Quantum computing has the potential to revolutionize information processing, but it faces several challenges and limitations. Error correction, scalability, and low temperature requirements are significant hurdles. Despite these challenges, researchers are actively developing novel solutions, including quantum-inspired algorithms that can run on classical hardware. Future prospects look promising, with potential breakthroughs in topological quantum computing, adiabatic quantum computers, and quantum simulation. The development of more advanced quantum algorithms is also expected to have applications in fields such as cryptography, optimization, and machine learning.
Quantum Computing Explained
Overall, significant investments are being made to overcome the challenges and realize the potential of quantum computing. As computers continue to evolve, a new frontier is emerging in the realm of quantum computing. This revolutionary technology has the potential to solve complex problems that are currently unsolvable by even the most advanced classical computers. At its core, quantum computing leverages the principles of quantum mechanics to perform calculations that are exponentially faster and more efficient than traditional methods.
One of the key features that sets quantum computing apart is its ability to exist in multiple states simultaneously. This property, known as superposition, allows a quantum computer to process vast amounts of data in parallel, making it an ideal solution for complex optimization problems. For instance, quantum computers can quickly find the optimal solution among an exponentially large number of possibilities, whereas classical computers would require an impractically long time to arrive at the same answer. This has significant implications for fields such as cryptography, where quantum computers could potentially break certain encryption algorithms, but also create new, unbreakable codes.
Another critical aspect of quantum computing is entanglement, which enables the connection and correlation between different qubits (quantum bits). When two or more qubits are entangled, their properties become linked, allowing for the manipulation of one qubit to instantly affect the others, regardless of the distance between them. This phenomenon has been experimentally confirmed through various studies, including a 2016 study published in the journal Science, which demonstrated the ability to entangle two qubits separated by over a kilometer (Chen et al., 2016). As researchers continue to harness the power of entanglement and superposition, the possibilities for quantum computing seem almost limitless.
What Is Quantum Computing?
Quantum computing is a type of computation that uses the principles of quantum mechanics to perform calculations and operations on data. This is in contrast to classical computing, which uses bits to store and process information, where each bit can have a value of either 0 or 1. Quantum computers, on the other hand, use quantum bits or qubits, which can exist in multiple states simultaneously, allowing for much faster processing of certain types of data.
One key feature of quantum computing is superposition, which allows a qubit to exist in multiple states at once. This means that a single qubit can perform many calculations simultaneously, making it potentially much faster than classical computers for certain tasks. Another important aspect of quantum computing is entanglement, where two or more qubits become connected and can affect each other even when separated by large distances.
Quantum computers are particularly well-suited to solving certain types of problems, such as simulating complex systems, factoring large numbers, and searching large databases. They have the potential to revolutionize fields such as cryptography, optimization, and machine learning. However, building a practical quantum computer is extremely challenging due to the fragile nature of qubits, which are prone to errors caused by interactions with their environment.
Several companies and organizations are actively working on developing quantum computers, including IBM, Google, Microsoft, and Rigetti Computing. These efforts have led to the development of small-scale quantum computers, such as IBM’s 53-qubit quantum computer and Google’s 72-qubit Bristlecone processor. While these systems are still in the early stages of development, they represent significant progress towards the goal of building a practical quantum computer.
Quantum computing has many potential applications, including breaking certain types of encryption, optimizing complex systems, and simulating the behavior of molecules and materials. It could also be used to speed up machine learning algorithms and improve the accuracy of weather forecasting models. However, it is still an emerging technology, and much research is needed to overcome the technical challenges involved in building a large-scale, practical quantum computer.
The development of quantum computing has also led to new areas of research, such as quantum information theory and quantum error correction. These fields are focused on understanding the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics and developing methods for protecting qubits from errors caused by their environment.
Principles Of Quantum Mechanics
Quantum mechanics is based on the principles of wave-particle duality, uncertainty, and superposition. According to the Copenhagen interpretation, particles such as electrons and photons can exhibit both wave-like and particle-like behavior depending on how they are observed. This concept was first demonstrated by Louis de Broglie in 1924, who proposed that particles could be described using wave functions.
The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle is another fundamental principle of quantum mechanics, which states that it is impossible to know certain properties of a particle, such as its position and momentum, simultaneously with infinite precision. This principle was first introduced by Werner Heisenberg in 1927 and has since been widely accepted as a fundamental limit on our ability to measure the physical world.
Superposition is another key concept in quantum mechanics, which allows particles to exist in multiple states simultaneously. This means that a particle can be in more than one position or have more than one set of properties at the same time. The Schrödinger equation, developed by Erwin Schrödinger in 1926, is used to describe the behavior of particles in superposition.
Entanglement is another important aspect of quantum mechanics, which describes the phenomenon where two or more particles become correlated in such a way that the state of one particle cannot be described independently of the others. This means that measuring the state of one particle will instantaneously affect the state of the other entangled particles, regardless of the distance between them.
Quantum computing relies heavily on the principles of quantum mechanics to perform operations on data. Quantum bits or qubits are the fundamental units of information in quantum computing and can exist in multiple states simultaneously due to superposition. This allows for parallel processing of large amounts of data, making quantum computers potentially much faster than classical computers for certain types of calculations.
The no-cloning theorem is another important principle in quantum mechanics, which states that it is impossible to create a perfect copy of an arbitrary quantum state. This means that any attempt to clone a qubit will introduce errors and destroy the original state. This theorem was first proven by William Wootters and Wojciech Zurek in 1982.
Bits And Qubits Compared
Bits are the fundamental units of information in classical computing, whereas qubits are the quantum equivalent in quantum computing. A bit can exist in one of two states, either a 0 or a 1, whereas a qubit can exist in multiple states simultaneously, known as superposition. This property allows qubits to process multiple possibilities simultaneously, making them much more powerful than classical bits.
The no-cloning theorem, a fundamental principle in quantum mechanics, states that an arbitrary quantum state cannot be copied precisely. This means that qubits cannot be duplicated or cloned, unlike classical bits which can be easily replicated. This property has significant implications for quantum computing and cryptography.
Qubits are also highly susceptible to decoherence, which is the loss of quantum coherence due to interactions with the environment. This makes them extremely sensitive to their surroundings and requires sophisticated error correction techniques to maintain their fragile quantum states. In contrast, classical bits are much more robust and less prone to errors.
The number of possible states in a qubit increases exponentially with the number of qubits, making it possible to process vast amounts of data simultaneously. This property, known as entanglement, is unique to quantum systems and has no classical equivalent. It allows quantum computers to solve certain problems much faster than classical computers.
Quantum gates are the quantum equivalent of logic gates in classical computing. They are the basic building blocks of quantum algorithms and are used to manipulate qubits to perform specific operations. Quantum gates are reversible, meaning they can be undone, whereas classical logic gates are often irreversible.
The DiVincenzo criteria, a set of five conditions, must be met for a physical system to be considered a viable candidate for quantum computing. These criteria include the ability to initialize the state of the qubits, perform universal quantum gate operations, and measure the state of the qubits with high fidelity.
Superposition And Entanglement Explained
In quantum mechanics, superposition is a fundamental concept that describes the ability of a quantum system to exist in multiple states simultaneously. This means that a qubit, the basic unit of quantum information, can represent not just 0 or 1, but also any linear combination of 0 and 1, such as 0 and 1 at the same time.
The concept of superposition is often illustrated with the example of Schrödinger’s cat, a thought experiment designed by Erwin Schrödinger in 1935. In this scenario, a cat is placed in a box with a radioactive atom that has a 50% chance of decaying within a certain time frame. If the atom decays, a poison is released that kills the cat. According to quantum mechanics, the radioactive atom is in a superposition of states, both decayed and not decayed at the same time, until observed.
Entanglement, on the other hand, is a phenomenon where two or more particles become correlated in such a way that the state of one particle cannot be described independently of the others. This means that measuring the state of one particle will instantaneously affect the state of the other entangled particles, regardless of the distance between them.
Entanglement is a key feature of quantum mechanics that has been experimentally verified numerous times. In 1997, Nicolas Gisin and his colleagues demonstrated the phenomenon of entanglement swapping, where two particles that have never interacted before can become entangled through the mediation of a third particle.
In the context of quantum computing, superposition and entanglement are essential resources for performing operations on qubits. Quantum algorithms, such as Shor’s algorithm and Grover’s algorithm, rely heavily on the manipulation of superpositions and entanglements to achieve exponential speedup over classical computers.
The fragile nature of superposition and entanglement, however, makes them prone to decoherence, a process where the quantum system interacts with its environment, causing the loss of quantum coherence. This highlights the importance of developing robust methods for preserving and manipulating these quantum states in order to build reliable quantum computers.
Quantum Gates And Circuits Defined
Quantum gates are the fundamental building blocks of quantum circuits, which are the quantum equivalent of logic gates in classical computing. A quantum gate is a mathematical operation that takes one or more qubits as input and produces a corresponding output, similar to how a logic gate operates on bits in classical computing.
The most common quantum gates are the Pauli-X, Pauli-Y, and Pauli-Z gates, which are analogous to the NOT gate in classical computing. These gates perform a bit flip operation on a single qubit, rotating it around the x, y, or z axis of the Bloch sphere, respectively. The Hadamard gate is another important quantum gate that creates a superposition state by applying a rotation around the x and z axes simultaneously.
Quantum circuits are composed of a sequence of quantum gates applied to one or more qubits. These circuits can be represented graphically using quantum circuit diagrams, which consist of wires representing qubits and boxes representing quantum gates. The order in which the gates are applied is critical, as it determines the overall operation performed by the circuit.
One of the key challenges in designing quantum circuits is dealing with errors that arise due to the noisy nature of quantum systems. Quantum error correction codes, such as the surface code or the Shor code, can be used to mitigate these errors by introducing redundancy and encoding the qubits in a way that allows errors to be detected and corrected.
Quantum circuits have many potential applications, including simulating complex quantum systems, factoring large numbers, and searching unsorted databases. They are also being explored for their potential use in machine learning and optimization algorithms.
The development of practical quantum computing architectures is an active area of research, with several approaches being pursued, including superconducting qubits, ion traps, and topological quantum computing.
Types Of Quantum Computers Discussed
Quantum computers can be categorized into several types based on the underlying quantum systems used for computation.
One type is the Gate-Based Quantum Computer, which uses a set of quantum gates to manipulate qubits and perform operations. This approach is similar to classical computing, where bits are manipulated using logic gates. The gate-based model is widely used in most quantum computing architectures, including those developed by IBM and Rigetti Computing.
Another type is the Analog Quantum Computer, also known as the Quantum Annealer. This type of computer uses a continuous set of quantum states to perform optimization tasks, rather than discrete qubits. D-Wave Systems has developed a commercial quantum annealer, which has been used for various applications such as machine learning and materials science.
Topological Quantum Computers are another type, which use exotic particles called anyons to store and manipulate quantum information. This approach is still in the early stages of development, but it has the potential to provide robustness against decoherence, a major challenge in building scalable quantum computers.
Adiabatic Quantum Computers are yet another type, which use a slow and controlled evolution of the quantum system to perform computations. This approach is similar to classical simulated annealing, where a system is slowly cooled to find the optimal solution.
Quantum computers can also be classified based on the number of qubits they possess, such as small-scale, medium-scale, or large-scale quantum computers. Small-scale quantum computers typically have fewer than 100 qubits, while large-scale ones have thousands or more qubits.
Quantum Parallelism And Speedup
Quantum parallelism is a fundamental concept in quantum computing that enables the simultaneous execution of multiple calculations, leading to exponential speedup over classical computers for specific problems.
In classical computing, the processing of information is sequential, meaning that each operation is performed one after another. In contrast, quantum computers can exploit the principles of superposition and entanglement to perform many calculations simultaneously, thereby achieving parallelism. This property allows quantum computers to solve certain problems much faster than their classical counterparts.
One of the most well-known examples of quantum parallelism is Shor’s algorithm for factorizing large numbers. This algorithm takes advantage of the quantum computer’s ability to exist in a superposition of states, allowing it to perform an exponential number of calculations simultaneously. As a result, Shor’s algorithm can factorize large numbers exponentially faster than any known classical algorithm.
Another example of quantum parallelism is Grover’s search algorithm, which can find an element in an unsorted database of N elements with only O(√N) operations. This represents a quadratic speedup over the best possible classical algorithm, which requires O(N) operations. The key to this speedup lies in the ability of the quantum computer to exist in a superposition of states, allowing it to search the entire database simultaneously.
Quantum parallelism also has implications for machine learning and optimization problems. For instance, quantum k-means clustering can be performed exponentially faster than classical algorithms for certain types of data. Similarly, quantum computers can be used to accelerate the solution of linear systems, which is a fundamental problem in many fields of science and engineering.
The concept of quantum parallelism has far-reaching implications for our understanding of computation and its limits. It highlights the potential of quantum computing to revolutionize fields such as cryptography, optimization, and machine learning, and underscores the need for further research into the development of practical quantum computers.
Error Correction In Quantum Systems
Quantum systems are prone to errors due to the noisy nature of quantum gates, which can lead to decoherence and loss of quantum information. To mitigate this issue, error correction codes have been developed to detect and correct errors in quantum computations.
One popular approach is the surface code, a 2D lattice-based architecture that encodes qubits on a grid. This allows for efficient error correction by measuring stabilizer generators, which can detect errors without destroying the encoded quantum information. The surface code has been shown to be robust against certain types of noise and can achieve high error thresholds.
Another approach is the Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill (GKP) code, a continuous-variable quantum error correction code that encodes qubits in a bosonic mode. This code has been demonstrated to correct errors in a laboratory setting using superconducting circuits. The GKP code is particularly useful for correcting errors in analog quantum systems.
Error correction codes can also be classified into two categories: active and passive error correction. Active error correction involves actively measuring the system to detect errors, whereas passive error correction relies on encoding the information in a way that makes it more resilient to errors. Both approaches have their advantages and disadvantages, and the choice of error correction strategy depends on the specific quantum system and its noise characteristics.
Quantum error correction codes can also be used for fault-tolerant quantum computing, where errors are corrected in real-time during a computation. This requires sophisticated classical control systems to detect and correct errors quickly. Fault-tolerant quantum computing is essential for large-scale quantum computations, as it allows for reliable execution of complex algorithms.
Error correction in quantum systems is an active area of research, with ongoing efforts to develop more efficient and robust error correction codes. Advances in this field are crucial for the development of practical quantum computers that can solve real-world problems.
Quantum Algorithms And Applications
Quantum algorithms are designed to take advantage of the unique properties of quantum mechanics, such as superposition and entanglement, to solve complex problems more efficiently than classical algorithms. One of the most well-known quantum algorithms is Shor’s algorithm, which can factor large numbers exponentially faster than any known classical algorithm. This has significant implications for cryptography, as many encryption protocols rely on the difficulty of factoring large numbers.
Another important application of quantum algorithms is in search and optimization problems. Quantum computers can use Grover’s algorithm to search an unsorted database of N elements in O(sqrt(N)) time, compared to O(N) time required by classical algorithms. This has potential applications in fields such as machine learning and data analysis.
Quantum algorithms also have the potential to revolutionize the field of simulation and modeling. The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a hybrid quantum-classical algorithm that can be used to solve complex optimization problems, such as those encountered in chemistry and materials science. This has the potential to lead to breakthroughs in fields such as drug discovery and materials synthesis.
In addition to these specific applications, quantum algorithms also have the potential to enable new types of machine learning and artificial intelligence. Quantum k-means clustering, for example, is a quantum algorithm that can be used to cluster high-dimensional data more efficiently than classical algorithms. This has potential applications in fields such as image recognition and natural language processing.
Quantum algorithms are not limited to theoretical applications; they have also been implemented on real-world quantum computers. For example, Google’s Bristlecone quantum processor has been used to implement a 53-qubit version of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA). This demonstrates the feasibility of using quantum algorithms to solve complex optimization problems in practice.
The development of practical applications for quantum algorithms is an active area of research. Companies such as IBM, Microsoft, and Rigetti Computing are all working on developing software frameworks for programming and optimizing quantum computers. These efforts have the potential to enable widespread adoption of quantum computing technology in the near future.
Current State Of Quantum Computing Research
Quantum computing research has made significant progress in recent years, with major breakthroughs in the development of quantum processors, quantum algorithms, and quantum error correction.
One of the most notable advancements is the demonstration of quantum supremacy by Google’s Sycamore processor in 2019, which performed a specific task exponentially faster than a classical computer. This achievement marked a significant milestone in the development of practical quantum computing. Furthermore, IBM has also made substantial progress with its 53-qubit quantum processor, which has demonstrated low error rates and high fidelity.
Another area of active research is the development of quantum algorithms that can solve real-world problems efficiently. For instance, researchers have developed quantum algorithms for simulating complex chemical reactions, optimizing complex systems, and solving machine learning problems. These algorithms have the potential to revolutionize fields such as chemistry, materials science, and artificial intelligence.
Quantum error correction is another critical area of research, as it is essential for large-scale quantum computing. Researchers have made significant progress in developing robust quantum error correction codes, such as the surface code and the Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill (GKP) code. These codes can correct errors that occur during quantum computations, thereby enabling reliable and scalable quantum computing.
In addition to these advancements, there is also growing interest in the development of quantum-inspired algorithms for classical computers. These algorithms leverage the principles of quantum mechanics to develop novel solutions for complex problems, even though they do not rely on quantum computing hardware.
The current state of quantum computing research is characterized by intense activity and innovation, with significant investments being made by governments, industries, and academia worldwide.
Challenges And Limitations Of Quantum Computing
Quantum computing is a rapidly advancing field that has the potential to revolutionize the way we process information. However, despite its promise, quantum computing faces several challenges and limitations that must be addressed before it can become a practical reality.
One of the main challenges in building a large-scale quantum computer is the issue of error correction. Quantum computers are prone to errors due to the noisy nature of quantum systems, and these errors can quickly accumulate and destroy the fragile quantum states required for computation. To overcome this challenge, researchers have developed various error correction codes, such as the surface code and the Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill code, which can detect and correct errors in real-time.
Another significant limitation of quantum computing is the issue of scalability. Currently, most quantum computers are small-scale and can only perform a limited number of operations. Scaling up to larger numbers of qubits while maintaining control over them is a significant challenge. This requires the development of new technologies for fabricating and controlling large numbers of qubits, as well as innovative architectures that can efficiently connect and manipulate these qubits.
Quantum computers also require extremely low temperatures, typically near absolute zero, to operate effectively. This necessitates the use of complex and expensive cryogenic systems, which can be a significant limitation for practical applications. Furthermore, the need for such low temperatures makes it difficult to integrate quantum computers with other technologies that operate at higher temperatures.
In addition, there is a lack of standardization in quantum computing, which can make it difficult to compare and contrast different quantum systems. This lack of standardization also hinders the development of a robust ecosystem of software and hardware tools for quantum computing.
Finally, there are significant challenges in programming and optimizing quantum computers. Quantum algorithms are often highly sensitive to the specific parameters of the quantum system, and small variations can significantly affect their performance. Furthermore, the lack of intuitive programming models and debugging tools makes it difficult to develop and test quantum algorithms.
Future Prospects And Potential Breakthroughs
Quantum computing has the potential to revolutionize various fields, including cryptography, optimization, and simulation. In the near future, we can expect significant advancements in the development of more robust and scalable quantum processors.
One potential breakthrough is the implementation of topological quantum computing, which uses exotic particles called anyons to store and manipulate quantum information. This approach has been shown to be more resilient to errors than traditional quantum computing methods, and researchers are actively exploring its possibilities.
Another area of research is the development of adiabatic quantum computers, which use a gradual change in the Hamiltonian to find the ground state of a complex system. This approach has been shown to be effective for solving certain optimization problems and may have applications in fields such as logistics and finance.
Quantum simulation is another area where significant progress is expected in the near future. By using quantum systems to mimic the behavior of other quantum systems, researchers hope to gain insights into complex phenomena such as superconductivity and magnetism.
The development of more advanced quantum algorithms is also an active area of research. For example, the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm has been shown to be effective for solving certain optimization problems and may have applications in fields such as machine learning and materials science.
In addition to these technical advancements, there is also a growing interest in the development of quantum-inspired algorithms that can run on classical hardware. These algorithms are designed to mimic the behavior of quantum systems but do not require the fragile quantum states necessary for true quantum computing.
Overall, the future prospects of quantum computing look promising, with significant breakthroughs expected in the near future.
References
- Albash, T., Boixo, S., Isakov, S. V., Smelyanskiy, V. N., Babbush, R., Ding, N., … & Neven, H. (2018). Quantum Annealing With More Than One Hundred Qubits. Nature Physics, 14(6), 635-639.
- Arute, F., Arya, K., Babbush, R., Boddu, D., Boixo, S., Borkar, A. N., … & Martinis, J. M. (2019). Quantum Supremacy Using A Programmable Quantum Computer. Nature, 574(7789), 505-510.
- Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., Breidbart, S., & Wiesner, S. (1993). Teleporting An Unknown Quantum State Via Dual Classical And Einstein-podolsky-rosen Channels. Physical Review Letters, 70(16), 2634-2637.
- Biamonte, J., Wittek, P., Pancotti, N., Rebentrost, P., Wiebe, N., & Lloyd, S. (2017). Quantum Machine Learning. Nature, 549(7671), 195-202.
- Boixo, S., Isakov, S. V., Smelyanskiy, V. N., Babbush, R., Ding, N., Jiang, Z., … & Neven, H. (2016). Evidence For Quantum Annealing With More Than One Hundred Qubits. Nature Physics, 12(11), 1038-1041.
- Boixo, S., Isakov, S. V., Smelyanskiy, V. N., Babbush, R., Ding, N., Jiang, Z., … & Neven, H. (2018). Characterizing Quantum Supremacy In Near-term Devices. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1805.05223.
- Chao, R., Reichardt, B. W., Sipiläinen, C. M., & Vuillot, D. R. (2018). Fault-tolerant Quantum Computation With Few Qubits. Nature Physics, 14(11), 1071-1076.
- De Broglie, L. (1924). Recherches Sur La Théorie Des Quanta. Annales De Physique, 10(3), 22-128.
- Deutsch, D. (1999). Quantum Turing Machine. Proceedings Of The Royal Society Of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical And Engineering Sciences, 455(1986), 3129-3141.
- Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935). Can Quantum-mechanical Description Of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? Physical Review, 47(10), 777-780.
- Farhi, E., & Gutmann, S. (2014). Quantum Linear Systems Algorithm With Exponential Speedup. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1409.5870.
- Farhi, E., Goldstone, J., & Gutmann, S. (2014). A Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm. Arxiv Preprint Quant-ph/1412.6062.
- Farhi, E., Goldstone, J., Gutmann, S., & Sipser, M. (2001). Quantum Computation By Adiabatic Evolution. Arxiv Preprint Quant-ph/0001106.
- Feynman, R. P. (1982). Simulating Physics With Computers. International Journal Of Theoretical Physics, 21(6-7), 467-488.
- Fowler, A. G., Mariantoni, M., Martinis, J. M., & Cleland, A. N. (2012). Surface Codes: Towards Practical Large-scale Quantum Computation. Physical Review A, 86(3), 032324.
- Freedman, M. H., Larsen, M., & Wang, Z. (2003). A Modular Functor Which Is Universal For Quantum Computation. Communications In Mathematical Physics, 227(3), 605-622.
- Gisin, N., Tittel, W., Zbinden, H., & Brendel, J. (1997). Experimental Demonstration Of Entanglement Swapping. Physical Review Letters, 79(11), 2093-2096.
- Gottesman, D. (1997). Class Of Quantum Error-correcting Codes Saturating The Quantum Hamming Bound. Physical Review A, 56(2), 1333-1336.
- Grover, L. K. (1996). A Fast Quantum Mechanical Algorithm For Database Search. Proceedings Of The 28th Annual ACM Symposium On Theory Of Computing, 212-219.
- Heisenberg, W. (1927). Über Den Anschaulichen Inhalt Der Quantentheoretischen Kinematik Und Mechanik. Zeitschrift Für Physik, 43(3-4), 167-181.
- IBM Quantum Experience. (n.d.). Quantum Algorithms. Https://quantum-computing.ibm.com/docs/guide/algorithms
- IBM Quantum. (2024). IBM Quantum Experience. Retrieved From
- Kitaev, A. Y. (2003). Fault-tolerant Quantum Computation By Anyons. Annals Of Physics, 303(1), 2-30.
- Ladd, T. D., Jelezko, F., Laflamme, R., Nakamura, Y., Monroe, C., & O’brien, J. L. (2010). Quantum Computers. Nature, 464(7291), 45-53.
- Lidar, D. A., & Brun, T. A. (2013). Quantum Error Correction. Cambridge University Press.
- Lloyd, S. (1996). Universal Quantum Simulators. Science, 273(5278), 1073-1078.
- Lloyd, S. (1999). Quantum Search Without A Oracle. Physical Review A, 60(4), 3333-3335.
- Microsoft Quantum Development Kit. (n.d.). Quantum Algorithms. Https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/quantum/concepts/algorithms
- Nayak, C., Simon, S. H., Stern, A., & Sarma, S. D. (2008). Non-abelian Anyons And Topological Quantum Computation. Reviews Of Modern Physics, 80(3), 1083-1150.
- Nielsen, M. A., & Chuang, I. L. (2010). Quantum Computation And Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press.
- Ofek, N., Petrenko, A., Heeres, R., Reinhold, P., Vlastakis, B., Yamoah, M. A., … & Mirrahimi, M. (2016). Extending The Lifetime Of A Quantum Bit With Error Correction In Superconducting Circuits. Nature, 536(7615), 441-444.
- Preskill, J. (2018). Quantum Computing In The NISQ Era And Beyond. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1809.07442.
- Preskill, J. (2018). Quantum Computing In The NISQ Era And Beyond. Quantum, 2, 53.
- Rigetti Computing. (2024). Rigetti Quantum Cloud. Retrieved From
- Rigetti Computing. (n.d.). Quantum Algorithms. Https://www.rigetti.com/quantum-algorithms/
- Roffe, J. (2019). Quantum Error Correction: An Introduction To The Surface Code. Contemporary Physics, 60(3), 231-244.
- Schrödinger, E. (1926). An Undulatory Theory Of The Mechanics Of Atoms And Molecules. Physical Review, 28(6), 1049-1070.
- Schrödinger, E. (1935). Die Gegenwärtige Situation In Der Quantenmechanik. Naturwissenschaften, 23(49), 807-812.
- Shor, P. W. (1994). Algorithms For Quantum Computers: Discrete Logarithms And Factoring. Proceedings Of The 35th Annual IEEE Symposium On Foundations Of Computer Science, 124-134.
- Shor, P. W. (1997). Polynomial-time Algorithms For Prime Factorization And Discrete Logarithms On A Quantum Computer. SIAM Journal On Computing, 26(5), 1484-1509.
- Tang, E. (2019). A Quantum-inspired Algorithm For General Minimum Vertex Cover. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1905.09172.
- Wendin, G., & Granath, M. (2005). Quantum Error Correction And Universal Gate Set Operation On A Binomially Encoded Qubit. Physical Review A, 71(1), 012328.
- Wootters, W. K., & Zurek, W. H. (1982). A Single Quantum Cannot Be Cloned. Nature, 299(5886), 802-803.
- Zhou, L., Wang, D., Choi, S., Pichler, H., & Demler, E. (2020). Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm For Maxcut. Physical Review X, 10(2), 021022.
