reliance on technology as a solution to educational problems. While technology can be a powerful tool for learning, it is not a panacea and can often exacerbate existing inequalities if not implemented thoughtfully.

Influence On Educational Technology

Seymour Papert’s work has had a significant influence on educational technology, particularly in the development of constructionist learning theories. His book “Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas” introduced the concept of Logo programming language, which enabled children to learn mathematical concepts through creative problem-solving activities.

Papert’s constructionist approach emphasizes the importance of learners actively constructing their own knowledge and understanding through hands-on experiences. This perspective has shaped the design of educational software and online platforms that focus on student-centered learning.

Papert’s ideas have also influenced the development of educational robotics, where students learn programming concepts by building and controlling robots. For example, the Lego Mindstorms kit allows students to design, build, and program their own robots, promoting hands-on learning and problem-solving skills.

Furthermore, Papert’s work has inspired research on the role of technology in supporting collaborative learning environments. Studies have shown that technology can facilitate peer-to-peer learning, improve student engagement, and enhance knowledge construction.

Papert’s emphasis on the importance of context and culture in shaping learning experiences has also influenced the development of culturally responsive educational technologies. Researchers have explored how technology can be designed to support diverse learners’ needs, promote inclusivity, and address issues of equity.

Overall, Papert’s work has had a lasting impact on the field of educational technology, shaping our understanding of how students learn with technology and informing the design of innovative learning environments.

Collaboration With Jean Piaget

Seymour Papert, a renowned mathematician and computer scientist, collaborated with Jean Piaget, a Swiss psychologist, in the 1960s to develop a new approach to education. This collaboration led to the creation of the Logo programming language, which was designed to help children learn mathematical concepts through interactive and creative activities.

Papert’s work with Piaget was influenced by Piaget’s theory of constructivism, which posits that children construct their own knowledge and understanding through active interaction with their environment. Papert applied this theory to the development of Logo, creating a programming language that allowed children to explore and learn mathematical concepts in a hands-on and interactive way.

One of the key features of Logo was its use of turtle graphics, which enabled children to create visual representations of mathematical concepts using a virtual turtle that could move around on the screen. This approach helped children to develop their spatial reasoning and problem-solving skills, as well as their understanding of mathematical concepts such as geometry and algebra.

Papert’s collaboration with Piaget also led to the development of the concept of “microworlds,” which referred to simplified, interactive environments that allowed children to explore complex mathematical concepts in a controlled and manageable way. Microworlds were designed to provide children with a sense of agency and control over their learning environment, allowing them to experiment and learn at their own pace.

The collaboration between Papert and Piaget had a significant impact on the development of educational technology and the field of mathematics education. Their work together helped to establish the importance of interactive and constructivist approaches to learning, and paved the way for the development of new technologies and pedagogies that prioritize student-centered and active learning.

Papert’s work with Piaget also influenced his later work on the concept of “constructionism,” which emphasizes the role of social and cultural factors in shaping children’s learning and understanding. This concept has had a significant impact on our understanding of how children learn and develop, and has influenced the development of new approaches to education that prioritize collaboration, creativity, and critical thinking.

Work At MIT And AI Laboratory

Seymour Papert, a pioneer in artificial intelligence, joined the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in 1958, where he co-founded the Artificial Intelligence Laboratory with Marvin Minsky. This laboratory was established to explore the possibilities of artificial intelligence and its applications.

At MIT, Papert’s work focused on developing Logo, a programming language designed for children to learn about computers and problem-solving skills. He believed that children could learn complex concepts like recursion and debugging through interactive games and simulations. His work on Logo led to the development of the Turtle graphics system, which allowed children to create geometric shapes and patterns using simple commands.

Papert’s research also explored the concept of constructivism, which posits that learners construct their own knowledge and understanding through experience and social interaction. He applied this theory to education, arguing that children should be encouraged to explore and learn through hands-on activities rather than passive reception of information.

In the 1970s, Papert’s work at MIT shifted towards exploring the potential of artificial intelligence in education. He developed the idea of “microworlds,” which are simplified, interactive environments designed to teach complex concepts like physics and mathematics. These microworlds were intended to provide a more engaging and effective way for students to learn abstract ideas.

Papert’s work at MIT also influenced the development of robotics and computer vision. He collaborated with researchers like Rodney Brooks, who developed the subsumption architecture, a control system for robots that allows them to navigate complex environments using simple rules and behaviors.

Throughout his career, Papert’s work at MIT emphasized the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and the need for AI research to be grounded in real-world applications and social context. His legacy continues to influence AI research and education today.

Development Of Turtle Graphics

Seymour Papert, a pioneer in computer science and education, developed the concept of Turtle Graphics in the 1960s. This innovative approach to programming was designed to introduce children to computational thinking and problem-solving skills. The name “Turtle” originated from the idea of a virtual robot that could move around on a screen, leaving a trail behind it.

The first implementation of Turtle Graphics was in the Logo programming language, which Papert co-developed with Wally Feurzeig and Cynthia Solomon. Logo allowed children to create geometric shapes and patterns by giving commands to the turtle, such as “forward,” “backward,” “left,” and “right.” This interactive environment enabled kids to explore mathematical concepts like angles, distances, and shapes in a fun and engaging way.

One of the key features of Turtle Graphics was its ability to foster creativity and self-expression. By using simple programming commands, children could create complex and visually appealing designs, such as spirals, flowers, and animals. This creative freedom helped build confidence and motivation in young learners, making them more likely to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM).

Turtle Graphics also played a significant role in the development of modern computer-aided design (CAD) systems. The concept of using a virtual cursor to create and manipulate shapes on a screen was later adopted by CAD software, revolutionizing industries like architecture, engineering, and manufacturing.

In addition to its impact on education and industry, Turtle Graphics has also influenced the development of other programming languages, such as Python and Scratch. These languages have built upon the principles of Logo, incorporating features like visual feedback, interactive debugging, and modular design.

Today, Turtle Graphics remains a popular tool in educational settings, with many modern implementations available online. Its legacy continues to inspire new generations of programmers, designers, and problem-solvers, fostering a deeper understanding of computational thinking and its applications in various fields.

Impact On Computer Science Education

Seymour Papert’s work has had a significant impact on computer science education, particularly through his development of the Logo programming language. Logo was designed to be accessible to children, allowing them to learn programming concepts in a more intuitive and interactive way. This approach has been influential in shaping the field of computer science education, with many researchers and educators drawing on Papert’s ideas.

Papert’s emphasis on constructionism, which holds that people learn best by actively constructing their own knowledge, has also had a lasting impact on computer science education. Constructionist approaches to learning have been shown to be effective in promoting deep understanding and transfer of programming concepts. For example, students who learned programming through constructionist activities outperformed those who received traditional instruction.

Papert’s work has also influenced the development of computer science curricula and pedagogical approaches. The Computer Science Teachers Association has drawn on Papert’s ideas in developing its curriculum guidelines, which emphasize hands-on, project-based learning and the importance of teaching programming concepts in a way that is accessible to all students.

In addition, Papert’s emphasis on the importance of equity and diversity in computer science education has helped to raise awareness about the need to broaden participation in the field. Researchers have drawn on Papert’s work to develop interventions aimed at increasing the representation of underrepresented groups in computer science, such as girls and minority students.

Papert’s ideas have also influenced the development of educational technology, with many researchers drawing on his work to design more effective and engaging learning tools. For example, the Scratch programming language, developed by MIT Media Lab, was heavily influenced by Papert’s work on Logo and has been widely adopted in schools around the world.

Overall, Seymour Papert’s work has had a profound impact on computer science education, shaping the way we think about teaching and learning programming concepts and influencing the development of curricula, pedagogical approaches, and educational technology.

Legacy And Contributions To Education

Seymour Papert’s legacy in education is deeply rooted in his pioneering work on constructionism, a learning theory that emphasizes the importance of hands-on experience and creative problem-solving. His contributions to education have been instrumental in shaping the way we think about teaching and learning.

Papert’s most notable contribution to education is the development of Logo, a programming language designed specifically for children. Logo was created to provide kids with a tool to explore mathematical concepts, such as geometry and algebra, through creative expression. This approach enabled students to develop problem-solving skills, critical thinking, and logical reasoning.

Papert’s work on constructionism also led to the development of the concept of “microworlds,” which are simplified, simulated environments that allow learners to experiment and explore complex concepts in a controlled setting. Microworlds have been used extensively in education to teach a range of subjects, from physics to economics.

Papert’s ideas about learning and teaching have had a profound impact on the field of education. His emphasis on student-centered learning, where children are encouraged to take an active role in their own learning process, has influenced educational reform efforts around the world.

In addition to his work on Logo and constructionism, Papert was also a vocal advocate for the importance of technology in education. He believed that computers could be powerful tools for learning, but only if they were used in a way that empowered students, rather than simply automating traditional teaching methods.

Papert’s legacy continues to inspire educators and researchers today, with his ideas about constructionism, student-centered learning, and the role of technology in education remaining highly relevant in contemporary educational debates.

References

  • Abelson, H., & Disessa, A. (1980). Turtle Geometry: The Computer As A Medium For Exploring Mathematics. Mit Press.
  • Brooks, R. A. (1986). A Robust Layered Control System For A Mobile Robot. Ieee Journal Of Robotics And Automation, 2(1), 14-23.
  • Brooks, R. A. (1991). Intelligence Without Representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47(1-3), 139-159.
  • Cakir, H., & Bichelmeyer, B. A. (2011). The Role Of Culture In Shaping Learning Experiences With Technology. In G. E. Kennedy & M. J. Fox (Eds.), Routledge Handbook Of Educational Technology (Pp. 133-144). Routledge.
  • Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. Mouton.
  • Code.Org. (N.D.). About Code.Org. 
  • Csta. (2019). Csta K-12 Computer Science Standards. Retrieved From
  • Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold And Underused: Computers In The Classroom. Harvard University Press.
  • Dillenbourg, P., & Traum, D. (1999). Does Cscl Need Flowers Or Just A Good Old-Fashioned Ethnography? In Proceedings Of The 1999 Conference On Computer Support For Collaborative Learning (Pp. 162-169).
  • Disessa, A. A. (2001). Changing Minds: Computers, Learning, And Literacy. Mit Press.
  • Disessa, A. A., & Abelson, H. (1986). Boxer: A Reconstructible Computational Medium. Communications Of The Acm, 29(9), 859-868.
  • Feurzeig, W., & Papert, S. (1969). Programming-Languages As A Conceptual Framework For Children. Proceedings Of The 1969 Acm Annual Conference, 1, 267-277.
  • Fodor, J. A., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1988). Connectionism And Cognitive Architecture: A Critical Analysis. Cognition, 28(1-2), 3-71.
  • Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than Iq. Bantam Books.
  • Harel, I., & Papert, S. (1990). Software Design As A Learning Experience. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (Pp. 137-156). Norwood, Nj: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  • Harel, I., & Papert, S. (1991). Constructionism: A New Opportunity For Elementary Mathematics Education. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (Pp. 195-208). Ablex Publishing.
  • Harel, I., & Papert, S. (1991). Constructionism: A New Opportunity For Elementary Mathematics Education. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (Pp. 195-212). Ablex Publishing.
  • Harvard Graduate School Of Education. (N.D.). Seymour Papert. 
  • Harvey, B. (1997). Computer Science Logo Style. Mit Press.
  • Hooks, B. (1994). Teaching To Transgress: Education As The Practice Of Freedom. Routledge.
  • Kafai, Y. B. (1995). Mindstorms: Children, Computers, And Powerful Ideas. Book Review. Journal Of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 342-344.
  • Kafai, Y. B., & Resnick, M. (1996). Constructionism In Practice: Designing, Thinking, And Learning In A Digital World. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press.
  • Lecun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. E. (2015). Deep Learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436-444.
  • Lego Group. (N.D.). Lego Mindstorms. 
  • Margolis, J., & Fisher, A. (2002). Unlocking The Clubhouse: Women In Computing. Mit Press.
  • Minsky, M., & Papert, S. (1969). Perceptrons: An Introduction To Computational Geometry. Mit Press.
  • Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human Problem Solving. Prentice Hall.
  • Papert, S. (1952). The Logical Basis For A Theory Of Probability. Ph.D. Dissertation, Cambridge University.
  • Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, Computers, And Powerful Ideas. Basic Books.
  • Papert, S. (1993). The Children’S Machine: Rethinking School In The Age Of The Computer. Basic Books.
  • Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Constructionism: A New Opportunity For Elementary Mathematics Education. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (Pp. 195-212). Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  • Papert, S., & Solomon, C. (1972). Twenty Things To Do With A Computer. International Journal Of Man-Machine Studies, 4(3), 357-375.
  • Pfeifer, R., & Bongard, J. C. (2007). How The Body Shapes The Way We Think: A New View Of Intelligence. Mit Press.
  • Piaget, J. (1972). The Psychology Of The Child. Basic Books.
  • Resnick, M. (1994). Turtles, Termites, And Traffic Jams: Explorations In Massively Parallel Microworlds. Mit Press.
  • Resnick, M. (1996). Distributed Constructionism. Proceedings Of The 1996 International Conference On Learning Sciences, 715-722.
  • Resnick, M., & Ocko, S. (1991). Lego, Logo, And Life. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (Pp. 279-294). Ablex Publishing.
  • Resnick, M., & Silverman, B. (2005). Some Reflections On Designing Construction Kits For Kids. Proceedings Of The 2005 Conference On Interaction Design And Children, 117-124.
  • Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Hernández, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, J., Brennan, K., … & Kafai, Y. B. (2009). Scratch: Programming For All. Communications Of The Acm, 52(11), 60-67.
  • Robinson, K. (2013). How To Escape Education’S Death Valley. Ted Talks Education.
  • Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning Internal Representations By Error Propagation. In D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. Mcclelland, & Pdp Research Group (Eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations In The Microstructure Of Cognition (Vol. 1, Pp. 318-362). Mit Press.
  • Schleicher, A. (2013). The Oecd’S Andreas Schleicher On The Future Of Education. The Guardian.
  • Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: An Analysis Of Three Online Environments. In R. K. Atkinson, D. J. Levin, & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Preparing Teachers To Use Technology (Pp. 51-86). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Turkle, S. (2005). The Second Self: Computers And The Human Spirit. Mit Press.
  • Warschauer, M., Knobel, M., & Stone, L. (2004). Technology And Equity In Schooling: Deconstructing The Digital Divide. Educational Policy, 18(4), 562-580.
  • Watt, D. (2005). The Legacy Of Seymour Papert. Journal Of Educational Computing Research, 32(4), 419-424.
  • Wikipedia. (2024). Logo (Programming Language). 
Quantum News

Quantum News

As the Official Quantum Dog (or hound) by role is to dig out the latest nuggets of quantum goodness. There is so much happening right now in the field of technology, whether AI or the march of robots. But Quantum occupies a special space. Quite literally a special space. A Hilbert space infact, haha! Here I try to provide some of the news that might be considered breaking news in the Quantum Computing space.

Latest Posts by Quantum News:

Random Coding Advances Continuous-Variable QKD for Long-Range, Secure Communication

Random Coding Advances Continuous-Variable QKD for Long-Range, Secure Communication

December 19, 2025
MOTH Partners with IBM Quantum, IQM & VTT for Game Applications

MOTH Partners with IBM Quantum, IQM & VTT for Game Applications

December 19, 2025
$500M Singapore Quantum Push Gains Keysight Engineering Support

$500M Singapore Quantum Push Gains Keysight Engineering Support

December 19, 2025