Can Large Language Models Really Improve Clinical Efficiency? Researchers propose an automatic evaluation paradigm to assess the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in delivering clinical services, such as disease diagnosis and treatment. The approach involves standardized patients, multi-agent frameworks, and extensive experiments in the field of urology. This innovative method paves the way for further research in developing more sophisticated evaluation methods for LLMs, potentially improving clinical efficiency and patient outcomes.
Can Large Language Models Really Improve Clinical Efficiency?
The article discusses the potential of large language models (LLMs) in improving clinical efficiency for medical diagnosis. The authors propose an automatic evaluation paradigm to assess the capabilities of LLMs in delivering clinical services, such as disease diagnosis and treatment.
Automatic Evaluation Paradigm: A New Approach
The proposed evaluation paradigm consists of three basic elements: metric data, algorithm, and standardized patients (SPs). Inspired by professional clinical practice pathways, the authors formulate a language model-specific clinical pathway (LCP) to define the clinical capabilities that a doctor agent should possess. The LCP serves as a guideline for collecting medical data for evaluation, ensuring the completeness of the evaluation procedure.
Leveraging Standardized Patients and Multi-Agent Framework
The authors introduce SPs from medical education as a means of collecting medical data for evaluation. These SPs simulate patient interactions with a doctor agent, which is equipped with a retrieval-augmented evaluation (RAE) to determine whether the behaviors of the doctor agent align with the LCP. This multi-agent framework simulates an interactive environment between SPs and a doctor agent, allowing for the assessment of LLMs’ clinical capabilities.
Extensive Experiments and Evaluation Benchmark
The proposed approach is applied in the field of urology, constructing an evaluation benchmark that includes a LCP, SPs dataset, and automated RAE. The authors conduct extensive experiments to demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach, providing insights for safe and reliable deployments of LLMs in clinical practice.
Challenges and Future Directions
While the proposed approach shows promise, there are still challenges to be addressed. For instance, ensuring the accuracy and reliability of SPs’ responses is crucial. Additionally, the authors acknowledge that their evaluation paradigm may not capture all aspects of human clinical decision-making. Nevertheless, this work paves the way for further research in developing more sophisticated evaluation methods for LLMs.
Conclusion
The article highlights the potential of large language models in improving clinical efficiency and proposes an automatic evaluation paradigm to assess their capabilities. The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through extensive experiments in the field of urology, providing insights for safe and reliable deployments of LLMs in clinical practice.
Can Large Language Models Really Improve Clinical Efficiency?
The article discusses the potential of large language models (LLMs) in improving clinical efficiency for medical diagnosis. The authors propose an automatic evaluation paradigm to assess the capabilities of LLMs in delivering clinical services, such as disease diagnosis and treatment.
Automatic Evaluation Paradigm: A New Approach
The proposed evaluation paradigm consists of three basic elements: metric data, algorithm, and standardized patients (SPs). Inspired by professional clinical practice pathways, the authors formulate a language model-specific clinical pathway (LCP) to define the clinical capabilities that a doctor agent should possess. The LCP serves as a guideline for collecting medical data for evaluation, ensuring the completeness of the evaluation procedure.
Leveraging Standardized Patients and Multi-Agent Framework
The authors introduce SPs from medical education as a means of collecting medical data for evaluation. These SPs simulate patient interactions with a doctor agent, which is equipped with a retrieval-augmented evaluation (RAE) to determine whether the behaviors of the doctor agent align with the LCP. This multi-agent framework simulates an interactive environment between SPs and a doctor agent, allowing for the assessment of LLMs’ clinical capabilities.
Extensive Experiments and Evaluation Benchmark
The proposed approach is applied in the field of urology, constructing an evaluation benchmark that includes a LCP, SPs dataset, and automated RAE. The authors conduct extensive experiments to demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach, providing insights for safe and reliable deployments of LLMs in clinical practice.
Challenges and Future Directions
While the proposed approach shows promise, there are still challenges to be addressed. For instance, ensuring the accuracy and reliability of SPs’ responses is crucial. Additionally, the authors acknowledge that their evaluation paradigm may not capture all aspects of human clinical decision-making. Nevertheless, this work paves the way for further research in developing more sophisticated evaluation methods for LLMs.
Conclusion
The article highlights the potential of large language models in improving clinical efficiency and proposes an automatic evaluation paradigm to assess their capabilities. The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through extensive experiments in the field of urology, providing insights for safe and reliable deployments of LLMs in clinical practice.
Publication details: “Towards Automatic Evaluation for LLMs’ Clinical Capabilities: Metric, Data, and Algorithm”
Publication Date: 2024-08-24
Authors: Lei Liu, Xiaoyan Yang, Fangzhou Li, Chenfei Chi, et al.
Source:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3637528.3671575
