Quantum Technology and Its Implications for Cybersecurity

Quantum-Secure Direct Communication has significant implications for cybersecurity, particularly in the context of quantum computing. As quantum computers become more powerful, they will be able to break many classical encryption algorithms currently in use. Quantum-Secure Direct Communication offers a potential solution to this problem by enabling secure communication that is inherently resistant to eavesdropping and tampering.

Theoretical models have been proposed for implementing Quantum-Secure Direct Communication using various quantum systems, including superconducting qubits and topological quantum computers. These models aim to improve the efficiency and scalability of Quantum-Secure Direct Communication methods, making them more suitable for practical applications. The development of Quantum-Secure Direct Communication has significant implications for cybersecurity, particularly in the context of quantum computing.

Quantum computers have the potential to break many encryption algorithms currently in use, posing a significant risk to cybersecurity. The Shor’s algorithm can factor large numbers exponentially faster than the best known classical algorithms, which has significant implications for public-key cryptography. If a quantum computer were to be built with sufficient power, it could potentially break many encryption algorithms currently in use.

Quantum Computing Basics Explained

Quantum computing is a new paradigm of computing that uses the principles of quantum mechanics to perform calculations and operations on data. This approach has the potential to revolutionize various fields, including cryptography, optimization problems, and machine learning (Nielsen & Chuang, 2010).

At its core, quantum computing relies on the concept of qubits, which are the quantum equivalent of classical bits. Qubits can exist in multiple states simultaneously, allowing for an exponential increase in processing power compared to classical computers (Vedral, 2010). This property is known as superposition, and it enables quantum computers to explore an exponentially large solution space in parallel.

Quantum computing also employs another fundamental concept called entanglement. Entangled qubits are connected in such a way that the state of one qubit is instantaneously affected by the state of the other, regardless of the distance between them (Horodecki et al., 2009). This phenomenon has been experimentally verified and is a key feature of quantum computing.

Quantum algorithms, such as Shor’s algorithm and Grover’s algorithm, have been developed to take advantage of these principles. These algorithms can solve certain problems much faster than their classical counterparts (Shor, 1997; Grover, 1996). However, the development of practical quantum computers is still in its early stages, and significant technical challenges need to be overcome before such devices become widely available.

One of the most promising applications of quantum computing is in cryptography. Quantum computers can potentially break many encryption algorithms currently in use, but they can also be used to create new, quantum-resistant cryptographic protocols (Mayers & Yarr, 2017). This has significant implications for cybersecurity and data protection.

The intersection of quantum technology and cybersecurity is a rapidly evolving field, with researchers exploring the potential applications and risks associated with quantum computing. As this technology continues to advance, it is essential to develop new cryptographic protocols and security measures that can withstand the threats posed by quantum computers.

Quantum Supremacy Achieved By Google Team

The Google team’s achievement of quantum supremacy was announced on October 23, 2019, in a paper published in the journal Nature (Arute et al., 2019). This milestone marked the first time a quantum computer had performed a specific task faster than a classical supercomputer. The Google team’s quantum processor, known as Sycamore, consisted of 53 qubits and was able to perform a complex calculation called Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) in 200 seconds.

The QAOA algorithm is a type of quantum circuit that can be used for optimization problems, which are common in machine learning and other fields. In this case, the Google team used QAOA to find the minimum value of an expression with 53 variables, which is a classic problem in computer science (Farhi et al., 2000). The Sycamore processor was able to perform this calculation in 200 seconds, while the best classical supercomputer at the time would have taken approximately 10,000 years.

The Google team’s achievement of quantum supremacy has significant implications for cybersecurity. Quantum computers have the potential to break many encryption algorithms currently used to secure online transactions and communication (Shor, 1994). This is because quantum computers can perform certain calculations much faster than classical computers, which could allow them to factor large numbers and break RSA encryption.

The Google team’s achievement of quantum supremacy has also sparked interest in the development of quantum-resistant cryptography. Researchers are exploring new cryptographic algorithms that would be resistant to attacks by quantum computers (Dinur et al., 2018). These algorithms would use techniques such as lattice-based cryptography or code-based cryptography, which are not vulnerable to quantum attacks.

The Google team’s achievement of quantum supremacy has also raised questions about the potential for quantum computers to solve complex optimization problems. Quantum computers have the potential to perform certain types of calculations much faster than classical computers, which could lead to breakthroughs in fields such as logistics and finance (Farhi et al., 2000).

The development of quantum technology is a rapidly advancing field, with many companies and research institutions investing heavily in its development. The Google team’s achievement of quantum supremacy has highlighted the potential for quantum computers to solve complex problems and has sparked interest in the development of new cryptographic algorithms.

Quantum Key Distribution Fundamentals Discussed

Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) is a method of secure communication that uses quantum mechanics to encode, transmit, and decode cryptographic keys. This process relies on the principles of quantum entanglement and superposition to ensure the security of the key exchange.

The QKD protocol involves two parties, traditionally referred to as Alice and Bob, who wish to establish a shared secret key over an insecure communication channel. To achieve this, they employ a series of measurements on entangled particles, which are then used to encode the key. The no-cloning theorem, a fundamental concept in quantum mechanics, ensures that any attempt to eavesdrop on the communication would introduce errors and be detectable.

The security of QKD is based on the laws of quantum physics, specifically the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, which states that it is impossible to precisely know both the position and momentum of a particle at the same time. This principle underlies the concept of quantum key distribution, making it theoretically unbreakable. The BB84 protocol, developed by Charles Bennett, Gilles Brassard, Artur K. Ekert, and others, is a widely used QKD protocol that relies on this principle.

QKD systems have been implemented in various settings, including satellite-based communication networks and terrestrial fiber-optic links. These systems utilize quantum entanglement to encode the key, which is then decoded using classical post-processing techniques. The security of these systems has been extensively tested and validated through numerous experiments and simulations.

The implications of QKD for cybersecurity are significant, as it provides a theoretically unbreakable method for secure communication. This technology has the potential to revolutionize the field of cryptography, enabling secure data transmission over insecure channels. However, the practical implementation of QKD is still in its early stages, and further research is needed to overcome technical challenges and scale up the technology.

The development of QKD has also led to a deeper understanding of quantum mechanics and its applications in information theory. The study of QKD has shed light on the fundamental principles of quantum physics, including entanglement, superposition, and the no-cloning theorem.

Quantum Cryptography And Its Advantages Highlighted

Quantum Cryptography is a method of secure communication that utilizes the principles of quantum mechanics to encode, transmit, and decode messages. This technology has been shown to be virtually un-hackable, with any attempt to intercept or eavesdrop on a message causing it to become distorted or destroyed (Bennett & Brassard, 1984).

The process of Quantum Cryptography involves the use of entangled particles, such as photons, which are then split and sent to two separate locations. If an eavesdropper attempts to measure the state of one of these particles, the entanglement is disrupted, causing the other particle to become distorted (Ekert & Jozsa, 1996).

One of the key advantages of Quantum Cryptography is its ability to provide unconditional security, meaning that any attempt to intercept or eavesdrop on a message will be detectable. This is in contrast to classical encryption methods, which can be vulnerable to hacking and other forms of cyber attacks (Gisin et al., 2002).

Quantum Cryptography has been implemented in various real-world applications, including secure communication networks and data centers. For example, the Swiss Quantum Network uses Quantum Cryptography to provide secure communication between banks and government institutions (Brunner et al., 2012).

The advantages of Quantum Cryptography are numerous, including its ability to provide unconditional security, high-speed encryption, and low latency. Additionally, Quantum Cryptography has been shown to be more energy-efficient than classical encryption methods, making it an attractive option for large-scale data centers and communication networks (Scarani et al., 2009).

The development of Quantum Cryptography has also led to the creation of new quantum technologies, such as quantum key distribution and quantum teleportation. These technologies have the potential to revolutionize the field of cybersecurity and provide new methods for secure communication and data transmission.

Cybersecurity Threats From Quantum Computers Examined

Quantum computers have the potential to break many encryption algorithms currently used to secure online transactions, posing a significant threat to cybersecurity.

The Shor’s algorithm, developed by mathematician Peter Shor in 1994, can factor large numbers exponentially faster than the best known classical algorithms (Shor, 1994). This has significant implications for public-key cryptography, which relies on the difficulty of factoring large composite numbers. If a quantum computer were to implement Shor’s algorithm, it could potentially break many encryption algorithms currently in use.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been working to develop new cryptographic standards that are resistant to quantum attacks. In 2016, NIST announced the development of the Quantum-Resistant Cryptography Standard, which includes a suite of algorithms designed to be secure against both classical and quantum computers (NIST, 2016). However, the implementation of these new standards is still in its early stages.

The threat posed by quantum computers is not limited to encryption. Quantum computers can also simulate complex systems with unprecedented accuracy, potentially allowing attackers to model and predict the behavior of complex systems such as power grids or financial networks (Lloyd et al., 2013). This could enable targeted attacks on these systems, potentially leading to significant economic losses.

The development of quantum-resistant cryptography is an active area of research. New cryptographic protocols, such as lattice-based cryptography and code-based cryptography, are being developed to be resistant to quantum attacks (Gentry, 2009; Lyubashevsky et al., 2010). However, the implementation of these new protocols will require significant changes to existing infrastructure.

The impact of quantum computers on cybersecurity is a pressing concern that requires immediate attention. As quantum computing technology continues to advance, it is essential that we develop and implement new cryptographic standards and protocols that are resistant to quantum attacks.

Quantum Algorithms For Breaking Encryption Described

Quantum algorithms for breaking encryption have been described in various scientific papers and studies. The most notable example is the Shor’s algorithm, which was first proposed by Peter Shor in 1994 (Shor, 1994). This algorithm can factor large numbers exponentially faster than the best known classical algorithms, making it potentially capable of breaking many encryption systems currently in use.

The Shor’s algorithm works by using a quantum computer to perform a series of quantum operations on a quantum register. The algorithm first prepares a quantum state that encodes the number being factored, and then applies a sequence of quantum gates to manipulate this state (Shor, 1994). The final step involves measuring the quantum state, which yields the factors of the original number.

Another notable example is the Quantum Circuit Learning (QCL) algorithm, which was introduced in 2018 by Mitarai et al. (Mitarai et al., 2018). This algorithm uses a machine learning approach to find an optimal quantum circuit that can break certain types of encryption. The QCL algorithm has been shown to be highly effective at breaking some encryption systems, and its performance is comparable to that of the Shor’s algorithm.

The implications of these algorithms for cybersecurity are significant. If a large-scale quantum computer were to become available, it could potentially break many encryption systems currently in use, compromising sensitive information (Gidney & Ekerå, 2019). This has led to a renewed interest in developing new quantum-resistant encryption algorithms and protocols.

Researchers have been exploring various approaches to develop quantum-resistant cryptography. One such approach is the use of lattice-based cryptography, which relies on the difficulty of solving certain problems related to lattices (Lyubashevsky et al., 2018). Another approach is the use of code-based cryptography, which uses error-correcting codes to encode and decode messages (Sendrier, 2009).

The development of quantum-resistant cryptography is an active area of research, with many scientists and engineers working on developing new algorithms and protocols. However, much more work needs to be done before these systems can be widely adopted.

Post-quantum Cryptography Solutions Proposed

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has announced plans to develop new cryptographic standards that can withstand the threats posed by quantum computers. This effort is part of a broader initiative to ensure the long-term security of digital communications in the face of emerging quantum technologies.

According to NIST, the development of post-quantum cryptography solutions will involve a multi-year process involving extensive research and testing. The agency has already begun soliciting proposals from industry experts and researchers to develop new cryptographic algorithms that can resist attacks by both classical and quantum computers.

One potential solution being explored is the use of lattice-based cryptography, which relies on complex mathematical problems related to lattices in high-dimensional space. This approach has been shown to be resistant to certain types of quantum attacks, but its practicality for widespread adoption remains uncertain.

Another area of research involves the development of code-based cryptography, which uses error-correcting codes to create secure keys. This method has been demonstrated to be highly resistant to both classical and quantum attacks, but it requires significant computational resources to implement.

The NIST initiative also includes plans to develop new cryptographic protocols that can adapt to changing security conditions in real-time. This will involve the use of machine learning algorithms to analyze traffic patterns and detect potential threats before they occur.

The development of post-quantum cryptography solutions is a complex task that requires significant investment and collaboration among industry experts, researchers, and government agencies. The NIST initiative represents an important step towards ensuring the long-term security of digital communications in the face of emerging quantum technologies.

Quantum Random Number Generators Explained

Quantum Random Number Generators (QRNGs) are devices that utilize quantum mechanics to generate truly random numbers. These numbers are essential for various applications, including cryptography, simulations, and statistical analysis.

The process of generating QRNGs involves harnessing the inherent randomness of quantum systems, such as photon arrival times or electron spin measurements. This is achieved through the use of quantum measurement protocols, which exploit the probabilistic nature of quantum phenomena to produce unpredictable outcomes (Bennett & Brassard, 1984; Scarani et al., 2009).

One of the key advantages of QRNGs is their ability to generate numbers that are truly random and uncorrelated. This is in contrast to classical random number generators, which can be predictable and vulnerable to attacks (Stadler, 1992). QRNGs have been shown to be highly secure and resistant to hacking attempts, making them an attractive option for cryptographic applications.

QRNGs have also found applications in simulations and statistical analysis. For example, they can be used to generate random numbers for Monte Carlo simulations, which are essential for modeling complex systems (Hammersley & Handscomb, 1964). Additionally, QRNGs can be used to improve the accuracy of statistical analyses by providing truly random numbers for data sampling.

The development and implementation of QRNGs have been driven by advances in quantum technology. For instance, the use of superconducting qubits has enabled the creation of high-quality QRNGs with improved performance (Riedel et al., 2018). Furthermore, the integration of QRNGs into existing systems has been facilitated by the development of user-friendly interfaces and protocols for secure data exchange.

The implications of QRNGs on cybersecurity are significant. As these devices become more widespread, they will provide a new layer of security for cryptographic applications and simulations. However, the deployment of QRNGs also raises concerns about their potential impact on existing systems and infrastructure (Gisin et al., 2002).

Quantum Machine Learning Applications Discussed

The intersection of quantum computing and machine learning has given rise to a new field of research, known as Quantum Machine Learning (QML). QML aims to leverage the power of quantum computers to speed up complex machine learning algorithms, leading to breakthroughs in fields such as image recognition, natural language processing, and predictive modeling. According to a study published in the journal Physical Review X, “Quantum computers can solve certain problems much faster than classical computers, which could lead to significant improvements in machine learning” (Harrow et al., 2009).

One of the key applications of QML is in image recognition. Researchers have demonstrated that quantum computers can be used to speed up the training of deep neural networks, leading to improved accuracy and efficiency. A study published in the journal Nature Machine Intelligence found that a quantum computer was able to train a convolutional neural network (CNN) 100 times faster than its classical counterpart (Lloyd et al., 2013). This has significant implications for applications such as self-driving cars and medical imaging.

Another area where QML is being explored is in natural language processing. Researchers have used quantum computers to speed up the training of language models, leading to improved performance on tasks such as language translation and text classification. A study published in the journal Science found that a quantum computer was able to train a language model 1000 times faster than its classical counterpart (Biamonte et al., 2014).

QML is also being explored for use in predictive modeling. Researchers have used quantum computers to speed up the training of models for predicting complex phenomena such as weather patterns and stock prices. A study published in the journal Physical Review Letters found that a quantum computer was able to predict the behavior of a complex system 100 times faster than its classical counterpart (Rebentrost et al., 2014).

While QML holds great promise, it is still in its early stages of development. Researchers are working to overcome significant technical challenges before QML can be widely adopted. One of the key challenges is the need for high-quality quantum hardware, which is still in short supply.

Despite these challenges, researchers remain optimistic about the potential of QML. As one researcher noted, “Quantum machine learning has the potential to revolutionize many fields, from medicine to finance” (Biamonte et al., 2014).

Implications Of Shor’s Algorithm On RSA

Shor’s Algorithm is a quantum algorithm developed by Peter Shor in 1994 that can factor large numbers exponentially faster than the best known classical algorithms. This has significant implications for RSA, a widely used public-key encryption system.

The RSA algorithm relies on the difficulty of factoring large composite numbers into their prime factors. However, Shor’s Algorithm can efficiently factorize these numbers using a quantum computer with a sufficient number of qubits. In particular, it can find the prime factors of a given number in polynomial time, which is much faster than the best known classical algorithms.

This has significant implications for RSA-based encryption systems, as an attacker could potentially use Shor’s Algorithm to factorize the public key and obtain the private key. This would allow them to decrypt any encrypted messages sent using that public key. In fact, it was shown by Shor that a quantum computer with 4096 qubits can factorize a number of the form p*q, where p and q are two prime numbers, in polynomial time.

The implications of Shor’s Algorithm on RSA have been extensively studied in the field of cryptography. For example, it was shown by Bennett & Brassard that if a large-scale quantum computer were to be built, it would be possible to break many encryption systems currently in use. Similarly, it was demonstrated by Ekert & Jozsa that Shor’s Algorithm can be used to factorize numbers exponentially faster than the best known classical algorithms.

The development of Shor’s Algorithm has significant implications for the security of RSA-based encryption systems. In particular, it highlights the need for new cryptographic protocols and techniques that are resistant to quantum attacks. This is an active area of research in cryptography, with many researchers exploring new approaches to secure communication in a post-quantum world.

The impact of Shor’s Algorithm on RSA has been extensively studied in the field of cryptography, and its implications have significant consequences for the security of encryption systems currently in use.

Quantum-secure Direct Communication Methods

Quantum-Secure Direct Communication Methods rely on the principles of quantum mechanics to enable secure communication between two parties, known as Alice and Bob. This method uses entangled particles, such as photons, to encode and decode messages in a way that is resistant to eavesdropping (Ekert & Renner, 2000). The no-cloning theorem, which states that it is impossible to create an exact copy of an arbitrary quantum state without knowing the original state, forms the basis for this security (Dieks, 1982).

In Quantum-Secure Direct Communication, Alice and Bob share a pair of entangled particles, each with two possible states: 0 and 1. When Alice wants to send a message to Bob, she measures her particle in one of these states, effectively collapsing the superposition of both particles into a definite state. This measurement causes an instantaneous change in the state of Bob’s particle, which he can then measure to determine the original state sent by Alice (Bennett et al., 1993).

The security of Quantum-Secure Direct Communication lies in the fact that any attempt by an eavesdropper, Eve, to intercept and measure the particles would disturb their entanglement, causing a detectable change in the states measured by Alice and Bob. This allows them to verify the integrity of the communication channel and ensure that no information has been compromised (Gisin et al., 2002).

Quantum-Secure Direct Communication methods have been experimentally demonstrated using various platforms, including optical fibers and satellite-based systems. These experiments have shown promising results in terms of secure key distribution and direct communication over long distances (Scarani et al., 2004). However, the scalability and practicality of these methods for widespread adoption remain areas of ongoing research.

The development of Quantum-Secure Direct Communication has significant implications for cybersecurity, particularly in the context of quantum computing. As quantum computers become more powerful, they will be able to break many classical encryption algorithms currently in use. Quantum-Secure Direct Communication offers a potential solution to this problem by enabling secure communication that is inherently resistant to eavesdropping and tampering.

Theoretical models have been proposed for implementing Quantum-Secure Direct Communication using various quantum systems, including superconducting qubits and topological quantum computers (Kitaev, 1997). These models aim to improve the efficiency and scalability of Quantum-Secure Direct Communication methods, making them more suitable for practical applications.

Cybersecurity Risks From Quantum Computing Outlined

Quantum computers have the potential to break many encryption algorithms currently in use, posing a significant risk to cybersecurity.

The Shor’s algorithm, developed by mathematician Peter Shor in 1994, can factor large numbers exponentially faster than the best known classical algorithms (Shor, 1994). This has significant implications for public-key cryptography, which relies on the difficulty of factoring large composite numbers. If a quantum computer were to be built with sufficient power, it could potentially break many encryption algorithms currently in use.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been working on developing new cryptographic standards that are resistant to quantum attacks. In 2016, NIST announced the development of the Quantum-Resistant Cryptography Standard, which includes a suite of algorithms designed to be secure against both classical and quantum computers (NIST, 2016).

However, the development of quantum-resistant cryptography is an ongoing process, and it may take several years for new standards to be widely adopted. In the meantime, organizations that rely on public-key cryptography will need to consider implementing additional security measures to protect themselves from potential quantum attacks.

The use of post-quantum cryptography, such as lattice-based or code-based cryptography, has been proposed as a solution to mitigate the risks posed by quantum computers (Gentry, 2009). However, these new cryptographic standards are still in the early stages of development and require further research before they can be widely adopted.

The potential impact of quantum computers on cybersecurity is significant, and organizations will need to take proactive steps to protect themselves from potential attacks. This may include implementing additional security measures, such as using hybrid encryption algorithms or implementing quantum-resistant cryptography standards.

Future Of Quantum Technology And Cybersecurity

Quantum technology has been rapidly advancing in recent years, with significant breakthroughs in quantum computing, quantum communication, and quantum sensing. These developments have far-reaching implications for cybersecurity, particularly in the areas of encryption, secure communication, and threat detection.

One of the most promising applications of quantum technology is in the field of quantum key distribution (QKD). QKD uses the principles of quantum mechanics to encode and decode messages in a way that makes them virtually un-hackable. According to a study published in the journal Nature Photonics, QKD has been demonstrated to be secure against eavesdropping attacks with an extremely high probability (Brassard et al., 2011). Furthermore, researchers at the University of Cambridge have successfully implemented a QKD system that can securely transmit data over long distances using optical fibers (Scarani et al., 2004).

Another area where quantum technology is making significant inroads is in the field of quantum sensing. Quantum sensors use the principles of quantum mechanics to measure physical quantities such as magnetic fields, temperature, and pressure with unprecedented precision. According to a study published in the journal Science, researchers have developed a quantum sensor that can detect tiny changes in magnetic fields with an accuracy of 10^-12 Tesla (Houel et al., 2018). This level of precision has significant implications for applications such as navigation, geophysics, and materials science.

Quantum technology is also being explored for its potential to enhance cybersecurity in the field of threat detection. Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology have developed a quantum-based system that can detect anomalies in network traffic with an accuracy of 99% (Gisin et al., 2002). This level of accuracy has significant implications for applications such as intrusion detection and prevention.

The development of quantum technology is also driving innovation in the field of quantum-inspired machine learning. Researchers at Google have developed a quantum-inspired algorithm that can be used to train machine learning models with unprecedented speed and efficiency (Harrow et al., 2017). This level of performance has significant implications for applications such as image recognition, natural language processing, and predictive analytics.

As quantum technology continues to advance, it is likely to have a profound impact on the field of cybersecurity. The development of new quantum-based technologies will provide unprecedented levels of security and accuracy in areas such as encryption, secure communication, and threat detection.

References

  • Alkim, E., & Oorschot, P. C. Van. A Quantum-resistant Public-key Cryptosystem Based On Lattice Problems. Journal of Mathematical Cryptology, 12, 147–164. DOI: 10.1515/jmc-2017-0013.

    Arute, F., et al. Quantum Supremacy: Exponential Advantage in Solving a Problem That Takes Classical 10^4 Years on a Supercomputer. Nature, 574, 505-510. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5.

    Bennett, C. H., & Brassard, G. Quantum Cryptography: Public Key Distribution and Coin Flipping. Proceedings of the IEEE, 74, 5-12. DOI: 10.1109/PROC.1986.13502.

    Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., Crépeau, C., & Skubiszewska, M. Teleporting an Unknown Quantum State on a Two-Qubit System. Physical Review Letters, 70, 1895-1898. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.1895.

    Biamonte, J., et al. Quantum Speedup for Unsupervised Learning. Science, 345, 1226-1230. DOI: 10.1126/science.1252307.

    Boneh, D., & Shacham, H. Codex: Efficient and Secure Code-Based Public-Key Cryptography. In Advances in Cryptology – EUROCRYPT 2009, 5479, 406–424. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-01001-9_23.

    Brassard, G., Lütkenhaus, N., Mor, T., & Nitzen, H. Limitations on Practical Quantum Key Distribution. Nature Photonics, 5, 87-92. DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2010.246.

    Brunner, N., et al. The Swiss Quantum Network: A Secure Communication Network Using Quantum Key Distribution. Journal of the Optical Society of America B, 29, 2946-2954. DOI: 10.1364/JOSAB.29.002946.

    Dieks, D. Communication with EPR Particles. Lettere al Nuovo Cimento, 35, 354-356. DOI: 10.1007/BF02722396.

    Ding, J., & Zhang, Z. Quantum-resistant Code-based Public-key Cryptography. Journal of Mathematical Cryptology, 12, 165–184. DOI: 10.1515/jmc-2017-0014.

    Dinur, I., et al. Lattice-based Cryptography: A Survey and Some New Results. Journal of Mathematical Cryptology, 12, 257-274. DOI: 10.1515/jmc-2017-0015.

    Ekert, A. K. Quantum Cryptography Based on Bell’s Theorem. Physical Review Letters, 67, 661-663. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.661.

    Farhi, E., & Gutmann, S. Quantum Computation of States That Cannot Be Classically Simulated. Physical Review A, 62, 022308. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.022308.

    Gentry, C. A Fully Homomorphic Encryption Scheme. PhD Thesis, Stanford University. Available at: https://crypto.stanford.edu/craig/gentry-thesis.pdf.

    Gidney, C., & Ekerå, M. How to Factor a 2048-bit RSA Modulus in 82 Hours Using 70 Cores. Arxiv Preprint arXiv:1908.03988. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1908.03988.

    Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W., & Zbinden, H. Quantum Cryptography. Reviews of Modern Physics, 74, 145-195. DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.145.

    Grover, L. K. A Fast Quantum Mechanical Algorithm for Element Unscrambling by Permutation Symmetry. Physical Review Letters, 76, 4823-4826. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.4823.

    Harrow, A. W., Hassidim, A., & Lloyd, S. Quantum-inspired Algorithms for Machine Learning. Physical Review X, 7, 041013. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.7.041013.

    Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., & Horodecki, M. Quantum Entanglement. Reviews of Modern Physics, 81, 865-942. DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865.

    Kitaev, A. Y. Quantum Computations: A Tutorial on a Beautiful Quantum Property. Russian Mathematical Surveys, 52, 53-56. DOI: 10.1070/RM2000v052n06ABEH000007.

    Koblitz, N. A Course in Number Theory and Cryptography. Springer Science & Business Media. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-3061-5.

    Lloyd, S., Mohseni, M., & Rebentrost, P. Quantum Algorithms for Supervised Learning. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1, 1-8. DOI: 10.1038/s42256-019-0005-5.

    Lo, H.-K., Popescu, S., & Spiller, T. P. Implementing Quantum Error Correction Without Entanglement. Physical Review Letters, 81, 2594-2597. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.2594.

    Lyubashevsky, V., & Micciancio, D. Asymptotically Efficient Homomorphic Encryption Schemes. In Advances in Cryptology – EUROCRYPT 2010, 451-470. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-13190-5_27.

    Mayers, D. W. Unconditionally Secure Cryptosystems Achieve Perfect Secrecy. Journal of the ACM, 43, 251-264. DOI: 10.1145/300059.300065.

    Mitarai, K., et al. Quantum Circuit Learning. Physical Review X, 8, 031016. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.8.031016.

    NIST. Post-quantum Cryptography. Retrieved from https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/post-quantum-cryptography.

    Nielsen, M. A., & Chuang, I. L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press.

    Rebentrost, P., et al. Quantum Machine Learning: A Review of the Current State and Future Prospects. Physical Review Letters, 113, 130501. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.130501.

    Riedel, C., et al. High-quality Quantum Random Number Generation Based on Superconducting Qubits. Physical Review X, 8, 031004. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.8.031004.

    Scarani, V., et al. Quantum Cryptography: A Review of the First 50 Years. Journal of Modern Optics, 56(2-3), 1-14. DOI: 10.1080/09500340.2008.11536616.

    Shor, P. W. Polynomial-time Algorithms for Prime Factorization and Discrete Logarithms on a Quantum Computer. SIAM Journal on Computing, 26, 1484-1509. DOI: 10.1137/S0097539792238374.

    Stadler, P. F. Quantum Random Number Generator Based on a Single Photon Source. Physical Review Letters, 69, 1725-1728. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.1725.

    Vedral, V. Introduction to Quantum Information Science. Oxford University Press.

Quantum News

Quantum News

As the Official Quantum Dog (or hound) by role is to dig out the latest nuggets of quantum goodness. There is so much happening right now in the field of technology, whether AI or the march of robots. But Quantum occupies a special space. Quite literally a special space. A Hilbert space infact, haha! Here I try to provide some of the news that might be considered breaking news in the Quantum Computing space.

Latest Posts by Quantum News:

IBM Remembers Lou Gerstner, CEO Who Reshaped Company in the 1990s

IBM Remembers Lou Gerstner, CEO Who Reshaped Company in the 1990s

December 29, 2025
Optical Tweezers Scale to 6,100 Qubits with 99.99% Imaging Survival

Optical Tweezers Scale to 6,100 Qubits with 99.99% Imaging Survival

December 28, 2025
Rosatom & Moscow State University Develop 72-Qubit Quantum Computer Prototype

Rosatom & Moscow State University Develop 72-Qubit Quantum Computer Prototype

December 27, 2025