In his 2024 paper, “Humility and Realism in Quantum Physics and Metaphysics”, Damiano Bondi, a scholar from the University of Urbino, Italy, explores the philosophical implications of quantum physics. Bondi suggests that the inability to achieve objective knowledge of nature should not lead to the abandonment of ontological realism, but rather encourage an attitude of epistemic humility. He discusses the measurement problem in quantum physics and its ontological implications, and introduces the concept of potentiality as a fundamental category of quantum metaphysics. Bondi also draws parallels between quantum physics and theology, highlighting the shared challenges in understanding reality.
What is the Role of Humility and Realism in Quantum Physics and Metaphysics?
The paper “Humility and Realism in Quantum Physics and Metaphysics” by Damiano Bondi, a scholar from the Department of Economy, Society, Politics at the University of Urbino, Italy, delves into the philosophical and metaphysical implications of quantum physics. The paper, published in 2024, particularly focuses on the concepts of epistemic humility and ontological realism.
Bondi’s thesis posits that the inability to achieve objective knowledge of nature does not necessitate the abandonment of ontological realism. Instead, it encourages scientists to adopt an attitude of epistemic humility. The paper presents the main theories of quantum physics, focusing on the measurement problem and its ontological implications.
The paper also addresses the issues of objectivity and realism, and discusses statistics as the new form of scientific epistemology. It introduces the concept of potentiality as the fundamental category of quantum metaphysics. Throughout the paper, Bondi draws parallels between quantum physics theories and theology, suggesting that when humans investigate the foundations of reality, certain thought patterns, core problems, and possible solutions resemble each other, regardless of the specific perspective and language used.
How Does Quantum Physics Challenge Our Understanding of Reality?
Quantum mechanics, as Bondi discusses, is ontologically revolutionary. This means it fundamentally challenges our understanding of the nature of being and reality. The revolution in physics began with Planck’s formulation of the hypothesis of quantum of action in 1900. This revolution, according to Bondi, resembles the scientific revolution of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries in many ways.
However, the exact form this revolution takes is still not entirely clear. The paper suggests that we are likely to reach a new coherent paradigm in the future, much like the Newtonian system that prevailed until the twentieth century. Currently, the situation strongly resembles the period of scientific revolution, with old paradigms being challenged and new ones still in the process of being established.
What is the Measurement Problem in Quantum Physics?
One of the main theories of quantum physics discussed in the paper is the measurement problem. This problem arises from the peculiar behavior of quantum systems, which do not have definite properties until they are measured. This is in stark contrast to classical physics, where objects have definite properties at all times.
The measurement problem has profound ontological implications. It challenges the classical notion of realism, which holds that the world exists independently of our observations. In the quantum world, it seems that the act of measurement itself plays a crucial role in determining the state of a system. This leads to a paradox: if the world only takes on definite properties when we measure it, does it mean that reality is somehow dependent on our observations?
How Does Quantum Physics Encourage Epistemic Humility?
The paper argues that the peculiarities of quantum physics, such as the measurement problem, encourage an attitude of epistemic humility. Epistemic humility is the recognition of the limits of our knowledge. In the context of quantum physics, it means acknowledging that our ability to know and understand the nature of reality is fundamentally limited.
This does not mean that we should abandon the pursuit of knowledge. Rather, it encourages us to approach our investigations with humility, recognizing that our understanding of the world is always provisional and subject to revision. This attitude is not only a philosophical stance but also a practical necessity in the face of the profound mysteries and paradoxes of the quantum world.
What is the Role of Potentiality in Quantum Metaphysics?
The paper introduces the concept of potentiality as a fundamental category of quantum metaphysics. In classical physics, objects have definite properties and exist in a state of actuality. In contrast, quantum systems exist in a state of potentiality until they are measured.
This concept of potentiality has profound implications for our understanding of reality. It suggests that the world is not a static, deterministic system, but a dynamic, probabilistic one. It also challenges the classical notion of causality, as the state of a quantum system is not determined by its past, but by the act of measurement.
How Does Quantum Physics Resemble Theology?
Throughout the paper, Bondi draws parallels between quantum physics and theology. He suggests that when humans investigate the foundations of reality, certain thought patterns, core problems, and possible solutions resemble each other, regardless of the specific perspective and language used.
This is not to say that quantum physics and theology are the same, or that one can be reduced to the other. Rather, it suggests that both are attempts to grapple with the profound mysteries of existence. Both quantum physics and theology challenge our intuitive understanding of the world and force us to reconsider our assumptions about reality. In this sense, they both require a degree of humility and openness to the unknown.
Publication details: “Humility and Realism in Quantum Physics and Metaphysics”
Publication Date: 2024-05-29
Authors: Damiano Bondi
Source: Religions
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15060670
