Researchers at Google Quantum AI have made significant progress in developing a real-time decoding system for quantum computers, a crucial step towards large-scale fault-tolerant algorithms. The team, has engineered a system that can decode errors in real-time with only a modest reduction in accuracy compared to offline decoders.
“Quantum error correction provides a path to reach practical quantum computing by combining multiple physical qubits into a logical qubit, where the logical error rate is suppressed exponentially as more qubits are added. However, this exponential suppression only occurs if the physical error rate is below a critical threshold. In this work, we present two surface code memories operating below this threshold…”
Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold. Google Quantum AI and Collaborators
(August 27, 2024) on ArXiv
However, many challenges remain ahead, including scaling up processors without increasing resource intensity and mitigating correlated bursts of errors that cause a noise floor at an error rate of 10^-10.
Despite these challenges, the team including Google is optimistic about the potential for exponential leverage in reducing logical errors with processor improvements. The work brings us closer to running large-scale quantum algorithms, but additional challenges will arise in logical computation and classical software elements must be scaled up to meet the needs of multi-surface-code operations.
Outline of the Logical Qubit Claims
This work demonstrates two surface code quantum memories, a distance-7 code and a distance-5 code, operating below the error-correction threshold. The larger quantum memory, using a 101-qubit distance-7 code, achieves a logical error rate reduction by a factor of 2.14 when increasing the code distance, resulting in an error rate of 0.143% per cycle of error correction.
This logical memory outperforms the best physical qubit’s lifetime by a factor of 2.4, exceeding break-even. Additionally, real-time decoding is achieved with an average latency of 63 µs at distance-5, over up to a million cycles with a cycle time of 1.1 µs. Repetition codes up to distance-29 reveal that logical performance is constrained by rare correlated error events, which occur approximately every hour or 3×10⁹ cycles. These results indicate that with scaling, this device could meet the operational requirements for large-scale fault-tolerant quantum algorithms.
The authors have made strides in developing a robust quantum error correction system, which is essential for large-scale quantum computing. They’ve demonstrated a distance-7 logical lifetime. This is more than double the best constituent physical qubit lifetime. It showcases exponential logical error suppression with code distance. This achievement forms the foundation for running large-scale quantum algorithms with error correction.
![Google Logical Qubit Breakthrough Paves Way For Large Scale Quantum Computing Cumulative distributions of error probabilities measured on the 105-qubit processor. Red: Pauli
errors for single-qubit gates. Black: Pauli errors for CZ gates. Blue: Average identification error for measurement. Gold: Pauli
errors for data qubit idle during measurement and reset. Teal: weight-4 detection probabilities (distance-7, averaged over 250
cycles). c, Logical error probability, pL, for a range of memory experiment durations. Each datapoint represents 105
repetitions
decoded with the neural network and is averaged over logical basis (XL and ZL). Black and grey: data from Ref. [17] for
comparison. Curves: exponential fits after averaging pL over code and basis. To compute εd values, we fit each individual code
and basis separately [24]. d, Logical error per cycle, εd, reducing with surface code distance, d. Uncertainty on each point is
less than 5 × 10−5
. Symbols match panel c. Means for d = 3 and d = 5 are computed from the separate εd fits for each code
and basis. Line: fit to Eq. 1, determining Λ. Inset: simulations up to d = 11 alongside experimental points, both decoded with
ensembled matching synthesis for comparison. Line: fit to simulation, Λsim = 2.25 ± 0.02.](https://quantumzeitgeist.com/wp-content/uploads/surfcode-1024x550.avif)
The researchers have also made notable progress in other areas:
- Repeatable performance: The error-corrected processors maintained consistent performance over several hours and up to 10^6 cycles without deterioration, a crucial requirement for future large-scale fault-tolerant algorithms.
- Real-time decoding: They’ve engineered a real-time decoding system with only a modest reduction in accuracy compared to offline decoders, which is essential for practical applications.
However, the authors acknowledge that many challenges remain ahead:
- Scaling up: While it’s possible to achieve low logical error rates by scaling up current processors, it would be resource-intensive and bring additional challenges in real-time decoding.
- Noise floor: The experiments identified a noise floor at an error rate of 10^(-10) caused by correlated bursts of errors, which must be mitigated for larger quantum algorithms.
Despite these challenges, the authors emphasise that quantum error correction provides exponential leverage in reducing logical errors with processor improvements. For instance, halving physical error rates would improve distance-27 logical performance by four orders of magnitude, reaching algorithmically relevant error rates.
The paper concludes by highlighting the importance of addressing additional challenges in logical computation and classical software elements to ensure scalability for multi-surface-code operations.
This research marks a significant milestone in the development of robust quantum error correction systems, paving the way for large-scale quantum algorithms.
External Link: Click Here For More
