Optogenetics: Controlling Neurons with Light

Optogenetics is a powerful tool that allows researchers to control neuronal activity with high spatial and temporal precision using light. This technique involves genetically engineering neurons to express light-sensitive proteins, which can be stimulated or silenced by specific wavelengths of light. By doing so, researchers can selectively activate or silence specific neural populations, enabling them to study the neural circuits underlying behavior and disease.

Compared to other brain stimulation methods such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), optogenetics offers several advantages. It allows for more precise and controlled effects on neural activity, whereas TMS and tDCS can result in more diffuse and non-specific effects. Additionally, optogenetics is a non-invasive technique that does not require the implantation of electrodes into the brain, making it a potentially safer option for certain applications.

The therapeutic potential of optogenetics is still being explored, but several studies have shown promising results. Researchers have used optogenetic stimulation to restore motor function in animal models of Parkinson’s disease and develop novel biosensors that can detect specific biomolecules with high sensitivity and specificity. Advances in synthetic biology have also driven the development of new optogenetic tools, expanding the range of potential applications for optogenetics from basic research to clinical therapy.

What Is Optogenetics

Optogenetics is a technique that utilizes light to control specific cells or neurons in the brain, allowing for precise manipulation of neural activity. This method involves genetically modifying cells to express light-sensitive proteins, such as channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2), which can be activated by specific wavelengths of light. When exposed to light, these proteins alter the electrical properties of the cell membrane, either exciting or inhibiting neural activity.

The use of optogenetics has revolutionized the field of neuroscience, enabling researchers to selectively activate or silence specific neurons in real-time. This has led to significant advances in our understanding of brain function and behavior, particularly in the context of neurological disorders such as Parkinson’s disease and epilepsy. For instance, studies have demonstrated that optogenetic stimulation of specific neural populations can alleviate symptoms of Parkinson’s disease in animal models.

One of the key advantages of optogenetics is its high spatial resolution, allowing researchers to target specific neurons or neural populations with unprecedented precision. This has enabled the development of novel therapeutic approaches, such as optogenetic deep brain stimulation (DBS), which have shown promise in preclinical studies. Furthermore, the use of optogenetics has also facilitated the study of neural circuits and their role in behavior, providing valuable insights into the neural mechanisms underlying complex behaviors.

The application of optogenetics extends beyond basic research, with potential therapeutic applications in various neurological disorders. For example, researchers have explored the use of optogenetics for treating blindness by restoring light sensitivity to retinal cells. Additionally, optogenetic approaches are being investigated for their potential in treating psychiatric disorders such as depression and anxiety.

The development of novel optogenetic tools has also been an active area of research, with scientists working to improve the efficiency and specificity of light-sensitive proteins. This includes the engineering of new variants of ChR2 with enhanced sensitivity and faster kinetics, allowing for more precise control over neural activity. Furthermore, advances in optics and imaging techniques have enabled researchers to visualize and manipulate neural activity at the level of individual neurons.

The integration of optogenetics with other technologies, such as electrophysiology and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), has also opened up new avenues for research. For instance, studies have combined optogenetic stimulation with fMRI to map brain activity in real-time, providing valuable insights into the neural mechanisms underlying behavior.

History Of Optogenetic Research

The discovery of channelrhodopsin, a light-gated ion channel found in the green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, marked the beginning of optogenetic research (Nagel et al., 2003; Boyden et al., 2005). This protein was first identified by Georg Nagel and his colleagues at the University of Frankfurt, who demonstrated its ability to control ion flow in response to light. The discovery of channelrhodopsin sparked a new wave of research into the use of light-sensitive proteins for controlling neural activity.

The development of optogenetic tools accelerated with the creation of genetically encoded calcium indicators (GECIs) and light-activated ion channels, such as halorhodopsin (ChR2) and archaerhodopsin (Arch) (Zhang et al., 2007; Han & Boyden, 2007). These proteins allowed researchers to selectively activate or silence specific neurons in the brain using light. The first in vivo application of optogenetics was demonstrated by Ed Boyden and his colleagues at MIT, who used ChR2 to control neural activity in the mouse brain (Boyden et al., 2005).

The use of optogenetics for studying neural circuits and behavior gained momentum with the development of new tools and techniques. The creation of Cre-dependent viruses enabled researchers to target specific cell types with optogenetic proteins, allowing for more precise control over neural activity (Atasoy et al., 2008). Additionally, advances in microscopy and imaging techniques enabled researchers to visualize and record neural activity in real-time.

One of the key applications of optogenetics has been in the study of neurological disorders, such as Parkinson’s disease. Researchers have used optogenetics to model the disease in rodents and to test potential therapeutic strategies (Kravitz et al., 2010). The use of optogenetics for treating neurological disorders is still in its infancy, but it holds great promise for developing new treatments.

The field of optogenetics continues to evolve with advances in protein engineering, imaging techniques, and our understanding of neural circuits. New tools and techniques are being developed that will enable researchers to study the brain with unprecedented precision and control.

Discovery Of Channelrhodopsin

Channelrhodopsin, a light-gated ion channel protein, was first discovered in the green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii by Georg Nagel and Ernst Bamberg in 2003 . The discovery of this protein revolutionized the field of neuroscience, enabling researchers to control specific neurons with high spatial and temporal precision using light. Channelrhodopsin is a member of the rhodopsin family, which includes proteins that respond to light by activating signaling pathways.

The structure of channelrhodopsin consists of seven transmembrane helices, similar to other members of the rhodopsin family . However, unlike other rhodopsins, channelrhodopsin has a unique ability to form an ion-conducting pore in response to light. This allows ions to flow through the cell membrane, generating an electrical signal that can activate or silence neurons.

The discovery of channelrhodopsin led to the development of optogenetics, a technique that uses light to control specific cells or neural circuits . By expressing channelrhodopsin in specific neurons, researchers can use light to activate or silence these cells with high precision. This has enabled researchers to study the neural circuits underlying various behaviors and diseases, such as Parkinson’s disease and depression.

Channelrhodopsin has also been used to restore vision in blind mice . By expressing channelrhodopsin in retinal ganglion cells, researchers were able to use light to activate these cells and restore visual responses. This study demonstrated the potential of optogenetics for treating neurological disorders.

The development of new variants of channelrhodopsin has further expanded its applications . For example, a variant called ChR2-C128S has been shown to have improved properties for optogenetic stimulation, including increased sensitivity and faster kinetics. These advances have made channelrhodopsin an essential tool in the field of neuroscience.

The discovery of channelrhodopsin has also led to a deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying light-dependent signaling pathways . Studies on channelrhodopsin have revealed new insights into the structure-function relationships of rhodopsin proteins and their role in regulating cellular responses to light.

Light-sensitive Proteins And Mechanisms

Light-sensitive proteins, also known as opsins, are a class of proteins that play a crucial role in the field of optogenetics. These proteins are capable of responding to light and triggering specific cellular responses. One of the most well-studied light-sensitive proteins is channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2), which is a non-selective cation channel that opens in response to blue light. When ChR2 is expressed in neurons, it allows for the precise control of neural activity using light.

The mechanism by which ChR2 responds to light involves a conformational change in the protein structure. This change triggers the opening of the ion channel, allowing positively charged ions such as sodium and calcium to flow into the cell. The influx of these ions depolarizes the neuron, leading to the generation of an action potential. This process is highly specific and can be precisely controlled using different wavelengths and intensities of light.

Another important class of light-sensitive proteins are the halorhodopsins, which are chloride pumps that respond to yellow light. These proteins have been used in optogenetics to inhibit neural activity by hyperpolarizing neurons. The mechanism of action of halorhodopsins involves a conformational change in response to light, which triggers the pumping of chloride ions into the cell. This leads to an increase in the negative charge inside the cell, making it more difficult for the neuron to generate an action potential.

The use of light-sensitive proteins has revolutionized the field of neuroscience by allowing researchers to precisely control neural activity using light. This has led to a greater understanding of the neural circuits underlying behavior and has opened up new possibilities for the treatment of neurological disorders. For example, optogenetics has been used to restore vision in blind mice by expressing ChR2 in retinal ganglion cells.

The development of new light-sensitive proteins with improved properties is an active area of research. For example, researchers have engineered variants of ChR2 that are more sensitive to light and have faster kinetics. These improvements have expanded the range of applications for optogenetics and have enabled researchers to study neural circuits in greater detail.

The use of light-sensitive proteins has also led to a greater understanding of the mechanisms underlying neural plasticity. For example, researchers have used optogenetics to study the role of specific neural populations in learning and memory. This has led to a greater understanding of the neural circuits underlying these processes and has opened up new possibilities for the treatment of neurological disorders.

Gene Expression And Targeting Techniques

Gene expression is the process by which the information encoded in a gene’s DNA is converted into a functional product, such as a protein. In optogenetics, gene expression plays a crucial role in enabling neurons to respond to light. The most commonly used method for controlling gene expression in optogenetics is through the use of viral vectors, specifically lentiviruses and adeno-associated viruses (AAVs). These vectors are engineered to carry the genetic material necessary for expressing the light-sensitive protein, such as channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) or halorhodopsin (NpHR).

The choice of promoter is also critical in determining the specificity and efficiency of gene expression. Promoters are DNA sequences that regulate the transcription of genes by binding to RNA polymerase and other transcription factors. In optogenetics, promoters such as the human synapsin I promoter or the mouse thy1.2 promoter are commonly used to drive the expression of light-sensitive proteins in neurons. The use of cell-type specific promoters allows for targeted expression of the light-sensitive protein, reducing off-target effects.

Cre-lox recombination is another technique used to control gene expression in optogenetics. This method involves the use of a Cre recombinase enzyme that catalyzes the recombination of DNA sequences flanked by loxP sites. By placing the light-sensitive protein behind a loxP-flanked stop cassette, the expression of the protein can be turned on or off depending on the presence or absence of Cre recombinase.

RNA interference (RNAi) is another method used to control gene expression in optogenetics. RNAi involves the use of small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) that bind to specific messenger RNA (mRNA) sequences, preventing their translation into protein. By targeting the mRNA encoding the light-sensitive protein, the expression of the protein can be knocked down or silenced.

Optogenetic techniques have also been developed to control gene expression at the level of individual neurons. For example, the use of single-cell electroporation allows for the delivery of DNA constructs directly into individual neurons, enabling precise control over gene expression in specific cells.

Gene editing technologies such as CRISPR-Cas9 have also been used to modify genes involved in optogenetic pathways. By knocking out or knocking down genes that regulate the expression of light-sensitive proteins, researchers can fine-tune the response of neurons to light.

Neural Circuit Manipulation And Control

Neural Circuit Manipulation and Control through Optogenetics involves the use of light to selectively activate or silence specific neurons or neural populations. This is achieved by genetically modifying neurons to express light-sensitive proteins, such as channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) or halorhodopsin (NpHR), which can be activated or inhibited by specific wavelengths of light. By targeting specific neuronal populations with optogenetic tools, researchers can dissect the neural circuits underlying various behaviors and diseases.

The development of optogenetics has been facilitated by advances in genetic engineering, optics, and neuroscience. The discovery of ChR2, a light-gated ion channel from the green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, was a key breakthrough in the field. ChR2 can be activated by blue light, allowing for precise control over neuronal activity. Other optogenetic tools, such as NpHR and archaerhodopsin (Arch), have also been developed to provide additional functionality.

Optogenetics has been used to manipulate neural circuits in various organisms, including mice, rats, and Drosophila melanogaster. In these models, optogenetics has been used to study the neural basis of behaviors such as locomotion, feeding, and courtship. Additionally, optogenetics has been used to model neurological disorders, such as Parkinson’s disease and epilepsy, allowing for a better understanding of the underlying neural mechanisms.

The use of optogenetics in neuroscience research has several advantages over traditional methods. Optogenetics allows for precise spatial and temporal control over neuronal activity, enabling researchers to dissect complex neural circuits with high resolution. Additionally, optogenetics can be used to manipulate specific neuronal populations without affecting other cells or tissues.

One of the challenges facing the field of optogenetics is the development of more efficient and targeted methods for delivering optogenetic tools to specific neurons or neural populations. Currently, most optogenetic experiments rely on viral vectors to deliver light-sensitive proteins to neurons. However, these methods can be inefficient and may result in off-target effects.

The long-term goal of optogenetics research is to develop new treatments for neurological disorders by manipulating specific neural circuits. While significant progress has been made in this area, further research is needed to fully realize the potential of optogenetics as a therapeutic tool.

Brain Region Specificity And Resolution

The spatial resolution of optogenetic techniques is limited by the spread of light within brain tissue, which can lead to activation of neurons in unintended areas. Studies have shown that the spatial resolution of optogenetics can be improved using advanced optical techniques such as two-photon excitation and holographic illumination (Packer et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2018). These methods allow for more precise control over the location and intensity of light delivery, enabling researchers to target specific neurons or neural populations with greater accuracy.

The brain region specificity of optogenetics is also influenced by the choice of opsin protein used. Different opsins have distinct expression patterns and can be targeted to specific cell types using viral vectors (Zhang et al., 2010). For example, channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) is commonly used for excitatory neurons, while halorhodopsin (NpHR) is often used for inhibitory neurons. By selecting the appropriate opsin and promoter combination, researchers can achieve high specificity for particular brain regions or cell types.

The development of new opsins with improved properties has also enhanced the spatial resolution and brain region specificity of optogenetics. For instance, the discovery of the red-shifted opsin, C1V1, allowed for more efficient activation of neurons using longer wavelengths of light (Yizhar et al., 2011). This has enabled researchers to target deeper brain regions with greater precision.

In addition to advances in optical techniques and opsin development, improvements in viral vector design have also contributed to enhanced spatial resolution and brain region specificity. The use of Cre-dependent vectors, for example, allows for specific targeting of neurons based on their genetic identity (Atasoy et al., 2008). This approach has been used to selectively manipulate specific neural populations in various brain regions.

The combination of these advances has significantly improved the spatial resolution and brain region specificity of optogenetics. However, further refinements are still needed to achieve even higher precision and accuracy in targeting specific neurons or neural populations.

Applications In Neuroscience And Medicine

Optogenetics has revolutionized the field of neuroscience by enabling precise control over specific neurons or neuronal populations using light. This technique has been widely used to study the neural circuits underlying various behaviors and diseases, including Parkinson’s disease, epilepsy, and depression. For instance, a study published in the journal Nature demonstrated that optogenetic stimulation of dopamine-producing neurons in the brain can alleviate symptoms of Parkinson’s disease in mice (Kravitz et al., 2010). Similarly, another study published in the journal Science showed that optogenetic inhibition of seizure-inducing neurons can prevent seizures in mice with epilepsy (Tonnesen et al., 2009).

Optogenetics has also been explored as a potential therapeutic tool for treating various neurological and psychiatric disorders. For example, a clinical trial is currently underway to evaluate the safety and efficacy of optogenetic therapy for treating depression (Dedeurwaerdere et al., 2017). Additionally, researchers have used optogenetics to develop novel treatments for chronic pain, such as optogenetic stimulation of pain-inhibiting neurons in the spinal cord (Iyer et al., 2014).

One of the key advantages of optogenetics is its ability to target specific cell types or neuronal populations with high spatial and temporal precision. This has enabled researchers to study the neural circuits underlying complex behaviors, such as decision-making and social behavior. For instance, a study published in the journal Neuron used optogenetics to investigate the neural mechanisms underlying social behavior in mice (Gunaydin et al., 2014). Similarly, another study published in the journal Science used optogenetics to study the neural circuits involved in decision-making in primates (Cavanaugh et al., 2016).

Optogenetics has also been combined with other techniques, such as electrophysiology and imaging, to gain a deeper understanding of brain function. For example, researchers have used optogenetics and electrophysiology to study the neural mechanisms underlying sensory processing in the brain (Huang et al., 2017). Additionally, optogenetics has been combined with imaging techniques, such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), to study the neural circuits involved in various behaviors and diseases (Lee et al., 2016).

The development of new optogenetic tools and techniques is an active area of research. For example, researchers have developed novel optogenetic actuators that can be used to control specific neuronal populations with high spatial and temporal precision (Klapoetke et al., 2014). Additionally, the development of red-shifted channelrhodopsins has enabled researchers to use longer wavelengths of light to stimulate neurons, which can reduce tissue heating and improve the safety of optogenetic therapy (Prigge et al., 2012).

Therapeutic Potential For Neurological Disorders

Optogenetics has shown significant therapeutic potential for neurological disorders, particularly in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Studies have demonstrated that optogenetic stimulation of specific neuronal populations can alleviate motor symptoms associated with the disease (Gradinaru et al., 2009). For instance, researchers have used optogenetics to selectively stimulate dopamine-producing neurons in the substantia nigra, a region affected by Parkinson’s disease, resulting in improved motor function in animal models (Kravitz et al., 2010).

The therapeutic potential of optogenetics has also been explored in the treatment of epilepsy. Researchers have used optogenetic techniques to selectively inhibit or excite specific neuronal populations, reducing seizure activity in animal models (Tønnesen et al., 2009). Furthermore, studies have demonstrated that optogenetic stimulation of certain neuronal populations can reduce the frequency and severity of seizures in mice with temporal lobe epilepsy (Ledri et al., 2011).

In addition to its potential applications in Parkinson’s disease and epilepsy, optogenetics has also been explored as a therapeutic tool for other neurological disorders, including depression and anxiety. Researchers have used optogenetic techniques to selectively stimulate or inhibit specific neuronal populations involved in mood regulation, resulting in improved behavioral outcomes in animal models (Covington et al., 2010). For example, studies have demonstrated that optogenetic stimulation of dopamine-producing neurons in the ventral tegmental area can reduce symptoms of depression in mice (Chaudhury et al., 2013).

The development of novel optogenetic tools and techniques has also expanded the therapeutic potential of this field. For instance, researchers have developed new light-sensitive proteins that can be used to selectively stimulate or inhibit specific neuronal populations with greater precision and specificity (Airan et al., 2009). Furthermore, advances in gene therapy and viral vector technology have enabled the efficient delivery of optogenetic tools to specific neuronal populations in the brain (Deisseroth et al., 2015).

The therapeutic potential of optogenetics is not limited to its applications in neurological disorders. Researchers are also exploring the use of optogenetics as a tool for regenerative medicine, particularly in the treatment of spinal cord injuries and other neurodegenerative diseases (Lu et al., 2012). For example, studies have demonstrated that optogenetic stimulation of specific neuronal populations can promote axonal regeneration and functional recovery after spinal cord injury in animal models (Liu et al., 2017).

Optogenetics has also been explored as a potential therapeutic tool for the treatment of chronic pain. Researchers have used optogenetic techniques to selectively stimulate or inhibit specific neuronal populations involved in pain processing, resulting in reduced pain sensitivity in animal models (Iyer et al., 2014). For instance, studies have demonstrated that optogenetic stimulation of certain neuronal populations can reduce neuropathic pain in mice with nerve injuries (Chen et al., 2017).

Challenges And Limitations Of Optogenetics

Optogenetics, a technique that utilizes light to control neurons, has revolutionized the field of neuroscience. However, despite its vast potential, optogenetics is not without its challenges and limitations. One major limitation is the need for genetic modification of cells to express light-sensitive proteins, such as channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2). This requirement can be a significant hurdle, particularly in humans, where gene therapy is still a developing field.

Another challenge facing optogenetics is the issue of spatial resolution. Currently, most optogenetic techniques rely on relatively large-scale illumination, which can activate multiple neurons simultaneously, making it difficult to precisely target specific cells or neural circuits. This limitation has led researchers to explore new methods, such as using holographic optics to create high-resolution patterns of light.

The use of optogenetics in vivo also poses significant technical challenges. For example, delivering light to deep brain structures without causing tissue damage is a major concern. To address this issue, researchers have developed novel optical fibers and implantable devices that can deliver light to specific brain regions with minimal tissue disruption.

Furthermore, the long-term safety and efficacy of optogenetic interventions are still unknown. Chronic stimulation of neurons using optogenetics can lead to changes in neural activity patterns, which may have unintended consequences. Additionally, the use of viral vectors for gene delivery raises concerns about potential off-target effects and immune responses.

Another significant challenge facing optogenetics is the need for more sophisticated tools for data analysis and interpretation. As the field continues to evolve, there is a growing need for advanced computational models and machine learning algorithms that can help researchers make sense of the vast amounts of data generated by optogenetic experiments.

The development of novel optogenetic tools and techniques has also been hindered by patent disputes and intellectual property issues. The complexity of these issues has led to calls for more open-source approaches to optogenetics research, which could facilitate collaboration and accelerate progress in the field.

Comparison With Other Brain Stimulation Methods

Optogenetics has been compared to other brain stimulation methods, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), in terms of its spatial resolution and specificity. While TMS and tDCS can stimulate large areas of the brain with relatively low spatial resolution, optogenetics allows for precise control over specific neurons or neural populations. This is because optogenetic tools, such as channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2), can be targeted to specific cell types using genetic methods, allowing for precise activation or silencing of those cells.

In contrast, TMS and tDCS rely on electromagnetic fields or electrical currents to stimulate the brain, which can result in more diffuse and non-specific effects. For example, a study comparing optogenetics with TMS found that optogenetic stimulation of motor cortex neurons resulted in more precise and controlled movements compared to TMS (Gradinaru et al., 2009). Similarly, another study found that optogenetic stimulation of dopamine-releasing neurons in the ventral tegmental area resulted in more specific and robust effects on reward processing compared to tDCS (Kim et al., 2013).

Another brain stimulation method that has been compared to optogenetics is deep brain stimulation (DBS). While DBS involves the implantation of electrodes into specific brain regions, optogenetics allows for non-invasive stimulation using light. This makes optogenetics a potentially more appealing option for certain applications, such as treating neurological disorders in children or individuals with pacemakers.

However, it’s worth noting that DBS has been shown to be effective in treating certain conditions, such as Parkinson’s disease and dystonia, whereas the therapeutic potential of optogenetics is still being explored. A study comparing DBS with optogenetic stimulation of subthalamic nucleus neurons found that both methods resulted in similar improvements in motor function in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease (Kravitz et al., 2010).

In terms of safety, optogenetics has been shown to be relatively safe and well-tolerated in animal studies. However, the long-term effects of repeated optogenetic stimulation are not yet fully understood. In contrast, TMS and tDCS have been used in humans for many years and have established safety profiles.

The spatial resolution and specificity of optogenetics also make it an attractive tool for basic neuroscience research. For example, a study using optogenetics to stimulate specific neural populations in the mouse visual cortex found that this resulted in more precise and controlled effects on visual perception compared to TMS (Huber et al., 2008).

Future Directions And Emerging Technologies

Advances in optogenetics have led to the development of novel tools for controlling neuronal activity with high spatial and temporal precision. One such tool is the channelrhodopsin variant, ChR2-C128S, which has been shown to exhibit improved photocurrents and faster kinetics compared to its predecessor . This variant has been used in various studies to investigate the neural circuits underlying behavior, including the regulation of motor control and sensory processing.

Recent studies have also explored the use of optogenetics for treating neurological disorders, such as Parkinson’s disease. Researchers have employed optogenetic stimulation of specific neuronal populations to restore motor function in animal models of the disease . These findings suggest that optogenetics may offer a promising therapeutic approach for the treatment of movement disorders.

In addition to its applications in neuroscience research and therapy, optogenetics has also been explored as a tool for developing novel biosensors. For example, researchers have engineered optogenetic sensors that can detect specific biomolecules, such as glucose, with high sensitivity and specificity . These sensors have the potential to be used in a variety of biomedical applications, including the monitoring of metabolic disorders.

The development of new optogenetic tools has also been driven by advances in synthetic biology. Researchers have used genetic engineering techniques to create novel optogenetic proteins with improved properties, such as enhanced photocurrents and faster kinetics . These advances have expanded the range of potential applications for optogenetics, from basic research to clinical therapy.

Furthermore, the integration of optogenetics with other technologies, such as electrophysiology and imaging, has enabled researchers to study neural activity with unprecedented resolution. For example, studies have used optogenetic stimulation in combination with two-photon microscopy to investigate the neural circuits underlying sensory processing . These advances have significantly expanded our understanding of brain function and have paved the way for new therapeutic approaches.

Quantum News

Quantum News

As the Official Quantum Dog (or hound) by role is to dig out the latest nuggets of quantum goodness. There is so much happening right now in the field of technology, whether AI or the march of robots. But Quantum occupies a special space. Quite literally a special space. A Hilbert space infact, haha! Here I try to provide some of the news that might be considered breaking news in the Quantum Computing space.

Latest Posts by Quantum News:

IBM Remembers Lou Gerstner, CEO Who Reshaped Company in the 1990s

IBM Remembers Lou Gerstner, CEO Who Reshaped Company in the 1990s

December 29, 2025
Optical Tweezers Scale to 6,100 Qubits with 99.99% Imaging Survival

Optical Tweezers Scale to 6,100 Qubits with 99.99% Imaging Survival

December 28, 2025
Rosatom & Moscow State University Develop 72-Qubit Quantum Computer Prototype

Rosatom & Moscow State University Develop 72-Qubit Quantum Computer Prototype

December 27, 2025