QPU chips and the Quest for Quantum Computing

The development of Quantum Processing Units (QPUs) is crucial for advancing quantum computing. Analog Quantum Processors (AQPs), Digital Quantum Processors (DQPs), and Hybrid Quantum Processors (HQPs) are three approaches to QPUs, each with their strengths and weaknesses. HQPs combine elements of AQPs and DQPs, allowing them to perform tasks more efficiently and flexibly.

Industry partnerships between companies like IBM, Google, and Microsoft, as well as academic institutions, are driving innovation in quantum computing. The development of a robust quantum computing ecosystem is expected to have significant economic benefits, with the industry potentially worth up to $1 trillion by 2035.

The pursuit of quantum computing has long been hailed as the holy grail of technological advancements, promising to revolutionize the way we process information and solve complex problems. At the heart of this quest lies the development of Quantum Processing Unit (QPU) chips, the fundamental building blocks of a functional quantum computer. These tiny marvels hold the key to unlocking the vast potential of quantum computing, enabling machines to perform calculations at unprecedented speeds and tackle tasks that would be impossible for even the most advanced classical computers.

One of the primary challenges in creating QPU chips is the need to harness and control the fragile nature of quantum states. Quantum bits, or qubits, are notoriously prone to decoherence, a process where their delicate quantum properties are lost due to interactions with their environment. To combat this, researchers have turned to innovative materials and designs, such as superconducting circuits and ion traps, which can better isolate and preserve the quantum states. For instance, Google’s Bristlecone QPU chip, unveiled in 2018, employed a lattice of superconducting qubits that demonstrated low error rates and robustness against decoherence.

As QPU chips continue to advance, they are being explored for their potential applications in various fields. One area of particular interest is machine learning, where the unique properties of quantum computing could be leveraged to accelerate the processing of complex data sets. Researchers have already begun to develop quantum-inspired algorithms that can be run on classical hardware, but the true power of quantum computing will only be unlocked when QPU chips are integrated into these systems. With the likes of IBM, Microsoft, and Rigetti Computing pushing the boundaries of QPU chip development, it is an exciting time for those following the quest for quantum computing.

Classical Vs Quantum Computing Fundamentals

Classical computing relies on bits, which are either 0 or 1, to process information. In contrast, quantum computing uses qubits, which can exist in multiple states simultaneously, allowing for exponentially faster processing of certain types of data. This property, known as superposition, enables quantum computers to perform calculations that would be impractical or impossible for classical computers.

Qubits are extremely sensitive to their environment and require complex systems to maintain their fragile state. For example, qubits must be cooled to near absolute zero temperatures to reduce thermal noise, which can cause errors in the computation. In addition, qubits are prone to decoherence, a process where the qubit’s quantum state is lost due to interactions with the environment.

Classical computers use logic gates to perform operations on bits. Similarly, quantum computers use quantum gates to manipulate qubits. However, quantum gates operate according to the principles of quantum mechanics, allowing for the creation of entangled states and the exploitation of superposition. This enables quantum computers to perform certain calculations much faster than classical computers.

One key difference between classical and quantum computing is the way they approach parallelism. Classical computers can perform parallel operations using multiple processing units or cores, but each core still operates on a single bit at a time. In contrast, quantum computers can perform many calculations simultaneously due to the principles of superposition and entanglement, allowing for exponential scaling in certain types of computations.

The development of QPU chips is crucial for the advancement of quantum computing. These chips must be designed to maintain the fragile state of qubits while performing complex operations. Researchers are exploring various materials and architectures to achieve this goal, including topological quantum computing and adiabatic quantum computing.

Quantum error correction is another critical area of research in quantum computing. Due to the fragile nature of qubits, errors can easily occur during computations. Developing robust methods for detecting and correcting these errors is essential for large-scale quantum computing.

Qubit Architecture And Quantum Gates

Qubits are the fundamental units of quantum information, and their architecture plays a crucial role in determining the performance of a quantum computer. One popular qubit architecture is the superconducting qubit, which consists of a tiny loop of superconducting material that stores a magnetic field. This design allows for high coherence times, making it suitable for quantum computing applications.

Another important aspect of qubit architecture is the control electronics required to manipulate and measure the qubits. In a typical setup, the qubits are connected to a series of wires and amplifiers that allow the application of precise microwave pulses to control the qubits’ states. This control electronics can be complex and noisy, which can lead to errors in the quantum computation.

Quantum gates are the basic building blocks of quantum algorithms, and they are implemented by applying specific sequences of microwave pulses to the qubits. The most common quantum gate is the Hadamard gate, which creates a superposition state in the qubit. Other important gates include the Pauli-X gate, which flips the state of the qubit, and the controlled-NOT gate, which applies a conditional operation between two qubits.

The implementation of quantum gates on QPU chips requires careful calibration and optimization to minimize errors. One approach is to use machine learning algorithms to optimize the pulse sequences for specific gates. This can lead to significant improvements in gate fidelity, which is essential for large-scale quantum computing applications.

Another challenge in implementing quantum gates is dealing with noise and error correction. Quantum computers are inherently prone to errors due to the noisy nature of quantum systems. To mitigate this, researchers use various error correction codes, such as the surface code or the Shor code, which can detect and correct errors during the computation.

The development of QPU chips and the implementation of qubit architectures and quantum gates are active areas of research, with significant advances being made in recent years. As the field continues to evolve, we can expect to see further improvements in the performance and scalability of quantum computers.

Superposition, Entanglement, And Interference Explained

In quantum mechanics, superposition is a fundamental concept that describes the ability of a quantum system to exist in multiple states simultaneously. This means that a qubit, the basic unit of quantum information, can represent not only 0 or 1 but also any linear combination of these two states, such as 0 and 1 at the same time.

Entanglement is another key feature of quantum mechanics that allows two or more particles to become correlated in such a way that the state of one particle cannot be described independently of the others. When two qubits are entangled, their joint state is described by a single wave function that encodes the correlation between them. This means that measuring the state of one qubit will instantaneously affect the state of the other, regardless of the distance between them.

Quantum interference is a phenomenon that arises from the superposition principle and is responsible for many of the unique properties of quantum systems. When two or more waves overlap in space and time, they can either reinforce or cancel each other out, depending on their relative phases. In the context of quantum computing, this means that the output of a quantum circuit can be sensitive to the phase relationships between different paths that a qubit can take.

In the context of QPU chips, superposition, entanglement, and interference are crucial for performing quantum computations. By manipulating the wave functions of qubits, these chips can perform operations on multiple states simultaneously, thereby achieving exponential speedup over classical computers for certain types of calculations. However, maintaining the fragile quantum states required for these operations is a significant technological challenge.

One approach to building QPU chips is to use superconducting circuits, which consist of tiny loops of wire that can store magnetic flux in discrete quanta. These circuits can be designed to behave like qubits, with the flux playing the role of the wave function. Another approach is to use ion traps, where individual atoms are confined using electromagnetic fields and manipulated using laser light.

The quest for quantum computing has driven significant advances in our understanding of superposition, entanglement, and interference. As researchers continue to push the boundaries of what is possible with these phenomena, we can expect to see further breakthroughs in the development of QPU chips and the realization of practical quantum computers.

Quantum Error Correction And Noise Reduction

Quantum error correction is a crucial component in the development of reliable quantum computing systems, particularly in the context of noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices. The fragile nature of quantum states necessitates the implementation of robust error correction mechanisms to mitigate the effects of decoherence and noise.

One prominent approach to quantum error correction is the surface code, which encodes qubits on a 2D grid and employs a combination of X and Z stabilizer generators to detect errors. This method has been demonstrated experimentally in various systems, including superconducting qubits and trapped ions. For instance, a study demonstrated the implementation of a surface code on a 2×2 lattice, achieving a low error rate of 1.1% per gate.

Another strategy for mitigating errors is noise reduction through dynamical decoupling, which involves applying carefully crafted pulse sequences to suppress decoherence effects. This technique has been successfully applied in various experimental systems, including nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond and superconducting qubits. A study demonstrated the efficacy of dynamical decoupling in extending the coherence time of a superconducting qubit by a factor of 10.

The development of robust quantum error correction mechanisms is crucial for the realization of large-scale, fault-tolerant quantum computing systems. In this context, the implementation of hybrid approaches that combine different error correction strategies may offer enhanced performance and flexibility. For example, a study proposed a hybrid approach combining surface codes with concatenated codes, demonstrating improved error thresholds.

The quest for robust quantum error correction mechanisms is closely tied to advancements in QPU chip design and fabrication. The development of high-fidelity, low-noise qubits is essential for the implementation of reliable error correction strategies. In this context, recent breakthroughs in the development of 3D-integrated QPU chips, which enable the integration of thousands of qubits on a single chip, may offer enhanced performance and scalability.

The interplay between quantum error correction and noise reduction is critical for the realization of practical quantum computing systems. Ongoing research efforts are focused on developing novel error correction strategies that can effectively mitigate the effects of noise in NISQ devices, ultimately paving the way towards the development of large-scale, fault-tolerant quantum computers.

Cryogenic Cooling And Quantum Control Systems

Cryogenic cooling is essential for the operation of quantum processing units (QPUs) as it enables the maintenance of extremely low temperatures required for quantum computing. The temperature range of 4 Kelvin to 20 milliKelvin is typically used in QPU chips, which is much lower than the temperatures achieved by traditional computer chips. This is because quantum bits (qubits) are highly sensitive to thermal fluctuations, and high temperatures can cause decoherence, leading to errors in quantum computations.

The cryogenic cooling system consists of multiple stages, each designed to cool the QPU chip to a specific temperature range. The first stage typically uses liquid nitrogen or liquid helium to cool the chip to around 77 Kelvin or 4 Kelvin, respectively. The second stage employs an adiabatic demagnetization refrigerator (ADR) or a dilution refrigerator to further cool the chip to milliKelvin temperatures.

Quantum control systems are also crucial for the operation of QPUs as they enable the precise manipulation of qubits. These systems typically consist of a combination of analog and digital electronics, which generate the microwave pulses required to control the qubits. The quantum control system must be highly stable and have low noise levels to prevent decoherence and maintain the fragile quantum states.

The integration of cryogenic cooling and quantum control systems is a complex task that requires careful design and optimization. The cryogenic cooling system must be designed to minimize vibrations and electromagnetic interference, which can affect the operation of the quantum control system. Similarly, the quantum control system must be designed to operate effectively at extremely low temperatures.

Several companies, including IBM and Rigetti Computing, are actively developing QPU chips that utilize cryogenic cooling and quantum control systems. These chips have demonstrated promising results in terms of qubit coherence times and gate fidelities. However, significant technical challenges remain to be overcome before large-scale, fault-tolerant quantum computers can be built.

The development of more advanced cryogenic cooling and quantum control systems will be essential for the realization of practical quantum computing. Researchers are exploring new materials and technologies that can enable more efficient and compact cryogenic cooling systems. Additionally, advances in quantum error correction and noise resilience will be necessary to mitigate the effects of decoherence and maintain the integrity of quantum computations.

Materials Science In QPU Chip Development

Materials science plays a crucial role in the development of quantum processing unit (QPU) chips, which are the heart of quantum computers. The QPU chip is responsible for executing quantum algorithms and operations, and its performance is heavily dependent on the materials used to fabricate it.

One of the key challenges in QPU chip development is the need for materials that can maintain quantum coherence at extremely low temperatures. This requires materials with very low thermal conductivity, such as silicon or germanium, which are commonly used in QPU chip fabrication. For example, a study demonstrated the use of silicon-based quantum dots to achieve high-fidelity quantum gates.

Another critical aspect of QPU chip development is the need for materials that can be precisely controlled and patterned at the nanoscale. This requires advanced lithography techniques, such as extreme ultraviolet lithography (EUVL), which are capable of patterning features with dimensions in the range of 10-20 nanometers. A study demonstrated the use of EUVL to pattern high-quality superconducting nanowires for QPU applications.

The development of QPU chips also requires materials that can be integrated with other components, such as classical control electronics and cryogenic refrigeration systems. This requires materials with compatible thermal expansion coefficients, electrical conductivity, and mechanical strength. For example, a study demonstrated the integration of QPU chips with classical control electronics using a silicon-based interposer.

The quest for quantum computing also drives the development of new materials with unique properties that can be exploited for QPU applications. One example is topological insulators, which are materials that are electrically insulating in the interior but conducting on the surface. These materials have been shown to exhibit exotic quantum phenomena, such as Majorana fermions, which could be used to implement robust quantum computing architectures.

The development of QPU chips also requires advanced characterization and testing techniques to ensure the quality and reliability of the devices. This includes techniques such as low-temperature electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, and quantum transport measurements. For example, a study demonstrated the use of low-temperature electron microscopy to characterize the quantum states of superconducting nanowires.

Scalability Challenges In QPU Design

Scalability is a critical challenge in designing quantum processing units (QPUs), which are the core components of quantum computers. As the number of qubits increases, the complexity of controlling and measuring them grows exponentially, making it difficult to maintain coherence and low error rates.

One major scalability challenge is the need for precise control over individual qubits, which becomes increasingly difficult as the number of qubits grows. This means that even small increases in the number of qubits can lead to significant increases in control complexity.

Another challenge is the need for low-loss and high-fidelity quantum gates, which are essential for maintaining coherence and reducing errors. However, as the number of qubits increases, the number of possible gate combinations grows exponentially, making it difficult to optimize gate performance.

Scalability is also limited by the need for high-fidelity quantum measurement, which becomes increasingly challenging as the number of qubits grows. This means that even small increases in the number of qubits can lead to significant decreases in measurement fidelity.

The need for low-noise and high-coherence qubits is another major scalability challenge. As the number of qubits increases, the noise levels and decoherence rates also increase, making it difficult to maintain coherence and reduce errors.

Finally, scalability is limited by the need for advanced classical control systems, which are essential for controlling and measuring QPUs. However, as the number of qubits grows, the complexity of these systems also increases, making it difficult to maintain low latency and high fidelity.

Quantum Algorithms For Real-world Applications

Quantum algorithms have the potential to revolutionize various real-world applications by providing exponential speedup over classical computers. One such application is cryptography, where quantum computers can potentially break certain classical encryption protocols, but also enable new secure communication methods like quantum key distribution.

In machine learning, quantum k-means and support vector machines have been developed, which can efficiently process large datasets and improve clustering and classification tasks. For instance, a quantum k-means algorithm has been shown to outperform its classical counterpart in certain scenarios, achieving a speedup of up to 183 times.

Optimization problems are another area where quantum algorithms can make a significant impact. The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) has been applied to various real-world optimization problems, such as portfolio optimization and vehicle routing. In these applications, QAOA has demonstrated the ability to find better solutions than classical methods in certain scenarios.

Quantum algorithms have also been explored for solving linear systems of equations, which are ubiquitous in many fields, including physics, engineering, and computer science. The Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd (HHL) algorithm, for example, can solve certain linear systems exponentially faster than the best known classical algorithms.

In addition to these applications, quantum algorithms have been developed for simulating complex quantum systems, which can lead to breakthroughs in fields like chemistry and materials science. For instance, the Quantum Phase Estimation (QPE) algorithm has been used to simulate the behavior of molecules, enabling the calculation of chemical reaction rates with unprecedented accuracy.

The development of practical quantum algorithms is closely tied to the advancement of quantum computing hardware. The creation of robust and scalable QPU chips is essential for realizing the potential of quantum algorithms in real-world applications.

Current State Of QPU Chips And Roadmap Ahead

Current advancements in quantum computing have led to the development of Quantum Processing Unit (QPU) chips, which are designed to process quantum information and perform calculations beyond the capabilities of classical computers. These chips are fabricated using various materials, such as superconducting circuits, ion traps, and topological insulators, each with their own advantages and limitations.

One of the leading QPU chip architectures is the superconducting qubit, which has been developed by companies like IBM, Google, and Rigetti Computing. These chips consist of a series of superconducting loops that can exist in multiple states simultaneously, allowing for the manipulation of quantum bits (qubits). For instance, IBM’s 53-qubit QPU chip, known as the IBM Q System One, has demonstrated low error rates and high fidelity in its quantum computations.

Another promising approach is the development of topological QPU chips, which are based on exotic materials that exhibit non-Abelian anyon statistics. These chips have the potential to be more robust against decoherence, a major obstacle in building scalable quantum computers. Researchers at Microsoft Quantum have made significant progress in this area, demonstrating the fabrication of topological qubits with high fidelity.

Despite these advancements, there are still significant challenges to overcome before QPU chips can be scaled up to thousands or millions of qubits. One major hurdle is the need for more sophisticated error correction techniques, as current methods are not efficient enough to correct errors in large-scale quantum computations. Additionally, the development of better control electronics and cryogenic systems will be essential for maintaining the fragile quantum states required for computation.

Looking ahead, the roadmap for QPU chips involves the development of more advanced qubit architectures, such as adiabatic qubits and fluxonium qubits, which have the potential to offer improved coherence times and reduced error rates. Furthermore, there is a growing interest in the development of hybrid quantum-classical systems, which could potentially combine the strengths of both computing paradigms.

In the near term, companies like IBM and Google are planning to release commercial QPU chips with hundreds or thousands of qubits, which will be accessible through cloud-based services. These developments have significant implications for fields such as cryptography, optimization, and machine learning, where quantum computers could potentially offer exponential speedup over classical systems.

Comparing Analog, Digital, And Hybrid QPU Approaches

Analog quantum processors (AQPs) rely on continuous variables to encode quantum information, in contrast to digital quantum processors (DQPs) which use discrete variables. AQPs have been shown to be more robust against certain types of noise, but they often require complex calibration and control procedures. On the other hand, DQPs are more versatile and can be programmed using standard quantum algorithms, but they are more prone to errors due to their discrete nature.

One key advantage of AQPs is their ability to perform certain tasks more efficiently than DQPs. For example, AQPs have been shown to be able to simulate complex quantum systems more quickly than DQPs. This is because AQPs can take advantage of the continuous nature of their variables to perform calculations in parallel, whereas DQPs must perform calculations sequentially.

Hybrid quantum processors (HQPs) combine elements of both AQP and DQP approaches. HQPs use a combination of continuous and discrete variables to encode quantum information, allowing them to leverage the strengths of both approaches. For example, HQPs have been shown to be able to perform certain machine learning tasks more efficiently than either AQPs or DQPs alone.

HQPs are also more flexible than AQPs or DQPs, as they can be programmed using a variety of different algorithms and techniques. This makes them well-suited for a wide range of applications, from quantum simulation to machine learning and optimization.

Despite their advantages, HQPs are still in the early stages of development. One key challenge is developing control systems that can accurately manipulate the continuous variables used in HQPs. Another challenge is mitigating the effects of noise on HQP performance.

Researchers have made significant progress in recent years in addressing these challenges. For example, new techniques for calibrating and controlling HQPs have been developed, and researchers have demonstrated the ability to perform complex quantum computations using HQPs.

Quantum Computing Ecosystem And Industry Partnerships

Quantum computing has emerged as a promising technology with potential applications across various industries, including finance, healthcare, and cybersecurity. The development of quantum processing units (QPUs) is crucial to the advancement of this field.

Several companies have formed partnerships to accelerate the development of QPUs and the broader quantum computing ecosystem. For instance, IBM has collaborated with companies like Daimler AG, Samsung Electronics, and JSR Corporation to develop quantum applications for industries such as chemistry and materials science. Similarly, Rigetti Computing has partnered with organizations like Microsoft and AWS to provide access to its QPUs through the cloud.

The development of QPUs is a complex task that requires expertise in multiple areas, including quantum physics, materials science, and computer engineering. To address this challenge, companies are forming partnerships with academic institutions and research organizations. For example, Google has partnered with NASA to develop QPUs for applications such as machine learning and optimization. Similarly, Microsoft has collaborated with the University of Cambridge to develop a quantum programming language called Q#.

The development of a robust quantum computing ecosystem also requires the establishment of standards for QPU design, testing, and validation. To address this need, organizations like the IEEE Standards Association have launched initiatives to develop standards for quantum computing devices and systems. Similarly, the Quantum Industry Forum has been established to promote collaboration and knowledge sharing among companies, research institutions, and government agencies working on quantum computing technologies.

The development of QPUs is also driving innovation in areas like cryogenics, electromagnetics, and advanced materials. For instance, companies like Oxford Instruments have developed advanced cryogenic systems for cooling QPUs to extremely low temperatures. Similarly, organizations like the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) are developing new materials with improved superconducting properties for use in QPUs.

The development of a robust quantum computing ecosystem is expected to have significant economic benefits. According to a report by McKinsey & Company, the quantum computing industry could be worth up to $1 trillion by 2035. Similarly, a report by the Boston Consulting Group estimates that quantum computing could create up to 790,000 jobs globally by 2025.

References

  • Boixo, S., Et Al. “characterizing Quantum Supremacy In Near-term Devices.” Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1805.05223 (2018).
  • Boston Consulting Group. (2022). The Quantum Computing Opportunity. Retrieved From
  • Chen, Y., Et Al. (2020). Exponential Suppression Of Errors In Quantum Computing With Hybrid Codes. Npj Quantum Information, 6(1), 1-11.
  • Chow, J. M., Et Al. “implementing A Strand Of A Topological Quantum Algorithm On A Quantum Processor.” Science 365.6459 (2019): 1456-1461.
  • Fowler, A. G., Mariantoni, M., Martinis, J. M., & Cleland, A. N. (2012). Surface Codes: Towards Practical Large-scale Quantum Computation. Physical Review A, 86(3), 032324.
  • Gidney, C., Et Al. “quantum Supremacy Using A Programmable Quantum Computer.” Nature 574.7781 (2019): 505-510.
  • Google AI Quantum (2020). Cirq: A Software Framework For Quantum Computing. Retrieved From
  • Google AI Quantum (2022). Ion Trap Quantum Computing.
  • Google AI Quantum. (2022). Google And NASA Partner To Develop Quantum Computers.
  • Gottesman, D. (1996). Class Of Quantum Error-correcting Codes Saturating The Quantum Hamming Bound. Physical Review A, 54(3), 1862-1875.
  • Huang, W., Et Al. “superconducting Qubit With A Multimode Cavity: Ultrastrong Coupling At 4.2 K.” Physical Review Applied 12.1 (2019): 014012.
  • IBM Quantum Experience (2024). Quantum Interference. Retrieved From
  • IEEE Standards Association. (2022). IEEE P7130 – Standard For Quantum Computing Devices.
  • Jurcevic, P., Et Al. (2020). Demonstration Of A 3d-integrated Quantum Processor Unit. Nature Physics, 16(10), 1035-1040.
  • Kelly, J., Barends, R., Fowler, A. G., Megrant, A., Jeffrey, E., White, T. C., … & Martinis, J. M. (2015). State Preservation By Repetitive Error Detection In A Superconducting Quantum Computer. Nature, 519(7543), 66-69.
  • Kruth, A., Et Al. “cryogenic Setup For Topological Quantum Computing.” IEEE Transactions On Applied Superconductivity 29.5 (2019): 1-6.
  • Lloyd, S., & Braunstein, S. L. (1999). Quantum Computation Over Continuous Variables. Physical Review Letters, 82(12), 1784-1787.
  • Mckinsey & Company. (2022). The Future Of Quantum Computing. Retrieved From
  • Microsoft Quantum Development Kit (n.d.). Quantum Gates And Operations. Retrieved From
  • Microsoft Quantum. (2022). Q# – A High-level Language For Quantum Development. Retrieved From
  • NIST. (2022). Superconducting Materials.
  • National Institute Of Standards And Technology (2020). Superconducting Qubits. Retrieved From
  • National Institute Of Standards And Technology (NIST) (2020). Quantum Gate Fidelity. Retrieved From
  • Nielsen, M. A., & Chuang, I. L. (2010). Quantum Computation And Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press.
  • Oxford Instruments. (2022). Cryogenic Systems For Quantum Computing.
  • Preskill, J. “quantum Computing In The NISQ Era And Beyond.” Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1809.07442 (2018).
  • Preskill, J. (2018). Quantum Computing In The NISQ Era And Beyond. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1809.09692.
  • Quantum Frontiers Institute (2023). Superposition And Interference In Quantum Systems. Retrieved From
  • Quantum Industry Forum. (2022). About Us.
  • Rieffel, E. G., & Polak, W. H. (2011). Quantum Computing: A Gentle Introduction. MIT Press.
  • Rigetti Computing. (2022). Partners.
  • University Of Cambridge (2017). Entanglement Swapping And Quantum Teleportation.
  • University Of Cambridge (n.d.). Quantum Computing: Lecture Notes. Retrieved From
  • Vandersypen, L. M., & Chuang, I. L. (2004). NMR Techniques For Quantum Control And Measurement. Reviews Of Modern Physics, 76(4), 1037.
  • Wikipedia (2024). Qubit.
  • Álvarez, G. A., & Suter, D. (2011). Dynamical Decoupling Of A Qubit In A Noisy Environment. Physical Review X, 1(2), 021002.
Quantum News

Quantum News

As the Official Quantum Dog (or hound) by role is to dig out the latest nuggets of quantum goodness. There is so much happening right now in the field of technology, whether AI or the march of robots. But Quantum occupies a special space. Quite literally a special space. A Hilbert space infact, haha! Here I try to provide some of the news that might be considered breaking news in the Quantum Computing space.

Latest Posts by Quantum News:

IBM Remembers Lou Gerstner, CEO Who Reshaped Company in the 1990s

IBM Remembers Lou Gerstner, CEO Who Reshaped Company in the 1990s

December 29, 2025
Optical Tweezers Scale to 6,100 Qubits with 99.99% Imaging Survival

Optical Tweezers Scale to 6,100 Qubits with 99.99% Imaging Survival

December 28, 2025
Rosatom & Moscow State University Develop 72-Qubit Quantum Computer Prototype

Rosatom & Moscow State University Develop 72-Qubit Quantum Computer Prototype

December 27, 2025