The efficient transmission of quantum information represents a persistent challenge in quantum information science, often necessitating classical communication as an intermediary. Recent research focuses on quantifying the minimum classical data required to accurately reconstruct expectation values of quantum states, a problem with connections to classical machine learning techniques such as ‘classical shadows’. Kaushik Sankar, currently unaffiliated with a specific institution, investigates these limits in a new study, titled ‘Lower Bounds on Relative Error Quantum Compression and Classical Shadows’. The work establishes fundamental lower bounds on the amount of classical information needed for this task, demonstrating a clear distinction between different error metrics and highlighting the computational complexity inherent in accurately representing quantum states with classical resources. Specifically, Sankar proves improved lower bounds for both one-way randomised classical communication of quantum states and related tasks involving expectation value estimation, even when restricted to the practically relevant set of Pauli observables.
Kaushik P. Seshadreesan and colleagues present research defining fundamental limits on classical communication required for accurate estimation of quantum expectation values, building upon existing work and offering implications for quantum information processing. The team rigorously investigates the trade-off between communication cost and estimation accuracy, framing the problem as a classical analogue to the ‘classical shadows’ technique used in quantum learning theory, and establishing a firm lower bound on what is achievable. Classical shadows are a technique used to efficiently characterise quantum states by performing a limited number of measurements.
Researchers demonstrate a lower bound of Ω(√d) on the one-way randomised classical communication complexity for achieving relative error in expectation value estimation, where ‘d’ represents the dimension of the Hilbert space, improving upon previously known additive error bounds. The Hilbert space is a complex vector space that describes all possible states of a quantum system. This result applies to both general observables – properties of a quantum system that can be measured – and when restricted to Pauli observables, a specific set of operators commonly used in quantum computing, highlighting its robustness and establishing a separation in compression size between relative and additive error settings for non-adaptive Pauli classical shadows with classical memory. Achieving relative error, which expresses the error as a fraction of the true value, necessitates a greater communication overhead than achieving additive error, which expresses the error as a fixed amount, crucial for designing efficient quantum information processing protocols.
The team extends this framework to prove randomised lower bounds for related one-way classical tasks. Specifically, they demonstrate an Ω(√d) lower bound when Alice provides the observable and Bob the quantum state, and another Ω(√d) lower bound when both Alice and Bob receive quantum states and aim to estimate their inner product – a measure of the similarity between two states.
Researchers introduce a probabilistic algorithm for solving the indexing problem, efficiently determining a single bit of information through comparison of strings and estimating the Hamming distance – the number of differing bits between two strings – rather than calculating it directly. This approach allows for a determination of the bit’s value, based on whether the estimated Hamming distance exceeds a defined threshold, offering a valuable tool in resource-constrained environments.
Researchers demonstrate a lower bound of Ω(√N) on the one-way randomised classical communication complexity for this indexing task, improving upon previous additive error bounds and implying a separation in compression size between relative and additive error settings for non-adaptive Pauli classical shadows with classical memory. This finding suggests a fundamental limit on how efficiently this indexing problem can be solved with classical communication, providing insight for algorithm design and optimization.
The study builds upon prior work initiated by Raz and subsequently refined by Gosset and Smolin. The team’s work reinforces the fundamental limitations imposed by classical communication on tasks requiring quantum state or observable information, providing a rigorous foundation for exploring more efficient quantum communication strategies.
The study establishes a clear benchmark for evaluating the performance of existing and future quantum communication protocols, pushing the boundaries of what is achievable with limited classical resources. Researchers present a comprehensive analysis of the trade-offs between communication cost and estimation accuracy, providing a clear understanding of the limitations imposed by classical communication on quantum tasks. This research guides future exploration towards alternative approaches and a deeper understanding of the fundamental limits of classical information processing within the quantum realm, offering a nuanced perspective on error metrics and their impact on communication efficiency.
The team’s work reinforces the robustness of the established lower bound and highlights its applicability to a broader range of classical communication scenarios, offering a valuable contribution to the field of quantum information processing.
👉 More information
🗞 Lower Bounds on Relative Error Quantum Compression and Classical Shadows
🧠 DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.21345
